Status of the CEDAR project DY with kaons / antiprotons I. Gnesi, A

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calibration for LHAASO_WFCTA Yong Zhang, LL Ma on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration 32 nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing 2011.
Advertisements

Study of the MPPC Performance - contents - Introduction Fundamental properties microscopic laser scan –check variation within a sensor Summary and plans.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Radiator study status Y. Horii, Y. Koga, N. Kiribe, … (Nagoya University, Japan) 1 B2GM, 6 th July.
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Feb 20, 2009 CALICE meeting, Daegu, Korea QRL in Magnetic Field 1 QRLed Driver in Magnetic Field Jaroslav Zalesak Institute of Physics of the ASCR, Prague.
1 Ist Virgo+ review Cascina H. Heitmann Alignment: Virgo+ changes.
LCWA, ALCPG 2009 Albuquerque, NM Ivo Polák, FZU, Prague1 Calibration system of CALICE AHCAL detector Ivo Polák 1.Two calibration light distribution.
Light Calibration System (LCS) Temperature & Voltage Dependence Option 2: Optical system Option 2: LED driver Calibration of the Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype.
MPPC update including plastic connector T2K experiment collaboration meeting 2007/4/18 (Wed) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira.
Experimental set-up for on the bench tests Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE/Photonis Multi-Channel.
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
Status of RICH mechanical design at PNPI E.Vznuzdaev for PNPI group: V.Dobyrn, A.Khanzadeev, E.Kormin, V.Lebedev, N.Miftakhov, V.Polyakov, V.Samsonov,
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Possible calibration methods for the final LXe calorimeter A. Papa 02/11/
First Look at the CEDAR Optics Richard Head (Univ of Bristol)
Timing Studies of Hamamatsu MPPCs and MEPhI SiPM Samples Bob Wagner, Gary Drake, Patrick DeLurgio Argonne National Laboratory Qingguo Xie Department of.
E.Guschin (INR,Moscow) 3 May 2006Calorimeter commissioning meeting Status of PRS/SPD detector Cosmic test results Installation/tuning of monitoring system.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.
Charles University Prague Charles University Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Absolute charge measurements using laser setup Pavel Bažant,
Calibration and production of PRAXIAL (*) sensors for the ATLAS muon spectrometer Optical Metrology - SPIE Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection.
Working group on photon vetoes Meeting on June 7 th : 1.Status of Geant4 simulations 2.Discussion on LAV structure 3.Discussion on readout 4.News on Spaghetti.
PSD upgrade: concept and plans - Why the PSD upgrade is necessary? - Concept of the PSD temperature stabilization and control - Upgrade of HV control system.
APS, 44th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics November 11-15, 2002; Orlando, Florida Hard X-ray Diagnostics in the HSX A. E. Abdou, A. F.
WACH4 26/11/2002Julien Cogan CERN/EP/CMA-1- THERMAL STEPS ANALYSIS Goals & Means : –apply a “step function” on the cooling water –look at : APD response.
IRC/SAC status Venelin Kozhuharov for the SAC/IRC working group NA62 Meeting
The VSiPMT: A new Generation of Photons Detectors G. Barbarino 1,2, F. C. T. Barbato 1,2, R. de Asmundis 2, G. De Rosa 1,2, F. Di Capua 1, P. Migliozzi.
E.Gushchin,S.Filippov(INR,Moscow) 16 April 2008Calo commissioning meeting CERN PS/SPD LED monitoring system status General status LED signal is used for.
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
CEDAR's system upgrade, some ideas Group Illinois-Torino Flavio Tosello – INFN-Torino April 4, 2014.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
ATF2 Status N.Terunuma, KEK
Activities at SMI/Vienna in testing the performance of SiPMs
PreShower Characterisations
Status of the forward tracker design
Installation of the T600 at Fermilab
Plans for this week MWPC: wire stretching today
Test Beam Request for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Beam
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
IFR Status Summary W. Baldini on behalf of the IFR Group
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
Ongoing R&D in Orsay/Saclay on ps time measurement: a USB-powered 2-channel 3.2GS/s 12-bit digitizer D.Breton (LAL Orsay), E.Delagnes (CEA/IRFU) Séminaire.
of secondary light ion beams
Analysis of FADC single-crystal data
Cedar 1-2 (row 1-2) P/T values given in mol/m^3
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Z. Szillasi On behalf of GEM Alignment group November 15, 2017
A precision measurement of d2 on the neutron
Success is when preparation meets opportunity
Francesco Gonnella NA62 Collaboration meeting Washington DC, U.S.A.
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
Directional Optical Module Integration
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
T32 status as of 17-Oct.
Imperial laser system and analysis
HALLA APEL REPORT Yves Roblin Hall A colllaboration Meeting
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

Status of the CEDAR project DY with kaons / antiprotons I. Gnesi, A Status of the CEDAR project DY with kaons / antiprotons I. Gnesi, A. Maggiora, F. Tosello – INFN-Torino June 3, 2014

Contents Required CEDAR resolution Issues from the analysis of DCS data T gradient in CEDARs T_CEDAR vs T_hall P/T behaviour PMT Majorities PMT test bench CEDAR DAQ Conclusions

CEDAR design specs (from CERN 82-13) @ 190 GeV/c : (βπ - βK ) / βπ = 3.161 •10-6

DCS data of the 2009 run – T gradient in CEDARs Time [s] Temp.Diff. [°C] Temperature [°C] CEDAR-1 THEAD TMID TTAIL CEDAR-2 THEAD-TMID TTAIL-TMID THEAD-TMID [°C] TTAIL-TMID [°C]

