California Central Valley (Experiment 6) ATM 419 Spring 2016 Fovell 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UU Unitah Basin WRF Model Configuration (same as DEQ) See Alcott and Steenburgh 2013 for further details on most aspects of this numerical configuration:
Advertisements

High-Resolution Land Use Data in WPS/WRF for Urban Regions
Günther Zängl, DWD1 Improvements for idealized simulations with the COSMO model Günther Zängl Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
Jared H. Bowden Saravanan Arunachalam
For the Lesson: Eta Characteristics, Biases, and Usage December 1998 ETA-32 MODEL CHARACTERISTICS.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
Issues in Very High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Over Complex Terrain in Juneau, Alaska Don Morton 1,2, Delia Arnold 3,4, Irene Schicker 3,
Nesting. Eta Model Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
This is the footer WRF Basics Weather Research and Forecasting.
This is the footer Running WRF on HECToR Ralph Burton, NCAS (Leeds) Alan Gadian, NCAS (Leeds) With thanks to Paul Connolly, Hector.
How to set up and run WRF model. Outline n How to download and compile the WRF code? n Namelist n Input and output files.
Introduction to Running the WRF in LES Mode Jeff Massey April 1, 2014 University of Utah WRF Users Group.
WRF SLP Bias Issues Update from Santa Cruz meeting Matt Higgins John Cassano May 18,
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
– Equations / variables – Vertical coordinate – Terrain representation – Grid staggering – Time integration scheme – Advection scheme – Boundary conditions.
HWRF ERROR ANALYSIS T N Krishnamurti A.Thomas A. Simon Florida State University.
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
November 1, 2013 Bart Brashers, ENVIRON Jared Heath Bowden, UNC 3SAQS WRF Modeling Recommendations.
+ Best Practices in Regional Climate Modeling Dr. Michel d. S. Mesquita Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Uni Research
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service Jan-Peter Schulz Deutscher Wetterdienst 27 th EWGLAM and 12 th SRNWP Meeting 2005.
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
– Equations / variables – Vertical coordinate – Terrain representation – Grid staggering – Time integration scheme – Advection scheme – Boundary conditions.
CCAM Numerical Weather Prediction Dr Marcus Thatcher Research Scientist December 2007.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Operational Mesoscale Model History Early: LFM, NGM (history) Eta (mainly history) MM5: Still used by some, but.
Installing and Running the WPS Michael Duda 2006 WRF-ARW Summer Tutorial.
Accounting for Uncertainties in NWPs using the Ensemble Approach for Inputs to ATD Models Dave Stauffer The Pennsylvania State University Office of the.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
This document gives one example of how one might be able to “fix” a meteorological file, if one finds that there may be problems with the file. There are.
Current and Future Initialization of WRF Land States at NCEP Ken Mitchell NCEP/EMC WRF Land Working Group Workshop 18 June 2003.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
WRF Modelling Aim:  18 th -19 th April Cyclone taking dust SW as opposed to SE  15 th – 16 th North Scotland hit  Cyclone has moved north dragging.
Installing and Running the WPS Michael Duda 2006 WRF-ARW Summer Tutorial.
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Parameterization of the Planetary Boundary Layer -NWP guidance Thor Erik Nordeng and Morten Køltzow NOMEK 2010 Oslo 19. – 23. April 2010.
Real-data WRF: Setup and run ATM 419 Spring 2016 Fovell 1.
Running the WRF Preprocessing System
Does nudging squelch the extremes in regional climate modeling?
Northwest Modeling Consortium
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
Real-data WRF: Verification with MET package
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
Status of the COSMO-Software and Documentation
Overview of Downscaling
“Storm of the Century”: grid nudging and stochastic perturbatons
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
Overview of the COSMO NWP model
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
gWRF Workflow and Input Data Requirements
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2017
An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations and Analysis
Statistical vs. Physical Adaptation
Convective and orographically-induced precipitation study
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Radiation fogs: WRF and LES numerical experiments
Model Vertical Coordinates and Levels and Nesting
NRL POST Stratocumulus Cloud Modeling Efforts
Alex Gallagher and Dr. Robert Fovell
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Data Assimilation of TEMPO NO2: Winds, Emissions and PBL mixing
WRAP 2014 Regional Modeling
WRF Application in COAWST
Presentation transcript:

California Central Valley (Experiment 6) ATM 419 Spring 2016 Fovell 1

Links/sources WRF namelist.input description and options MET User's Guide (v.5.0) NCAR’s Research Data Archive: rda.ucar.edu 2

Case overview We will make a 3-day simulation during December 2005 in a 2-domain configuration centered over California. Verification period will be the last 2 days of the 3-day run. First day ignored as “spin-up”. Verification domain will be the California Central Valley (CV) using observations from ASOS/AWOS obtained from MADIS. The success metric will be CV-averaged mean absolute error (MAE), summed over those 49 hours as verified against the dataset I provide. The smallest total will "win". 3

New aspects of this experiment Use the NARR reanalysis for initialization Verify against observations confined to a portion of the model domain Verify against a fraction of the forecast time period Optionally, manipulate vertical model levels The “default WRF” setup performs quite poorly 4

Domain setup Experiment setup details in CV_experiment_details.docx Edit namelist.wps as required Do domain setup Check your domain 5

Using NARR reanalysis NARR requires its own Vtable for ungrib and also a fixed-fields file to be provided for the metgrid step. See details document. NARR data are available every 3 hours (10800 sec) NARR files named like: –merged_AWIP D merged_AWIP RS.clm merged_AWIP RS.flx merged_AWIP RS.pbl merged_AWIP RS.sfc – Actually need only the 3D, flx, and sfc files –link_grib.csh /network/rit/lab/atm419lab/NARR/200512/merged* 6

In namelist.wps &ungrib out_format = 'WPS', prefix = ’NARR', / &metgrid constants_name = ’/network/rit/lab/atm419lab/NARR/FIXED_NARR', fg_name = ’NARR', io_form_metgrid = 2, / 7 Specifying the ‘ prefix ’ and ‘ fg_name ’ as “NARR” is not necessary but is convenient if you decide to use alternate or combined data sources. If you are not using NARR, you must remove the constants_name reference. (Move the line after the / to ‘deactivate’ it.)

WPS and WRF Link to the NARR files and get your NARR Vtable Perform ungrib.exe, metgrid.exe as usual Check on num_metgrid_levels Edit namelist.input as required for default run setup (see also next slide) – We will run for 3 days, using 2 domains – Make sure domain particulars match namelist.wps Do real.exe via batch script submit_wrf Create your default run RUN01 8

Edit namelist.input Make sure run_days = 3 and start/end times are correct Make sure domain details match namelist.wps Make sure num_metgrid_levels is correct Model setup: – time_step = 120 sec – 51 vertical levels – p_top_requested = – Microphysics option 2 – LW and SW 4, with 10 min time step (radt) – YSU PBL w/ sf_sfclay_physics = 1 – Noah LSM – Cumulus scheme #1 (K-F), on in both domains, with 5 min time step (cudt) – Turn the 6 th order diffusion on in both domains, with diff_6th_factor = 0.12 for both (diff_6 th _opt = 1, 1) – Use dampcoef = 0.01 for both domains – Moisture and other scalar advection option 2 in both domains 9

Dampers often used in real-data WRF 10 w_damping = 1, diff_opt = 1,1, km_opt = 4,4, diff_6th_opt = 1, 1, diff_6th_factor = 0.12, 0.12, damp_opt = 3, zdamp = 5000., 5000., dampcoef = 0.01, 0.01, w_damping = 1 suppresses some “anomalously large” vertical motions. Coefficients are hard-coded in share/module_model_constants.F diff_6 th _opt = 1 or 2 provides 6 th order smoothing. Here, option 1 is used, which is not positive definite. damp_opt = 3 provides upper-level Rayleigh damping. Coefficient dampcoef is damping rate (1/s). Applied over depth zdamp below model top. Typical values are up to 0.2 for real-data runs. Here, dampcoef is much smaller than typically used.

