Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Meeting Your Proficiency Testing Requirements on a Tight Budget James M. Ingram Jr. (315) 393-0229

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A Perspective on Geotechnical Testing: The Details Matter

Advertisements

ISO/IEC 17043:2010 Proficiency Testing Program for Multiple-Laboratory/ Multiple Instrument Data Validation of Petroleum Products. ISO/IEC 17043:2010 Proficiency.

M11EGR TRWL vs Liner Material Statistical Analysis 19May2003 jar.

General Statistics Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.

The New TNI Laboratory Accreditation Standards Requirements for an Accreditation Body.

AFDO – MFRPA Meeting Governmental Food and Feed Laboratories Accreditation Meeting Dr. Bill Hirt -- ANAB.

Copyright Alan Rowley Associates Steps to an Accurate Result Select a method and validate it as suitable for the purpose envisaged. Establish that.

Proficiency Testing and Inter Laboratory Comparisons Identification, Supervision and Evaluation Europe Aid/117469/C/SV/TR December 2005 – June 2007 Facilitating.

Preparing for a Initial Assessment

1 NCSLI Conference 2013 Inter-Laboratory Comparison Study Using Modular Instrumentation and Lessons Learned Author:Dimaries Nieves – National Instruments.

Motivating Best Practice in Lab QMS 1 Principles behind ISO/IEC J.E.J. (Ned) Gravel, CD, PEng, CAE, CA-LS, IPL Principal, MOTIVA Training Inc.

Consumers Energy Company (CECo) the principal subsidiary of CMS Energy values Accreditation.

Technical requirements  Sampling  Analysis  Reporting of the results.

5.2 Personnel Use competent staff Supervise as necessary

University of Florida Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 1 Useful Tips for Presenting Data and Measurement Uncertainty Analysis Ben Smarslok.

An introduction to the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Sally Bruce, Chief for the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.

Lecture 7 Analytical Quality Control

Quality Control In Measurements Tom Colella CLAS Goldwater Environmental Lab.

HKAS Assessor Seminar 2006 Technical Assessor Role and Responsibility 28 Feb 2006 Dr Sidney Tam Consultant & Head Division of Clinical Biochemistry Queen.

Improving Test Ratios Using Reference Multimeters.

Automotive Test & Measurement Case Studies SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006.

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Practical Solutions to Traceability and Uncertainty in Accreditation Presented to CITAC-NCSLI Joint Workshop.

WLTP DTP PM-PN Subgroup Activities, Progress & Future Plans 7 th DTP Meeting Bern 12 th – 14 th September 2011 Chris Parkin.

Metrology Adapted from Introduction to Metrology from the Madison Area Technical College, Biotechnology Project (Lisa Seidman)

Yokogawa Indonesia ＜ Document Number> Copyright © 2004, Yokogawa Indonesia ACCREDITATION OF CALIBRATION LABORATORY STANDARD LAB CENTER.

Chemical Metrology at NCSLI Charter and Goal PITTCON 2002 March 17, 2002 Richard B. Pettit Primary Standards Laboratory Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque,

Role of RENAR and the Ministry of Research in Promoting Interlaboratory Comparisons (ILCs) Daniela-Eugenia CUCU RENAR.

Dr. Peter Bode, Associate Professor Delft University of Technology, Interfaculty Reactor Institute Mekelweg JB Delft, The Netherlands Tel

BMTA July 2005: 1 Valid Analytical Measurement Studies of Proficiency Testing scheme performance S Ellison LGC Limited, Teddington The work described in.

RPF Laboratory Accreditation/Verification Task Group RPF meeting 13/14 November 2002.

Magnification Calibration Interlaboratory SEM Study: Part 1.

Requirements for the Competence of Providers of Proficiency Testing Schemes ILAC Guide 13:2000 – supplementing ISO Guides 43-1 and 43-2.

SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006 ISO/TS 16949:2002 certification – Meeting the requirements of.

“Normalization” of Foliar Nutrient Data. l Differences in laboratory methodology may affect analytical results.

Principles behind ISO/IEC 17025

Comparison of CA Evaluation Protocols, CA Framework, IPMVP and CPUC Policy Manual* A preface to group discussion *In terms of how they define.

© Copyright 2007 Corsec Security, Inc. Corsec Security, Inc. FIPS and Common Criteria Validation Consultants.

SRRTTF Interpretation of Low Level PCB Data Project Objectives and Impact on +Blank Correction Procedures.

Turn in lab reports and WS 1 to the front basket. Remember to attach your draft.

Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO 17025

Simplifying Measurement Uncertainties Bill Hirt, Ph.D / February 2016.

Proficiency Testing Bryanne Shaw Biology Section Manager.

