Ben Page Chairman Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute How can we make “empowerment” work?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting your message across Ben Page Chairman Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute
Advertisements

Adults and Communities Overview and Scrutiny Panel The Safer Doncaster Partnership (including an update on metal theft) 25 th June 2012.
Scrutiny of Local Strategic Partnerships Effective Overview and Scrutiny.
Youth Engagement Presentation to Coalition Council By: Sarah Stea, YMCA Tracey Burnet-Greene, SMDHU Co-chairs, Youth Engagement Core Group.
Getting closer to communities What can partnerships do for us? Elected Member training pack | Community Engagement and Empowerment.
Searching for the impact of involvement Bobby Duffy 16 th July 2007
Lynne Miller, Vocational Services Manager Increasing access to paid employment opportunities for service users in a large Mental Health and Addictions.
Calderdale Place Survey “a new focus on improving outcomes for local people and places”
Improving Public Confidence in Birmingham Ashley Ames Research Director, Ipsos MORI.
Big Listening 2010 A summary of surveys 13, 14 and 15.
© MORI Not to be used, reproduced or shown to any third party without the prior written permission of MORI Social research as a business Carole Lehman.
New Perceptions and Performance Data What the BVPIs tell us May 2007 Andrew Collinge Research Director, Local Government Research Unit.
PREVENTING AND TACKLING ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR WORKSHOPS David Clarke Head, Anti-social Behaviour Unit Home Office & Louise Arnold Group Director - Community.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. The engagement of service users and other stakeholders as.
New Perceptions and Performance Data What the BVPIs tell us May 2007 Andrew Collinge Research Director, Local Government Research Unit.
CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY OVERVIEW REPORT PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION 09 APRIL 2003.
Public attitudes towards immigration and cohesion Kully Kaur-Ballagan.
Participation and community cohesion – exploring the link Dr Stella Creasy Deputy Director Involve.
Youth in Focus. Young people’s voices “ money issues are a key thing for me” “the right kind of support is really important to me” “ forming relationships.
Lancashire overview Mike Walker Corporate Research and Intelligence Manager Policy Unit.
Mandy Williams, Participation Cymru manager
Place Survey Workshop 5 th August 2008 Phil Challoner Communications Manager Paul Wright Head of Communities & Regulatory Services Chris Wright Principal.
Lancashire Place Survey Gary Welch Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute 22 nd April 2009.
Brixton Green Brixton People Know What Brixton Needs Dinah Roake
The voluntary sector and devolution
Northern, Eastern and Western Devon CCG
Alexander Needs Assessment
Cambridgeshire Homelessness Trailblazer MoU workshop
Northern, Eastern and Western Devon CCG
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Aboriginal Targeted Earlier Intervention Strategy
Birmingham South Central CCG
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Social Mobility 2009 The Sutton Trust.
Building the foundations for innovation
The People’s Parliament in Sandwell:
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Planning
Rethinking Construction 10 years on – what has changed?
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
Southern Derbyshire CCG
Summary.
North East Lincolnshire CCG
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Law Society of Scotland Survey of members 2017
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
London Care and Support Forum – Registered Managers Network
Liverpool Where were these photos taken?
RESEARCH PREVIEW Stakeholder Perceptions of Law Enforcement in Washington State NOVEMBER 13, 2018.
Children Act 2004 – Every Child Matters
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
The democratic case for in house council services
Maintaining public trust and confidence
Manchester Industrial Relations Society Student Debate
Purpose of engagement To engage with citizens, elected members and staff in identifying actions to achieve the goals of a new Stakeholder Engagement.
Tackling housing challenges Involving People, Residents & the Community Lesley Baird TPAS Scotland.
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Key Cities and the Industrial Strategy
Law Society of Scotland, Annual Members Survey 2018 Report by Mark Diffley Consultancy and Research Ltd.
Young people’s participation and the SEND reforms Pamela Shaw, Senior Participation Officer NatSIP: The voice of young people in improving outcomes.
Developing a User Involvement Strategy.
Tackling Childhood Obesity Together (TCOT) UK – Westminster City Council, Hammersmith and Fulham Council and the Royal Borough of Kensington.
Participation through the British Sign Language (Scotland) Act 2015
Engaging young people in the democratic process
CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2016
Housing Rights in Practice
Housing Rights in Practice
Presentation transcript:

Ben Page Chairman Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute How can we make “empowerment” work?