Other dampers (leave these alone) epssm = damps vertically-propagating sound waves emdiv = damps the external mode If absent from namelist.input, default values are employed 11

Advection options 12 moist_adv_opt = 2, 2, scalar_adv_opt = 2, 2, These can be used to make advection of moisture and other scalars either positive definite (1) or monotonic (2). Raw advection Positive definite Monotonic (pos. def. + no oscillations)

Diffusion options In a moderate resolution real-data WRF run (such as ours), there are two kinds of “meteorological diffusion”: horizontal and vertical – Vertical diffusion is handled by the PBL scheme, even for free atmosphere above the PBL – Horizontal diffusion is handled by diff_opt, km_opt namelist options km_opt = 4 computes strictly horizontal diffusion (the only option when a PBL scheme is employed) –km_opt = 1 applies constant diffusion (undesirable) –km_opt = 2 or 3 does 3D turbulent diffusion (inconsistent with PBL scheme) diff_opt = 1 does diffusion along model surfaces, while diff_opt = 2 does diffusion in physical space (see next slide). diff_opt = 0 shuts it off. –diff_opt = 2 used to blow up in complex terrain. Now it “shuts itself off”. Standard setup for these runs: diff_opt = 1, km_opt = 4. 13

14 diff_opt = 1 diff_opt = 2 Horizontal diffusion is along model surfaces (if model levels sloped, diffusion isn’t really horizontal) Diffusion is in physical space (even if model surfaces are sloped)

Verification Review of steps – Create an analysis directory (like RUN01 ) – Create subdirectories RUN01/postprd and RUN01/wrfprd – Move your wrfout * files into RUN01/wrfprd – Make sure you have edited copies of run_unipost and MET_run_ASCII2_ASOS.sh in the analysis directory ( RUN01 ). See upcoming slides. 15

run_unipost export startdate= export fhr=24 export lastfhr=72 export incrementhr=01 for domain in d02 Our simulation starts on at 00Z but our verification period will start 24 hours later. Our verification will focus on D2. 16

MET analysis domains Statistics will be generated for 2 areas in D2: the FULL domain and the CV subdomain, described in the file CV_large.poly –CV_large.poly is a polygon outlining the CV interior (see next slide) MET_run_ASCII2_ASOS.sh points to a configuration file called PointStatConfig.NODUP.ATM419.CV (see upcoming slides) 17

CV_large Contents of CV_large.poly 18

PointStatConfig.NODUP.ATM419.CV 1/4 19 // // Forecast and observation fields to be verified // // repeated wind twice for forecast,. third wind is L1 vs gust fcst = { wind_thresh = [ NA ]; message_type = [ "ADPSFC" ]; field = [ { name = "TMP"; level = [ "Z2" ]; cat_thresh = [ >0 ]; }, { name = "WIND"; level = [ "Z10" ]; cat_thresh = [ >=0 ]; }, [etc.] This section of the configuration file declares the forecast fields to be verified Temperature at 2-m Wind speed at 10-m For information only. You do not need to edit this file.

PointStatConfig.NODUP.ATM419.CV 2/4 20 obs = { wind_thresh = [ NA ]; message_type = [ "ADPSFC" ]; field = [ { name = "TMP"; level = [ "Z2" ]; cat_thresh = [ >0 ]; }, { name = "WIND"; level = [ "Z10" ]; cat_thresh = [ >=0 ]; }, [etc.] This section of the configuration file declares the observation fields to be verified. They must match up 1:1 with declared forecast fields. For information only. You do not need to edit this file.

PointStatConfig.NODUP.ATM419.CV 3/4 21 // // Verification masking regions // mask = { grid = [ "FULL" ]; poly = ["/network/rit/home/rf518462/METV5/CV_large.poly"]; sid = ""; }; The CV area is described in the polygon file called CV_large.poly. See next slide. For information only. You do not need to edit this file.

PointStatConfig.NODUP.ATM419.CV 4/4 22 // // Point observation time window // obs_window = { beg = -1800; end = 1800; } // // Interpolation methods // interp = { vld_thresh = 1.0; type = [ { method = UW_MEAN; width = 1; } ]; }; duplicate_flag = SINGLE; Other selections that could be reconsidered. Obs time can be up to 30 min (1800 sec) before or after the forecast time SINGLE here means only one obs per station is permitted at the given forecast time. (MET selects closest time match.) Interpolation method is unweighted mean

MET_run_ASCII2_ASOS.sh Date_base= Date_hour=00 domain=2 MYHOME=/network/rit/home/rf MET_base=$MYHOME/METV5 OBS_base=/network/rit/lab/atm419lab/MADIS/MADIS_ RUN_base=$PWD/postprd Grey = do not change. Although verification period starts on 6 th, this should be configured as shown here. 23

