1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,
Advertisements

August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
22 July 2005Mauro Donega HEP20051 B s lifetimes in hadronic decays at CDF Mauro Donegà Université de Genève on behalf of the CDF collaboration.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
1 Rare Decays At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) BEAUTY 2006 OXFORD 28 September 2006.
BR = ( (stat) ± 2(syst) ± 5 (BR))  From PDG * From MC * BR(  needs to be rescaled for f s /f d From Data b->sss pure penguin amplitude.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
B s and Λ b Lifetimes and BRs at the Tevatron Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 25 th September 2006 Beauty 2006,
Radiative and Rare B-Decays at BaBar All results are preliminary unless journal ref. is given limit values are 90% CL unless otherwise specified Carsten.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
B physics: new states, rare decays and branching ratios in CDF Vyacheslav Krutelyov Texas A&M University For CDF Collaboration July 1, 2004 BEACH04 Chicago,
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
B c Results from CDF II Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 23 rd Jul HEP2005 Europhysics Conference, Lisboa,
Lepton/Photon 2003, Batavia, IL, USA August 11 th – 16 th Measurement of  b Branching Ratios in Modes Containing a  c Why are the  b branching fractions.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
1 LBNL RPM 15 February 2007 Probing the Physics Frontier with Rare B Decays at CDF Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab)
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
1 Search for FCNC Decays B s(d) → μ  μ - Motivation Analysis Method Results Conclusion Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin For Doug Glenzinski, Hauke.
Search for B s →  +  - and B d →  +  - Decays at CDF Cheng-Ju Lin (Fermilab) Representing CDF Collaboration SUSY 2004 Tsukuba, Japan June 17, 2004.
Search for Rare Decays of the B S Meson at the Tevatron Ralf Bernhard University of Zurich XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD 19 th March 2006.
1 Rare Bottom and Charm Decays at the Tevatron Dmitri Tsybychev (SUNY at Stony Brook) On behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations Flavor Physics and CP-Violation.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
1 Heavy Flavor Physics At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) Aspen Winter Conference Aspen, Colorado 13 February 2006.
Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool for the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty st June 2005 Rare Decays at the Tevatron.
1 Sinéad M. Farrington University of Oxford for the CDF Collaboration HQL 15 th October 2010 Rare B and D Decays at CDF.
Mauro Donega’ - CDF collaboration meeting February 3, 2006 B d,s ->h 1 h 2 : BR, CP asymmetries, and lifetimes S. Budroni, S. Donati, M. Donega’, S. Giagu,
Matthew Martin Johns Hopkins University for the CDF collaboration andBranching Ratios from Flavor Physics & CP Violation Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France.
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
B Production Cross Sections and Fragmentation Fractions at LHCb Laurence Carson (University of Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the LHCb collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Rare decays of charm & bottom atTevatron  Introduction  Tevatron  CDF & DØ Detector  Rare charm decays  Rare bottom decays  Summary & Conclusions.
Michael Milnik (University of Karlsruhe) for the CDF Collaboration Search for Rare b-Hadron Decays at CDF II HEP 2007, Manchester.
Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool for the CDF Collaboration ICHEP 28 th July 2006 Rare B Decays at CDF.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
1 The use of control channels in the analysis of the B s  μ + μ - decay Tuesday Meeting, 2 June 2009.
7/7/06Jason Rieger BEACH 2006 Rare B Decays at the Tevatron Jason Rieger, Indiana University On behalf of the DØ and CDF collaborations BEACH 2006.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India LHC weekely meeting.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Results on B Lifetimes from DØ
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
University of Liverpool for the CDF Collaboration ICHEP 28th July 2006
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
Rare and Forbidden Charm Meson Decays in FOCUS
B Physics at the Hadron Colliders: Bs Meson and New B Hadrons
W. Wester, CDF, Fermilab, Beauty 2005, Assisi
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Pentaquark Searches and DsJ Studies in BaBar
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Λb and heavy states at Tevatron
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Bs Physics and Prospects at the Tevatron
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006

