Sawyer County, WI Classification/Compensation Study Employee Briefings January 14,15 and 16, 2014 Carlson Dettmann Consulting, LLC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Advertisements

Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Hubbard County, Minn. Classification and Compensation Study Update GREG MANGOLD| AUGUST 5, 2014.
Mt. San Antonio College CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY February 2012.
Job Analysis Questionnaire (JAQ) Orientation Session Classification and Compensation Study Management Advisory Group International, Inc. April 2015.
Compensation Deborah Marsh November Total Rewards Total Rewards definition Total Rewards definition Why Total Rewards? Why Total Rewards? Elements.
Update on Job Reclassification System Redesign Project Civil Service Senate Patti Dion, Employee Relations Director Sheila Reger, OHR Consulting Team Manager.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
Texas A& M University Central Texas Staff Salary Study Process February 25, 2014.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Agenda Review Major Changes from January 8 Presentation of Draft Preliminary Results Review Final Recommendations Other Progress to Date  
Identify some of the major reasons for conducting survey
MAG Management Advisory Group, Inc.
An Overview of Strategic Human Resource Management.
Building Effective Compensation and Classification Systems to Attract and Retain Talented Employees 5050 Quorum Drive, Suite 625, Dallas, Texas
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Single Status Job Evaluation for Schools Autumn Term 2008.
Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016.
The Performance and Staff Development Program
Classification & compensation Study
Who We Are National Public Sector Consulting Experience Expertise
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Facilitator/Trainer: Ben Ramsey GLM Management Consulting Group, LLC
Staff Compensation Structure
Fair Labor Standards Act: Implementing Changes
Who We Are Who We Are Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. with offices throughout the United States including 30 years of nationwide experience Understanding.
Project Objectives and Scope Project Work Plan
Motorist Services Consolidation
Why do we need a compensation survey
Iredell County Classification and Compensation Study August 15 –
Fair Labor Standards Act: Implementing Changes
Today’s Agenda The importance of a conversation
an effective self assessment system
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Job Analysis Chapter 4.
Classification & compensation Study
Compensation: Creating an Equitable and Market-driven Pay System
Compensation Program Update
Grade and pay structures
Total Rewards Health Check Up
HSA 530 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
HSA 530Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
HSA 530 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
HSA 530 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com.
HSA 530 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
HSA 530 RANK Education for Service-- hsa530rank.com.
HSA 530 Inspiring Innovation-- snaptutorial.com
Designing pay levels, mix and pay structures
Job Analysis Questionnaire (JAQ) Orientation Session
Assessing your total rewards offer
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
The 90 Day Plan A Key To Getting an Offer
The 90 Day Plan A Key To Getting an Offer
Job Analysis CHAPTER FOUR Screen graphics created by:
Title and Total Compensation Project
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
Carlson Dettmann Consulting, a Cottingham & Butler Company
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE
ESTABLISHING A TRAINING COMMITTEE
Action Planning for Quality Improvement
LESSON 3 Job Analysis Dr. Salim Al-Shukaili.
AIKEN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT February 12, 2019
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
The University Career Architecture Project (UCAP) is designed to better define jobs, support career progression, and align compensation practices with.
Classification and Compensation Study St. Johns River State College
Classification & compensation Study
Chapter 10: Compensation
HR AUDIT (An Early Evaluation System) (An Early Evaluation System) S.Jayaprakash., M.Sc (IT), PGD.HRM, DLL & AL.
Presentation transcript:

Sawyer County, WI Classification/Compensation Study Employee Briefings January 14,15 and 16, 2014 Carlson Dettmann Consulting, LLC

A Sound Compensation Program Aligns with strategic objectives Creates internal equity Competitive Considers total compensation design Supports performance management Affordable Legal Understandable Efficient Audited regularly

Our Approach  Use objective job evaluation to establish internal consistency  Use strategic market data to pay fairly in your employment markets  Implement a plan that will be useful (and appropriately flexible) for many years  Stress communication with employees

Project Scope  Study covers job 90 classifications  Excludes sworn/bargaining employees  Several pay schedules  Measure Job responsibilities Internal comparability Salary markets  Recommend Pay structure Methods for pay progression Supporting policies and maintenance plan

Steps to Internal Consistency 1. Job documentation 2. Job analysis 3. Job evaluation

Job Evaluation Formal process for ordering a set of jobs, independent of individual performance, into a hierarchy based on the value or worth of jobs in the organization.

Evaluation Factors  Formal preparation and experience required for employment  Decision-making and impact  Thinking challenges/problem-solving  Interactions and communication  Work environment

Market Measurement  For a sufficient set of benchmark positions Jobs having likely matches in the market Fairly stable in job content Representative of different pay and responsibility levels  Gather data Public, private, and not-for profit sectors

Three Major Policy Questions 1. What markets does the County want to use for comparison? 2. What position does the County want to take in those markets? High, low, middle? Different strategy for different position levels? 3. How does the County want to administer its future pay plan? General increases? Steps? Pay-for-performance? Combination?

Job Description Questionnaire  This is a critical document Collect key information on job responsibilities Provided by employees and managers  Each employee is responsible For either own Questionnaire For either own Questionnaire Or agreeing to be in a joint Questionnaire Or agreeing to be in a joint Questionnaire  Supervisors/department heads must review Questionnaires CDC will interview department heads CDC will interview department heads

Suggestions  Can use either electronic or paper form  Don’t wait Week 1 – accumulate information Week 2 – write a draft Week 3 - final  OK to collaborate If two or more doing same job, can submit a single Questionnaire for all – your choice  NO SUPERVISOR IS TO TELL AN EMPLOYEE WHAT TO WRITE There’s a place for supervisor comments  Save a copy

Project Steps & Timeline  January  Project kick-off  February/March Analyze jobs (including management interviews) Evaluate job content Survey Markets  April/May Presentation and discussion with Committee/County Board

JDQ Completion Dates  February 7 – Employee’s JDQ’s due to Department Supervisor/DH  February 14 – JDQ’s from Departments to HR  February 24 – JDQ’s to Carlson Dettmann

Employee Appeals  After adoption of recommendations Criteria: gross error or substantial changes  e.g., “I think I am classified wrong because...”  Knowing you can appeal improves accuracy and builds integrity May be the best possible method of creating employee acceptance

Questions