Running MET Steps (after editing files) – Execute srun bash run_unipost – Execute srun sh MET_run_ASCII2_ASOS.sh – Execute plot_met_CV.sh to get statistics for T, Td and RH The plot_met_CV.sh script has been altered to report either statistics averaged over stations throughout D2 (“FULL”) or those in the CV (“CV_large”). We will verify against CV_large. – Options for this script have changed somewhat. – See next slide. If your analysis was set up correctly, the first analysis time reported should be _0000. We are skipping Dec 5 th. 24

sh plot_met_CV.sh _ FULL TMPf TMPo N 40 MAE BCRMSE MSE BIAS STDf STDo LVL Z2f Z2o _ FULL TMPf TMPo N 40 MAE BCRMSE MSE BIAS STDf STDo LVL Z2f Z2o _ FULL TMPf TMPo N 41 MAE BCRMSE MSE BIAS STDf STDo LVL Z2f Z2o _ FULL TMPf TMPo N 39 MAE BCRMSE MSE BIAS STDf STDo LVL Z2f Z2o sh plot_met_CV.sh _ CV_large TMPf TMPo N 20 MAE BCRMSE MSE BIAS STDf STDo LVL Z2f Z2o _ CV_large TMPf TMPo N 19 MAE BCRMSE MSE BIAS STDf STDo LVL Z2f Z2o _ CV_large TMPf TMPo N 20 MAE BCRMSE MSE BIAS STDf STDo LVL Z2f Z2o _ CV_large TMPf TMPo N 21 MAE BCRMSE MSE BIAS STDf STDo LVL Z2f Z2o Note that option 2 reports TMP for domain “FULL”, which has about 40 stations. Note that option 3 reports TMP for domain “CV_large”, which has about 20 stations. This is what we want. 25

sh plot_met_CV.sh 3 sh plot_met_CV.sh 9 sh plot_met_CV.sh 11 TMP for CV_large DPT for CV_large RH for CV_large 26 For RH in CV_large, MAE sum = for hours Low RH results from a warm bias in T and a dry bias in Td, especially at night.

Experiment 6: Improve the CV RH forecast 27

Experiment 6 For Experiment 6, your task is to improve the RH forecast for the CV Our default run RUN01 has a pretty standard setup, but fails to capture CV RH well, especially at night. WRF model provides many, many options. Not all options make sense for this application, and not all options “play nice” together. The pervasive question: are we getting the right answer for the right reason? 28

Notes There are many namelist and physics options. Not all work with all physics combinations. Some are not well-tested. Some may force smaller time steps. The LES options should be ignored, as they require much, much finer grid spacing. slope_rad and topo_shading modify solar radiation on terrain slopes, but usually used when spatial resolution is higher than in our domains. iz0tlnd = 1 enhances surface evaporation in more heavily vegetated areas. icloud = 1, 2 alters how SW radiation interacts with clouds. icloud = 0 makes clouds transparent to radiation. sf_urban_physics controls some aspects of urbanized areas in the domain. The isfflx flag can deactivate surface fluxes in some physics combinations. Similarly, ifsnow can activate/deactivate snow effects with sf_surface_physics = 1. ysu_topdown_pblmix = 1 attempts to modify YSU to work better in foggy boundary layers. Only works with YSU PBL. topo_wind = 1 attempts to adjust near-surface winds for unresolved topography. Only works with YSU PBL. For cumulus schemes other than K-F ( cu_physics = 1), cudt should be 0. 29

30 The success metric will be CV-averaged MAE, summed over those 49 hours as verified against the dataset I provide. The smallest total will "win". Rules: You cannot change the time period being simulated. Your simulations must start on , and run for 3 days. You cannot change the verifying data, region or time period. The data are from ASOS/AWOS stations, the region is the CV, and time period is the two day interval between and You cannot use any data assimilation or nudging. You have to use the domain I provided (2 nested domains, resolution, location). You cannot change the resolution, or add a 3rd nest. You must use the WRF model executable and the PointStatConfig file I have provided. However: You CAN alter model physics options. See WRF namelist page for scads of available options. You CAN alter the initialization data source, in any way you wish. This includes a different reanalysis altogether and/or different atmospheric and soil moisture sources. You CAN change the number of vertical levels, and use the eta_levels namelist option to manipulate them as you wish. (See following slides for additional information.) You CAN change the length of time steps, for the model and/or for the radiation and cumulus schemes. However, please leave bldt = 0.