THE ROLE OF PROFICIENCY TESTING - A PERSPECTIVE FROM AN ACCREDITATION BODY Randall Querry American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) November.

2016 MFRPS: Changes To Standard 10 Guy F. Delius, R. S. CSO Food and Drug Administration Office Of Partnerships Standards Implementation Staff February.

© A2LA Understanding the Accreditation Hierarchy - Who’s Who and What’s What ? NCSL International Conference Orlando, FL August 7, 2008 by Roxanne.

APLAC Interlaboratry Comparison Program for Short Gauge Blocks - APLAC M018 Takashi Horaguchi International Accreditation Japan (IAJapn), National Institute.

Recommended Guide for Determining and Reporting Uncertainties for Balances and Scales Val Miller NIST Office of Weights and Measures.

The Traceability of Conductivity Meter and Cell Calibration in the Low Conductivity Ranges Jun Bautista, Director, Genzyme Metrology Genzyme Corporation,

Putting Confidence Into Your Lab’s Results Alan Steele, Barry Wood & Rob Douglas National Research Council Ottawa, CANADA National.

Calibrating DC Current Shunts: Techniques and Uncertainties Jay Klevens, Ohm-Labs, Inc. © 2011.

Development of a Standard Practice for the Calibration of Torque-measuring Instruments for Verifying the Torque Indication of Testing Machines Speaker/author:

4 August An Interlaboratory Comparison of 3.5 mm Coaxial 2-Port Vector Network Analyzer Measurements 4 August 2008 Li Pi Su, Dexter Shelton, George.

Challenges in Method Validation – A Regulatory Laboratory Perspective

Status Report of Time and Frequency Laboratory, NML-SIRIM, Malaysia

Monitoring aspects of permits and inspections (1)

Proficiency Testing as a quality improvement tool

Annex 6 Test procedure for measuring rolling resistance

Date of download: 11/4/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

National Laboratory Association

The Proficiency Testing Matrix

By John Wilson Accreditation and Metrology Services (Pty) LTD.

Workshop Method Validation in Analytical Sciences Current practices and future challenges Gent, 9-10 May 2016 Report from WG 1 Day2.

Accreditation of Environmental Testing Labs by a Non-Governmental Accreditation Body (NGAB) – How is this Different from a State Accreditation? Operational.

WLTP DTP PM-PN Subgroup Activities, Progress & Future Plans

محدوده مرجع در آزمايشگاه تشخيص طبی Reference Interval

METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS

محدوده مرجع در آزمايشگاه تشخيص طبی در بخش بیوشیمی Reference Interval

Inter-Laboratory Comparison Exercise CPC CALIBRATION

Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Meeting Your Proficiency Testing Requirements on a Tight Budget James M. Ingram Jr. (315)

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Commercial PT or Inter-Laboratory Comparison?

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates A2LA Proficiency Testing Requirement If proficiency testing programs that are suitable and relevant to the scope of accreditation are available through commercial proficiency testing programs … or through well-organized inter-laboratory comparisons (ILCs) or internal/external round robin programs, the laboratories must participate in these programs.

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Program Requirements Acceptability of such programs will be made on a case-by-case basis by the assessor, and will be based on the design of the program, its frequency, the suit- ability of the samples, and defined written criteria for data analysis and corrective action.

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates PT Program Acceptability Design of the program Frequency of PT activities Written criteria for data analysis Corrective actions

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Program Design Calibrator vs. DMM Number of Technicians Before and after measurements?

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Frequency of the PT Activity Calibration Labs – Two per year 100% of scope in four years Plan and schedule are required

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Data Analysis Average of multiple readings? Measurement Uncertainty budgets Normalized Error – En Spreadsheet – validated! Added value calculations?

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Sample Spreadsheet DC VoltageEn Results Prior to V CalPost V Cal Nominal Range Nominal ValueTech A Tech BRef Lab Tech A Tech BRef LabIn-House Tech A Tech B Tech A Tech B 220 mV0.00 mV mV mV mV mV mV mV mV mV mV0.276#### ##### ### mV ######### ### mV mV0.142#### ##### ### Measurement of a Fluke 5700A calibrator with an HP 3458A DMM

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Documented Results Outline of the PT activity Measurement Uncertainty budgets Data & results of analysis Conclusions and analysis Corrective actions

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates Conclusion Added work (one time?) Money and time saved Convenience More technicians involved

Copyright © 2004 J.M. Ingram & Associates For further information contact: James M. Ingram Jr. Principal Consultant J.M. Ingram & Associates Management and Metrology Consultants 505 Wadhams Street Ogdensburg, New York (315)