TSM&O Performance Measures Plan Traffic Incident Management and Program Management Stakeholder Meeting #2 July 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio QuickClear Ohio Fire Chiefs' Association Annual Conference
Advertisements

Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Training Performance Measurements and Reducing Secondary Collisions Tim Lane, Chief of Enforcement Az Department of Transportation.
 Definition  Goals  Elements  Roles and Responsibilities  Accomplishments.
Ohio QuickClear TIM Training subtitle. QuickClear Committee AAA Ohio Buckeye State Sheriff’s Association Ohio Association of Chiefs of Police Ohio Department.
Use of Traffic Incident Management in Intelligent Traffic Systems Mark Meints Emergency Program Specialist Nebraska Department of Roads.
Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Mark Meints NDOR Emergency Program Specialist.
BIO Az DPS Assignments Masters from Northern Arizona University
Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project Guidance on Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies 31.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP #08-56 Project Management and Procurement Assistance Consultant for an Intelligent Transit System Solution (I.T.S.S.) October.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
Lawrence Regional ITS Architecture Update. Today’s Agenda What is ITS? Review 2007 ITS Plans Review the proposed work plan Define project goals and objectives.
MAINTENANCE & TRAFFIC OPERATION INCIDENT MANAGEMENT.
Lesson 2 N ATIONAL T RAFFIC I NCIDENT M ANAGEMENT (TIM) R ESPONDER T RAINING P ROGRAM LAW ENFORCEMENT | FIRE | EMS | TRANSPORTATION TOWING & RECOVERY |
2014 4th Quarter November 5, Agenda Welcome / Introductions TNDOT TIM & TMC initiatives update KSP Post 3: Crash scene evidence preservation District.
MODULE 2 ROLES AND PROCEDURES
Transpo 2012 The Future of Traffic Incident Management, October 30, 2012 Javier Rodriguez, P.E., ITS Operations Engineer Joe Snyder, TMC Manager FDOT District.
Traffic Incident Management Focus State Initiative: Program-Level Performance Measurement Workshops Talking Operations Webcast February 22, 2006.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Prepared by the TIME Task Force Operations Committee 1 T.I.M. TEAMS T.I.M. TEAMS TIM Traffic Incident Management Team.
Minnesota I-394 ICM Corridor. What is Integrated Corridor Management? Independent Network of Transportation Systems –Freeways, including managed lanes.
Benefit-Cost Analysis of the SMART SunGuide Operations in Fort Lauderdale, Florida June 2006 Steve Corbin District ITS Operations Manager FDOT District.
May 16, 2007Change Management Board Meeting1 Local: Toll-Free: Ext
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Improving Safety For Incident Responders Illinois Department of Transportation Update: June 2010 MODULE 4 MODULE.
MODULE 4 Traffic Incident Management and The Road Ranger/TMC Operator
Getting Results from Regional Traffic Incident Management Teams Southwest Florida T I M Teams Collier - Lee - Charlotte and Sarasota - Manatee.
GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF TIM PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT Kelley Klaver Pecheux, PhD U.S. Department of Transportation T3 Webinar Program December 16,
Florida Traffic Incident Management Performance Measures Paul Clark – Florida DOT Traffic Incident Management and Road Ranger Program Manager.
Regional Concept of Transportation Operations: The Hampton Roads Experience Presented by: Camelia Ravanbakht, PhD Talking Technology & Transportation (T3)
Technology and Resources In “Quick Clearance” Incident Management.
Traffic Incident Management Performance Measurement The Focus States Initiative: On the Road to Success.
1 NCHRP Guidance on Quantifying Benefits of TIM Strategies – Quarterly Progress Review WebEx Bill Legg, Washington State Intelligent Transportation.
NC State Highway Patrol (SHP) In Highway Scene Management.
Sinclair Community College Dayton, Ohio October 9, 2015.
Improving Communication and Coordination in Highway Work Zones Kimberly Peters Incident Management Program Director, INDOT Event Date.
Real-Time Information and Response Jon Nelson, P.E. MoDOT.
TSM&O Performance Measures Plan Project Management Team Meeting #1 February 2016.
TSM&O Performance Measures Plan System Management Stakeholder Meeting #2 June 2016.
TSM&O Performance Measures Plan Steering Committee Meeting #2 August 2016.
FDOT D5 – Integrated Corridor Management Program
2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
Smart Phone App for Road Rangers
Missouri Traffic Safety and Blueprint Conference October 19, 2016
Project Board Meeting.
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Program Plan Development Roundtable December 13, 2016.
Performance Measures Plan
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
RAD-IT Architecture Software Training
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation
Every day counts 4 changing the culture of law enforcement
[Project Name] STEERING COMMITTEE UPDATE [Date]
Focus State Initiative: TIM Performance Measures
Carrier Qualifications & On-Boarding
Building Emergency Evacuation Plan (BEEP) Training for Building Emergency Coordinators and Alternates.
Introduction A variety of situations may create the need to evacuate a University building including fires, natural disasters, and alarm activations.
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Employee engagement Close out presentation
INCIDENT ANALYSIS USING PROBE DATA
We Need Your Feedback Please complete your learning evaluations
“All Hands” Meeting Institutional Self-Evaluation Report (ISER)
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
PSI National Dialogue on Medical Sharps
Building Emergency Evacuation Plan (BEEP) Training for Building Emergency Coordinators and Alternates.
Module 2: TSMO Strategies
Introduction A variety of situations may create the need to evacuate a University building including fires, natural disasters, and alarm activations.
Traffic Incident Management and Traveler Information
Second U.S. Roadway Safety Data Capabilities Assessment
August 27, 2014 Planning for Systems Management and Operations in the Phoenix Metropolitan Region FHWA Webinar June 16, 2016 Thank you Tamara and thank.
Presentation transcript:

TSM&O Performance Measures Plan Traffic Incident Management and Program Management Stakeholder Meeting #2 July 2016

2 Agenda Welcome Back & Meeting Objectives Meeting #1 Recap Draft Performance Measures & Implementation Group Discussion Wrap-Up

Meeting Objectives Recap Meeting #1 Confirm TSMO metrics Discuss Implementation  Useful to Your Job? Identify outstanding items to address in plan 3

Meeting #1 Recap 4

5 Dispatch Dispatch Time T3 – T1 Time between the first recordable awareness of the incident by a responsible agency and the time the agencies resources are dispatched. Adapted from Figure 4: On-Scene Time

TIM – National Metrics Identified 4 National TIM Metrics – 2006 FHWA Focus State Initiative & 2011 NCHRP 20-24(37)D – Roadway Clearance Time (RCT) First report to restoration of all traffic lanes – Incident Clearance Time (ICT) First report to last responder departure from scene – Secondary Crashes Either direction, cont. by primary crash – Arrival Time (2011) First report to first assets on-scene 6 Source: Source:

TOC Group Discussion - Meeting #1 7 Work load – How do you quantify “busy”? – How do you project staffing needs? – Scheduling Quality assurance – SOG compliance Assets – What is the work load priority and “injured reserve” list? – Location and status

TOC Group Discussion - Meeting #1 Work LoadQuality AssuranceAssets Weather/Special eventsImpact within 10 minutes by incident typeWorkload priority report Day of week Notification/page withing specified time limit by incident type Downtime by device and device priority HolidayKey event timelinePortable device locations Phone calls/radio transmissionsUpdates from other agenciesTraffic signal status (recall) Incident volume by TOD/DOW Timer notifications and usage rates (by call type) Equipment on "injured reserve" list Actions by TOD/DOW (all systems, not just TOC) Time between construction project status updates Repeat service request on same device Filter by weather event characteristics (ex. Duration, severity) Traveler info updates by incident type and severity Workload activity threshold triggerDevice activation Statewide staffing needs projectionIncidents without notifications Maintenance crew schedulesExternally-generated incidents without action Key construction project milestones and schedulesTime in pending status Overload notifications by TOC White Board Discussion 8

9 Group Discussion/Feedback Is the measure clear & understandable? Does ODOT have the needed data? How will the perf. meas. be actionable? Are perf. meas. missing from the list? Implementation? How would you prioritize them?

OR

Traffic Incident Management 11

12

Current Reports Event-scale 13

Current Reports 14 Unit-scale District-scale State-scale

Metric Category: Incident Timeline 15 Proposed Metrics From TIM Strategic PlanImportance Data easily available? (data sources) detection timeyeslow NO (OnStar) verification timeyeshigh YES (CCTV, CAD) dispatch time (shown in TOC metrics as well) yeshigh YES (CAD, 911) response time (various TIM disciplines) yesmedium-high YES (ODOT and OSP data) roadway clearance timeyeshigh YES (incident report) incident clearance timeyeshigh PARTIAL (incident report)

Current Statewide Roadway Clearance Report for Lane Blocking Crashes on OSP Patrolled Routes 16

17

18

Refining the Roadway Clearance Measure Urban (OSP is not primary coverage/inside city limits) vs. Rural (OSP is primary coverage/outside city limits) Incident classification – Fatal – Intermediate Injury, HazMat, Motor Carrier – Minor All others Future: By Resource Proximity – County / Fire District 19

Draft Refined Roadway Clearance Analysis 20 MUTCD Temp Traffic Control (6I.01) Major = 2+ hours Intermediate = 30 min. – 2 hrs. Minor = >30 min.

