Content Management System
Benefit from self-service web tool Self-hosted wordpress blog server BI class Subject guide Library news Gathering information from students Faculty teaching Student government / campus community
More User-friendly web tools For static web content Web 2.0 functions Comment Forum Poll: survey, test Wiki Tag category Mashup
CMS: package for: Who: individual or a community of users What: easily publish, manage and organize a wide variety of content on a website Including: Electronic commerce; Blogs Forums Peer-to-peer networking Newsletters Podcasting Picture galleries File uploads and downloads
Options Commercial hosted: ContentM for YSU Service company hosts it No maintenance needed Not flexible Opensource CMS: Drupal Local control Develop functionality Host it: maintenance and administration
ContentM Consistent Interface Stable performance Better Security vendor administrate the server
Disadvantage of ContentM Limited Web 2.0 functions No support for programming languages External host; security issues across domain barriers Issues when interacting with other servers Developments tied to vendor’s business plan
Advantage of Opensource Powerful on functions: wiki, blog, tagging, mashup, forum, comment, poll… Add-on functions when we need Continue to develop with the new technology Inside of campus: transfer checking information easier More expertise on campus Community of users
Disadvantage of Opensource Domain; working with IT Self-host and manage the server Self administration More work on security issues. Update
Commercial vs OpenSource Evaluate your needs Stable vs. flexible Staff Speed Cost (long term and short term) Control Administration Updates fixes
Commercial vs OpenSource Re-purpose Several unique instances: more websites several functions: wiki, FAQ, survey, test
Try it! First opensource server is hardest Common middleware Appache Database: mySQL/PostgreSQL Tomcat PHP, Java hMailserver Linux