OUTCOME BASED COMMISSIONING IN THURROCK Thurrock is pursuing outcome based commissioning as a way of ensuring that the benefits of personalisation are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Personalisation in Leicestershire. Why do we need to change? The present system – Based on matching a limited range of services to people’s assessed needs.
Advertisements

Well Connected: History A reminder - previous presentation in December 2013: Arose out of Acute Services Review Formal collaboration between WCC, all.
People, families and communities NHS Commissioning Board Children’s Trust Westminster’s Joint Health and Wellbeing Board Local Healthwatch Providers West.
28th March 2013 Debbie Newton Chief Operating & Finance Officer
Personalisation, Direct Payments so what is the difference? Offering more choice and control for families or a way of saving money?
Listening to you, working for you Bexley’s Children’s Services Prevention Agenda Thriving Families Service Vision Children do not wait.
The Impact on Practice (ImP) Project: A framework to maximise the impact of continuing professional education on practice Liz Clark, Jan Draper and Shelagh.
Yorkshire and Humber Personal Budget Event Elaine Baulcombe (Service Manager - SEND) & Andrew Mahoney (Lead for SEND and Personalisation Children's Transformation)
Cash for Care HCE Annual General Assembly London - September 2008.
Copyright 2011 Right Care The Accountable Integrated Care System Sept 2011 Commissioning for Value.
Homecare Europe – UK developments in homecare. Being in Control Current policy focuses on care directed by the people receiving the care, with responsive.
Personalised Approaches & Self Directed Support in Dumfries and Galloway.
The Value for Money & Policy Review of Disability Services Presentation to Inclusion Ireland Conference 15th April 2011 Bairbre Nic Aongusa, Director Office.
Evaluation of the SEND Pathfinder Programme: Early Findings Graham Thom and Meera Prabhakar May 2012.
Manchester City Council - a Social Impact Bond
Still Putting People First Jo Bryan Commissioning and Service Development Manager.
Early help – some signals and examples Nick Page 18 March 2013.
A system of self directed support. What are the different terms you have heard about self directed support?
Helping Families update Scrutiny Select Committee Meeting March 2013 Nick Page.
SELF DIRECTED SUPPORT Equality Impact Assessment.
IPC OUTCOMES WORKSHOP : DAY 1 National Drivers. Why Change our approach to outcomes ?  People are living longer:  180% increase in over 85s by 2036.
Self-Directed Support. Personalisation ‘It enables the individual alone or in groups to find the right solutions for them and to participate in the delivery.
A Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and Active Citizens The Coalition Government’s approach to future reform of adult social care.
Putting People First Delivery Programme Introductory transformation presentation: This document is part of the personalisation toolkit
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
IPC OUTCOMES WORKSHOP : DAY 1 IPC Model of an Outcome Based Approach.
Michelle Kennedy Child Poverty Sector Specialist 1.
Cornwall Council Housing Adaptations & Advice Service Jane Barlow; Head of Housing Karen Sawyer; Assistant Head of Housing.
Getting commissioned to deliver innovation and personalised outcomes Mike Wright, Development Director, KeyRing Living Support Networks 26 th November.
Commissioners Network 12 th Jan 2011 Domiciliary Care workstream update Catherine Pascoe South West Dementia Partnership.
Local Area Agreement Strengthening delivery Improving Outcomes Jon Bright Director of Policy and Delivery Birmingham City Council.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Transforming the quality of dementia care – consultation on a National Dementia Strategy Mike Rochfort Programme Lead Older People’s Mental Health WM CSIP.
An Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot in Coventry: service users’ accounts of having an individual budget.
RIGHT CARE RIGHT TIME Personalisation Programme Briefing Offering Patients more choice and control in Trafford Merry, Head of Personalised.
Y O U R C O U N C I L Dynamic Provider Framework Home Care Presented by: Preeya Madhoo – Head of Category Management Jane Love – Interim Head of Commissioning.
Annual Report to HASC 2010 Cllr Eunice Campbell, Portfolio Holder for Adult Services & Health.
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
How we introduced personalisation
Building evaluation in the Department of Immigration and Citizenship
Direct Payments Debbie Waldron 22nd June 2016
Care Act and young people with Sensory Impairments
Partnership for Preparing for Adulthood
Leading Transformational Change
Progress So Far – Newport City Council Outcomes Project
Better Care Fund (previously known as Integration Transformation Fund)
Name Job title Research Councils UK
Personalisation in Practice: A National and Regional Perspective
This is a presentation template which can be used and adapted to communicate key introductory messages and stimulate discussion about the personalisation.
Personal Budgets “Lessons Learned”
What’s working and what’s not?
Developing an Integrated System in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
A new way of delivering adult social care
Glen Garrod Vice-President, ADASS 17 October 2017
Denise Elliott Interim Head of Commissioning Adult & Health Services
Personal Wheelchair Budget Programme
Care Market Strategy October 2017 Dr Simon Willson Monika Gandy.
Summary.
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Overview of Personal Health Budgets
Outcomes Based Commissioning
The NHS.
Preparing for Adulthood
Person and Community Centred Approaches
TA Toolkit Teacher Session
Customer journey perspectives
Self-directed Support
Housing LIN NW, 5 October 2011 Merron Simpson and Kate McAllister
Tracie Wills Senior Commissioning Officer
The EU Model of PIC Raymond Hill Team Leader, PIC Task Force
Presentation transcript:

OUTCOME BASED COMMISSIONING IN THURROCK Thurrock is pursuing outcome based commissioning as a way of ensuring that the benefits of personalisation are experienced by all Strategies that give people money up front – Direct Payments and Individual Budgets – clearly work very well for people who are able to take the money and create their own support systems. However, the evidence is that most people will want to continue to use mainstream services Therefore the challenge is how to help mainstream services develop in ways that will deliver on personalisation – that is, services that are flexible and responsive every day. We believe that commissioning services by outcomes, and not by tasks, is the key to bringing this change about

LEVELS OF FINANCIAL AUTONOMY Individual budgets Council commissioned services People who want to have the cash and directly employ/contract People who want to choose their service, but not employ/contract People who want services provided, but want control over what they do Direct Payments Outcomes are key to all levels of financial control Focussing on outcomes at all levels will ensure that all service users have a higher level of experience

THE CHANGE PROCESS The changes required are wide ranging and significant They involve changes to practice, process, systems and above all culture They involve changes for commissioners, providers and service users, and a significant shift in the relationships between them

THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SERVICE USER, COMMISSIONER AND PROVIDER Commissioner Commissions services to deliver tasks that address eligible needs Provider Delivers commissioned tasks Service user Receives commissioned tasks Linear and hierarchical Service user Identifies issues, outcomes and how best to achieve them Commissioner Supports SU to identify outcomes & agree resources Provider Works with SU to agree tasks that achieve outcomes Dynamic three way relationship TASK BASED COMMISSIONING OUTCOME BASED COMMISSIONING Requires inflexibility Requires flexibility

THE COMMISSIONING AGENDA - STRATGEGIC The process applies to all providers, but we have focussed on home care provision at this stage. We created a new Specification that emphasised; –A requirement to satisfy the commissioned outcomes for individual –A requirement to work flexibly within an overall aggregated monthly budget, committing resources where they are required We re-tendered, went from 9 to 4 providers, and chose providers who we believed would want to come with us on the journey

THE COMMISSIONING AGENDA - INVIDUDUAL We have moved from having Care Plans to Commissioning Plans Instead of prescribing tasks, we agree the outcome and an indicative monthly level of resource This started last October – 37% of people now have Commissioning Plans

THE COMMISSIONING AGENDA - INDIVIDUAL However, we believe that more is required. In particular, we believe the assessment process has to become not just outcome focussed, but person directed This is because that’s where the best identification of outcomes comes from and where the greatest degree of ownership comes from

PERSON DIRECTED SUPPORT PLANNING Thinking Process* Independent Support to frame the thinking Support to develop the thinking Description of situation Support Plan Service user Family and friends Health and Care services Universal services Contributions Community Commissioning Plan Resource allocation Test of fitness for purpose** Services commissioned Review of outcomes * The thinking process replaces the process of the practitioner gathering information in order to form a view and is based on the service users thoughts ** A Support Plan is fit for purpose if it will lead to the best levels of independence, health and well being

THE PERFORMANCE AGENDA Our overall targets are; Be in the top 10% of Councils for overall satisfaction with social care (new National Indicator) –Be in the bottom 10% for spend per head on social care We believe that effectively working to outcomes eliminates waste of resources and maximises value for money

THE PERFORMANCE AGENDA AIMPERFORMANCE INDICATORDATA SOURCE THRESHOLDS Providers achieve the commissioned outcomes Service users report of extent outcome achieved Care Commissioner review 1 – Above 90% % 3- below 80% Care Commissioners report of extent outcome achieved Care Commissioner review 1 – Above 90% % 3- below 80% The provider is accountable to the service over way support is delivered Service users report that provider has found out what tasks they think should be carried out and how Monitoring Officer – 50% sample 1 – Above 90% % 3- below 80% Service user reports that the provider carries out agreed tasks – LAA specific target of 75% Service user reports that the provider carries out the tasks in the way agreed Service user reports that the provider agrees changes as and when circumstances change

CURRENT CHALLENGES The providers are each grappling with how to organise their workers to achieve higher levels of flexibility; Patch based, team working Pilot of service users who work as a co-operative, pooling their monthly budget of hours We are working out how to move to payment of providers by commissioned hours (outcomes) and not by actual delivery of hours. Use of electronic monitoring to ensure that, as flexibility increases, service users only pay for what they get (although this data will not be used for the invoicing process)

CURRENT CHALLENGES We are working out how to structure incentive payments for providers; –For achievement of user satisfaction (LAA target) –For achievement of reduced admission to residential care Restructuring of the field work services around new practice requirements, new roles and job profiles to support person directed working

FUTURE CHALLENGES Will providers need to diversify in order to have more and different resources to achieve meeting outcomes The independent sector is still under resourced – unit costs some 40% below Council provision. How much is this about efficiency and how much is it about quality?

SO IS IT WORKING Both our own internal monitoring and some providers own monitoring is showing a small increase in user satisfaction. At this stage, we are very pleased with that. We will be more satisfied with all being a little happier than just a few being much happier Our providers say that working in Thurrock is good and positive experience. We see them being innovative and confident Our field workers, despite the changes and threats to their roles, report that Thurrock is a good and exciting place to work

THE FUTURE The challenge for Thurrock is to keep working on the developments in both the commissioning and providing arms. It will take a few more years for the strategy to fully mature. We await the report of the national pilot on Individual Budgets. If a way is found to provide money up front without taking undue financial risks, Thurrock will have no problem in building this into its outcome based processes.