Chinese MARC (Taiwan) and its bibliographic database Ching-Chen Anthony Mao (Fu Jen Catholic University) Ching-fen Frances Hsu (National Central Library)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The US RDA Test: Status & Next Steps For the Authority Control Interest Group, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, January 9, 2011 Presented.
Advertisements

Lis512 lecture 4 the MARC format structure, leader, directory.
Representation of the UNIMARC bibliographic data format in Resource Description Framework Gordon Dunsire, Mirna Willer, Predrag Perožić Presented at DC-2013,
Nonprint Materials Cataloging Codes LSC550 Dr. Yan Ma.
Providing Online Access to the HKUST University Archives: EAD to INNOPAC Sintra Tsang and K.T. Lam The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 7th.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
AACR2 Chapter 12 (Not Just Monographs and Serials) and 2002 Amendments Presented by Cheryl Obong and Tschera Connell, ASA Dept., OSU Libraries November.
MARC in 2011 Alan Hopkinson
The Library Cataloging Tradition
Fixed Fields Information Session 29 February 2012 Andrew Gloe Map Acquisitions & Cataloguing Team Australian Collections Management & Preservation Branch.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer Module 1: What RDA is and isn’t [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Metadata: Its Functions in Knowledge Representation for Digital Collections 1 Summary.
October 23, Expanding the Serials Family Continuing resources in the library catalogue.
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.
PCC RDA POST- IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Highlights of the Task Group Report PCC Participants Meeting January 27, 2013.
Homework Full-text article – entire textual contents of article in online format Abstract – brief summary of article Citation – basic information required.
UNIMARC : what next? Alan Hopkinson Chairman Permanent UNIMARC Committee.
Metadata: An Overview Katie Dunn Technology & Metadata Librarian
Updated :02 Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Library XML Name Access Control Repository at the Hong Kong University of Science.
Lis512 lecture 6 the MARC format number and code fields.
Richard Siegersma General Manager Thorpe-Bowker Australian ISBN agency since 1997.
Society of American Archivists Research Forum 18 August 2015 A Deep Dive into the Archival MARC Records in WorldCat (and ArchiveGrid) Jackie Dooley Program.
Organizing Internet Resources OCLC’s Internet Cataloging Project -- funded by the Department of Education -- from October 1, 1994 to March 31, 1996.
LI 804.  What MARC is  How MARC was developed  How MARC is used  The future of MARC  Our evaluation of MARC.
The Library Cataloging Tradition Marty Kurth CS 431 February 9, 2005 [slides stolen from Diane Hillmann]
Cataloging 12.3 to 14.2 Seminar. Cataloging 2 -New check routines -Cataloging authorizations -Other innovations -Fix and expand routines -Floating keyboard.
The British Library and SUNCAT Brenda Young The British Library Bibliographic Development.
National Bibliographies the Chinese Experience Ben Gu ( 顾犇 ), Director Acquisitions & Cataloging Department / Online Library Cataloging Center National.
Highlights from recent MARC changes Sally McCallum Library of Congress.
Focus on MARC 21 Holdings Sally H. McCallum Library of Congress.
Developing Databases and Selecting an Appropriate Library System.
Integrating Resources Cataloging Workshop Instructors Place/Date 1-1.
Demonstration of HKCAN database Outline Database system overview Software characteristics Database status.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Update MARC Change Summary Sally McCallum RDA Update Forum June 23, 2012 Library of Congress.
MARC- Machine Readable Cataloging LI 804 Organization of Information Group Presentation.
Rare Book Study Group Report Group Members: - Sarah Elman, Columbia University - Shuwen Cao, Princeton University CEAL CTP RDA Workshop March 23, 2015.
The physical parts of a computer are called hardware.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
COMMON COMMUNICATION FORMAT (CCF). Dr.S. Surdarshan Rao Professor Dept. of Library & Information Science Osmania University Hyderbad
UNIMARC in Russia RUSMARC as national implementation of UNIMARC 3rd UNIMARC Users Group Meeting, Lyon, France, March 31, 2010 Olga Zhlobinskaya National.
The Catalog of the Future: Integrating Electronic Resources By Dana M. Caudle Cataloging Librarian Auburn University Libraries
Sally McCallum Library of Congress
Jeanne Piascik Principal Cataloger University of Central Florida Technical Services Member Group FLA 2014 Annual Conference.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: The Tools of our Trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC.
Session 2 Tools and Decisions. 2-2 Session 2 1. What tools are available to help you catalog IR’s? 2. What decisions need to be made?
1 Overview of the U.S. RDA Test by Tina Shrader Cataloging Section Head and CONSER Coordinator National Agricultural Library June 28, 2010.
Presenter: Tito Wawire US Embassy, Library of Congress.
Language of Cataloging. What’s wrong with this picture?
An information retrieval system may include 3 categories of information:  Factual  Bibliographical  Institutional  Exchange and sharing of these categories.
Robert Bremer December 2009 Provider-Neutral E-Monographs.
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Integrating Resources An Introduction for IOCC May 16, 2002 Mechael D. Charbonneau.
7th Annual Hong Kong Innovative Users Group Meeting
Cataloging Unique Collections with RDA and Non-MARC Standards
From the old to the new… Towards better resource discoverability
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000
Electronic Integrating Resources
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
MARC: Beyond the Basics 11/24/2018 (C) 2006, Tom Kaun.
PREMIS Tools and Services
MARCXTM: Topic Maps Modeling of MARC Bibliographic Information
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
‘Splitting’ the MUSIC format
Alternate graphic representation 880 field
Presentation transcript:

