Mount Olive Township Public Schools PARCC Results

PARCC Results by Proficiency Level 2015 to 2016 – All Tests

PARCC Results by Proficient Score 2015 to 2016 – All Tests

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 3 rd Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) ELA 43.5% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 72.0% +65% better 72% 81.6 TR +87.5% 73.3 MV +68.5% 67.5 CMS +55.1% 67.2 SS +54.4%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 3 rd Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) MATH 51.7% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 69.8% +35% better 69.8% 79.7 TR +54.1% 76.7 MV +48.3% 65.3 CMS +26.3% 59.0 SS +14.1%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 4th Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) ELA 53.5% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 78% +45.7% better 78% 87.5 TR +63.5% 80.6 SS +50.6% 74.8 CMS +39.8% 71.2 MV +33.0%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 4th Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) Math 46.6% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 66.2% +42.% better 66.2% 79.0 SS +69.5% 75.3 TR +61.5% 60.6 CMS +30.0% 54.8 MV +17.5%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 5th Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) ELA 53.3% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 77.8% +45.9% better 77.8% 85.3 TR +60.0% 84.8 SS +59.0% 73.9 MV +38.6% 72.7 CMS +36.3%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 5th Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) MATH 47.2% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 66% +39.8% better 78.3 TR +65.8% 77.3 SS +63.7% 59.1 MV +25.2% 57.9 CMS +22.6% 66%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 6th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better ) 52.3% 6th Grade MATH Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 76.3% +45.8% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 42.9% Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 62.4% Mount Olive vs. State +45.4%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 7th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 56.3% 7th Grade MATH Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 80.1% +42.2% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 38.7% Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 58.6% Mount Olive vs. State +51.4%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 8th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 55.2% 8th Grade MATH* Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 83.1% +50.5% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 24.9% Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 26.3% Mount Olive vs. State +5.0% 8th Grade Algebra I 41.2% State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 90.5% Mount Olive vs. State %

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 9th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 49.0% 9th Grade Algebra I* Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 78.8% +60.8% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 41.2% Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 38.4% Mount Olive vs. State -6.7%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 10th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 44.4% 10th Grade Algebra II Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 73.2% +64.8% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 48.1% Mount Olive vs. State +16.7% 41.2%

2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 11th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 41.0% 11th Grade Geometry Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 78.9% +92.4% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 42.1% Mount Olive vs. State +55.0% 27.0%

2013 Grade 3 NJASK to 2016 Grade 3 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 66.4% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 85.0% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 13.3% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 37.5% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 77.7% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 88.0% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 28.0% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 35.0% 21.7 Point Increase 9.5 Point Increase

2013 Grade 4 NJASK to 2016 Grade 4 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 59.4% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 68.7% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 5.6% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 45.8% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 78.3% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 82.7% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 15.7% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 42.1% 36.5 Point Increase 20.1 Point Increase

2013 Grade 5 NJASK to 2016 Grade 5 PARCC Comparison NJASK NJ Proficient or Better 61.2% NJASK Mount Olive Proficient or Better 86.0% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 10.8% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 46.0% ELA Math NJASK NJ Proficient or Better 79.9% NJASK Mount Olive Proficient or Better 88.5% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 40.5% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 39.8% 29.0 Point Increase 5.5 Point Increase

2013 Grade 6 NJASK to 2016 Grade 6 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 66.1% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 84.8% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 13.3% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 40.2% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 78.8% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 89.3% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 28.3% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 45.5% 32.2 Point Increase 11.9 Point Increase

2013 Grade 7 NJASK to 2016 Grade 7 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 65.2% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 87.9% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 33.3% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 42.3% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 63.6% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 84.8% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 34.8% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 51.4% 18.1 Point Increase 7.5 Point Increase

2013 Grade 8 NJASK to 2016 Grade 8 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 81.9% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 88.1% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 22.4% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 50.5% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 69.3% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 84.8% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 7.6% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 5.6% 16.8 Point Decrease 42.9 Point Increase

2013 HSPA to 2016 PARCC Comparison HSPA - NJ Proficient or Better 91.6% HSPA - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 98.2% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 17.0% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 92.4% ELA – Grade 11 Math HSPA - NJ Proficient or Better 79.6% HSPA - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 93.1% HSPA Percent Increase over NJ 7.2% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ (Geometry) 55.9% 38.9 Point Increase 85.2 Point Increase

Change in Average Proficiency 2013 NJASK – 2016 PARCC per Test

English Language Arts/Literacy 2013 NJASK Mount Olive State of NJ Percent Difference 2016 PARCC Mount Olive State of NJ Percent Difference Point change over State - NJASK to PARCC 2013 NJASK % 2016 PARCC ELA % NJASK % 2016 PARCC ELA % NJASK % 2016 PARCC ELA % NJASK % 2016 PARCC ELA % NJASK % 2016 PARCC ELA % NJASK % 2016 PARCC ELA % HSPA % 2016 PARCC ELA %85.2

Mathematics Mount Olive State of NJ Percent Difference 2016 PARCC Mount Olive State of NJ Percent Difference Point change over State - NJASK to PARCC 2013 NJASK % 2016 PARCC MATH % NJASK % 2016 PARCC MATH % NJASK % 2016 PARCC MATH % NJASK % 2016 PARCC MATH % NJASK % 2016 PARCC MATH % NJASK % 2016 PARCC MATH % HSPA % 2016 PARCC GEOMETRY %39.0

