TRANSIT SYSTEMS PLANNING Module 3, Lesson 4. Learning Objectives Define systems planning Understand the steps required for plan selection and the key.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Advertisements

Improvements to Project Development and Program Management of New Starts Projects FY 2008 Proposed Effective April 30, 2006.
Southwest LRT Project Craig Lamothe, AICP Senior Project Manager 2011 MN State Planning Conference September 29, 2011.
CONNECT COBB Northwest Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis Town Center Area Community Improvement District Update March 27, 2012.
Chicago Transit AuthorityJune, 2007 Chicago Transit Authority Regional South Metro Transportation Summit June 16, 2007 Matteson, Illinois.
Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/
Copyright © 2011 Holland & Knight LLP. All Rights Reserved Capital Investment Grants Proposed Interim Policy Guidance April 15, 2015 Jeffrey F. Boothe.
VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Feasibility Study and Alternatives Analysis Public Workshop Wednesday, October 22 nd, :30 – 9:00 pm Battlefield.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 4 1 Module 4: CSS in Corridor and Sub-area Planning.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
New Starts/Small Starts and BRT: An Update APTA Bus Conference Seattle, WA May 5, 2009.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
1 FTA Research Programs Ronald Hynes Acting Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation April 17, 2007.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #5 MARCH 12 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM Northern Service Center.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 (formerly 5305) Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California.
Framework for Rail Planning and Project Development.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Colfax Corridor Connections (Denver) & 15/15L Transit Priority Study (RTD) RTD Board - Planning & Development Committee August 6, 2013.
2015 Annual Program Evaluation (APE) Status Update July 14, 2015.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
Transportation and Traffic Engineering Ch 1 Introduction 10/10/2017
PRASA ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/16 to 2017/18
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Update on Route 1 Efforts Transportation Advisory Committee October 20, 2015 Leonard Wolfenstein, FCDOT Jane Rosenbaum, FCDOT Doug Miller, FCDOT Department.
Southwest LRT Project Craig Lamothe, AICP Senior Project Manager
Regional Railroad Authority (WCRRA)
Transit Systems Planning
California’s Rural Intercity Bus System: 2018 Update
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Transit Standards and Performance Measures
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
North-South Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Chicago Transit Authority
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

TRANSIT SYSTEMS PLANNING Module 3, Lesson 4

Learning Objectives Define systems planning Understand the steps required for plan selection and the key features and elements required

Overall Context Systems planning requires a long-term approach that integrates with community goals and objectives and coordinates with other mode, land use and financial plans.

What is Systems Planning? Capital, operations and policy elements Longer term focus years Five to 10 year update cycle Integrates with community goals and objectives Coordinates with other mode plans Coordinates with land use plan Includes financial plan Systems Planning Service planningPolicy planning Short range planning Long-range planning Capital planning Strategic planning Operations planning Financial planning

What is Systems Planning? Highly dependent on the nature and goals for public transit in the target community. Can be very significant initiative in communities where transit plays a meaningful role in providing transportation capacity and/or in shaping urban development. Can be more significant in growing communities where transit is looked at as a critical means of meeting future mobility needs. Occasionally produces a system master plan that is part of a regional commitment to a guideway network (MARTA, WMATA, BART, DART, etc), and can be a centerpiece in a local referendum or major decision.

Sample System Plan Adopted Regional System, 1968 After extensive discussions with local planning bodies, the WMATA planners settled on a 97.2 mile system (44.8 miles in subway), with 88 stations and “future extensions” mapped in every direction. In February 1968, they named it Metro., WMATA. 6

Systems Planning Steps Goals and Objectives Development of alternative plans Specification of the evaluation criteria Forecasts of future conditions Stakeholder input Assessment of current conditions Evaluation of alternative plans Corridor or project planning Plan refinement Plan selection

Systems Planning: Key Features for Large Urban Area Systems Plans Carried out in collaboration with other modes and with the land-use planning entity. Often major multiyear initiative. Typically involves major transportation or transportation and land-use modeling efforts. Followed by corridor or project development planning.

Stakeholders Existing and future passengers Local citizens/taxpayers Vested interest groups in all relevant areas associated with project impacts (energy, air-quality, environment, mobility, population segments [seniors, disabled, minority, etc.], business, etc.). Regional, state, federal authorities who might be involved in providing approvals and funding.

Transit Plan Development Evaluation, and Selection Adopted from Vuchic Local conditions Topography Roadway network Land-use Financial capacity Environmental considerations Transit system goals and objectives: role of transit Travel demand (current and forecast) Origin destination pattern Flow volumes level of service goals Design alternative plans Mode or modes Network configuration/alignments Network extent Carpooling/vanpool Bus Express bus Streetcar Bus rapid transit Light rail Heavy rail Commuter rail other Evaluation and selection of plan Matching modes to market characteristics

Guidance in Matching Technologies to Market Characteristics 12

STEPS IN PROJECT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Alternatives Analysis Final Design Commitment of Non-Federal Funding, Construction Plans, ROW Acquisition, Before-After Data Collection Plan, FTA Evaluation for FFGA, Begin Negotiations Project Management Oversight Construction Preliminary Engineering Complete NEPA Process Refinement of Financial Plan Select LPA, MPO Action,Develop Criteria, PMP FTA Decision On Entry into PE FTA Decision On Entry into Final Design Full Funding Grant Agreement Preliminary Engineering Final Design Construction Decision Point Major Development Stage Systems Planning Planning Decisions Needs Policies Priority corridor(s) Decisions Mode, general alignment Financial plan Adopt LPA into LRTP Decisions Refinements to LPA Final scope and cost Complete NEPA Implement financial plan Refine Project Management Plan Enhance Technical Capacity New Starts Planning and Project Development Process

Small Starts Planning and Project Development 15 Alternatives Analysis Project Development Select LPA FTA Approval to Start PD Project Construction Grant Agreement System Planning Decisions Mode, general alignment Financial plan Decisions Needs Policies Priority corridor(s) Decisions Refinements to LPA Final scope and cost Complete NEPA Implement financial plan

Key Decisions for Each Phase of New Starts Project Development Systems planning: priority corridor Alternatives analysis: mode and alignment Preliminary engineering: final scope/cost, completion of NEPA, financial plan Final design: construction documents Full Funding Grant Agreement  FTA: funding  Project sponsor: delivery of the project

Operating Facilities Element Operating facilities or garages  Approximately 1 per 200 vehicles.  Geographically spaced to minimize deadhead time.  Located to minimize neighborhood impact and optimize access to transit network. Occasionally separated by mode and functions (storage and light maintenance, heavy maintenance).

Passenger Facilities Element Transit centers – enable transferring between vehicles and provide operator layover points. Can be attractive community assets. Park-and-ride lots – support express services. Passenger shelters and facilities – provide comfort, service awareness, and passenger support information.

Fleet Element Match capacity needs to size and types of transit vehicles. Establish a program of vehicle replacement to:  ensure adequate capacity,  enhance labor productivity  balance capital spending requirements,  support a stable maintenance workload,  ensure compatibility with fueling, communications, maintenance, cleaning, and related system elements.

References Vukan Vuchic, Urban Transit Operations, Planning and Economics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2005, Part III, Transit Systems Planning and Mode Selection, pp George Gray and Lester Hoel, Editors, Public Transportation, Chapter 13, System and Service Planning, Herbert Levinson, pp