Current Status of Main Interferometer Design Yoichi Aso 2011/2/4, LCGT f2f Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

Stefan Hild, M.Mantovani, A.Perreca and A. Freise Advanced Virgo meeting, August 2008 Automated simulations: choosing modulation frequencies à la Advanced.
Dual Recycling for GEO 600 Andreas Freise, Hartmut Grote Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Universität Hannover Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik.
Polarization Techniques for Interferometer Control Peter Beyersdorf National Astronomical Observatory of Japan LSC March 2002 Advanced Configurations LIGO-G Z.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Optical Layout Cavity Lengths Input Mode Cleaner (IMC) »IMC FSR = ~9 MHz »Length = ~16.6 m = ~HAM1 to HAM3 separation.
LIGO- G05XXXX-00-R 40m meeting, May Experimental update from the 40m team 40m TAC meeting May 13, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech and the 40m collaboration.
BS and Mirrors for the LCGT Norikatsu Mio, PSC Univ. of Tokyo Eiichi Hirose, ICRR Univ. of Tokyo December 13, 2011 CSIRO, Lindfield Australia.
Towards dual recycling with the aid of time and frequency domain simulations M. Malec for the GEO 600 team Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Albert-Einstein-Institut.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
LIGO-G R Aspen Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype Seiji Kawamura 2004 Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves Gravitational.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Degeneracy for power-recycling and signal recycling cavities in Advanced Virgo.
Stefan Hild October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Interferometers with detuned arm cavaties.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
Matt Evans, LSC March 2003 (G E)1 Lock Acquisition in LIGO  Who am I? »Matt Evans »Caltech graduate  What is Lock Acquisition? »The process.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
LSC-VIRGO joint meeting - Pisa1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect Frequency modulation PRCL length in Virgo Some results from a Finesse simulation.
LIGO- G R Aspen winter conference, January Toward the Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype Aspen winter.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
Hiro Yamamoto GWADW Girdwood, Alaska LIGO-G Beam Splitter in aLIGO Hiro Yamamoto LIGO/Caltech BS02 to BS05? larger BS? BS in aLIGO IFO for.
Specifications for OMC telescope in AdVirgo R. Gouaty, E. Tournefier Estimation of carrier HOM power at the dark port Constraints on OMC waist and position.
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research Univ. of Tokyo Development of an RSE Interferometer Using the Third Harmonic Demodulation LIGO-G Z Osamu Miyakawa,
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
LIGO- G R 40m weekly meeting, Jan 05, Explore demodulation phase for DDM on 40m RSE prototype Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech LIGO-G R.
Concept and Current Status of Japan 4m RSE March Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
ILIAS - Geneve1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect in Virgo J. Marque.
LIGO-G Z 3) Current Status & Plan for Japan RSE -- Stabilization and Installation of PRC & Detuning -- LSC Livingston 2002 Kentaro Somiya.
1 Fumiko 2006 Elba Meeting Current status of the 4m RSE.
LCGT Main Interferometer Subsystem Type B Review R Y. Aso on behalf of the LCGT MIF Working Group.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Main Interferometer Subsystem
LCGT LSC Design and other practical interferometer details Yoichi Aso 2010/12/7.
Input Mode Matching of LCGT 2012/1/5, Yoichi Aso.
Advanced Virgo: Optical Simulation and Design
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
Main Interferometer Meeting
GEO600 Control aspects where do the error signal come from?
A study of Arm Length Stabilization in KAGRA
LCGT Main Interferometer Subsystem
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Output Mode Cleaners: Introduction for non-experts
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Effect of sideband of sideband on 40m and Advanced LIGO
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Alignment Investigations towards Advanced Virgo
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1
Presentation transcript:

Current Status of Main Interferometer Design Yoichi Aso 2011/2/4, LCGT f2f Meeting

● Optical Parameters ● Lengths ● Figure Error ● Optical Layout ● Control Scheme ● LSC ● ASC Contents

Optical Parameters Which parameters does this working group deal with ? Lengths, Mirror ROCs, Wedge Angles, Reflectivities for AR and Green. (Mirror Reflectivities are given by the detector configuration subsystem) Larm = 3000: Set by the facility limit (i.e. mountain size) Lprc, Las, Lsrc: Set to meet RFSB resonant conditions required by the LSC scheme. Steps to chose length parameters Set nominal values Fine Adjustments Lmc, Lprc, Lsrc, Las: ● Avoid RFSB resonance in the AC ● Compensate for small reflection phase by the AC ● HOM resonances Strategies for handling ROC errors Lmc, Lprc, Lsrc, Las: Which length has to be adjusted to compensate for the mirror ROC errors ?