Recording your results Google spreadsheet 31 Create a unique simulation name with your surname. Add your summed MAE to the spreadsheet. Record your numbers even if the run wasn’t very good. Save your notes and outputs as I may ask to see them. See “RUN01 results” tab for output from plot_met_CV for T, Td and RH for RUN01

Altering vertical levels 32 ncdump –v ZNW wrfinput_d01 ZNW = 1, 0.993, 0.983, 0.97, 0.954, 0.934, 0.909, 0.88, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0 ; If you specify 51 vertical levels in the namelist.input, real.exe creates 51 “eta” or “sigma” levels, representing a nondimensional vertical coordinate stored as ZNW in wrfinput_d01. Use ncdump to reveal the eta values. They always start at 1, and end with 0. You can manually declare these levels in namelist.input ’s &domains section. You should get the same result from real.exe, to within roundoff error. eta_levels = 1, 0.993, 0.983, 0.97, 0.954, 0.934, 0.909, 0.88, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0,

“Eta” or “sigma: coordinate 33 WRF Dynamics and numerics tutorial document p h = hydrostatic pressure p h s = hydrostatic pressure at surface p h t = hydrostatic pressure at model top = held constant

34 ncks -C -H -d south_north,1 -d west_east,1 -v PHB wrfinput_d01 Time[0] bottom_top_stag[0] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[70]=0 Time[0] bottom_top_stag[1] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[4831]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[2] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[9592]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[3] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[14353]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[4] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[19114]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[5] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[23875]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[6] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[28636]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[7] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[33397]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[8] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[38158]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[9] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[42919]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[10] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[47680]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[11] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[52441]=16540 Time[0] bottom_top_stag[12] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[57202]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[13] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[61963]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[14] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[66724]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[15] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[71485]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[16] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[76246]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[17] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[81007]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[18] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[85768]=41466 Time[0] bottom_top_stag[19] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[90529]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[20] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[95290]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[21] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[100051]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[22] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[104812]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[23] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[109573]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[24] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[114334]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[25] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[119095]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[26] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[123856]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[27] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[128617]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[28] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[133378]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[29] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[138139]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[30] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[142900]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[31] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[147661]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[32] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[152422]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[33] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[157183]=94881 Time[0] bottom_top_stag[34] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[161944]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[35] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[166705]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[36] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[171466]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[37] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[176227]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[38] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[180988]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[39] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[185749]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[40] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[190510]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[41] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[195271]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[42] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[200032]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[43] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[204793]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[44] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[209554]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[45] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[214315]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[46] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[219076]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[47] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[223837]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[48] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[228598]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[49] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[233359]= Time[0] bottom_top_stag[50] south_north[1] west_east[1] PHB[238120]= PHB is base state geopotential height. Divide by for height above MSL. Here, PHB for grid point (1,1) is shown. As this is over water, the height is also height AGL. These heights are for the W locations, which start at the surface.

35 Default vertical levels from real.exe …results in 8 levels within lowest 1 km AGL First W level above ground at ~ 54 m so first scalar level at about 27 m If you increase or decrease the number of levels, these heights change… … but real.exe tries to keep the lowest 8 W levels at same heights (see next slide)

Model levels for e_vert = 51 and Model levelW height (51 levels), in meters W height (31 levels), in meters If you want to increase vertical resolution near the surface, this is NOT accomplished by increasing the number of model levels! Specify eta_levels instead. Note both vertical grids have same lowest 8 model levels!

Some other WRF initialization datasets ERA-Interim (6 hourly files) –/network/rit/lab/atm419lab/ERAI/200512/ – Requires Vtable.ERA-interim.pl CFSR (Climate Forecast System Reanalysis, v. 1; also 6 hourly) –/network/rit/lab/atm419lab/CFSR/ pgb* = atmospheric data on pressure levels flx* = surface data – Requires doing atmospheric and surface ungrib tasks separately, using different Vtables – Vtables: Vtable.CFSR_press_pgbh06, Vtable.CFSR_sfc_flxf06 – Set different prefixes (such as CFSR, CFSR_SFC) for the 2 ungrib runs, then combine them for metgrid: fg_name = 'CFSR','CFSR_SFC', 37