SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING. WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-- in other words, logic is
Advertisements

Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
{ Introduction to Logic The two types of logos. Induction  Definition: compiling of evidence/reasons/ examples that support an argument  Example: “Wow!
Logic and Logical Fallacies A.P. English Language.
Reading an Advertisement. Fight breaks out at US OPEN /article /US-Open-2010-Spectator-
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Logos Formal Logic.
Categorical Syllogisms Always have two premises Consist entirely of categorical claims May be presented with unstated premise or conclusion May be stated.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
Argument Strategies. Aristotle’s 4 main arguments 1. argue about what is possible or impossible 1. If people continue to eat foods with chemicals, it.
1 Sections 1.5 & 3.1 Methods of Proof / Proof Strategy.
Who Defined the Study of Philosophy and Logic? ________,___________,__________ These three philosophers form the basis of what is known as__________________.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
LOGIC A Very Short Introduction Words We need to define words!
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
Introduction to Toulmin Logic Scott Hale English
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Proofs Rules of Inference Rules of Equivalence.
Use and mention Logic is part of philosophy Logic is a word “Logic” is a word Use There’s glory for you. --what do you mean by “glory”? Mention.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 2 Arguments are among us…
Chapter 23: Enthymemes, Argument Chains, and Other Hazards.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
SYLLOGISMS: Ideas set out in logical patterns. EXAMPLE #1 MAJOR PREMISE: All men are mortal. MINOR PREMISE: Brad Pitt is a man. CONCLUSION: Brad Pitt.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
PROPOSALS LESSON #17. WRITING TIP OF THE DAY – CAPITALS For proper nouns (names of people, places, publications, titles, etc.), always capitalize the.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Persuasive Appeals AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION Logos
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive reasoning.
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
Valid and Invalid Arguments
Lecture 10 - ARGUMENT.
Author’s Viewpoint and Strength of an Argument
SELECTING DEBATE PATTERNS, ATTACKING FALLACIES, & REFUTATION
What makes a Good Argument?
Deductive Arguments.
Deductive and Inductive REASONING
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Syllogism – logical reasoning from inarguable premises; the conclusion is unarguable if the syllogism is structured correctly. Example:  Because Socrates.
Homework Quiz On your mark... Get set....
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Arguments.
New Rhetoric Journal PDN: read the sentence below and identify what techniques the authors used to support their claim. Come up with as many techniques.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Deductive Reasoning: The process of thought through which a conclusion is reached through a set of premises (assumptions that something is true).
Logical Forms.
Natural Deduction.
Principles of Argument
Critical Thinking.
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Predicates and Quantifiers
Philosophical Methods
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Syllogisms and Enthymemes.
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Starting out with formal logic
Presentation transcript:

SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING

WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor Premise, and Conclusion. Major Premise – general statement, assumed true. Minor Premise – specific statement, assumed true Leading to a logical conclusion based on the premises.

THREE TYPES OF SYLLOGISMS What structures / forms of reasoning are true? Three different kinds of syllogism: 1.Categorical 2.Conditional 3.Disjunctive

THREE TYPES OF SYLLOGISMS What structures / forms of reasoning are true? Three different kinds of syllogism: 1. Categorical – (all / every) 2. Conditional – (if / then) 3. Disjunctive – (either / or) Based on different premises in the assumption.

CATEGORICAL (ALL / EVERY) Something true about all members of a category must be true about a particular example. Expressed using variables : Major: A is true about B. Minor: C is equivalent to B. Conclusion: A is also true about C. Example : Major: All men are mortal. Minor: Socrates is a man. Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates must be a mortal.

PRACTICE: Finish the Categorical Syllogism: Major : All dogs go to heaven. Minor : _____________________________________. Conclusion : Therefore, ______________________.

CONDITIONAL (IF / THEN) If a first assumption proves to be true, then a logically related assumption must also be true. Expressed using variables : Major: If A is true, then B is true as well. Minor: A is true. Conclusion: B must be true as well. Example : Major: Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. Minor: There is smoke. Conclusion: Therefore, there must be a fire.

PRACTICE: Finish the Conditional Syllogism: Major : If I am late to work, I’ll get in trouble. Minor : _____________________________________. Conclusion : Therefore, ______________________.

DISJUNCTIVE (EITHER / OR) If a first assumption proves to be true, then a related but contradictory assumption must be false. Expressed using variables : Major: If A is true, then B must be false. Minor: A is true. Conclusion: B must be false then. Example : Major: Either I pay more taxes, or get audited by the IRS. Minor: I did pay my taxes. Conclusion: Therefore, I won’t be audited by the IRS.

PRACTICE: Finish the Disjunctive Syllogism: Major : Either I spend the whole weekend playing video games, or I do some studying. Minor : _____________________________________. Conclusion : Therefore, ______________________.

ABBREVIATED SYLLOGISMS When people speak, they don’t articulate the full logical structure of their reasoning. Mr. Burtosky might say: “The substitute is a teacher, so give her the same respect while I’m gone. The logic underlying this statement is: Major: You should respect your teachers. Minor: The substitute is a teacher. Conclusion: You should respect her too. What statement was left out in what Mr. Burtosky said?

ENTHYMEME Enthymeme – an abbreviated syllogism, where one of the premises making up a logical deduction is left unstated. Etymology – Enthymeme is Greek for “in-the-mind”. The missing premise is inferred by the audience listening to the argument.

CONVERTING ENTHYMEMES - EXAMPLE If I say “Max is originally from Canada, so he really likes maple syrup.” Major Premise: All Canadians like maple syrup. Minor Premise: Max is a Canadian. Conclusion: Therefore, Max likes maple syrup. If I say “The only thing that matters is the number of games, that’s why the PS4 is best console.” Major Premise: The console with the most games is the best. Minor Premise: The PS4 has more games than any other console. Conclusion: Therefore, the PS4 is the best console.

CONVERTING ENTHYMEMES - PRACTICE Jace is on the speech and debate team, so he must be good at public speaking.” Major Premise: _________________________________________. Minor Premise: _________________________________________. Conclusion: Therefore, __________________________________. We should go to fast food place with the best breakfast, which means we should go to Jack in the Box.” Major Premise: _________________________________________. Minor Premise: _________________________________________. Conclusion: ____________________________________________.

CONCLUSION A syllogism is the formal structure of logical argument. Made up of three parts, a major premise, minor premise, and conclusion. Three kinds of syllogisms, categorical (every / all), conditional (if / then), and disjunctive (either / or). An enthymeme is an abbreviated syllogism, with one premise unstated and assumed by the audience.

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS To demonstrate your knowledge of logical reasoning, you will identify and analyze the ENTHYMEME (abbreviated argument) being communicated by a magazine advertisement: Select a magazine advertisement. Cut it out, and tape / glue it to a piece of notebook paper. Summarize the advertisement’s message (complete sentence). Re-write that message as a syllogism (major, minor, conclusion). Identify which premise was left unstated - the inference.