Microbiology Discrete Results Reporting Presenters: Tymn Neece Sonal Pandey Lancaster General Hospital Lancaster, Pa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Archetypes in HL7 2.x Archetypes in HL7 Version 2.x Andrew McIntyre Medical Objects 9 th HL7 Australia Conference, 8.
Advertisements

Experience with Using the UMLS Semantic Network to Coordinate Controlled Terminologies for a Large Clinical Data Repository James J. Cimino Department.
Result Status Relationships
1 Cardinality Specification and Testing Recommendations LOI and LRI MU Certification September 9 th, 2013 Draft
The Role of Standard Terminologies in Facilitating Integration James J. Cimino, M.D. Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine Columbia University.
HL7 Version Implementation Guide: Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Public Health.
LRI Validation Suite Meeting November 1st, Agenda Review of LIS Test Plan Template CLIA Testing EHR testing (Juror Document)—Inspection Testing.
S&I Framework LRI Validation Suite Vocabulary Testing Proposal (Lab Results Interface) Robert Snelick National Institute of Standards and Technology October.
Software and Systems Division “IHE-PCD F2F Meeting” (NIST Testing Tool Status) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) John Garguilo, Sandra.
LRI Validation Suite LRI Validation Suite Meeting Rob Snelick—NIST March 27th, 2012.
Laboratory Pilots/Deployment May 15, Participants Coordination of Effort Validation Suite Vocabulary Group Implementation Guide Analysis Support.
Public Health Case Reporting - CSTE TIG Lab Vocabulary Review May 1 st Week – Bacterial Diseases CRSWg, LMCoP, VMCoP May 6 th, /8/20151.
LRI Validation Suite Meeting September 06, Agenda Test data update – Selection of core message set Update Review validation discussion page – Mapping.
S&I Framework LRI Validation Suite Juror Document Design Specification and Mapping Robert Snelick National Institute of Standards and Technology November.
Anatomic Pathology Reporting Challenge Reporting methods over HL7 transactions vary significantly by vendor –Result Segment(s) -- OBXs –Note Segment(s)
Indiana Health Information Exchange THE HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUMMIT.
LRI Validation Suite Meeting September 27, Agenda Action Item List Test data update – Selection of core message set – Review of lab results test.
Laboratory Pilots/Deployment June 26, Participants Coordination of Effort Validation Suite Vocabulary Group Implementation Guide Analysis LRI/LOI/eDOS.
20/11/2009 DICOM WG13 Atsushi Amano Medical Imaging Systems Committee Japanese Association of Healthcare Information Systems Industry (JAHIS) 1 JAHIS /
Susceptibility (Sensitivity) Testing: Results Pharmaceutical Microbiology – Practical Course Semester One_ Sensitivity Results & MIC Broth Dilution/
EMR-LINK Auto-complete troubleshooting guide. Auto-completion: 1.A feature enabled within Centricity when Ignis installs a bi-directional interface and.
1 Message Mapping Guide Update for the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System NMI eSHARE Webinar Ruth Jajosky, DMD, MPH January 21, 2016 Center.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Chapter 03 Mechanisms for Interfacing and Integrating Device Data SaigonTech – Engineering Division Integrating Device Data into the Electronic Medical.
Implementation of National Standards (LOINC, SNOMED) for Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results: BioSense Experience Nikolay Lipskiy 1, DrPH, MS, MBA;
THE NEW WORLD OF STANDARDIZED ELECTRONIC PATHOLOGY (E-PATH) REPORTING Eric B. Durbin, MS Jovanka N. Harrison, PhD NAACCR Pathology Data Work Group NAACCR.
Implementation Workgroup Udayan Mandavia, iPatientCare, Inc. With: Kedar Mehta and Arnaz Bharucha July 28, 2014 Constraining the CCDA User Experience Presentation.
1 Transition to ICD-10 UC San Diego Health System 2015.
1 Interoperability with Web Services Environmental Health Labs Leverage Existing Technology to Collect Sample Data Presenter: Lynda Vidot NCEH National.
4.0.7 New Features Presented by Nicholas Felts. What version are you on? A or lower B C D.Live on E.Going to
Emdeon Office Batch Management Services This document provides detailed information on Batch Import Services and other Batch features.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Roundtable Kathy Branca Jesus Blasquez Ray Harms.
LIS Admin Presented by Peggy Steele and Jane Blackmar Lab Implementation.
Public Health - Clinical LOINC Meeting Sundak Ganesan, M.D. Health Scientist, Surveillance Operations Team National Notifiable Disease Surveillance (NNDSS)
SMS Text Messaging Onsite CRM
Foreign Barcode.
Utilizing BioSense Integrator Technology for Electronic Laboratory Results Reporting: A Technical Perspective W. Lane Chambers Healthcare Systems Consultant.
OBSERVER PORTAL  Accessible from “Observers Portal”
Tips on implementing a new HIS interface
11th HL7 Australia Conference, 13th December 2006
IHE PCD F2F San Diego, America’s Finest City
Point-of-Care Identity Management
Short Guide to SoftMic Supplemental Billing
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of 758 admitted patients for whom cultures of nares were performed to assess methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus.
NEW FEATURES SoftMic Version x Randy Carter SoftMic Specialist
Presented by Randy Carter
6th Annual PHIN Conference August 25-28, 2008
Meaningful Use 2014 New Setup Options
ConnectingOntario ClinicalViewer
UF Health and UF Health Sciences Center
Microbiology Reference Lab Interface
Lessons Learned Interfacing SoftBank to Foreign LIS
New Features – x Randy Carter Education Services
Basic Technology skills
Trouble-shooting with MOM
Trouble-shooting with MOM
MAX Warranty Tracking Vince Stefanetti, Exact MAX Americas Trainer.
Support Remedy on Demand.. Focused on proactive support and monitoring
5 × 7 = × 7 = 70 9 × 7 = CONNECTIONS IN 7 × TABLE
5 × 8 = 40 4 × 8 = 32 9 × 8 = CONNECTIONS IN 8 × TABLE
4 × 6 = 24 8 × 6 = 48 7 × 6 = CONNECTIONS IN 6 × TABLE
5 × 6 = 30 2 × 6 = 12 7 × 6 = CONNECTIONS IN 6 × TABLE
Anonymized HL7 message, which would be sent from an LIS to an HIS
New Product Line SoftMic
Deciphering TB Lab Reports
10 × 8 = 80 5 × 8 = 40 6 × 8 = CONNECTIONS IN 8 × TABLE MULTIPLICATION.
3 × 12 = 36 6 × 12 = 72 7 × 12 = CONNECTIONS IN 12 × TABLE
5 × 12 = × 12 = × 12 = CONNECTIONS IN 12 × TABLE MULTIPLICATION.
5 × 9 = 45 6 × 9 = 54 7 × 9 = CONNECTIONS IN 9 × TABLE
3 × 7 = 21 6 × 7 = 42 7 × 7 = CONNECTIONS IN 7 × TABLE
Presentation transcript:

Microbiology Discrete Results Reporting Presenters: Tymn Neece Sonal Pandey Lancaster General Hospital Lancaster, Pa

Text Based Results Hybrid Results Structured Discrete Micro Result Reporting Options

Help achieve the MU requirements for Structured data Improve result layout in EMR Infectious Disease Reporting EMR report writer resource Reports can be written by patient location and organism identified Tie pharmacy data to positive cultures for Drug effectiveness monitoring Why would I ever want to do this?

Become best friends with your EMR support staff (send flowers, bake cookies!!) Include your Interface Engine Staff Determine what your EMR and connected systems are capable of displaying Don’t forget any systems or organizations connected to your outbound results feed Take good notes – write everything down Write a good Validation plan Planning for Success

OBR 4 – Order Procedure 4.1 – HIS code 4.2 – Order Name OBR 15 - Specimen Source OBR 25 – Result Status F = Final P = Preliminary C = Corrected HL7 Basics OBR Segments

HL7 Basics OBR Segment OBR 4OBR 15 OBR 25

OBX 2 - Value type ST = String Data SN = Structured Numeric CWE = Coded element TX = Textual Data HL7 Basics OBX Segments

OBX (O) Organism/Isolate Identification OBX 4 – Observation Sub ID (Isolate #) Links the Organism to the MIC Important when multiple organisms are identified OBX 5 – Observation Identifier(Organism ID ^Name) OBX 5 – Observation Value 5.1 – Identifier – can be SNOMED or LOINC or Local Text – description of organism 5.3 – Name of coding system 5.4/5.5/5.6 – Alternate Identifier/Text/Coding system HL7 Basics OBX Segments

OBX4OBX5

OBX (Q) Isolation Quantitation OBX 4 Observation Sub ID(isolate #) OBX 5 Observation value(quantitation) HL7 Basics OBX Segments

ORC (ORC(S)) Antibiotic Sensitivity Panel –LGH removed this. Incompatible with Epic OBR(OBR(S)) Antibiotic Sensitivity Panel –OBR 3.1 Entity Id(filler and Organism ID) –OBR 4 – Ordered Procedure – OBR 4 (in 2nd OBR) MIC or KB HL7 Basics Sensitivity Segments

OBX(OBX(S)) Antibiotic Sensitivity –OBX 2 – value type is Structured Number –OBX 3 – Antibiotic –OBX 4 – Isolate # –OBX 5 (5.1 – 5.4) Comparitor/Number/Separator(suffix)/Number –OBX 6 – Units –OBX 6 (6.1 – 6.3 ) Units Identifier/Text/coding system HL7 Basics OBX Sensitivity Segments

OBX 2OBX 3OBX 4OBX 5OBX 6

Flagging Abnormal results in HIS OBX 8.1 Abnormal Flag Isolate level flagging “A” sent out for abnormal alphanumeric

Flagging Abnormal results in EPIC

Susceptibility Table in EPIC

Flagging Abnormal results in Epic Results marked as “Significant” manually

Uses a mix of micro discrete results and formatted text display DSP segments format text to send to the HIS. Micro Discrete Display in Cerner

Cerner Microview - Organisms Micro Discrete Display in Cerner

Susceptibilities Sent in OBX segments display in Powerchart

Quantitations and Comments sent in DSPs Micro Discrete Display in Cerner

Discrete Micro Message Structure Soft Specifications Structure Structure

Gram Stain

Questions