15283 New Sensitive and Specific Rapid HSV-2 Antibody Test Objective To describe the performance and uses of a new HSV-2 specific serological rapid test,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Combined Rapid and HIV RNA Testing in a Public STD Clinic: San Francisco, Jeffrey D. Klausner, Susan Philip, Katherine Ahrens, Giuliano Nieri,
Advertisements

The Psychosocial Impact of Testing Individuals with No Prior History of Genital Herpes for Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 KR Turner, T Miyai, CK Kent, JD.
Post Marketing Surveillance of Oraquick Rapid HIV Testing Laura Wesolowski, PhD Gale R Burstein, MD, MPH Julia Zhu, MS Steven Ethridge, MT Division of.
Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Syphilis A Preliminary Review of the U. S
Human Papillomavirus 16: Prevalence, Incidence, and Behavioral Risk Factors Deborah L. Thompson, MD, MSPH March 10, 2004.
Rapid HIV Testing and Its Role in Advancing HIV Prevention: 2004 Update Bernard M. Branson, M.D. Chief, Lab Determinants and Diagnostics Section Centers.
Performance of Bio-Rad Genetic Systems HIV-1/HIV-2 Plus O EIA Followed by Multispot or OraQuick Advance in a Dual Immunoassay HIV Testing Strategy Laura.
Results of a Pilot Point-of-Care (POC) HIV Testing Program using INSTI HIV in an Urban Sexual Health Clinic in Canada Presentation to: 2007 HIV Diagnostics.
Evaluation of HIV Rapid Diagnostic Devices National STD Prevention Conference San Diego, CA 6 March 2002 Jennifer A. Malia, MS, MT WRAIR.
Laboratory Diagnosis of HSV Infection Peter Leone, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of North Carolina.
OnSite HBsAg /HCV Ab Rapid Test
Linked Testing Using Rapid HIV Tests for Antenatal Care Sentinel Surveillance in Resource-Limited Settings Evidence from Angola’s Experience in 2009 James.
OnSite HAV IgM Rapid Test Upgraded to Revision H for Better Sensitivity CTK-MK-PPT-R0090 Rev 1.0.
OnSite Rubella IgG/IgM Rapid Test Novel Unique & Only Semi-Quantitative 4-Line Rapid Test.
HIV Screening and Women’s Health Health Care Education & Training, Inc. Originally developed by: Section 5: Test Options.
Rapid HIV Testing: 2003 Update Bernard M. Branson, M.D. Chief, Lab Determinants and Diagnostics Section Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Implementing Rapid HIV Testing in the United States Bernard M. Branson, M.D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Overview and Background.
CLINICAL TRIAL OF THE HEMA-STRIP HIV RAPID TEST USING FINGERSTICK BLOOD, WHOLE BLOOD, PLASMA, AND SERUM Niel T. Constantine 1, Dan Bigg 2, Daniel Cohen.
Performance of rapid HIV tests used singly and in combination: Moving toward a point of care diagnosis. Kevin Delaney, MPH HIV Diagnostics: New Developments.
Figure 1 A Case Series of Discordant Laboratory Results with Statewide Rapid HIV Testing in New Jersey Eugene G Martin, PhD 1, Gratian Salaru, MD 1, Sindy.
An Approach for a Rapid HIV Antibody Home-Use Oral Fluid Test 1 An Approach for a Rapid HIV Antibody Home-Use Oral Fluid Test OraSure Technologies, Inc.
Performance Characteristics of the FARRZYME™ High Avidity Anti-dsDNA IgG Antibody ELISA Brenda B. Suh-Lailam 1, Tyson R. Chiaro 1, K. Wayne Davis 1, Andrew.
RESULTS Rapid testing started at one publicly funded counseling and testing site in New Jersey on November 1, Through December 31, 2004, 48 sites.
Panbio Dengue ELISAs.
Herpes viruses. Adenoviruses. Biological properties, pathogenecity for humans. Laboratory diagnostics, prophylaxis and therapy of diseases. Vinnitsa National.
Trinity Biotech Fingerstick whole blood sample for HIV OTC test Presented by; Fiona Campbell.
Update on FDA Workshop on Immune Globulins for Primary Immune Deficiency Diseases: Antibody Specificity, Potency and Testing Blood Products Advisory Committee.
Evaluation of the Presage™ ST2 ELISA Jun Lu 1, David G. Grenache 1,2 1 ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT 2 Department.
Panbio Dengue Duo Cassette
Michelle P. Lewis Patent License Manager Rapid Detection of the Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) in Saliva Samples Johnson Space Center Advanced.
CLIA Waiver for the OraQuick ® Rapid HIV-1 Antibody Test Elliot P. Cowan, Ph.D. Senior Regulatory Scientist Office of Blood Research and Review Center.
CBER Update on status of West Nile virus test, lot release and validation panel development Indira Hewlett, Ph.D CBER/FDA Blood Products Advisory Committee.