2 Where are we now? A decade of reform to boost involvement and accountability Surveys, user engagement, juries, workshops, consultation strategies, local area forums, ward sub- committees etc Voting in NDC elections Empowerment Plans, White papers etc New national indicator on feelings of influence measured every two years via the Place Survey, starting September  Real challenges of place! Public angrier than before?

3 As Hazel Blears said at the launch I believe that the biggest improvements in public services are driven not by the oversight of central government, but by local people – by communities having a chance to say what they want. In my experience there is no service that cannot be improved by the active involvement of local people, no challenge that cannot be better met by harnessing their energy and initiative.

4 Both major parties grappling with the challenge of the limits of state action and the need for “cultural change”

5 But it is not all good news People don’t feel listened to

6 Most People feel they are not listened to But may still be difficult to get them to take part in a particular exercise – or take part in existing structures Five challenges 1.Relevance Is the Council doing a good job in implementing its Agenda 21 obligations? 2.Credibility/efficacy problem - what’s in it for me? What will actually change? 3.Resources 4.Political and managerial commitment 5.Scale – most good examples are only working with a very small proportion of people

7 Most people favour local area forums of one kind or another Don’t know/no opinion Yes, support No, oppose Support QIn principle, would you support or oppose extending Community Partnerships to other parts of the Borough? Base: All residents (1,021)

8 But many fewer SAY they personally want to get involved Don’t know/no opinion Yes, support No, oppose Support Involvement QIn principle, would you support or oppose extending Community Partnerships to other parts of the Borough? No Depends Yes QAnd would you personally be interested in getting involved? Don’t know Base: All respondents who support the idea (835) Base: All residents (1,021)

9 And in practice only a tiny proportion ever do… Don’t know/no opinion Yes, support No, oppose Support Involvement QIn principle, would you support or oppose extending Community Partnerships to other parts of the Borough? No Depends Yes QAnd would you personally be interested in getting involved? Don’t know Base: All respondents who support the idea (835) Base: All residents (1,021) Actual Proportion - 2%

10 But it is not all good news And what matters? analysis from our forthcoming “Impact of Empowerment” report

11 What drives Satisfaction with Area at the resident level? Satisfaction with area 46% of variation in satisfaction with area explained Cleanliness score Feel area cohesive Concern about ASB Satisfied with housing, Education, planning Satisfied with housing, Education, planning Parks and Open spaces How well Informed kept Feeling can influence council 32% 14% 13% 10% 4% 2%

12 But it is not all good news Looking at 15,000 face to face interviews in the poorest wards in England

13 Comparisons of actual involvement, Yes QHave you been involved in any activities organised by (local NDC) in the last two years? No Source: NDC Surveys 2002, 2004, 2006 Base: All residents aged 16+

14 Influence vs. community cohesion Neighbours look out for each other Know most/many people in neighbourhood Feel part of the local community Feel able to influence Don’t feel able to influence Source: Ipsos MORI NDC Household Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 residents aged 16+

15 Influence vs. contentment with local area Good quality of life Satisfied with area Feel NDC improved area Feel able to influence Don’t feel able to influence Source: Ipsos MORI NDC Household Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 residents aged 16+

16 But it is not all good news But this falls away when we look at overall differences by each area…

17 Involvement vs feeling NDC improved area Feeling NDC improved area 2006 (%) Levels of involvement 2006 (%) Source: NDC Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 NDC residents aged 16+

18 Involvement vs perceived quality of life Perceived quality of life 2006 (%) Levels of involvement 2006 (%) Source: NDC Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 NDC residents aged 16+

19 Involvement vs feeling part of community Feeling part of community 2006 (%) Levels of involvement 2006 (%) Source: NDC Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 NDC residents aged 16+

