The X-Ray Universe 2008, Granada, Spain, May 28, 2008 Chandra Monitoring of X-Ray Evolution of SNR 1987A Sangwook Park Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X-ray Astronomy with High Spectral Resolution: Astro-E2 / ISAS Y. Tanaka.
Advertisements

SN 1987A spectacular physics Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
Suzaku Discovery of Fe K-Shell Line from the O-rich SNR G Arxiv: Fumiyoshi Kamitukasa et al.
Stephen C.-Y. Ng McGill University. Outline Why study supernova? What is a supernova? Why does it explode? The aftermaths --- Supernova remnants Will.
Magnetic Fields in Supernova Remnants and Pulsar-Wind Nebulae S.P. Reynolds et al. Martin, Tseng Chao Hsiung 2013/12/18.
Strange Galactic Supernova Remnants G (the Tornado) & G in X-rays Anant Tanna Physics IV 2007 Supervisor: Prof. Bryan Gaensler.
RX J alias Vela Jr. The Remnant of the Nearest Historical Supernova : Impacting on the Present Day Climate? Bernd Aschenbach Vaterstetten, Germany.
Patrice Bouchet – DSM/IRFU/Sap CEA-Saclay – COSPAR 2010 IRFU/ Service d’Astrophysiqu e Day 8550: years since outburst How old were you when this.
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
Supernova 1987A at 25 years. 1.Highlights of the past 25 years 2.Outstanding mysteries and surprises 3.What we can expect to learn, sooner and later TOPICS.
X-ray Properties of Five Galactic SNRs arXiv: Thomas G. Pannuti et al.
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Rie Yoshii ( RIKEN/Tokyo Univ. of Science) すざくで観測した N103B Observation of N103B by Suzaku 〜 together with SNR and SNR (type Ia SNRs.
Supernovae from Massive Stars: light curves and spectral evolution Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
October 10, 2002COSPAR Houston, TX1 X-Ray Spectral Morphologies of Young Supernova Remnants John P. Hughes Rutgers University  Cara Rakowski, Rutgers.
SN 1987A the excitement continues Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
Facts about SNe and their remnants Evolution of an SNR sensitively depends on its environment. Observed SNRs are typically produced by SNe in relative.
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1 H.J.Völk 2, E.G.Berezhko 1, 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical.
IR Shell Surrounding the Pulsar Wind Nebula G SNRs and PWNe in the Chandra Era Boston, July 8, 2009 Tea Temim (CfA, Univ. of MN) Collaborators:
An X-ray Study of the Bright Supernova Remnant G with XMM-Newton SNRs and PWNe in the Chandra Era Boston, MA – July 8 th, 2009 Daniel Castro,
The Hot Plasma in the Galactic Center with Suzaku Masayoshi Nobukawa, Yoshiaki Hyodo, Katsuji Koyama, Takeshi Tsuru, Hironori Matsumoto (Kyoto Univ.)
Radio and X-Ray Properties of Magellanic Cloud Supernova Remnants John R. Dickel Univ. of Illinois with: D. Milne. R. Williams, V. McIntyre, J. Lazendic,
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Summary of Post-Main-Sequence Evolution of Stars M > 8 M sun M < 4 M sun Subsequent ignition of nuclear reactions involving.
I.Introduction  Recent evidence from Fermi and the VLBA has revealed a strong connection between ɣ -ray emission in AGNs and their parsec-scale radio.
Collaborators: Michael Muno (UCLA) Frederick Baganoff (MIT) Yoshitomo Maeda (ISAS) Mark Morris (UCLA) George Chartas (Penn State) Divas Sanwal (Penn State)
A New Magnetar Candidate Located Outside the Galactic Plane? Joe Callingham | Sean Farrell | Bryan Gaensler | Geraint Lewis Sydney Institute for Astronomy.
Collisional Ionization and Doppler Lines in the Ultra-compact Binary 4U years or X-ray Binaries, Chandra Workshop, July 10-12, 2012, Boston MA.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton Paul O’Brien X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Collaborators:- James Reeves, Darach.
THE EXPANSION ASYMMETRY AND AGE OF THE CASSIOPEIA A SUPERNOVA REMNANT XinZhou
2005/9/28 X-ray Universe The electron and magnetic field energies in the east lobe of the radio galaxy Fornax A, measured with XMM-Newton. Naoki.
Chandra Observation of the Failed Cluster Candidate K. Hayashida, H. Katayama (Osaka University), K. Mori (Penn State University), T.T. Takeuchi.
X-ray signature of shock modification in SN 1006 Supernova Remnants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era July , Boston, USA Marco Miceli.
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
X-ray study of a nearby nuclear X-ray study of a nearby nuclear starburst and a nearby AGN starburst and a nearby AGN Roberto Soria (UCL) Mat Page, Kinwah.
C. Y. Hui & W. Becker X-Ray Studies of the Central Compact Objects in Puppis-A & RX J Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse.
X-ray observation of the Cygnus Loop with Suzaku and XMM-Newton
Expected Gamma-Ray Emission of SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (d = 50 kpc) E.G.Berezhko 1, L.T. Ksenofontov 1, and H.J.Völk 2 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute.
RGS observations of cool gas in cluster cores Jeremy Sanders Institute of Astronomy University of Cambridge A.C. Fabian, J. Peterson, S.W. Allen, R.G.
A New Window on Radio and X-ray emission from Strongly Interacting Supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada Collaborators: Roger Chevalier,
1 Radio – FIR Spectral Energy Distribution of Young Starbursts Hiroyuki Hirashita 1 and L. K. Hunt 2 ( 1 University of Tsukuba, Japan; 2 Firenze, Italy)
American Astronomical Society – Austin, TX (2008) Patrick Slane (CfA) In collaboration with: D. Helfand (Columbia) S. Reynolds (NC State) B. Gaensler (U.
W.Becker 1, M.C.Weisskopf 2, Z.Arzoumanian 3, D.Lorimer 4, F.Camilo 5, R.F.Elsner 2, G.Kanbach 1, O.Reimer 6, D.A.Swartz 2, A.F.Tennant 2, S.L.O’Dell 2.
A smoothed hardness map of the hotspots of Cygnus A (right) reveals previously unknown structure around the hotspots in the form of outer and inner arcs.
J. Miguel Mas Hesse Elena Jiménez Bailón María de Santos Luis Colina Rosa González-Delgado When UV meets IR. Moriond 2005.
The Galactic Center region The Galactic Center region K. Koyama and A. Senda (Kyoto-U) Y. Maeda and H. Murakami (ISAS / JAXA) Y. Maeda and H. Murakami.
ALMA observations of Molecules in Supernova 1987A
Metallicity in intra-cluster medium of clusters and groups of galaxies
Supernova.
CSI in SNRs You-Hua Chu Inst of Astron and Astroph
Young, thin, & on the m o v e : HETG Observations of SNRs
SN 1987A: The Formation & Evolution of Dust in a Supernova Explosion
Chandra HETG Spectra of SN 1987A at 20 Years
Vikram V Dwarkadas University of Chicago
Martin C. Weisskopf AAS 2011 May 23
Chandra Science Highlights
Rebecca Surman Union College
A one-dimensional look at the recent HETG data
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
Mid-infrared Observations of Aged Dusty Supernovae
Ay 123: Supernovae contd...
DISCRETE X-RAY SOURCE LUMINOSITY FUNCTION (LF):
RADIO EMISSION FROM SNe & GRBs, AND THE NEED FOR SKA
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
XMM-Newton Observation of the composite SNR G0. 9+0
Supernova Nucleosynthesis and Extremely Metal-Poor Stars
Suzaku Observation of Tycho’s Supernova Remnant
HETG Spectral-imaging of SN1987A
Supernova.
Presentation transcript:

