CHAIRS AND DIRECTORS ORIENTATION August 16, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
CLA RTP amendments 1. Align with December 10 vote to allow up to 2 members of same academic area to serve at different ranks 2. Specify that two members.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Personnel Policies Workshop Best Practices for Personnel Committees.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Update 11/9. Academic Senate University Appointments and Promotions Committee Policies and Procedures (approved ASLC 10/20/10)
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University College of Arts and Sciences Performance Review Committee Workshops October 27 and 28, 2014.
Kim Gingerich, Assistant to V-P, Academic & Provost Lisa Weber, Administrative Secretary, Dean of Science Marie Armstrong, Associate University Secretary.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum May 25, 2007.
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Call Changes APM c: “Each campus shall develop guidelines and checklists to instruct chairs about their duties and responsibilities in connection.
Faculty Tenure and Promotion Policies, Procedures and Standards Faculty 101 Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee 3 December 2009.
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
Tenure and Promotion Processes Arlene Earley Carney Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs.
Key HOP Policies and Recent Guidelines Jesse T. Zapata & Gail Jensen September 2, 2015.
ARTICLE X, DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION PROCEDURES GOVERNING TENURE, PROMOTION, AND CONTRACT RENEWAL contract, unchanged for
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
Faculty Senate Meeting November 19, Agenda I.Call to Order and Roll Call - M. Bruening, Secretary II.Proposed Amendment to the Faculty Bylaws (CRR.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD Academic Affairs MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1995 T0: Department Chairs FROM: Frank Martino Provost & Vice President,
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi December 20, 2010.
October 15, 2015 Presented by: Tom Friedman– TRUFA President.
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop spring 2017.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2016.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
Training for Faculty Search Committees
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Working with Your Chair and Mentor
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Academic Year UNC Asheville
Understanding and Implementing the New RTP Policies In Fall 2016
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
Understanding apt process/routing dossiers
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
Considerations in Engineering
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
School Community Councils
Life of a Dossier Redelegated Merit Non-Redelegated Merit
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
New Faculty Orientation
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Training for Reviewers Fall 2018
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Promotion and Tenure.
Presentation transcript:

CHAIRS AND DIRECTORS ORIENTATION August 16, 2016

Topics Part I - Collective Agreement and Faculty Topics Duties of Department Chairs and Center Directors Faculty Appointment Process Tenure and Promotion PART II – Academic Issues and the Role of the Chair Academic Integrity Academic Reviews Curriculum Changes

Duties of Chairs/Directors (Article 27) Each Department shall have a Chair and each Centre shall have a Director who, in addition to responsibilities as a member of the faculty, has other responsibilities. The primary responsibility of a member as Department Chair or Centre Director is to represent the interests of his/her Department or Centre. Other responsibilities include:

Duties - General Act as academic leader in the following areas: i. updating, revising and developing programs; ii. orienting departmental or centre faculty and staff to policies, procedures, and practices; iii. mentoring faculty members early in their research and teaching careers; and iv. fostering an environment of excellence in teaching and research in the Department or Centre. Representing the Department's or Centre’s interests to the Dean and within the University;

Duties – General (continued) Chairing the Departmental or Centre Committee or designating a representative to do so, and preparing the Committee meeting agenda in a timely manner; Convening meetings of the Department or Centre Committee at least once each fall and once each winter term for the purpose of establishing matters of internal policy, or recommending policy to the appropriate bodies within the University;

Duties - General (continued) Consulting with all members of the Department or Centre on its needs and academic goals; Encouraging participation in Departmental or Centre activities; Providing the Chair-elect or Director-elect with information and documents necessary to prepare to assume the office of Chair or Centre Director;

Duties – Operational Managing the operations of the Department or Centre; Overseeing the administration of the Department or Centre in consultation with members of the Department or Centre; Overseeing the use of space and equipment assigned to the Department or Centre; Designating a deputy and advising the appropriate Dean accordingly in the event of an absence for a period longer than five (5) working days;

Duties – Teaching Related Recommending teaching duties of Departmental or Centre members to the Dean, including: i. normal scheduled teaching load for faculty members (including LTAs), two (2) full courses or equivalent; ii. normal scheduled teaching load for faculty members appointed as ILTAs, four (4) full courses or equivalent; and iii. unscheduled teaching responsibilities. Allocating non-teaching responsibilities to faculty members after appropriate consultation;

Duties - Performance Related Annually advising a probationary appointee whether or not the appointee’s performance is adequate, and where appropriate and feasible, advising remedial measures; Advising the Dean annually on performance review of faculty members based on criteria and procedures established by the Departmental or Centre Committee; Providing the Dean with Annual Report Summaries for the Department/Centre; Forwarding to the Dean annual performance review recommendations for staff

Duties - Other Submitting to the appropriate Dean in writing an estimate of the Department's or Centre’s budgetary requirements for the ensuing year and administering the current Departmental or Centre budget Department Chairs and Centre Directors are not responsible for deciding upon or implementing disciplinary action against members of BUFA; Department Chairs and Centre Directors shall have full voting rights in Departmental and Centre Committee meetings.