20 Involvement vs satisfaction with area Satisfaction with area 2006 (%) Levels of involvement 2006 (%) Source: NDC Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 NDC residents aged 16+ South Kilburn Preston Road West Ham & Plaistow Kensington Beswick & Openshaw

21 Involvement vs trust in local NDC partnership Trust in local NDC partnership 2006 (%) Levels of involvement 2006 (%) Source: NDC Survey 2006 Base: 13,008 NDC residents aged 16+ Marsh Farm Doncaster Central South Kilburn Braunstone Blakenall Greets Green

22 Involvement vs knowing other people Knowing other people 2006 (%) Levels of involvement 2006 (%) Source: NDC Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 NDC residents aged 16+

23 Involvement vs trust in local council Trust in local council 2006 (%) Levels of involvement 2006 (%) Source: NDC Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 NDC residents aged 16+ North Fulham

24 Influence vs satisfaction with area Satisfaction with area 2006 (%) Feelings of influence 2006 (%) Source: NDC Survey 2006 Base: 15,792 NDC residents aged 16+

25 Change in influence vs change in satisfaction with area Change in satisfaction with area (%) Change in feelings of influence (%) North Huyton Thornhill North Fulham Ocean Estate Source: Longitudinal data NDC Surveys 2002 & 2006 Base: 19,574 (2002) & 15,792 (2006) residents aged 16+

26 Change in influence vs change in trust in local council Change in trust in local council (%) Change in feelings of influence (%) Source: Longitudinal data NDC Surveys 2002 & 2006 Base: 19,574 (2002) & 15,792 (2006) residents aged 16+

27 But it is not all good news Looking at the 2006 BVPI surveys

28 Satisfaction with council (%) Influence much weaker correlation Base: BVPI 2006 (70 District, County and Unitary Authorities) Feelings of influence (%) Source: Ipsos MORI Southwark Northants Cherwell DC City of London

29 Satisfaction with council (%) Opportunities for participation matter a bit more Base: BVPI 2006 (70 District, County and Unitary Authorities) Satisfied with opportunities for participation (%) Source: Ipsos MORI Bromley Notts CC Gateshead Hackney Kensington and Chelsea

30 Satisfaction with council (%) Correlation Base: Standard govt surveys 2006 (130 Single, Upper Tier and District Ipsos MORI client authorities) Feel informed by Council about Services and Benefits it provides (%) Feeling Informed really matters… Kensington & Chelsea Haringey Oldham Bedfordshire Bury Westminster City of London Bromley

31 Familiarity vs. perceived effectiveness Police Courts Prisons Crown Prosecution Service Probation Service Youth Offending Teams Source: Ipsos MORI, 2003 Base: 2,001 adults aged 16+, GB, Feb-March 2003

32 But it is not all good news Giving people confidence they have influence – if they need it – will be key

33 Beyond research: empowerment and participative techniques!! …our recent citizens summit at Downing Street

34 Neither/nor Strongly agree Strongly disagree Tend to disagree Tend to agree The Government should conduct these type of exercises on a more regular basis – as long as they listen and take account of our views Base: 54 forum participants 3 rd March 2007 Overall participants are positive – if those in authority listen and act…..

35 Split on level of empowerment The experts who provide and manage public services know best – they should find out what we think and get on with it % Agree QWhich of these two statements is closest to your own view? The general public should be much more actively involved in shaping public services, through for example people deciding on priorities Base: 54 forum participants 3 rd March 2007

Involve service users hands on in creative ways…

37 How do we investigate this changing area?

38 Get people involved – workshops & Citizen Researchers

39 Conclusions Huge accountability problems for politicians Signs that can help achieve positive outcomes and has significant positive side-effects – but issue of scale But don’t set up to fail – recognise range of methods/levels of involvement needed/wanted  Need to communicate better, more than consult better Making people feel they can influence if they need to is key Avoid consumer politics – ultimately need to give more responsibility back to people, or persuade THEM TO TAKE IT

Thank you