Set Recycling Cavity Lengths Requirements ● f1 is resonant in PRC-SRC ● f2 is perfectly reflected by MICH ● f2 is resonant in PRC ● MICH has a moderate reflectivity to f1 (~50%) ● This is to make the resonance of PRC-SRC not too sharp ● This requirement came from the variable detuning of SRC Nominal Values Chosen Assumption Here: RFSBs are completely anti-resonant to the arm cavities. Not True !

Locations of RF SBs in the FSR of AC Reflection phase f1(Φ1): deg f2(Φ2): 0.09 deg RF SBs are detuned in the RCs (1) Adjust Lmc to make Φ1:Φ2 = f1:f2 (2) Macroscopically adjust Lprc and Lsrc What we do next

f2 resonance Adjust Lprc by 3.7mm Adjust Lsrc by 7.4mm f1 resonance Lmc adjustment = cm

Check Higher Order Mode Resonances We don't want.... ● TEM00 of the RF SB harmonics to be resonant in the AC ● HOMs of the RF SB to be resonant in the AC FSR of the Arm Cavity HOM Resonances RF SB Harmonics (Black:f1, Red:f2) JM Diagram

Mirror ROC Error ROC ~ 7000m 1% error = 70m Mirrors are never perfect ! ROC error HOM resonant curves move in the JM diagram Accidental Overlap ? HOM overlap figure of merit Mirror ROC error can be negative but not positive

Comments on Length Parameters ● Larm may not be exactly 3000m ● Two arms will have different ROC errors ● Arm reflection phases depend on the arm finesse Adjust Lmc, Lprc, Lsrc and Las based on the actually delivered mirrors. Required adjustment range (rough estimate) Lmc: +/- 1cm Lprc, Lsrc: +/-10cm Las: +/-3mm (no need to adjust ?) ● Measure the actual transverse mode spacing using the Arai-Stochino method. ● Measure Lmc, Lprc, Lsrc from FSR measurements ● Las can be measured by the demodulation phase difference between the independent lock of X and Y arms at REFL. Measurement Methods Adjusted Lengths

Optical Layout Detailed optical layout design is a non-trivial task ! ● Take into account wedge deflection ● Make the two arms at the right angle ● Track the optical path length (for SB resonant conditions) ● Track the Gaussian mode evolution ● Track the Gouy phase evolution ● Take into account the dispersion effect for the green beams ● Trace secondary beams (AR reflected) ● Generate CAD files We have to... A python package to do the above job was developed. gtrace: A Gaussian ray tracing library

Example: Substrate Change between iLCGT and bLCGT iLCGT: Fused Silica TMs (n=1.45) bLCGT: Sapphire TMs (n=1.754) If two mirrors have the same wedge angle Incident angle to the ITMs must be different We have to change the ITM wedge angle between iLCGT and bLCGT Wedge angle: Set to nicely separate POX and POY beams for bLCGT bLCGT: 0.2deg ---> iLCGT: 0.33deg Are the POX and POY still available for iLCGT ? (To keep the incident angle to ITMs the same) Answer: Yes

Length Sensing and Control Scheme Current Status ● A new Optickle model with MZ and Folding ● PM-PM schemes have been explored (to be compatible with WFS) ● May use Non-Resonant Sidebands ● Several Options (SDM, no-MZ DDM, MZ DDM, etc) ● With a good feed forward gain (over 100), any scheme seem to work ● These schemes can be changed after installation

PRM PR2 PR3 SR3 SR2 SRM BS ITMY ETMY ITMXETMX OMCREF L AS_DC ASP O POP REF L Sideband Resonant Conditions for Control Signal Extraction Carrie r f1 sideband (PM 11.25MHz) f2 sideband (PM 45MHz) f3 sideband (AM MHz) ● f1 sideband resonates in PRC-SRC ● f2 sideband resonates only in PRC ● f3 sideband does not enter the interferometer at all

Sensing Matrix with NRS (BRSE, with MZ, measured at 100Hz) Clean signal separation [W/m]

BRSE DDM with MZ Feed forward accuracy = 3%

DRSE DDM with MZ Feed forward accuracy = 1% MICH UGF = 10Hz

Alignment Sensing and Control Scheme ● Michimura-kun is working on it using Optickle ● Checking the Optickle results with analytical calculation for Fabry-Perot Good Agreement ● Problematic result for FPMI (iLCGT) ● No signal separation of ITM and ETM at the AS port. ● Checking with analytic calculations ● Agatsuma-kun has been doing ASC calculation independently ● Need to merge the work force

Other Issues These issues will be discussed at the next MIF subsystem meeting: Feb. 9 th 13:00 - ● SRC Folding ● Arm cavity g-factor (positive or negative ● Lock acquisition (Green lock) ● Mirror specs