The X-Ray Universe 2008, Granada, Spain, May 28, 2008 Chandra Monitoring of X-Ray Evolution of SNR 1987A Sangwook Park Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics The Pennsylvania State University with D. N. Burrows, J. L. Racusin (Penn State), S. A. Zhekov, R. McCray (Colorado), B. M. Gaensler, C.-Y. Ng (Sydney), & L. Staveley-Smith (Western Australia)

SN 1987A in Her Uniqueness Brightest supernova observed by mankind since 1604 (J. Kepler) Distance: 50 kpc, in the LMC Age: 21 years old as of Jan 2008 Type II SN Progenitor: Blue supergiant (Sk , B3 I) Neutrino burst => Core-collapse explosion => neutron star? Most intensively studied SN of all time: – – Optical/UV: HST and many ground-based – – Radio: initial detection, turned on again in ~1990 – – X-ray: no initial detection, turned on in ~1990 – – Gamma-ray: detected decay lines from 56 Co  decay of 56 Ni, confirming explosive nucleosynthesis => ADS: ~1000 (~1/week) refereed papers (since 1987)   Chandra observations since 1999: - Monitoring: ACIS, twice a year, separated by ~6 months - Spectroscopy: HETG/LETG - - As of , 21 Chandra observations performed: 16 ACIS monitoring ( Penn State/Colorado ) 4 HETG/LETG deep spectroscopy ( Penn State/Colorado/MIT ) 1 HRC imaging ( CfA/Sydney/Penn State/Colorado )