Faculty Appointment Procedures Article outlines the appointment procedures to be followed by the Department Three step process: 1. Search 2. Review 3. Recommendation Process begins with Dean granting permission to initiate a competition

Faculty Appointment Procedures - Search Search Committee Makeup - Department Committee, a sub committee, membership from other Departments Department fully discusses the qualifications, area of competence and teaching responsibilities of the position Chair forwards the outcome of these discussions to the Dean for review and approval

Faculty Appointment Procedures - Search All vacant positions must be advertised (except as specified in Article (b)) The advertisement must be approved by the Dean Candidates must apply in writing Department makes arrangements to collect, screen and answer all applications for the position All applications, CVs, off-prints, correspondence and other pertinent documents are kept on file and open to all Department faculty

Faculty Appointment Procedures - Review Short list, normally of 3 candidates, compiled by the Department The criteria for selecting candidates for the short list are on the basis of criteria in Articles (a), (b) and 20 (Employment Equity) If short list does not include a self-identified member of a designated group, written reasons must be provided to the Dean along with the dossiers of all self-identified members of designated groups for the position JCEE Review

Faculty Appointment Procedures - Search Discussions of the merits of the candidates shall take place in meeting of the Department or search committee. Minutes kept of all such meetings

Faculty Appointment Procedures - Recommendation After short listed candidates have been interviewed and the Department considers the choice to be made, a recommendation regarding the appointment is made, according to established Departmental procedures The Chair forwards the recommendation for the appointment to the Dean, in writing, within one week of the Department reaching its decision. Chair has the responsibility to report accurately and fully the views of the Department and shall include a minority report if, such viewpoint has been expressed.

Tenure and Promotion The Department/Centre makes a recommendation regarding T&P or P for a candidate to the Faculty based T&P Committee The Faculty T&P committee reviews all applications for the Faculty and makes recommendations to the Provost regarding each applicant. The Dean makes a separate recommendation to the Provost on the applicant from the Faculty

Tenure and Promotion (Article 21) Articles – cover the Department/Centre Procedures for T&P Department/Centre Committee develops its own procedures for T&P in accordance with the D/C procedures and guidelines The candidate is excused from the consultation at every stage of the process (1 exception) Candidate’s dossier is submitted by October 1, and made available to D/C Committee members electronically

T&P Department Role D/C meets in camera to review the content of the application and evaluates whether the candidate has met criteria for T&P to Associate (21.04) or Promotion to Professor (21.05) Committee also considers any information arising from any meeting held with the candidate (21.19) The committee must make a recommendation regarding the candidate by December 15. Only tenured and probationary faculty may consider and vote on an application

T&P Department Role Must make one of the following recommendations: 1) For applications for tenure and promotion to Associate Professor: 1) whether or not tenure and promotion to Associate Professor will be granted, and if not, 2) whether or not a further probationary period (deferred tenure) of up to two (2) years will be offered. 2) For applications for tenure by members hired at the Associate Professor or Professor rank: whether or not tenure will be granted. 3) For applications for promotion to Associate Professor or to Professor: whether or not promotion will be granted.

T&P Department Role There are two routes by which the committee gets here: 1. The committee does not require further information or is not considering a negative decision it will vote by secret ballot (Art ) 2. If the committee requires further information or is considering a negative recommendation, the candidate is informed in writing of the specific questions/concerns raised and afforded the opportunity to provide additional information in writing and /or in person at a meeting of the D/C Committee (Art ) The D/C committee will subsequently meet, in camera without the candidate to further discuss the application and vote by secret ballot (Art )

Tenure and Promotion (Article 21) Article describes the procedures to be followed regarding voting. For candidates applying for T&P to Associate, T&P shall be linked as one vote and one recommendation Separate, sealed ballots for each candidate being considered Results of the vote recorded by the Chair and a witness. Ballots retained in sealed envelope, in a secure place, until an appeal process, if any, has concluded. Following the vote, a voting member may submit to the Dean, in confidence, signed, written comments regarding the candidate’s application. Any comments are included in the dossier and forwarded to the Faculty T&P committee.

Tenure and Promotion (Article 21) The Chair drafts a written report stating: The D/C recommendation The reasons for the recommendation The recorded vote, and The minority view, if any, and the reasons for the minority view This report is made available for review by the D/C committee for 10 days, to allow for review and revisions. After 10 days the Chair forwards the report to the candidate and the Dean for inclusion in the candidate’s dossier

Questions?