ICASA 2011 – Addis Ababa 1 Olayemi Matthew, MPH Institute of Human Virology Nigeria (IHVN) High HSV-2 prevalence among pregnant women in Nigeria and its.
1 Update on Diagnostic Tests For Genital Herpes 14 Case Studies National STD Prevention Conference Chicago, IL March 12, 2008 Peter Leone MD, Chapel Hill,
DENGUE CASE INVESTIGATION REPORT CDC Dengue Branch and Puerto Rico Department of Health 1324 Calle Cañada, San Juan, P. R Tel. (787) ,
Diagnostic Testing for Zika Virus Frederick S. Nolte, PhD, D(ABMM), F(AAM) Professor and Vice-Chair for Laboratory Medicine Department of Pathology and.
Introduction to Quality Assurance. Quality assurance vs. Quality control.
Dynex M² Multiplexed Automated Platform
1University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
TUPEB018 Field evaluation of rapid HIV serologic tests for screening HIV-1/2 infection using serum samples from Rakai Cohort, Uganda. S.C. Kagulire, P.D.
PREMARKET EVALUATION OF THE BD MAXTM CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE PCE ASSAY
J. Matthew Brennan, MD, MPH Duke University School of Medicine
Immunochromatography
Emilia H. Koumans, Fujie Xu, Maya Sternberg, Lauri E. Markowitz
Appraising a diagnostic test study using a critical appraisal checklist Mahilum-Tapay L, et al. New point of care Chlamydia Rapid Test – bridging the gap.
2011 American Society for Microbiology Meeting
ASM 2017 Microbe Annual Meeting Sunday-507
California Clinical Laboratory Association
Sarah Hawkes, Paz Bailey G, Sternberg M, Lewis DA and Puren A
Rapid Diagnosis of Dengue virus
Laboratory Assays for Epstein-Barr Virus-Related Disease
Immunochromatography
Appraising a diagnostic test study using a critical appraisal checklist Mahilum-Tapay L, et al. New point of care Chlamydia Rapid Test – bridging the gap.
Content and Labeling of Tests Marketed as Clinical “Whole-Exome Sequencing” Perspectives from a cancer genetics clinician and clinical lab director Allen.
San Francisco Department of Public Health
Figure Seropositivity for IgG against HSV-1, CMV, and EBV
Infectious Disease Following Kidney Transplant: Core Curriculum 2010
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Laboratory Assays for Epstein-Barr Virus-Related Disease
ImmunoWELL Zika Virus Serology.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Quality Control Barbara Weberman MT(ASCP)
AIDS in the United States
Figure. Groups 1–3, patients tested, and test results (viral PCR and antibodies)‏ Groups 1–3, patients tested, and test results (viral PCR and antibodies)
1985: First HIV-1 ELISA Approved by FDA
A CASE SERIES OF DISCORDANT LABORATORY RESULTS WITH RAPID HIV TESTING
Fertility and Sterility
Varicella Vaccine Efficacy Estimates
Regulatory-Industry Statistics Workshop , 2019
Presentation transcript:

15283 New Sensitive and Specific Rapid HSV-2 Antibody Test Objective To describe the performance and uses of a new HSV-2 specific serological rapid test, HerpeSelect® Express™, which received FDA clearance for use in moderately complex point of care sites, and has been submitted for CLIA waived status. Methods A total of 976 (575 from sexually active adults, 401 from pregnant women) samples were tested with the HerpeSelect® Express™ IgG test. Results were compared to the HerpeSelect® 2 ELISA IgG and HerpeSelect®1 and 2 Immunoblot IgG. In addition, sera positive for other viruses were used to determine cross-reactivity. The HerpeSelect Express IgG test was performed by adding sample and a buffer to the device per the package insert. The test and control lines form within 15 minutes and the device is read. The test is considered valid if a control line appears. Results The sensitivity of HerpeSelect Express IgG test compared with the HerpeSelect 2 ELISA was 97.5% (237/243) and the specificity was 98.5% (322/327) among the sexually active adult population with capillary whole blood samples. The sensitivity of HerpeSelect Express IgG test compared with the HerpeSelect 2 ELISA was 94.2% (114/121) and the specificity was 96.4% (266/276) among the pregnant women population with capillary whole blood samples. Cross-reactivity was not observed with HSV-1 IgG positive serum samples. Concordance of results between whole blood and serum was 99%. Reproducibility between lots, operators, and sites was excellent. Overall cross-reactivity was 4.2% (9/213). Conclusion The HerpeSelect Express IgG test demonstrates excellent sensitivity, specificity and concordance compared to HerpeSelect 2 ELISA IgG and HerpeSelect 1 and 2 Immunoblot IgG. Implications This HerpeSelect Express IgG test is a FDA-cleared point-of-care test that performs comparably to HerpeSelect 2 ELISA  Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is a common human pathogen that causes a variety of clinical manifestations, and is the most common cause of genital herpes.  