Why Continuous Improvement? Benefits to adopting a systems approach to drive improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
PORTFOLIO.
Parents as Partners in Education
Elementary School Counselor
Dennis M. Williams, Jr., Principal Dr. Susan Bitner, Assistant Principal Ralph Rapino, Assistant Principal William Miles, Assistant Principal Louis James,
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Curriculum Leadership The Central Figure is the Principal.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic, Resource Teacher.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Office of Service Quality
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Structural Foundations for Continuous Improvement Leaders of Learners April 2016.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
Secondary Assessment & Grade Reporting
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
School Improvement Survey Results
Grant Champions Workshop Logic Model Development
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Comprehensive Planning
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
New Teacher Induction Model
Principles that Promote a Culture For Learning Understanding the WHY and the WHAT Chuck Salina Ph.D. Suzann Girtz Ph.D. Gonzaga University.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Planning for Continuous Improvement: The importance of goal setting
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
Goal Progress Measure 1.1 Update September 26, 2017 Academics Division
Minooka Strategic Planning Strategy Action Plans
February 21-22, 2018.
Arvin Advantage After School Program
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
New Prospect Elementary School
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
Continuous Improvement
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Summit Hill Elementary School
Effective After-School Programs Presented by
Mountain Park Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Why Continuous Improvement? Benefits to adopting a systems approach to drive improvement

Why CI? “The constant pursuit of knowledge and improvement, striving to make yourself better today than you were yesterday, is not merely an indispensable tenet for leaders to follow, but one of the great joys of life. It is a pursuit that motivates me every day to be a better husband, a better father, a better Christian, a better friend, and a better football coach” (p. 154).

Why CI? Practiced use of CI strategies helps build a growth mindset among students, teachers and staff

Why CI? CI helps build relationships with stakeholders

Why CI? When we Create and use systems that align curriculum, instructional delivery and assessment to the learning requirements (standards), and Consistently monitor progress toward agreed-upon academic goals, and Adjust accordingly to meet student needs, then We eliminate guesswork involved when predicting performance on high-stakes tests.

Why CI?

Pater Noster Lighthouse, Marstrand, Sweden Why CI? CI provides a framework to understand the interdependence of system components and provide structure to the myriad of “things” that comprise the work of education

Variable Inputs Predictable Quality Outputs Why CI? CI provides a system of responsive processes to produce high-quality outputs

Why CI? CI promotes students’ engagement and ownership in their own learning

Building the foundation

Benchmark survey results

What would you need to improve your level of comfort in leading CI training on your campus? Theme Number of respondents Additional training/CI refresher/review of strategies10 Training in PDSA3 Training in use of tools/student data folders3 Understand district expectations for implementation3 Turnaround training/guidance in steps to follow3 Training in tracking student data/measuring progress2 Examples of CI in the classroom1 Collaboration with other principals1 Training other than CI (rigor/relevance, SIOP)2

Benchmark survey results What are you hoping to accomplish for your campus in terms of CI by the end of the school year? Theme Number of respondents PDSA8 Monitoring student data5 Student data folders4 Campus and classroom beliefs/mission/vision4 Understand/follow district expectations for implementation3 CI foundations3 Developing and using goals to track progress2 CI and work of the PLC2 Other/not directly related to CI18

District expectations Tight – Loose – Tight (TLT) approach District-designated outcomes Campus-determined design and implementation Campus-wide classroom outcomes based on design Recursive alignment with CI professional learning plan Sep/Oct 2016 – Evidence of campus and classroom mission statements Jan 2017 – Evidence of campus and classroom goals Apr 2017 – Evidence of classroom PDSA Sep 2017 – Evidence of classroom use of CI tools, such as data folders and plus/delta

Why CI?

Today’s teacher Bases actions on the belief that all students can learn Plans instruction to meet learning goals aligned to standards Uses a wide variety of high-yield strategies to teach for depth of understanding Uses multiple methods to measure and monitor student growth and can clearly explain student performance to parents Can assess progress of individual students as well as student groups Models what it means to be an educated person (they read, question, create, and try new things) Works collaboratively with parents to engage them in the work of the school - National Board for Professional Teaching Standards

Building the foundation