Chinese MARC (Taiwan) and its bibliographic database Ching-Chen Anthony Mao (Fu Jen Catholic University) Ching-fen Frances Hsu (National Central Library) Taipei, Taiwan World Library and Information Congress: 72nd IFLA General Conference and Council Monday 21 August 2006, 77 SI - UNIMARC

Outline 1. The origin of CMARC 2. State of the Art 2.1 Features of CMARC 2.2 Development of CMARC 2.3 CMARC3 XML schema/DTD 2.4 CMARC3 to MARC21 3. NBINet union catalog 3.1 Issues of Multiple MARC format 3.2 Issues of Multiple internal codes 4. Conclusion

1. The origin of CMARC ● Library Automation Planning Committee (LAPC), 1980 ● to develop the machine-readable format as the standard for cataloging Chinese publications. ● The Chinese MARC Working Group (CMWG). The decision was made to take UNIMARC as the model for designing the CMARC and USMARC as a major reference.

1. The origin of CMARC(cont.) ● 1981, Chinese MARC for Books. ● 1982, the First Edition of Chinese MARC Format (CMARC) was published with elements to process serials, maps, music and audio-visual materials in additional to monographs. ● 1984, Second Edition of CMARC was published. Fields dedicated to Chinese rare books and rubbings were added. ● 1989, Third Edition of CMARC was published. ● 1997, Fourth Edition was published. ● 2001, 2002

2. State of the Art 2.1 Features of CMARC The features of CMARC are: ● Developed according to the characteristics of Chinese materials ● Applicable to materials in various languages ● Applicable to various types of materials ● Implemented with ISO 2709/CNS for bibliographic information interchange on magnetic tape

2.1 Features of CMARC(cont.) ● Implemented with Chinese Cataloging Rules[Taiwan] for Chinese materials and AACR2 for western materials ● Implemented with Chinese Character Code for Information Interchange (CCCII) or Big5 for Chinese data ● Conforms with international standards for geographic areas codes, time period codes, country codes, language codes, cartographic materials codes ● Designs Concise CMARC for small libraries

data fields of CMARC ● Field 100 General Processing Data $a/26-29 Character Sets use code "90" for CCCII, "91" for Big5, "92" for CNS-11643, "93" for GB ● Field 128 Coded Data Field: Music Performances and Scores at subfield $a, use additional codes from "ya" to "yz", etc. for Chinese music performances; ● Field 129 Coded Data Field: Rubbings $a/0-6 include codes for Type of Rubbings...

2.2 Development of CMARC ● The task of modifying CMARC will continue to be made under the principles of maintaining structural integrity and embedding elements from current development of both UNIMARC and MARC21. ● However, CMARC replaces the Linking Entry Block (4XX) with equivalent Related Title Block (5XX)

2.3 CMARC3 XML schema/DTD ● 2004, Dr. Shien-Chiang Yu published MARC XML Schema/DTD report [in Chinese] ● Which is developed to convert ISO2709/CNS files to and from XML documents based on XML Schema.

2.4 CMARC3 to MARC21 In order to avoid data loss during MARC conversion, many libraries use CMARC format for Chinese materials and USMARC/MARC 21 for materials in western languages. ● 1993, converting bibliographic records in CMARC to USMARC, and from USMARC to CMARC. ● 2006, conversion specifications from CMARC to MARC21

3. NBINet union catalog

3.1 Issues of Multiple MARC format

3.2 Issues of Multiple internal codes

4. Conclusion