Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / Block diagram of system architecture with aspects of WIP design addressed in this paper highlighted with arrows Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / (a) Charlie—balancing and (b) system architecture Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / The effect of tire damping (B w ) and drive train damping (B wp ) on pole-placement gains. Note that the X-axis represents the damping in both B w and B wp in all figures. (a) Comparison of pitch gains, (b) comparison of wheel position gains, (c) comparison of pitch rate gains, and (d) comparison of wheel velocity gains. The effect of tire–ground damping in simulation with an initial velocity of rad/s in pitch rate (e) B w = 0 N m s/rad and (f) B w = 0.1 N m s/rad. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / Tire testing setup: (a) two tires were tested, 84 mm diameter on left and 90 mm diameter on right; (b) steel and aluminum rods of equal dimensions weighing kg and kg were loaded on the cart; and (c) cart instrumented with optical encoder to measure position and velocity Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / Rolling resistance tests. (a) No load on cart, (b) cart loaded with kg aluminum rod, and (c) cart loaded with kg steel rod. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / Phase plots showing relative stability—(a) pendulum pitch versus pitch rate with hard tires, (b) pendulum pitch versus pitch rate with soft tires, (c) wheel position versus velocity with hard tires, and (d) wheel position versus velocity with soft tires Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / Simulated output of WIP response to disturbance of rad/s in pitch rate under the following filter configurations. (a) and (d) Wheel velocity filter f c = 5.0 Hz and pitch rate filter f c = 5.0 Hz; (b) and (e) wheel velocity filter f c = 5.0 Hz and pitch rate filter f c = 50.0 Hz; (c) and (f) wheel velocity filter f c = 50.0 Hz and pitch rate filter f c = 5.0 Hz. Note the instability of the response in plots (c) and (f). Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / (a)–(f) Phase plots with various filter configurations, filter cutoffs are indicated: (a) and (d) phase plots with equal cut off frequencies. (b), (e) and (c), (f) Phase plots with different cutoff frequencies. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / Interpretation of the behavior of the balancing machine based on the sign of mechanical power terms, quadrants III and IV represent stabilizing conditions Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / Two types of limit cycle behavior depending on the magnitude of the compensation term, V fc. From 0 to 40 s, the plots display limit cycles generates due to an underestimation of V fc while from 40 to 100 s limit cycles due to and over-estimation of V fc are displayed. (a) Wheel and pendulum power products. The negative spikes in P w and positive spikes of P p between 0 and 40 s indicate deviation quadrants IV and III, and (b) pitch and wheel positions. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / (a) Friction compensation algorithm and (b) phase plot of operation of compensation algorithm. Time is encoded in color with red representing t = 0 s and blending into dark gray at t = 35 s. Note the reduction in limit cycles indicated by small central dark gray orbit. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / (a) Variation of pitch gain with motor constants, (b) variation of wheel position gain with motor constants, (c) variation of pitch rate gain with motor constants, and (d) variation of wheel velocity gain with motor constants. Note: the wheel velocity gain is the only gain that reduces the stability margin of the voltage controlled WIP. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / (a) Pitch gain variation with gearing ratio, (b) wheel position gain with gearing ratio, (c) pitch rate gain with gearing ratio, (d) wheel velocity gain with gearing ratio, and (e) and (f) simulation of WIP response to a disturbance of rad/s in pitch rate with gearing ratios N = 50 and N = 200 Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Design for Control of Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Platforms J. Mechanisms Robotics. 2015;7(4): doi: / WIP model Figure Legend: