AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.01CA3-05 January 17, 2006 City-initiated Code Amendment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

August 20, 2014 Infill Incentive District Revisions 2014.
TOWNSHIP OF BECKWITH OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW OFFICIAL PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE: AUGUST 24, 2010 OPEN HOUSE NO. 3 AGENDA  What is an Official Plan?  The Official.
The following is a presentation containing aerial photos, zoning maps and relevant information for the rezoning cases and proposed text and map amendments.
Josh Metz, Associate Planner Consistency Determination: City of Seaside – 2013 Zoning Code Text Amendments.
Student Code of Conduct Revision Process Student Code of Conduct Committee Assistant principals, parents, interventionists, AEA representatives.
Zoning Ordinance Update Planning Commission February 25, 2015.
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
Area Commissions Purpose Area commissions are established to afford additional voluntary citizen participation in decision-making in an advisory.
City Council Meeting January 18, Background  Staff receiving increasing number of inquiries regarding installation of wireless telecommunications.
B IG I DEAS part 2 May 19, 2014 City of Duluth Unified Development Code.
Land Use & Code Basics Baseline Information on Permits and Processes.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK MARCH 24, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING THE PASADENA.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
Nebraska Innovation Zone Commission Design Standards February 5, 2009.
A 1,240 Acre Master Development Plan Proposal, West of Willcox, AZ. Cochise County Board of Supervisors August 23, 2011 Docket MDP / Z
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 11, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Design Review Program Overview. Design Review Program Created in 1994 to… o Encourage better design & site planning that enhances the character of the.
Planning and Community Development Department Update on Improvements to the Development Review Process and Recommended Changes Related to Design Review.
Horizon West Village Planned Development Code Update Adoption Public Hearing Board of County Commissioners February 11, 2014 Chapter 38, Article XIII,
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment Public Hearing Proposed elimination of the 50% review step from the design review process.
1 Presented to the Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations By the City of Fort Worth, Planning and Development Department August 24, 2009 CONSERVATION.
Zoning Ordinance Update 15 MAY Purpose and Intent Update Comprehensive Plan ( ) Update Zoning Ordinance (2012) Implementation and Adjustment.
The Three Levels of Development Planning 1 Small Area Plan Zone / CDD DSP / DSUP.
Repeal and Replace the Boundary Adjustment Act with the Urban Reserve Act.
Request to Amend the Alachua County Unified Land Development Code Chapter
Community Development Department APPLICATION 2922 VARIANCE TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
Community Development Department Special Exception Vehicle Rental and Leasing St. Joe Plaza.
STAKEHOLDERS MEETING JKV- OAK PARK JANUARY 15, 2016 Orange City Sign Code Review 1.
The Rezoning Process CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING.
Planning & Community Development Department Board of Zoning Appeals: Hillside Development Permit # Hillcrest Place City Council March 14, 2016.
Presentation and public hearing review of Zoning Map Amendments pursuant to Zoning Code Rewrite Planning and Zoning Board Hearing.
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Presentation to City Council May 2, 2016.
Joy Patterson, Principal Planner City of Sacramento March 16 th, 2016 For the 2016 Planning Academy.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: August 31, 2004 A proposed.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.02Code Amendment March.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
ITEM 6.B ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT AT CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 25, 2009.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
May 14, Planning Commission Planning Commission May 14, 2015.
Overview: Code Modification Process Summary. PROPONENT Step 1 - Proponent has a code change in mind MODIFICATION (Mod) Step 2 - Proponent enters the mod.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
Administrative Code Amendment
Water Efficiency Ordinance ZCA No. 750
Municipal Code Amendment Suspension of Utility Services for Violation of Specified Code Sections of the Pasadena Municipal Code City Council May 15,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
CITY OF STOCKTON PLANNING COMMISSION
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
Planning Land Development Regulations Board (PLDRB)
Protected Area Any areas in which tree protection measures are required pursuant to this Chapter, including without limitation any Bluff Conservation Area.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Appeal: Time Extension for Variance # East Walnut Street
ZONING CODE UPDATE ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
Community Design Advisory Committee
Mock planning commission hearing LC 101
Constructed c.1932 Designated as a Master Plan Historic Site in 1979 Significant for commercial and social history related to the Depression A unique.
Planning Advisory Committee Orientation
Charter School Legislation HB 1390 and SB 737.
Mock planning commission hearing LC 101
Land Use 101: The Design Process
Presentation transcript:

AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.01CA3-05 January 17, 2006 City-initiated Code Amendment for the purpose of revising design review procedures in Division , Design Review, of the Stockton Development Code (Chapter 16, Stockton Municipal Code). City of Stockton James Glaser, CDD Director CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

Design Guidelines – Approved March 30, 2004  Design review standards for new development  Achieve improved design quality for Stockton  Ensure smooth design review process while maintaining high permit volume; or  Improve visual quality of Stockton  Enhance community image/character  Protect and enhance property values Design Guidelines

Projects Subject to Design Guidelines  Single-family  New tract development (design standards)  Infill development in special districts  Multi-family (including duplex, triplex, etc.)  Commercial (Citywide )  Downtown, Miracle Mile, Channel Area, and Freeway Corridors  Special Uses  Business Park and Industrial (Citywide)  Signs (Citywide)

What Do Guidelines Cover  Urban design considerations  Landscaping considerations  Parking and circulation considerations  Site Planning considerations  Safety through design considerations

Application Filing, Processing, and Review Procedures APPEALS BUILDING PERMIT NO REVIEW REVIEW APPEALS BUILDING PERMIT NONDISCRETIONARY CDD DIRECTOR DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS REVIEW DISCRETIONARY REVIEW AUTHORITY