DCS data of the 2009 run – T gradient in CEDARs In CEDAR 1 : THEAD > TMID > TTAIL and THEAD – TTAIL can be >1 K during colder days Effect of the magnets of the beam line , as already suspected ? In CEDAR 2 : THEAD > TMID but TTAIL > TMID ; THEAD > TMID can be >1 K Effect of the gate of the hall which is faced to the middle of CEDAR 2 ? Temperature gradient in the vessel should be avoided like stated in CERN 74-4 p.7 To improve long-term stability in the two vessels , some additional thermal shield seems necessary : a tent (like attempted in the past) : simpler a less expensive an active shield (with controllable heaters)

DCS data of the 2009 run – THALL / TCEDAR (1) Each CEDAR is also equipped with a PT100 screwed on one of its “feets” (ambient THALL) Looking at the temperature excursions in an interval of t(hours) for every sensor of each CEDAR and evaluating the three ratios, THALL / THEAD , THALL /TMID , THALL > TTAIL , as a function of t(hours) we obtained that : the ratios (insulation factors) have their maximum at t ≈ 12 hours the value of the ratio depends on the considered “internal” sensor the highest value in the two CEDARs is 5 Therefore the effectiveness of the internal shield (rigid polyurethane foam) seems to have reduced from the factor 20 (determined at the production time, ~1980) to a factor < 5 This can represent an further demand for some additional thermal shield Some additional test should be peformed to confirm this observation. Chritophe Menezes Pires said that an additional PT100 for ambient temperature measurements is already available (in the DCS chain) , if a cross-check is needed.

DCS data of the 2009 run – THALL / TCEDAR (1) Cedar 1-2 (row 1-2) Insulation Factors The three mentioned ratios vs t(hours) from HEAD / MIDDLE / TAIL temperature probes (from left to right). The insulation factor seem to be factor 3-5 while the design specs reported a factor 20-80

DCS data of the 2009 run – P/T behavior (1) Cedar 1-2 (row 1-2) P/T values given in mol/m^3 for the HEAD(red)/MIDDLE(green)/TAIL(blue) temperature probes. The first column shows the correlation between the temperature of the precision pressure probe (°C, x-axis) and the gas pressure (bar, y-axis)

DCS data of the 2009 run P/T behavior (2) P/T of CEDARs 1-2 Zooms: gas density variation are shown They show both increasing and decreasing trends and are not always related to pressure scans The relative variation of the density is ~2.5•10-3 while CEDAR reuirements by desing are ~10-4

CEDAR PMT Majorities Ratios Ratios 8-fold/6-fold (red), 8-fold/7-fold (green) and 7-fold/6-fold (blue) for CEDARS 1 (top) and 2 (bottom) Obtained by asking time differences between majorities 8,7 and 6 less than 1 second, so that they should be related to the same spill. Nevertheless they are often > 1 → a better understanding of these DCS data is needed

CEDAR PMT test bench (1) CEDARs will be used to tag kaon, which are about 2.5% of a beam having an intensity of about 108 particle/s . Due to beam divergence, the PMTs receive photons from pions too, therefore they work at a rate > 2.5•106 Hz but < 107 Hz. Output of P.K.Jasinski's MC assuming a beam divergence of divX = 0.221 mrad (FWHM) divY = 0.134 mrad (FWHM) (2008 run) Radius of Cerenkov ring [mm] Counts Light Diaphragm = 0.5mm

CEDAR PMT test bench (2) This high rate suggests to test the PMTs and the associated voltage dividers (and the electronic chain) in the same conditions. A test bench will be produced to this purpose. The Laser driver has been designed and Pspice-simulated for the three tunable parameters : pulse height, width and rate (up to 10 MHz) The PCB is in production The temperature-compensated readout of SiPM is prototyped. The mechanics is being designed PMT being tested Light tight box Uniform ND filters 460 nm Laser diode variable ND filter SiPM (to tune the filters) Reference PMT (for high rate tests) semi-reflective mirror

CEDAR DAQ Since the working rate of the PMT will likely be > 2.5•106 the DAQ front-end has to be fast. Considering the characteristics of the GANDALF board (http://wwwhad.physik.uni-freiburg.de/gandalf/) , it seems the correct choice . GANDALF has been already used for the CEDAR readout (although at lower PMT rates). Horst Fischer agreed to provide the needed module(s) as soon as we decide which specific configuration we want to implement (transient recorder or TDC).

Conclusions Some questions have been raised by the analysis of the DCS data (P/T stability, ratios of the PMT majorities) We need a discussion with the DCS group to understand possible mistakes in our analysis and/or evaluate the feasibility of a monitoring of those parameters based on the DCS data The analysis of few raw data is being started in order to study the CEDAR performance in an off-line analysis Temperature gradients seem to exist in the CEDAR vessels. Insulation performance of the existing PUR-foam shield is not well understood. PMTs should be tested at the expected rates. In order to settle these issues we requested an early installation of the CEDARs . Johannes Bernhard and Lau Gatignon approved this request (but the date has not yet been fixed). New tests / monitoring of pressure and temperature should allow to make a decision on the type of the additional temperature shield (passive vs active). A PMT test bench is being built. DAQ choice has to be finalized. We likely need a discussion with the Freiburg group to understand if the GANDALF configuration used in the past for the CEDAR readout can cope with the expected new rate.