Junior Engagement Program Evaluations – 1 st Semester SY1314

Partners and Clients 1024 students 8 Philosophy faculty 54 areas 6 sectors: 1 - Labor (Formal & Informal) 4 - Elderly 2 – Government Agency 5 – Person With Disability 3 – Volunteer Groups 6 – Environment

Phases / Processes a. Social Investigation / MOA Signing b. Exposure c. Classroom Orientation d. Enlistment e. Medical Assessment g. Area Orientation h. Area Engagement i. Social Analysis j. Area Evaluation Other activities: FIRO-B Session Philosophy Processing Recollection

INAF Theme I and the Other As a Social Being & Part of a Social Institution

Achievements - 16 hours Area Engagement (from 12 hours) - Discipline-based JEEP * Health Sciences * Political Science *new * Environmental Science *new

Achievements - Social Analysis * Men and Women for Others * Students form their own synthesis - JEEP Checklist/Conversational Starters/ Integration Tips

Achievements - Video Teaser (shot in Marikina Public Market) - Incidence Report in place (stolen gadgets, student’s discomfort over an area)

Achievements - Collaboration with SL/DB champions - Former students, NOW Area Contact Persons * tapped networks * knows the context of formation * models for our students

Achievements - OSCI-JEEP log frame (to be presented in a while)

Areas for Improvement - Area Criteria and Deliberation * work, interaction * highlights sectoral concern/s & social structures and processes - Medical Assessment * procedure and agreement with OHS * STARS

Area for Improvement - External Communications / Online Manual (Facebook or blogspot?) - Evaluation Process and Tools * Student Evals * Area Evals * Department Evals (SL/DB)

Areas for Improvement - Enlistment concerns *perennial concern - Schedule conflicts between students and areas *perennial concern

Learnings - # never say die (16 hours, DB jeep) - # we’re all in this together (sharing of best practices, OSCI TWG, collaboration with SL/DB champions)

Learnings - # we find ways (area concerns, weather disturbances, “holiday showers” in August) - # be the better person (in dealing with students and areas, composure)

Learnings - # bilog ang mundo (rotation of tasks) - # back to basics (grounding with objectives) (policies and process oriented?)

Learnings - # research is a must (sectors, frameworks, disciplines) - # listen MORE (social analysis as an ‘opinion hub’)

Recommendations - Pre/Post surveys - Revisit Area Criteria (ground with program objectives) - Area Database for Potential SL/DB efforts

Recommendations - “STARStalk” with OHS, OGC. * clearance procedure/deadline * access to list? - Enlistment Solutions - Improve evaluation tools and processes

Recommendations - “Sectoral Bytes.” - Educational Sessions / Enrichment Talks: * Sectoral Situationers * Social Analysis Frameworks * Formulating Objectives * Statistics and Evaluations * Web Design / Blogspot management

Recommendations - Terms of Reference with Departments for discipline-based JEEP * roles and responsibilities * evaluations - More discipline-based JEEP * explore with departments * response of the students?

Recommendations - Learning Highway. Bridging. - “JEEP Awards.” * hardworking area monitors * promising students

KSA’s Quantitative Results KNOWLEDGE 95.8% agreed that JEEP provided them with opportunities to discern their identity and motives given their different contexts

KSA’s Quantitative Results SKILL 96.2% agreed that JEEP enabled them to identify their part in the Philippine social structure

KSA’s Quantitative Results ATTITUDE 93% agreed that JEEP allowed them to display the desire to be moved to do more (MAGIS)

OSCI-JEEP log frame O1: Increased ability to analyze sectoral problems/issues and identify their role in social structures O2: Strengthened capacity to utilize the skills learned in their respective disciplines through the JEEP sectors (esp. for discipline-based) O3: Increased desire to act in response to the JEEP experience

Thank You!