CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.

Advertisements

1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,

Bill Zannini Business Programs Coordinator October 27, 2008.

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006.

Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.

University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.

Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.

The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.

EPortfolio Assessment Pilot. Agenda Purpose of the ePortfolio assessment pilot CSD use of ePortfolio English department use of ePortfolio Future applications.

 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.

Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.

1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer

Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.

Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.

Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: Women and Gender Studies Director: Barbara LeSavoy Assessment Coordinator: Barbara LeSavoy Date.

Outcome Assessment Reporting for Undergraduate Programs Stefani Dawn and Bill Bogley Office of Academic Programs, Assessment & Accreditation Faculty Senate,

 Assessment is a Team Sport Leah Bradley Sandra Connelly, Ph.D. Elizabeth Hane, Ph.D. Anne Wahl, Ed.D. ANNY Presentation April 9, 2013.

Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.

Graduate Assistant compiles raw data for Assessment Committee by survey (where appropriate) and by curricular objective Assessment Committee reviews compilation.

Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.

Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.

What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.

WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.

SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.

The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.

A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-

THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.

Integrating Teaching, Learning and Assessment: A Programmatic ePortfolio Process AAEEBL Conference, Boston, MA - July 28, 2011 Karen Stein, Faculty Director,

Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.

1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,

Unit Meeting Feb. 15, ◦ Appreciative Inquiry Process-BOT Steering Committee and Committee Structure. ◦ Four strategies identified from AIP: Each.

Program Assessment – an overview Karen E. Dennis O: sasoue.rutgers.edu.

CURRICULUM MAPPING. WORKSHOP LEARNING OUTCOME PARTICIPANTS WILL USE A CURRICULUM MAP TO DEMONSTRATE HOW STUDENT PROGRESS TO ACHIEVE PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES.

Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.

EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.

The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.

Saddleback College “Level Up” Basic Skills and Student Outcomes Transformation Grant Institutional Effectiveness Participation Initiative State Chancellor’s.

Refresher Course on Assessment

Writing Program-level Student Learning Outcomes (PSLOs)

Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011

Outcomes Assessment Committee

Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.

Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report

Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle

Director of Policy Analysis and Research

Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development

June 5, 2017 General Track Meeting.

ORIGINAL SMART GOAL FORM

Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support

21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development

Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for

Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes

Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012

Working with Department Faculty to Develop a Culture of Assessment

Strategic Planning Summary.

PILR: Pre College Information Literacy Research

Dr. James W. Dottin Department Chair Business Administration

Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007

Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW

Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017

Electrical Engineering Tech. (A. A. S

Assessment Day Strategy

Key Dates for GEARS Fall 2017 All Faculty Selected Faculty

Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for

Curriculum Coordinator: Rosemary Philips

Dean of Engagement Evaluation

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment

Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.

Presentation transcript:

CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016

Agenda Welcome and Introductions Progress Report 6 Results Progress Report 7- Coming Soon Ongoing Support and Resources

Director of Educational Effectiveness Assessment Focus: Program Level Assessment Laurie Clayton Assistant Director of Educational Effectiveness Assessment Focus: General Education Assessment Leah Bradley Assessment Management System Coordinator Grace Rubin New Name: Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment

Progress Report 6 University Results

Progress Report 6 University and CIAS Trend Comparison

Progress Reports 1-6 CIAS Summary Trends

Progress Report 6 CIAS Use of Results Minimal Evidence (1) 4% Clear Evidence (2) 50% Clear Evidence (3) 43% Advanced (4) 4% Continuous Improvement Rubric Ratings 96%

Continuous Improvement What does it look like? Improve assessment processes Improve student learning Develop instructional strategies Enhance or revise curriculum Analyzed and used SLO results from direct sources to… And explained why changes were needed and described next steps Conduct professional development activities Improve academic support services

Continuous Improvement Examples (CIAS) Enhance Curriculum Based on the data collected, we added writing assignments focusing on the analysis and synthesis of research discoveries to improve the student’s ability to clearly define and defend their project. Re-assessment will take place next fall to evaluate improvement. Instructional Strategies Based on the assessment results additional peer activities and peer support were added to the course. This support included online project management tools per team group to improve peer engagement and tracking. Academic Support As a result, the faculty initiated a series improvement sessions where students at all levels voluntarily participate in developing their skills. Responses to senior exit interview questions in spring 2015 revealed that the improvement sessions were valued by students.

Closing the Loop Explain why changes were needed and described next steps Described looking back on prior assessment results

Progress Report 7 Coming October 3, % of programs meeting benchmarks 100% of programs use results CIAS Goals 100% programs meeting benchmarks 100% of programs use results University Goals

Completing the Progress Report Login to Taskstream Here you can review your PLOAP and PR6 Select an outcome to report Be strategic Complete the Progress Report Refer to rubric Share with colleagues Submit PR 7 December 15 Deadline

Progress Report 7 Getting Help Web Resources: Curriculum Mapping, Developing Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes, Sample Plans, Implementation Checklist, Rubrics 1:1 Consultations CIAS Walk-in Hours Continuous Improvement Rubric and Feedback

Program Assessment Resources and Support Use your Taskstream workspace Demonstrate Continuous Improvement Build a curriculum map Revise and improve PLOAP

Academic Program Analysis and Review (APAR)  Progress Report results are included in the APAR metrics for both Undergraduate and Graduate programs  Trend data is used and includes three prior years  Metrics include: Benchmarks Met (programs meeting at least one) Use of Results (Evidence of continuous improvement according to rubric)

Questions