Identification of HSV-2 antibodies can be important for patient counseling and education.  HerpeSelect Express is a glycoprotein-G2 based test and measures HSV-2 specific antibodies.  HerpeSelect Express IgG test is FDA cleared, it is currently CLIA moderately complex, and CLIA waiver is being sought. Abstract  A total of 575 sexually active adults and 401 pregnant women were prospectively tested for HSV-2 using capillary whole blood, venous blood and serum samples.  To evaluate the HerpeSelect Express IgG test’s cross-reactivity, 213 specimens that were HSV-2 negative by HerpeSelect ELISA, and IgG positive for at least one virus (HSV-1, rubella, varicella zoster virus, Epstein Barr virus, or cytomegalovirus) OR positive for rheumatoid factor or anti-nuclear antibody.  Focus Diagnostics tested a CDC panel composed of 100 samples (65 HSV-2 positive and 35 negative samples).  Five clinical sites (Focus, a clinical laboratory, a public health clinic, a university student health clinic, and a STD clinic) assessed inter/intra-operator reproducibility and inter/intra-site reproducibility. Each site tested ten samples in singlicate on three different days.  HerpeSelect Express device is run as follows: After addition of sample and buffer, the antibody-gold conjugate and sample migrate across the test strip. HSV-2 antibodies (if present) and gold conjugate sequentially contact the test and controls lines and cause specific colored lines to form within 15 minutes. Materials and Methods Figure 2: Assay cartridge. Cross-sectional view of the test cartridge. Figure 1: Diagram of the mechanism of the assay. Figure 3: A. Finger Stick, B. Sample Being Added to Device, C. Buffer Being Added to Device, D. HSV-2 Negative Result. E. HSV-2 Positive Result. ABCDE HerpeSelect® Express™ Performance vs. HerpeSelect® 2 ELISA IgG HerpeSelect® Express™ Performance vs. HerpeSelect® 2 Immunoblot IgG PopulationSample TypeSensitivitySpecificitySensitivitySpecificity Sexually Active Adults (n = 575) 1 Capillary Whole Blood 97.5%98.5%93.8%91.8% Venous Whole Blood 97.1%98.8%93.4%92.4% Serum97.1%98.8%92.9%91.8% Pregnant Women (n = 401) 2 Capillary Whole Blood 94.2%96.4%94.9%95.4% Venous Whole Blood 92.6%97.8%93.2%97.2% Serum91.7%96.7%92.3%96.1% Table 1: Summary of the sensitivity and specificity for the HerpeSelect Express with capillary whole blood, venous blood and serum samples versus HSV-2 ELISA and HSV-1/2 Immunoblot. CDC HSV-2n HerpeSelect® Express™ % Agreement PositiveNegativeInvalid Positive % Negative % Table 2: Agreement with CDC Panel (n=100) Cross-Reactantn HerpeSelect® Express™ PositiveNegativeInvalid% Cross-Reactivity HSV-1 IgG % Rubella % VZV IgG % EBV IgG % CMV IgG % RF % ANA % Combined Cross-Reactants % Table 4: Cross-reactivity Testing (n=213) Inter-Lot Reproducibility< 10% Inter-Operator and Inter-Site Reproducibility≤ 65.0% Intra-Operator Reproducibility≤ 35.1% Intra-Site Reproducibility≤ 23.0% Table 3: Reproducibility Conclusions  HerpeSelect Express IgG rapid test demonstrated excellent sensitivity (97.5%) and specificity (98.5%) compared with HerpeSelect 2 ELISA IgG and HerpeSelect 1 and 2 Immunoblot IgG.  Overall cross-reactivity was 4.2%  HerpeSelect Express is a point-of-care test with performance comparable to HerpeSelect 2 ELISA IgG Background Andrew Hudak 1, Jay M. Lieberman, M.D. 1, and Gary A. Richwald, M.D., MPH 2 Focus Diagnostics, Inc., Cypress, CA 1 / HSV & HPV Support Groups Los Angeles, CA 2 Materials and Methods (cont) Results Andrew Hudak, Scientist Research and Development Focus Diagnostics, Inc Corporate Avenue Cypress, CA Tel x2728 Fax Results (cont) 1 5 samples were not tested, 1 sample was equivocal on the Immunoblot and was excluded. 2 1 ELISA sample was not tested, 3 samples were equivocal on ELISA. 2 Immunoblot samples were not tested. Note: Sensitivity and Specificity calculations include samples that tested invalid on HerpeSelect Express Acknowledgement: Erik Zendejas, MD, MPH, Biostatistician, Focus Diagnostics, Inc. Constance Bridges, MBA, RAC, ASQ-CBA, Director of Regulatory Affairs, Focus Diagnostics, Inc. The results are presented as a means to convey further information on the performance of this assay with a masked characterized serum panel and do not imply endorsement by CDC.