PARCC Results by Proficiency Level 2015 to 2016 – All Tests

PARCC Results by Proficient Score 2015 to 2016 – All Tests

Grade 3 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 4 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 5 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 8 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 9 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 10 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 11 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 3 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 4 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 5 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 6 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 7 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Grade 8 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Algebra I Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Algebra II Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

Geometry Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

2016 Grade 3 ELA Results by School

2016 Grade 3 Math Results by School

2016 Grade 5 ELA Results by School

2016 Grade 4 Math Results by School

2016 Grade 5 ELA Results by School

2016 Grade 5 Math Results by School

Grade 3 ELA Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

Grade 3 Math Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

Grade 4 ELA Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

Grade 4 Math Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

Grade 5 ELA Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

Grade 5 Math Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

COHORT COMPARISON Cohort comparisons measure the same groups of students from one year to the next; last year’s 3 rd graders as this year’s 4 th graders. While gains can be seen in terms of percentage growth, such comparisons don’t control for test results over differing material.

COHORT COMPARISON PARCC 2016 % Prof2015 % Prof% increase CMS Grade 3 ELA Literacy67.5% Grade 4 ELA Literacy74.8%59.8%25.1% Grade 5 ELA Literacy72.7%50.0%45.4% Grade 3 Math65.3% Grade 4 Math60.6%42.9%41.3% Grade 5 Math57.9%34.5%67.8% MV Grade 3 ELA Literacy73.2% Grade 4 ELA Literacy71.2%62.5%13.9% Grade 5 ELA Literacy73.9%64.6%14.4% Grade 3 Math76.7% Grade 4 Math54.8%55.4%-1.1% Grade 5 Math59.1%59.8%-1.2%

COHORT COMPARISON PARCC 2016 % Prof2015 % Prof% increase TR Grade 3 ELA Literacy81.6% Grade 4 ELA Literacy87.5%87.1%0.5% Grade 5 ELA Literacy85.3%80.0%6.6% Grade 3 Math79.7% Grade 4 Math75.3%76.4%-1.4% Grade 5 Math78.3%53.8%45.5% SS Grade 3 ELA Literacy67.2% Grade 4 ELA Literacy80.6%74.5%8.2% Grade 5 ELA Literacy84.8%81.0%4.7% Grade 3 Math59.0% Grade 4 Math79.0%69.2%14.2% Grade 5 Math77.3%52.4%47.5%

COHORT COMPARISON PARCC MOMS 2016 % Prof2015 % Prof% increase Grade 6 ELA/Literacy76.30% Grade 7 ELA/Literacy80.10%42.7%87.6% Grade 8 ELA/Literacy83.10%66.0%25.9% Grade 6 Mathematics62.40%NA Grade 7 Mathematics58.60%40.4%45.0% Grade 8 Mathematics26.30%NA Algebra I90.50%NA MOHS Grade 9 ELA/Literacy78.80%NA Grade 10 ELA/Literacy73.20%22.6%223.9% Grade 11 ELA/Literacy78.90%15.1%422.5% Algebra I38.40%NA Algebra II48.10%NA Geometry42.10%NA

2015 Grade 3 ELA to 2016 Grade 4 ELA – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 4 ELA to 2016 Grade 5 ELA – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 5 ELA to 2016 Grade 6 ELA – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 6 ELA to 2016 Grade 7 ELA – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 7 ELA to 2016 Grade 8 ELA – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 8 ELA to 2016 Grade 9 ELA – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 9 ELA to 2016 Grade 10 ELA – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 10 ELA to 2016 Grade 11 ELA – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 3 ELA to 2016 Grade 4 ELA – Cohort Comparison by School

2015 Grade 4 ELA to 2016 Grade 5 ELA – Cohort Comparison by School

2015 Grade 3 Math to 2016 Grade 4 Math – Cohort Comparison by School

2015 Grade 4 Math to 2016 Grade 5 Math – Cohort Comparison by School

2015 Grade 3 Math to 2016 Grade 4 Math – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 4 Math to 2016 Grade 5 Math – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 5 Math to 2016 Grade 6 Math – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 6 Math to 2016 Grade 7 Math – Cohort Comparison

2015 Grade 7 Math to 2016 Grade 8 Math (No Algebra – Cohort Comparison)

2015 Grade 7 Math to 2016 Grade 8 Math (Including Algebra I) – Cohort Comparison

INTERNAL Student Achievement Data Mount Olive Township Public Schools

The Mount Olive schools use the STAR 360 exam to measure English/Language Arts and Math academic gains for students in grades The assessments are designed to identify areas of accomplishment in each students by systematically increasing the difficulty of questions asked for each question a student answers correctly. For each wrong answer, the assessment system adjusts question difficulty a bit lower. The pattern of correct responses are then compared to all others responding to the same examinations nationwide to compute a percentile ranking. The assessment protocol is administered three times throughout the school year; once near the beginning in the year (in early October); once in the middle of the year (January) and once at the end of the year (early June). The Fall results for the STAR 360 follow.

Mean Percentile Rank of Mount Olive students scoring in the top 50% of students nationwide taking the same assessment by school and subject

Mean Percentile Rank of Mount Olive students scoring in the top 50% of students nationwide taking the same assessment by grade and subject

Mount Olive Schools National Ranking by Subject

Mount Olive Elementary School Performances in Reading (PR) by Grade Level

Mount Olive Middle School Performance in Reading (PR) by Grade Level

Mount Olive Elementary School Performances in Math (PR) by Grade Level

Mount Olive Middle School Performance in Math (PR) by Grade Level