Application Filing, Processing, and Review Procedures APPEALS BUILDING PERMIT NO REVIEW REVIEW APPEALS BUILDING PERMIT NONDISCRETIONARY ARCH REV COMMITTEE DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS REVIEW AUTHORITY DISCRETIONARY ARCH REV COMMITTEE

SECTION AMENDMENT OF CODE. Chapter 16, Section of the Stockton Municipal Code is hereby amended and shall read as follows: – Applicability B. Use of Design Guidelines 1. Adopted design guidelines. The Director Review Authority shall refer to the City of Stockton Citywide Design Guidelines (Guidelines) and other design guidelines that have been adopted by the Council in order to provide guidance to applicants seeking to comply with the requirements of this Division. 3. To be used as review criteria. The design guidelines are to be used by City staff, the Director, Architectural Review Committee (ARC), Cultural Heritage Board, Redevelopment Commission, Commission, and Council as adopted criteria for the review of development proposals subject to the requirements of this Division. EXHIBIT 2

SECTION AMENDMENT OF CODE. Chapter 16, Section of the Stockton Municipal Code is hereby amended and shall read as follows: – Applicable Review Authority A.Nondiscretionary projects. The Director Architectural Review Committee (ARC) shall be the applicable Review Authority for all nondiscretionary projects. The ARC shall be composed of a panel of at least two private-sector architects appointed by the Community Development Director to perform the function of the Review Authority for Design Review. Two or more panels of architects may be appointed, including one alternate architect for each panel, to perform the design reviews on an alternating weekly schedule. B.Discretionary projects. 4.Director. The Director ARC shall be the applicable Design Review Authority for:

SECTION AMENDMENT OF CODE. Chapter 16, Section of the Stockton Municipal Code is hereby amended and shall read as follows: – Application Filing, Processing, and Review Procedures A.Optional preliminary design review. The option of a preliminary design review is strongly encouraged and may be requested by applicants before the formal submittal of an application. This is an informal review by the Director or Architectural Review Committee (ARC) in order to provide direction/guidance to project proponents before preparation of detailed designs/plans for formal application submittal. C.Initial review. Each application shall be reviewed by the Director or ARC to ensure that the application is consistent with this Development Code, the City of Stockton Citywide Design Guidelines (Guidelines), other design guidelines that may be adopted by the City, and the purpose and intent of this Division.

D.Procedures. 1.Review. a. Nondiscretionary permits (Building Permit/allowed uses). For projects that do not require any type of discretionary approval, the applicant shall submit Design Review Plans before Building Permit submittal. The Director ARC shall review the submitted plans for compliance with the Guidelines, other design guidelines that may be adopted by the City, and/or applicable Development Code standards, and prepare a list of make recommendations and supporting findings in compliance with C.2, below. Following the ARC’s review of the plans, the Director shall prepare and transmit a list of the ARC’s findings and recommendations to the applicant in a timely manner – noting that a request for reconsideration may be submitted, where applicable.

Discretionary permit/entitlement. For projects that require a discretionary approval of a development application (e.g., Use Permit, Variance, Land Development Permit, Planned Development Permit, etc), the applicant shall submit Design Review Plans for the proposed project at the same time as the discretionary application is submitted to the Department. The Director shall review the project for compliance with the land use and development regulations contained in this Development Code and. The ARC shall review the overall design of the project for compliance with the Guidelines and other design guidelines that may be adopted by the City. In reviewing the design of the project, the Director ARC shall use the guidelines as a reference, and prepare a list of make recommendations and supporting findings in compliance with D.2, below. Following the ARC’s review of the plans, the Director shall prepare and transmit a list of the ARC’s findings and recommendations to the applicant in a timely manner -- noting that a request for reconsideration may be submitted and/or that the Planning Commission is the final Design Review Authority, where applicable. b.

2.List of recommendations. a. The list of findings and recommendations shall be forwarded: 1) To the applicant within 30 working days from the date the application is deemed complete by the Director. 2)To the applicable Review Authority for consideration simultaneously with any accompanying discretionary permit/entitlement application. b. Where the recommendations of the Director would substantially alter a proposed development, the applicant may be requested to submit revised plans at the discretion of the Director with a request for reconsideration by the ARC.

3.Determination. Following submittal of the list of recommendations to the applicant and the submittal of any revisions and request for reconsideration, if applicable, the Director Review Authority shall review the design of the project in compliance with the list of recommendations ( C.2), above, and : a. Nondiscretionary permits. Make a consistency determination. b. Discretionary permit/entitlement. 1) Director ARC. If the final Design Review Authority is the Director ARC, the Director ARC shall make a consistency determination. 2) Other Review Authorities. If the Director ARC is not the final Design Review Authority, the Director ARC shall make a written recommendation to the Review Authority and the Design Review plans shall be considered with the application(s) by the applicable Review Authority identified in Table 4-1 (Review Authority). Following review of the Design Review plans, the Review Authority shall make a consistency determination.

E. On-site review. The review may include on-site inspection of the subject parcel, if deemed necessary by the Director ARC. SECTION AMENDMENT OF CODE. Chapter 16, Section A of the Stockton Municipal Code is hereby amended and shall read as follows: – Post Issuance Procedures A.Appeal. The decision of the Review Authority may be appealed in compliance with Division (Appeals). The decision of the Director Architectural Review Committee (ARC) may be appealed to the Commission, following a request for reconsideration, and the decision of the Commission may be appealed to the Council.

a)Environmental – Approval (IS23-04) b)General Plan Amendment - Approval (GPA5-04) c)Rezoning – Approval (Z-6-04) Item 9.01 ACTION DATE: MARCH 8, 2005 Recommended Actions ACTION DATE: JANUARY 17, 2006 Code Amendment (CA3-05) – Approval Item 9.01 Recommended Actions CA3-05