1 Project seminar on - By:- Tejaswinee Darure. Contents: 1] Aircraft (Boing-737) modeling a] Longitudinal Dynamics b] State space representation of system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pole Placement.
Advertisements

Properties of State Variables
Robust control Saba Rezvanian Fall-Winter 88.
Design of LFC using Optimal Control Theory The optimal controller is designed to minimize the quadratic performance index of the following form For linear.
Chapter 8 Root Locus and Magnitude-phase Representation
President UniversityErwin SitompulModern Control 11/1 Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul President University Lecture 11 Modern Control
Linear system by meiling CHEN1 Lesson 8 Stability.
February 24, Final Presentation AAE Final Presentation Backstepping Based Flight Control Asif Hossain.
Modern Control Systems1 Lecture 07 Analysis (III) -- Stability 7.1 Bounded-Input Bounded-Output (BIBO) Stability 7.2 Asymptotic Stability 7.3 Lyapunov.
Digital Control Systems STATE OBSERVERS. State Observers.
Multivariable Control Systems
Slide# Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations.
Separation Principle. Controllers & Observers Plant Controller Observer Picture.
AUTOMATIC CONTROL THEORY II Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Introductory Control Theory CS 659 Kris Hauser.
Book Adaptive control -astrom and witten mark
Properties of Root Locus Lesson Objectives : After finish this lesson, students will be able to  be aware of the control system problem  be aware of.
Chapter 7 Stability and Steady-State Error Analysis
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
Robotics Research Laboratory 1 Chapter 7 Multivariable and Optimal Control.
1 Chapter 11 Compensator Design When the full state is not available for feedback, we utilize an observer. The observer design process is described and.
CONTROL OF MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEM BY MULTIRATE FAST OUTPUT SAMPLING TECHNIQUE B. Bandyopadhyay and Jignesh Solanki Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai,
Matlab Tutorial for State Space Analysis and System Identification
Lecture 14: Pole placement (Regulator Problem) 1.
Prof. Wahied Gharieb Ali Abdelaal
(COEN507) LECTURE III SLIDES By M. Abdullahi
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY VI -SEMESTER AUTOMATIC CONTROL 1 CHAPTER NO.6 State space representation of Continuous Time systems 1 Teaching Innovation.
DESIGN OF CONTROLLERS WITH ARBITRARY POLE PLACEMENT AND STATE OBSERVERS Dr. C. Vivekanandan Professor and Vice Principal Dept. of EEE Jan. 9, 20161SNSCE.
Basic search for design of control system and disturbance observer
Eigenvalues, Zeros and Poles
Modern Control Systems (MCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
FULL STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL:
The Root Locus Analysis
Chapter 12 Design via State Space <<<4.1>>>
Teknik kendali.
LQR Linear Quadratic Regulator
Transfer Functions Chapter 4
Pole Placement and Decoupling by State Feedback
Chapter 10 Optimal Control Homework 10 Consider again the control system as given before, described by Assuming the linear control law Determine the constants.
Pole Placement and Decoupling by State Feedback
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE Design Of Multiloop P and PI controllers based on quadratic optimal approach.
Properties Of the Quadratic Performance Surface
Feedback Control Systems (FCS)
Controller and Observer Design
Optimal Control Theory
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Root-locus Technique for Control Design
Root-Locus Analysis (1)
4.2 State Feedback for Multivariable Systems
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
Numerical Analysis Lecture 16.
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
Derivative of scalar forms
Multirate Output Feedback
Static Output Feedback and Estimators
§1-3 Solution of a Dynamical Equation
Aim: How do we use quadratic formula to solve equation?
Digital and Non-Linear Control
8. Stability, controllability and observability
Homework 9 Refer to the last example.
Homework 3: Transfer Function to State Space
NONLINEAR AND ADAPTIVE SIGNAL ESTIMATION
Observer Design & Output Feedback
CONTROL INTRO & OVERVIEW
Homework 3: Transfer Function to State Space
State Feedback.
NONLINEAR AND ADAPTIVE SIGNAL ESTIMATION
IntroductionLecture 1: Basic Ideas & Terminology
Chapter 7 Inverse Dynamics Control
Presentation transcript:

1 Project seminar on - By:- Tejaswinee Darure

Contents: 1] Aircraft (Boing-737) modeling a] Longitudinal Dynamics b] State space representation of system c] Response for each state and output 2] Pole placement technique 3] Linear quadratic regulator design 4] Kalman filter design + LQG 5] Loop transfer recovery 6] Conclusion 2

3 u(t) : axial velocity w(t) : normal velocity V(t) : velocity magnitude α(t) : angle of attack γ (t) : flight path angle θ (t) : pitch angle Longitudinal Dynamics

4 u’ w ’ q ’ θ ’ = x u x w x q x θ z u z w z q z θ m u m w m q m θ uwqθuwqθ + x η x τ z η z τ m η m τ 0 0 ητητ uwqθuwqθ θγ θγ State space representation for longitudinal stability + =

5 ∫BC A u x xˆ Y A = B = C = State space representation for longitudinal stability

6

7 Pole placement technique :- B A C∫ -K y u x xˆxˆ K = Where desired poles will be at- P = j j j j

8  x’(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t) (1) Consider, state feedback as - u(t)= - K*x(t) (control law)  This indicates that instantaneous states are given as feedback where K is a matrix of order 1*n called as state feedback matrix. x’(t)=A CL x(t) where A CL =A-B*K (2)  Hence stability and transient response of closed system is determined by the eigen values of matrix A-B*K.  Depending on the selection of state feedback gain matrix K, the matrix A-B*K i.e. A CL can be made asymptotically stable.  Thus system closed loop poles can be placed at arbitrary chosen locations by choosing appropriate state feedback matrix with the condition that system must be completely state controllable. >>K= place(A,B, p) where p will be desired pole locations.

9

10 Linear quadratic regulator for LTI system  Optimal control problem is to find a control input u which causes the system to follow an optimal trajectory x(t) that minimizes performance criteria or cost function, f J(t,t f ) = Let, quadratic cost function be, f J(t,t f ) =  Q and R are state and control weighing matrices and are always square and symmetric.  J is always scalar quantity.  Linear quadratic regulator (LQR) provides optimal control law for linear system by minimizing above quadratic cost function.

11  If A- B*K is stable, u= -K*x be control law where K is optimal gain matrix then let us define, X T (Q+K T RK)X =  P is positive definite real symmetric matrix. After taking derivative and comparing, We get, -(Q+K T RK)= (A-B*K) T P-P(A-B*K) i.e. matrix P should satisfies above equation. By solving this we obtain, K = R -1 B T P Therefore control law is, u = -K x(t) = - R -1 B T P >>[K,P,e] = lqr(A,B,Q,R) where, e = Eigen values of A CL

12

13 Another example A = B = C= D= Q=I R=I

14

15

16

17  We found that it may be required to change plant’s characteristics by using a closed loop system, in which controller is designed to place the poles at desired location.  Hence by selecting the controller gain matrix, K, we can place the close loop poles at desired location  Optimal control allows us to directly formulate performance objectives of a control system.  Linear quadratic regulator (LQR) provides optimal control law (-Kx) for linear system by minimizing quadratic cost function. Conclusion:

18

19

20

21