ROUTING MOBILE IP  Motivation  Data transfer  Encapsulation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile IP Outline Intro to mobile IP Operation Problems with mobility.
Advertisements

Lecture 10: Network Protocols/Mobile IP. Introduction to TCP/IP networking.
Cellular Communications
Mobile Communications-Network Protocols/Mobile IP
MOBILE NETWORK LAYER Mobile IP.
資 管 Lee Lesson 12 IPv6 Mobility. 資 管 Lee Lesson Objectives Components of IPv6 mobility IPv6 mobility messages and options IPv6 mobility data structures.
Lecture 9 Mobile Networks: IP Addressing and Mobile IP Wireless Networks and Mobile Systems.
1 Mobile IP Why mobile IP? How mobile IP works –Introduction –Agent discovery/Advertisement –Registration –Routing considerations –Security Mobility management.
1 Mobile IP Myungchul Kim Tel:
Mobile IP Overview: Standard IP Standard IP Evolution of Mobile IP Evolution of Mobile IP How it works How it works Problems Assoc. with it Problems Assoc.
MOBILITY SUPPORT IN IPv6
Chapter 13 Mobile IP. Outline  ADDRESSING  AGENTS  THREE PHASES  AGENT DISCOVERY  REGISTRATION  DATA TRANSFER  INEFFICIENCY IN MOBILE IP.
A Study of Mobile IP Kunal Ganguly Wichita State University CS843 – Distributed Computing.
IPv6 Mobility David Bush. Correspondent Node Operation DEF: Correspondent node is any node that is trying to communicate with a mobile node. This node.
CMPE Wireless and Mobile Networking 1 CMPE 257 Spring 2006 Wireless Internetworking 2 Wireless and Mobile Networks.
Mobile IP.
Mobile IP Polytechnic University Anthony Scalera Heine Nzumafo Duminda Wickramasinghe Edited by: Malathi Veeraraghavan 12/05/01.
Wireless & Mobile Communications Chapter 6: Network Protocols/Mobile IP  Motivation  Data transfer  Encapsulation  Security  IPv6  Problems  DHCP.
Slide 1, Dr. Wolfgang Böhm, Mobile Internet, © Siemens AG 2001 Dr. Wolfgang Böhm Siemens AG, Mobile Internet Dr. Wolfgang.
Mobile IP Seamless connectivity for mobile computers.
Hamid Sheikhghanbari Sukesh Moolya
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochen Schiller, SS028.1 Mobile Communications Chapter 8: Network Protocols/Mobile IP  Motivation  Data.
Jose Alcid David Chapman Aaron Trank
Mobile IP Overview and Discussion. 2 Spectrum of Mobility – from network perspective no mobility high mobility mobile user, using same access point mobile.
National Institute Of Science & Technology Mobile IP Jiten Mishra (EC ) [1] MOBILE IP Under the guidance of Mr. N. Srinivasu By Jiten Mishra EC
Mobile IP Most of the slides borrowed from Prof. Sridhar Iyer
1 Sideseadmed (IRT0040) loeng 5/2010 Avo
IT351: Mobile & Wireless Computing
1 Mohamed M Khalil Mobile IPv4 & Mobile IPv6. 2 Mohamed M Khalil Mobile IP- Why ? IP based Network Sub-network A Sub-network B Mobile workforce carry.
Mobile IP Miae Woo. By Miae Woo2 Motivation for Mobile IP Routing  based on IP destination address, network prefix (e.g ) determines physical.
Module E Mobile Network Layer J.-P. Hubaux, N. Vratonjic, M. Poturalski, I. Bilogrevic Mobile Networks Some slides addapted from.
Fall 2005Computer Networks20-1 Chapter 20. Network Layer Protocols: ARP, IPv4, ICMPv4, IPv6, and ICMPv ARP 20.2 IP 20.3 ICMP 20.4 IPv6.
Mobile Communications: Network Protocols/Mobile IP Mobile Communications Chapter 9: Network Protocols/Mobile IP  Motivation  Data transfer  Encapsulation.
Internetworking Internet: A network among networks, or a network of networks Allows accommodation of multiple network technologies Universal Service Routers.
Mobile IP Outline Intro to mobile IP Operation Problems with mobility.
Session: 14S. K. Nayak14.1 Mobile Computing Session 14 Mobile IP S. K. Nayak Synergy, Dhenkanal.
Background of Wireless Communication Student Presentations and Projects Wireless Communication Technology Wireless Networking and Mobile IP Wireless Local.
Understanding IPv6 Slide: 1 Lesson 12 IPv6 Mobility.
Introduction to Mobile IPv6
Mobile IP Lec#9. Lecture Objectives ● Present the basic principles of addressing in IP networks ● Describe the problem of mobility with IP and consider.
Mobile IP 순천향대학교 정보기술공학부 이 상 정 VoIP 특론 순천향대학교 정보기술공학부 이 상 정 2 References  Tutorial: Mobile IP
Ασύρματες και Κινητές Επικοινωνίες Ενότητα # 10: Mobile Network Layer: Mobile IP Διδάσκων: Βασίλειος Σύρης Τμήμα: Πληροφορικής.
Mobile Communications Chapter 8: Network Protocols/Mobile IP  Motivation  Data transfer  Encapsulation  Security  IPv6  Problems  Micro mobility.
Mobile IP Definition: Mobile IP is a standard communication protocol, defined to allow mobile device users to move from one IP network to another while.
An Introduction to Mobile IPv4
Mobile IP 순천향대학교 전산학과 문종식
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochen Schiller, SS028.1 Mobile Communications Chapter 8: Network Protocols/Mobile IP  Motivation  Data.
DMET 602: Networks and Media Lab Amr El Mougy Yasmeen EssamAlaa Tarek.
Mobility support in IP v4. Internet Computing (CS-413) 2.
Mobile IP THE 12 TH MEETING. Mobile IP  Incorporation of mobile users in the network.  Cellular system (e.g., GSM) started with mobility in mind. 
 Mobile IP is the underlying technology for support of various mobile data and wireless networking applications.  It is designed by IETF.
1 OverviewOverview A device on a network is reachable through normal IP routing by the IP address it is assigned on the network. The problem occurs when.
DMET 602: Networks and Media Lab
RFC 3775 IPv6 Mobility Support
Introduction to Wireless Networking
Mobility And IP Addressing
© Model Engineering College
Unit 3 Mobile IP Network Layer
Introduction to Wireless Networking
DMET 602: Networks and Media Lab
Unit 3- Mobile Network layer  Motivation  Data transfer  Encapsulation  Security  IPv6  Problems  DHCP  Ad-hoc networks  Routing protocols.
CSE 4215/5431: Mobile Communications Winter 2010
CSE 4215/5431: Mobile Communications Winter 2011
Cellular Communications
Cellular Communications
Mobile IP Outline Homework #4 Solutions Intro to mobile IP Operation
Mobile IP Outline Intro to mobile IP Operation Problems with mobility.
Mobile IP Outline Intro to mobile IP Operation Problems with mobility.
Mobile IP-2 CS441 – Mobile & Wireless Computing
Presentation transcript:

ROUTING MOBILE IP  Motivation  Data transfer  Encapsulation

Motivation for Mobile IP Routing – based on IP destination address, network prefix (e.g ) determines physical subnet – change of physical subnet implies change of IP address to have a topological correct address (standard IP) or needs special entries in the routing tables Specific routes to end-systems? – change of all routing table entries to forward packets to the right destination – does not scale with the number of mobile hosts and frequent changes in the location, security problems Changing the IP-address? – adjust the host IP address depending on the current location – almost impossible to find a mobile system, DNS updates take to long time – TCP connections break, security problems

Requirements for Mobile IPv4 (RFC 3344, was: 3220, was: 2002, updated by: 4721) Transparency – mobile end-systems keep their IP address – continuation of communication after interruption of link possible – point of connection to the fixed network can be changed Compatibility – support of the same layer 2 protocols as IP – no changes to current end-systems and routers required – mobile end-systems can communicate with fixed systems Security – authentication of all registration messages Efficiency and scalability – only little additional messages to the mobile system required (connection typically via a low bandwidth radio link) – world-wide support of a large number of mobile systems in the whole Internet

TERMINOLOGY Mobile Node (MN) – system (node) that can change the point of connection to the network without changing its IP address Home Agent (HA) – system in the home network of the MN, typically a router – registers the location of the MN, tunnels IP datagrams to the COA Foreign Agent (FA) – system in the current foreign network of the MN, typically a router – forwards the tunneled datagrams to the MN, typically also the default router for the MN Care-of Address (COA) – address of the current tunnel end-point for the MN (at FA or MN) – actual location of the MN from an IP point of view – can be chosen, e.g., via DHCP Correspondent Node (CN) – communication partner

EXAMPLE NETWORK mobile end-system Internet router end-system FA HA MN home network foreign network (physical home network for the MN) (current physical network for the MN) CN