21

22

23

Metric Category: 2 nd Order Incident Metrics 24 Proposed Metrics From TIM Strategic PlanImportance Data easily available? (data sources) roadway closure durationyeshigh YES (incident report) % of crash incidents meeting goal for roadway clearance time nohigh YES (incident report) roadway clearance time mediannohigh YES (incident report)

Metric Category: Incident Status – Tow Related 25 Proposed Metrics From TIM Strategic PlanImportance Data easily available? (data sources) tow arrival timenohighNO time tow was callednohighNO length of time to complete tow tasks nohighNO % of incidents where tow companies arrive without correct equipment yeslowNO

Incident TIM staffing/resource attributes 911-ODOT Dispatch Integration (OIS) to help with event reconciliation (TOCS v. Crash Analysis Unit). 26 Proposed Metrics From TIM Strategic PlanImportance Data easily available? (data sources) locationnomedium YES (incident report) incident densitynomedium YES (incident report) incident typenomedium YES (incident report)

27

WAZE and HERE Data as Secondary Crash Tools 28

ADOT Secondary Crash Example Source: 29

TraCS Example from FDOT 30 Same software used by ADOT and others Source: Guidance for Implementation of Traffic Incident Management Performance Measurement Website (

Metric Category: Secondary Crashes 31 Proposed Metrics From TIM Strategic PlanImportance Data easily available? (data sources) secondary crash = within the queue of the existing incident yeshigh NO (only in text) Ratio of secondary crashes to primary crashes nolow NO (only in text)

Metric Category: Incident Responder Risk 32 Proposed Metrics From TIM Strategic PlanImportance Data easily available? (data source) average time on scene per incident type nohigh PARTIAL (ODOT and OSP data) incident responder struck-bys yesmedium-highNO incident responder fatalities yesmedium-highNO On-Scene Time

Metric Category: Staff Training 33 Proposed Metrics From TIM Strategic PlanImportance Data easily available? (data source) number of responders trained in National TIM training classes yeshighNO number of responders trained in specific discipline nohighNO

TOC Operations 34

Current Reports Actions/dispatcher 35

Metric Category: Efficiency/Scheduling of Staff Time 36 Proposed MetricsImportance Data easily available? (data source) TOC total workload by hour of day and day of week high PARTIAL (TOCS, Pantel) Employee total workload by hour of day and day of week or month (seasonality) high PARTIAL (TOCS, Pantel)

Metric Category: Dispatch time ODOT-only resources vs. all events (911 Dispatch) 37 Proposed MetricsImportance Data easily available? (data source) dispatch timehigh YES (TOCS)

Current Reports 38

Current Reports 39

Metric Category: SOG Compliance/QA 40 Proposed MetricsImportance Data easily available? (data source) lane blocking crashes with no ATISmedium YES (TOCS) average time to notificationmedium YES (TOCS) ATIS posting in less than 10 minutesmedium YES (TOCS) events with no notificationmedium YES (TOCS) timer usage by dispatcher (timeline reporting)medium PARTIAL (TOCS) traveler info updatesmedium-high YES (TOCS)

41 Group Discussion/Feedback Is the measure clear & understandable? Does ODOT have the needed data? How will the perf. meas. be actionable? Are perf. meas. missing from the list? Implementation? How would you prioritize them?

Meeting #1 / #2 Action Items Send ideas or comments on PMs to Chris Use the forum tab on the project website for discussions – TIM – Report back to respective groups; gather feedback – InView / perf. meas. Feedback Program Management – ODOT to continue to share new/custom reports with other districts 42

TSMO Performance Measures Plan Wrap Up Recap Discussion – Consensus items – Please contact Chris with any additional thoughts/questions/comments that come up 43

Thank you. 44

Lit Review Recommendations Outcomes drive perf. meas. Keep it simple Useful for wide audiences Well-defined metrics Data quality Data fusion and automation 45

Metric Statistical Considerations Mean v. Median  distinguish outliers Percentile Results – 5 th v. 95 th Standard Deviation – range of results Sample Size  normalize data sets Data bias 46

Draft Refined Roadway Clearance Analysis 47

Performance Measure Development Decision matrix 48

Decision Matrix Columns 49 Metric category Proposed metric Existing? Data source requirements Issues addressed, sensitivity trying to capture Importance Data easily available? TIM also includes: – From TIM Strategic Plan – Strategic Plan Timeframe

Metric Category: TIM/Traveler Info 50 Proposed MetricsImportance Data easily available? (data source) traveler info updatesmedium-high YES (TOCS)

Mock Asset Management Summary Report Consensus on… – Metrics? – Prioritization? – Implementation? – Desired Outcomes? – Will you use it? 51