SNR 1987A: Physical Picture Cf. Michael et al Artistic presentation of SN 1987A (SAO/CXC) Optical/Soft X-rays Hard X-rays Radio ? NS/BH

N E (7626) SNR 1987A: ACIS Images 2000– arcsec

SNR 1987A: X-Ray & Radio Light Curves

(Zhekov+ 06,08) (Haberl+ 06; Heng+ 08) (Haberl+ 06; Heng+ 08)

SNR 1987A: X-Ray & Radio Light Curves - Soft X-ray light curve continues a rapid increase (f ~ t 7 ): a current (last 2 yr) rate of ~35% /yr. As of , f (0.5-2 keV) = 4.1 x erg/cm 2 /s, L x = 2.7 x erg/s. - Hard X-ray light curve increases with a lower rate of ~20% /yr (f ~ t 4 ). As of , f (3-10 keV) = 5.2 x erg/cm 2 /s, L x = 1.6 x erg/s. - Cross-comparisons among different X-ray instruments are consistent. - Radio emission shows an evolution of the spectral index: currently S ~  Radio light curves are flatter than X-rays: ~ t 2.6 (9 GHz), ~ t 2.2 (1.4 GHz). An upper limit (~50% of the 3-10 keV flux) for the contribution from synchrotron emission in the observed hard X-ray flux is estimated based on a simple extrapolation of the radio fluxes (assuming S ~  -0.8 and no spectral break), and SRCUT/PL model fits of the latest ACIS spectrum.

SNR 1987A: X-ray Radial Expansion Racusin et al X-ray radius vs time. Broadband deconvolved image for each epoch is deprojected (43 deg) and fitted to a model (a torus + 4 lobes) in order to estimate the radius of the SNR as a function of time. Estimated overall expansion velocity is ~3500 km/s (w/ poor fit). The expansion slows down to ~1700 km/s since d ~ 6000.

SNR 1987A: X-Ray Spectral Evolution 2008 Jan Soft component: kT s ~ 0.3 keV n e t ~ cm -3 s Hard component: kT h ~ 1.9 keV n e t ~ 2 x cm -3 s   n s /n h ~ 100 Overall softening of spectrum. Abundances fixed at values obtained from the LETG/HETG data (Zhekov et al. 2008): N = 0.56 O = 0.08 Ne = Mg = 0.28 Si = 0.33 Si = 0.30 Fe = 0.19 Dewey+ 2008, Zhekov+ 2008Park+ 2006

SNR 1987A: Dispersed Spectrum (2007) Dewey+ 2008; Zhekov Deep HETG (355 ks) & LETG (285 ks) observations in Two characteristic shock model fit: kT ~ 0.5 and 2 keV. - Soft kT is constant (~0.5 keV). - Hard kT decreases (2.7 -> 1.9 keV). Bulk gas velocities measured by the line widths are v ~ km/s, while v ~ km/s as derived from the fitted electron temperatures. Do lower bulk motion velocities imply a contribution from the reflecte shock? kT ~ 1.9 keV kT ~ 0.5 keV

SUMMARY Ring-like morphology with asymmetric intensity Developments of X-ray spots => becomes a complete ring as the blast wave arrives the inner ring Steep brightening in soft X-rays => Now ~24 x brighter than 2000: L x (0.5-2keV) = 2.7 x ergs/s A rapid brightening (~ t 7 ): The shock continues interacting w/ a steep density increase. Radial expansion: v ~ 7800 km/s to 1700 km/s at day ~6000 Slower brightening in hard X-rays: ~6 x brighter than Synchrotron emission? But, steeper than radio light curves (f ~ t 4 vs t 2.6 ). Shock-CSM interaction: spectral softening and distribution of shock velocity Soft comp kT ~ keV (constant) Hard comp kT ~ 1.9 keV (decreasing) Low bulk velocities: reflected shock? Little changes in metal abundances. The complex shock structure by interacting with inner ring: Careful analysis with more data is required with upcoming Chandra monitoring with the HETG. The origin of hard X-ray emission: hot gas vs synchrotron? We need to watch continuous evolution in both X-ray and radio emission. Searching for the embedded neutron star