2 OUTLINE Experimental Issues For Rare Decay Searches B s(d)   +  - Status and Prospects Non-resonant Rare Decays: - B d   K *0 - B +   K + - B s   Conclusion

3 Tevatron is gold mine for rare B decay searches: Enormous b production cross section, x1000 times larger than e + e - B factories All B species are produced (B 0, B +, B s,  b …) Dataset: Di-muon sample, easy to trigger on with good purity level in hadronic environment Analyses presented today use to 1 fb -1 of data TEVATRON & CDF Tevatron Integrated Luminosity Projection Baseline Design We are here Tevatron is expected to deliver 8 fb -1 /exp for Run II Monte Carlo CDF: Excellent silicon vertex detector Good particle identification (K,  ) Good momentum and track impact parameter resolutions M(B s )-M(B d )~90MeV CDF can distinguish B s and B d   decays

4 Trigger is the lifeline of B physics in a hadron environment !!! Rare B “Di-Muon” triggers: Low single muon thresholds Require Sum p T or outer muon chambers Di-muon trigger is the primary trigger for the CDF B s      search SVT “Hadronic” triggers using silicon vertex detectors: exploit long lifetime of heavy quarks Two-track trigger (CDF) – Two oppositely charged tracks with large impact parameters B Triggers at CDF CDF

5 BRIEF MOTIVATION In the Standard Model, the FCNC decay of B   +  - is heavily suppressed SM prediction is below the sensitivity of current experiments SM  Expect to see 0 events at the Tevatron (Buchalla & Buras, Misiak & Urban) B d   is further suppressed by CKM factor (v td /v ts ) 2 SM prediction  Any signal at the Tevatron would indicate new physics!!

6 Penguin or box processes in the Standard Model New physics could interfere with the SM amplitudes Can look for new physics via decay rates and decay kinematics B Rare Decays B      h : B +   K + B 0   K * B s    Rare processes: predicted BR(B s    )=16.1x fb-1 di-muon trigger data C. Geng and C. Liu, J. Phys. G 29, 1103 (2003)   s s s b s b s s   B u,d,s       K + /K*/ 

7 B   +   : Analysis Overview Motto: reduce background and keep signal eff high Step 1: pre-selection cuts to reject obvious background Step 2: optimization (need to know signal efficiency and expected background) Step 3: reconstruct B +  J/  K + normalization mode Step 4: open the box  compute branching ratio or set limit

8 Motto: reduce background and keep signal eff high Step 1: pre-selection cuts to reject obvious background Step 2: optimization (need to know signal efficiency and expected background) Step 3: reconstruct B +  J/  K + normalization mode Step 4: open the box  compute branching ratio or set limit B   +   : Analysis Overview 9.8 X 10 7 B + events (produced)

9  +  - mass ~±2.5  mass window B vertex displacement: CDF  Isolation (Iso): (fraction of p T from B   within  R=(  2 +  2 ) 1/2 cone of 1) “pointing (  )”:  (angle between B s momentum and decay axis) P  PP PP L 3D  x y B s    R < 1 (  < 57 o )     z B      SIGNAL VS BKG DISCRIMINATION

10 CDF OPTIMIZATION CDF constructs a likelihood ratio using discriminating variables  Iso P s/b is the probability for a given sig/bkg to have a value of x, where i runs over all variables. Optimize on expected upper limit L R (optimized)>0.99

11 Background Estimate CDF signal region is also contaminated by B  h + h - (e.g. B  K + K -, K +  ,     ) - K   muon fake rates measured from data Assume linear background shape extrapolate # of background events sidebands to signal region ± 60 MeV signal window Decay B  hh Background Combinatoric Background Total Background BsBs 0.19± ± ±0.36 BdBd 1.37± ± ±0.39 L R > 0.99

