A half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UVic Libraries 2008 LibQUAL+ Survey Prepared for the UVic Senate Committee on Libraries.
Advertisements

The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Using Assessment Data to Improve Library Services Christopher Stewart Dean of Libraries, Illinois Institute of Technology Charles Uth, Head of Collection.
LibQUAL+ Data for Learning Commons Focus Groups University Libraries Assessment Committee.
Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.
Assessment with LibQUAL+ ™ at the University of Vermont Vermont Library Association College and Special Libraries Section Conference April 7, 2006 Selene.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LibQUAL+ ® Training Practical Lessons Drawn From Ten Years of Library Service Quality in a Research Library ALA Boston Midwinter 2010.
 Large-scale, web-based, user-centered assessment of library service effectiveness across multiple universities.  Co-developed by ARL and Texas A&M University,
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
January 22, 2007 ALA Midwinter, Seattle Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College LibQUAL+ Results: What Now? Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
Old.libqual.org What will ARL do for you? What will you do? January 2005 Shrivenham, UK.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.
LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool Amy Hoseth Massachusetts LSTA Orientation Meeting Boston, MA October 21, 2005 old.libqual.org.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Measurement and Assessment of Library Programs and Services Eileen E. Hitchingham Dean, University Libraries Virginia Tech The Changing.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
TM Project web site New Ways of Listening to Users: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Consuella Askew Waller April 10-13, 2003 ACRL 11 th.
Your LibQUAL+ ® Community: A Results Meeting American Library Association (ALA) Annual Conference Washington, DC June 25, 2007 Martha Kyrillidou, Director.
Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.
LibQUAL + ™ 2004 Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2004 survey with comparisons to past surveys.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
LibQual Survey. The CUC Group Resp.% Calvin College & Theological Seminary1, % Cedarville University Centennial Library % Geneva College %
Data Collection and Beyond Assessment at the U.Va. Library
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
How to participate LibQUAL+
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Reading Radar Charts.
We did LibQUAL+®: Now what?
Assessment with LibQUAL+ ™ at the University of Vermont
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2007
Using the LibQUAL+ Survey to Inform Strategic Planning
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
Your LibQUAL+® Community: A Results Meeting
LibQUAL+ v LibQUAL Lite at the University of Glasgow
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making
Presentation transcript:

a half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17, 2005 Boston, MA Eileen E. Hitchingham Dean University Libraries, Virginia Tech Virginia Tech and LibQual+ Virginia Tech and LibQual+ 2004

VT LibQual+ Survey Groups

Strategy for getting participation No incentivesNo incentives Bug them a lotBug them a lot

Information Control a library web enabling me to locate information on my own Information Control journal collections I require for my work Information Control the electronic information resources I need Graduate Students LibQual+ items for which we don’t meet minimum expectations

Undergraduates No LibQual+ items with the dread red- don’t meet minimum expectations

When we say ARL average we are comparing to the average of those ARL libraries in the spring 2004 survey…

Everybody uses Google …

Graduate Student Comparisons of minimum, perceived, desired on dimension summaries VT A public major research institution

So what have we learned and what have we done? With a small staff and not too many $$ we continue to hover around average for ARL’s on the dimensions and overall satisfaction Fewer comments regarding copiers came in for 2004 after we did a consolidation fix following the 2003 LibQual+ Our users were not satisfied with web access prompting a major revision in summer 2004 Our users found our old PC’s lacking and we added 60 new public PC’s in summer 2004 Our graduate students are generally satisfied on the affect of service dimension, but not our undergraduates. Almost 16% of the comments noted that students – all disciplines, grad, undergrad, wanted a more comfortable, visually appealing library and we are using these comments in the capital project request cycle Our undergraduate students use the physical and electronic library less than students in other ARL libraries and we are using this information as part of the input to the core curriculum review LibQual+ is useful all year, whatever the discussion we often end up saying “LibQual+ showed us that…..