DATA TRANSFER TO THE MOBILE SYSTEM Internet sender FA HA MN home network foreign network receiver Sender sends to the IP address of MN, HA intercepts packet (proxy ARP) 2. HA tunnels packet to COA, here FA, by encapsulation 3. FA forwards the packet to the MN CN

DATA TRANSFER FROM THE MOBILE SYSTEM Internet receiver FA HA MN home network foreign network sender 1 1. Sender sends to the IP address of the receiver as usual, FA works as default router CN

OVERVIEW MOBILE IP. Protocol delivery to and from the mobile node CN router HA router FA Internet router home network MN foreign network 4. CN router HA router FA Internet router home network MN foreign network COA

NETWORK INTEGRATION Agent Advertisement – HA and FA periodically send advertisement messages into their physical subnets – MN listens to these messages and detects, if it is in the home or a foreign network (standard case for home network) – MN reads a COA from the FA advertisement messages Registration (always limited lifetime!) – MN signals COA to the HA via the FA, HA acknowledges via FA to MN – these actions have to be secured by authentication Advertisement – HA advertises the IP address of the MN (as for fixed systems), i.e. standard routing information – routers adjust their entries, these are stable for a longer time (HA responsible for a MN over a longer period of time) – packets to the MN are sent to the HA, – independent of changes in COA/FA

type = 16 length = * #COAs R: registration required B: busy, no more registrations H: home agent F: foreign agent M: minimal encapsulation G: GRE encapsulation r: =0, ignored (former Van Jacobson compression) T: FA supports reverse tunneling reserved: =0, ignored AGENT ADVERTISEMENT preference level 1 router address 1 #addresses type addr. sizelifetime checksum COA 1 COA 2 type = 16sequence numberlength code preference level 2 router address 2... registration lifetime... RBHFMGr reserved T

REGISTRATION t MN HA registration request registration reply t MN FAHA registration request registration request registration reply registration reply

MOBILE IP REGISTRATION REQUEST home agent home address type = 1lifetime T x identification COA extensions... SBDMGr S: simultaneous bindings B: broadcast datagrams D: decapsulation by MN M mininal encapsulation G: GRE encapsulation r: =0, ignored T: reverse tunneling requested x: =0, ignored

MOBILE IP REGISTRATION REPLY home agent home address type = 3lifetime code identification extensions... Example codes: registration successful 0 registration accepted 1 registration accepted, but simultaneous mobility bindings unsupported registration denied by FA 65 administratively prohibited 66 insufficient resources 67 mobile node failed authentication 68 home agent failed authentication 69 requested Lifetime too long registration denied by HA 129 administratively prohibited 131 mobile node failed authentication 133 registration Identification mismatch 135 too many simultaneous mobility bindings

ENCAPSULATION original IP headeroriginal data new datanew IP header outer headerinner headeroriginal data

ENCAPSULATION I Encapsulation of one packet into another as payload – e.g. IPv6 in IPv4 (6Bone), Multicast in Unicast (Mbone) – here: e.g. IP-in-IP-encapsulation, minimal encapsulation or GRE (Generic Record Encapsulation) IP-in-IP-encapsulation (mandatory, RFC 2003) – tunnel between HA and COA Care-of address COA IP address of HA TTL IP identification IP-in-IPIP checksum flagsfragment offset lengthDS (TOS)ver.IHL IP address of MN IP address of CN TTL IP identification lay. 4 prot.IP checksum flagsfragment offset lengthDS (TOS)ver.IHL TCP/UDP/... payload

ENCAPSULATION II Minimal encapsulation (optional) – avoids repetition of identical fields – e.g. TTL, IHL, version, DS (RFC 2474, old: TOS) – only applicable for non fragmented packets, no space left for fragment identification care-of address COA IP address of HA TTL IP identification min. encap.IP checksum flagsfragment offset lengthDS (TOS)ver.IHL IP address of MN original sender IP address (if S=1) Slay. 4 protoc.IP checksum TCP/UDP/... payload reserved

GENERIC ROUTING ENCAPSULATION original header original data new datanew header outer header GRE header original data original header Care-of address COA IP address of HA TTL IP identification GREIP checksum flagsfragment offset lengthDS (TOS)ver.IHL IP address of MN IP address of CN TTL IP identification lay. 4 prot.IP checksum flagsfragment offset lengthDS (TOS)ver.IHL TCP/UDP/... payload routing (optional) sequence number (optional) key (optional) offset (optional)checksum (optional) protocolrec.rsv.ver.CRKSs RFC 1701 RFC 2784 (updated by 2890) reserved1 (=0)checksum (optional) protocolreserved0ver.C