12 L R > 0.99 CMU-CMU Channel: Expect Observed Prob B s 0.88± % B d 1.86± % CMU-CMX Channel: Expect Observed Prob B s 0.39± % B d 0.59± % Now Look in the Bs and Bd Signal Windows B s Limits (combine both channels): Br(B s   )<8.0×10 90%CL Br(B s   )<1.0×10 95%CL B d Limits (combine both channels): Br(B d   )<2.3×10 90%CL Br(B d   )<3.0×10 95%CL

13 CDF B s   176 pb ×10 -7 Published DØ B s   240 pb ×10 -7 Published DØ B s   300 pb ×10 -7 Prelim. DØ <B s   700 pb -1 Prelim. Sensitivity CDF B s   364 pb ×10 -7 Published CDF B s   780 pb ×10 -7 Prelim. Branching Ratio Limits Evolution of limits (in 95%CL): World’s best limits Babar B d   111 fb ×10 -8 Published CDF B d   364 pb ×10 -8 Published CDF B d   780 pb ×10 -8 Prelim. 90% CL Conservative projection based on our current (780pb -1 ) performance Latest improvements Sensitivity enhanced ~15-20% Use NN over Likelihood dE/dx for muon ID to reduce K/  fake rate Factor of 4 improvement at 8 fb -1 ?

14 B      h DECAYS AT THE TEVATRON

15 METHODOLOGY Experimental method similar to B s   analysis Measure branching ratio (or set limit) relative to the reference B  J/  h resonance decay Exclude  and  ’ invariant mass regions for non-resonant decays Relative efficiency determined from a combination of data and Monte Carlo Bkg estimated from mass side-band(s). Feed-down contribution estimated from MC

16 NORMALIZATION MODES Clean samples of norm events Apply similar pre-selection requirements as B   analysis N B+ = 6246 N B0 = 2346 N Bs = 421 J/ψ K J/ψ φ J/ψ K *

17 Use three similar variables to B   Decay length significance 2D Pointing |  B –  vtx | Isolation B      h SIGNAL VS BKG DISCRIMINATION Optimization: Using data sidebands and MC to avoid introducing biases f.o.m. = N sig / sqrt(N sig +N bkg ) optimized for Branching Ratio Cut

18 UNBLINDED B 0 AND B + RESULTS B +   K + : N obs = 107 = 51.6 ± 6.1 Significance = 5.2  B 0   K* 0 : N obs = 35 = 16.5 ± 3.6 Significance = 2.9  CDF B s    : N obs = 9 = 3.5 ± 1.5 Significance = 1.8 

19 B  J/  h RESULTS CDF 1fb -1 B    B    B s  Rel BR± stat ± syst ± 0.15 ± ± 0.23 ± ± 0.55 ± 0.11 Abs BR ± stat ± syst ± 0.15 ± ± 0.31 ± ± 0.51 ± 0.31 Rel BR 95% CL Limit x Rel BR 90% CL limit x B  Kl + l - BK*l+l-BK*l+l- BaBar (208 fb -1 ) ± ±0.12 PRD 73, (2006) Belle (253 fb -1 ) ± ±0.11 preliminary, hep- ex/ D0 (0.45 fb -1 )hep-ex/ x10 -3

20 Conclusions CDF is a very rich environment to do B, and especially Rare B, physics. It has measured B s   and B d   with the worlds best limits, and will make significant improvements to the next update It has measured the branching ratios for B     B    0  and set a limit for B s  Future updates are planned which will utlize the large data sets being taken at the Tevatron

21 Back up Slides

22 Pre-Selection cuts: < m  < GeV/c 2 muon quality cuts p T (  )>2.0 (2.2) GeV/c CMU (CMX) p T (B s cand.)>4.0 GeV/c |y(B s )| < 1 good vertex 3D displacement L 3D between primary and secondary vertex  (L 3D )<150  m proper decay length 0 < < 0.3cm CDF PRE-SELECTION Bkg substantially reduced but still sizeable at this stage