May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 1 NRAO – Westford e-VLBI Trial Chester Ruszczyk / Walter Brisken MIT Haystack / NRAO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The CVN Real Time Correlator Zhang Xiuzhong, Chen Zhong Shanghai Astronomical Observatory China 4th e-VLBI Workshop Sydney
Advertisements

Chapter 7 – Transport Layer Protocols
7th US VLBI Technical Meeting at Haystack Observatory, November 3-4, 2009 Arecibo VLBI Report Arecibo VLBI Team: V. Arun, R. Ganesan, T. Ghosh, C. Salter.
Characterization of Wireless Networks in the Home Presented by: Rick Skowyra Paul Freitas Mark Yavis, Konstantina Papagiannaki, W. Steven Conner.
Video over Wireless : Performance Evaluation in the GSM Circuit-Switched Channel Almudena Konrad Amoolya Singh University of California, Berkeley December.
INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS Tristan Walters Rayce West.
E-VLBI Development at Haystack Observatory Alan Whitney Chet Ruszczyk Kevin Dudevoir Jason SooHoo MIT Haystack Observatory 24 March 2006 EVN TOG meeting.
Christopher Bednarz Justin Jones Prof. Xiang ECE 4986 Fall Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
Data Communications and Networks
2012 DiFX user’s meeting, Sydney, Australia USNO Software Correlator: Status Report Outline USNO/WACO Background USNO Prototype Software Correlator (UPSC)
1 CMPT 471 Networking II DHCP Failover and multiple servers © Janice Regan,
E-VLBI Software Suite & DRAGON Interoperability Chet Ruszczyk, Jason Soohoo.
Chapter 2 – X.25, Frame Relay & ATM. Switched Network Stations are not connected together necessarily by a single link Stations are typically far apart.
5th e-VLBI Workshop, September 2006, Haystack Observatory 1 A Simulation model for e-VLBI traffic on network links in the Netherlands Julianne Sansa*
Module 10: Monitoring ISA Server Overview Monitoring Overview Configuring Alerts Configuring Session Monitoring Configuring Logging Configuring.
ARMADA Middleware and Communication Services T. ABDELZAHER, M. BJORKLUND, S. DAWSON, W.-C. FENG, F. JAHANIAN, S. JOHNSON, P. MARRON, A. MEHRA, T. MITTON,
Masaki Hirabaru CRL, Japan APAN Engineering Team Meeting APAN 2003 in Busan, Korea August 27, 2003 Common Performance Measurement Platform.
E-VLBI and End-to-End Performance Masaki HirabaruYasuhiro KoyamaTetsuro Kondo NICT KoganeiNICT Kashima
Chapter 15 – Part 2 Networks The Internal Operating System The Architecture of Computer Hardware and Systems Software: An Information Technology Approach.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate Implementing Multi-Domain Monitoring Services for European Research Networks Szymon Trocha, PSNC A. Hanemann, L. Kudarimoti,
Data Communications and Computer Networks Chapter 2 CS 3830 Lecture 8 Omar Meqdadi Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of.
1 Implementing Monitoring and Reporting. 2 Why Should Implement Monitoring? One of the biggest complaints we hear about firewall products from almost.
VTP: VDIF Transport Protocol Chris Phillips, Alan Whitney, Mamoru Sekido & Mark Kettenis November 2011.
Masaki Hirabaru NICT Koganei 3rd e-VLBI Workshop October 6, 2004 Makuhari, Japan Performance Measurement on Large Bandwidth-Delay Product.
E-VLBI Trials Ny-Alesund to Haystack (VSI-E non real-time) C. Ruszczyk, J. Soohoo, A. Whitney [1], R. Hanssen, F. Koppang [2], O. Schjelderup, H. Eidnes.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate perfSONAR MDM Service for LHC OPN Loukik Kudarimoti DANTE.
3.2 Software Fundamentals. A protocol is a formal description of digital message formats and the rules for exchanging those messages in or between computing.
The ALMA Phasing Project (APP) APP is an ongoing ALMA Development Project (approved in 2012) to provide the hardware and software necessary to coherently.
BASIC NETWORK PROTOCOLS AND THEIR FUNCTIONS Created by: Ghadeer H. Abosaeed June 23,2012.
Measuring the Capacity of a Web Server USENIX Sympo. on Internet Tech. and Sys. ‘ Koo-Min Ahn.
VLBI_UDP An application for transferring VLBI data via UDP protocol Simon Casey e-VLBI meeting, Haystack 20 Sep 2006.
ISecurity End of Semester Presentation November 29, 2012.
Masaki Hirabaru NICT APAN JP NOC Meeting August 31, 2004 e-VLBI for SC2004 bwctl experiment with Internet2.
2005/7/131 Plans and Options for e-VLBI on the VLBA Jon Romney NRAO, Socorro 4 th e-VLBI Workshop 2005 July 13.
Firewalls A brief introduction to firewalls. What does a Firewall do? Firewalls are essential tools in managing and controlling network traffic Firewalls.
Visual Flow Analysis: What do real-world problems look like? Brent Draney NERSC Center Division, LBNL 2/07/06.
TeXCP: Protecting Providers’ Networks from Unexpected Failures & Traffic Spikes Dina Katabi MIT - CSAIL nms.csail.mit.edu/~dina.
Congestion Notification Process for Real-Time Traffic draft-babiarz-tsvwg-rtecn-01.txt Jozef Babiarz Kwok Ho Chan Victor Firoiu 60 th IETF, Aug. 5 th,
An Analysis of AIMD Algorithm with Decreasing Increases Yunhong Gu, Xinwei Hong, and Robert L. Grossman National Center for Data Mining.
SA1: second year overview Arpad Szomoru JIVE January 30EXPReS Board Meeting, Utrecht, the Netherlands: SA1Slide #2 Outline Accomplishments in 2007.
Discussion for Compatibility. Common Recognition Data transport protocol in e-VLBI is ONLY important for realtime e-vlbi. Data (FILE) format is important.
Wireless I. Six Modes of Wireless Six Modes of Wireless – Notes Master ▫Access Point or base station Managed ▫Aka Infrastructure Mode ▫Access point or.
WIDAR Correlator Options and Potential Craig Walker NRAO Socorro U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting May 14-15, 2007.
2007 / 5 / 141 VLBA Requirements, Plans & Status Jon Romney NRAO, Socorro Second US VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting Socorro 2007 / 5 / 14.
SA1: overview, first results
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Distributed Systems CS
Instructor Materials Chapter 9: Testing and Troubleshooting
Jaime Johnson Yuhang Lin Nathan Daniel Anil Koneri Vineeth Chander
Domain 4 – Communication and Network Security
Hubs Hubs are essentially physical-layer repeaters:
Haystack Geodesy Program and Technical Development
CaribREN Caribbean Region – R&E Networks
Department of Computer Science University of Calgary
Hubs Hubs are essentially physical-layer repeaters:
Lab 2: TCP IP Attacks ( Indirect)
e-EVN: practical considerations
SAS-3 Backchannel Revised T10/11-044r0
Access Control Lists CCNA 2 v3 – Module 11
Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Observational Astronomy
Observational Astronomy
VTP: VDIF Transport Protocol
Defining Usage Models for ESS Mesh
Computer Science Division
Sciences & Engineering
Arecibo Observatory VLBI Program and Plans
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Chapter 5 Data Link Layer – Hub, Switch
Presentation transcript:

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 1 NRAO – Westford e-VLBI Trial Chester Ruszczyk / Walter Brisken MIT Haystack / NRAO

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 2 Agenda Trial Description Trial Results Network Performance Steps To Achieve Success –May 21 st Trial –Others ?

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 3 Trial Description Real-time e-VLBI Trial –May 7 th 12 UTC – 16 UTC –X band Antennas –VLA single dish –Westford Correlator –Haystack Mode –32 Mbps single channel

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 4

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 5 Trial Results Auto-correlation –Westford Failed to get auto-correlation with VLA –Issue was network performance –Socorro to Haystack No fringes were attempted to be detected

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 6 Network Performance Link from Socorro to NYC –~42Mbps Link from Socorro to Haystack –32.7 Mbps MAX. Drops in performance on the sending machine –Failed to maintain required data rate ~34Mbps

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 7 Network Performance Potential source of the performance failure –Backbone between NYC - Haystack –Rate limiting Socorro and Albuquerque 35Mbps maximum May be limiting TCP performance for long haul networks –Investigating

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 8 Next Steps Isolate the network performance between the backbone and the end systems. Quantify the performance from the Mark5A at the VLA to Haystack –This can be a noise source being sent from the VLA to Haystack and decoded at the correlator –Implementing Web100 based kernel to analyze the end-systems Determine why 42Mbps was achievable between VLA and NYC but not beyond. –Verify Performance from Denver, Chicago, NYC to Haystack

May 15, 2007U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting, Socorro NM 9 Next Steps (cont) Install Network Diagnostic tools on Mk5s –Quantify end systems and –end-to-end characteristics If we are unable to sustain the required TCP traffic through testing –Use constant bit rate UDP based protocol May 21, attempt the second test. VLA network connection extended beyond May. –Other test dates?