The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel: 877.DMC.3500 Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Advertisements

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Arlington Effective Educator Development System. Philosophy Statement The new evaluation system should be centered on Educators and Evaluators learning.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Principals’ Meeting Talent Management Tuesday, April 8, 2014.
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Education Data Services & Educator Evaluation Team Reporting Educator Evaluation Information in EPIMS for RTTT Districts April – May, 2013 Robert Curtin.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS March 13, 2014 Wifi: EnglishWLan PW:BostonEnglish1821 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 28 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
Colorado Department of Education Katy Anthes March 2014 Educator Effectiveness & Teacher Librarians.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
Educator Plans Overview
What it means for New Teachers
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Training
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Formative Assessments and Observations on EDFS
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
State Board of Education Progress Update
Improving student achievement through teacher observation and feedback
An ideal assessment programme
Local Option Plan for Analysis of Student Work (ASW)
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Evaluation Cycle At-A-Glance
END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS
Presentation transcript:

The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston, MA Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS) April 2013

2 Timeline Submit your collection of evidence: By April 20 th, or a date established by your evaluator Receive the final evaluation report: By April 22 nd, if non-PTS By June 1 st, if PTS is due to receive a summative evaluation By June 20 th, if PTS is due to receive a formative evaluation Sign the evaluation report to acknowledge receipt: By June 1 st Have a conference with the evaluator (optional) By June 1 st Required if the summative rating is “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” Optional if summative rating is “Proficient” or “Exemplary”

3 Overview of summative evaluations What is the purpose? (1) for you to receive feedback on how you did this year and how you can continue to grow (2) for the evaluator to determine a rating on your performance that determines your educator plan and/or staffing for next year What is your role? Gather and submit your collection of evidence that is: Meaningful (quality is more important than quantity) Covers all 6 areas of evaluation: 1. Student learning goal: 2. Professional practice goal: 3. Standard I: 4. Standard II: 5. Standard III: 6. Standard IV:

4 How will ratings be determined? Evaluator’s activityResources the evaluator will use Determine ratings on: 1.Standard I 2.Standard II 3.Standard III 4.Standard IV Teacher rubric Observation records Educator collection of evidence Other evidence (e.g., data) Determine attainment of: 1.Professional Practice Goal(s) 2.Student Learning Goal(s) Rubric on Attainment of Goals Observation records Educator collection of evidence Other evidence (e.g., data) Determine the overall summative rating*Professional judgment Ratings on all four Standards Assessment of attainment of goals *Note: to be rated Proficient overall, an educator must be rated at least Proficient on Standard I and Standard II.

5 Exercise #1: Think like an evaluator – assess the goals Step 1: Take out the handout “Exercise: Goal Attainment” Step 2: Review the educator’s goal and data. Step 3: Using the rubric, determine a rating on the educator’s attainment of goal. Provide a rationale for your rating.

6 What will your summative rating mean for next year? Overall RatingEducator plans / Staffing decisions Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Self-Directed Growth Plan (2-year or 1-year) Directed Growth Plan Improvement Plan Developing Educator Plan Obtain PTS (Must be at least Proficient on all standards and overall) Non- renewal PTS educatorsNon-PTS educators