LEARNING PERSONALIZED: THE NEXT CHAPTER OF TEACHING AND LEARNING Allison Zmuda, Presenter 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Transdisciplinary Units What is the meaning of Transdisciplinary?
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Authentic Performance Tasks
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Project-Based Learning
What should be the basis of
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
A Strategy for Assessment PORTFOLIOS Jones, M., Shelton, M. (2011). Developing Your Portfolio--Enhancing Your Learning and Showing Your Stuff: A Guide.
Backward Planning Center for the Education and Study of Diverse Populations.
Top 10 Instructional Strategies
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Project-Based Learning Training What is the problem with current education methods?
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
Some theoretical considerations of project based learning by Lau Kwok Chi.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
AUTHENTIC LEARNING IN STUDIES OF RELIGION THROUGH THE INQUIRY PROCESS.
4 (Secret) Keys to Student Engagement Robyn Jackson & Allison Zmuda.
Professional Teaching Portfolio Valerie Waloven
MDE Mississippi Teacher Center Beginning Teacher Support Training Program.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Evaluation 4.0 Or at least a 3.75.
Manchester Administrator Retreat
Music to Our Ears: Making Personalized Learning Come Alive
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Contemporary Issues in Curriculum: Chapters 1-5
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Backwards Design for Rigor
A deeper dive into personalized learning
Module 2: Introduction to Using OER for Math Instruction
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Cultivating Student Inquiry With Service-Learning
Quarterly Meeting Focus
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
PROJECT/PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING: Who’s Doing the Thinking?
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Alternative Assessment (Portfolio)
Magothy River Middle School
Contemporary Issues November 8, 2010.
Project-Based Learning
Project-Based Learning
Understanding by Design
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
Informational Writing Unit Grade 7-Looking at Grade 6/year 1
the New Syllabus: Dr Nina Cook, Pymble Ladies’ College.
Understanding by Design
District Assessment System
Your Inquiry Project
Teaching All Children: Planning and Assessment
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
3 Stages of Backward Design
Project–Based Learning
5 E Instructional Model created by Debra DeWitt
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Introduction Icebreaker House keeping rules
Undergraduate Survey Data
CWT workshop 2.
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Why Performance Assessments Matter
Skills for Learning, Life and Work
CONSTRUCTIVISM Submitted To: Ma’am Misbah Yasmeen BPGCW (Air University)
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Presentation transcript:

LEARNING PERSONALIZED: THE NEXT CHAPTER OF TEACHING AND LEARNING Allison Zmuda, Presenter 1

PROBLEM: WE ARE TRAINING OUR STUDENTS AS IF WE LIVE IN A PREDICTABLE WORLD. 2

WE USED TO LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE EFFICIENCY TRUMPS EVERYTHING Knowledge is just a collection of facts about the world and procedures for how to solve problems. The goal of schooling is to get these facts and procedures into the student’s head. Teachers know these facts and procedures and their job is to transmit them to students. Simpler facts and procedures should be learned first. The way to determine the success of schooling is to test the students to see how many facts and procedures they have acquired. 3

LEARNING IN A CONTEMPORARY WORLD Messy problems Dizzying amount of information Growing intolerance for boredom Struggling on what matters Making sense of humanity and human nature 4

THE REAL “HIGH STAKES” JOBS FOR FUTURE REPORT 5

6

THE REAL “HIGH STAKES” COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS Conley, D. T. Redefining College Readiness. Eugene, OR: Education Policy Improvement Center.

8

THE REAL “HIGH STAKES” WHAT OUR STUDENTS WANT… We want to do work that makes a difference to me and to my world. We want to learn with the media of our times. We want to do work that is relevant, meaningful and authentic. We want to be engaged intellectually. We want stronger relationships with our teachers, with each other and with our communities locally, nationally and globally. 9

WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT 10

PAUSE AND REFLECT 11

OBSERVATIONS YOU SEE IN YOUR STUDENTS What is it about your students that makes you think they need to learn how to think? 12

HOW WE WOULD LIKE THEM TO BE

DEFINITION OF PERSONALIZED LEARNING “Personalized learning is a progressively student –driven model where students deeply engage in meaningful, authentic, and rigorous challenges to demonstrate desired outcomes.” — Zmuda, Curtis and Ullman (2015) 14

KEY DIFFERENCES INDIVIDUALIZATION Student controls the pace of the topic as well as when to demonstrate mastery. Teacher drives instruction through teacher-created tasks and related lesson plans. DIFFERENTATION Student selects from a range of content, process, and/or product options to meet the requirements. Teacher tailors instruction based on individual student need and preference. 15

PAUSE AND REFLECT 16

TRANSITION TO PERSONALIZED LEARNING 1 st Column: Key elements 2 nd Column: Impact on role of the teacher and student 3 rd Column: Habits of Mind developing a gradual release to more self-directed learning 17

THREE STAGES OF UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN 18 Stage 1: DESIRED RESULTS Stage 2: EVIDENCE Stage 3: LEARNING PLAN

19

GOALS What are the desired results? 20

GOALS FROMTO Teacher determines goals Teacher and student(s) determine goals 21

INQUIRY AND IDEA GENERATION What sparks your thinking based on the topic? What is worth pursuing? 22

INQUIRY AND IDEA GENERATION FROMTO Teacher defines problem, challenge, investigation or idea Teacher may define parameters but students have a role in design of problem, challenge, investigation, or idea 23

TASK AND AUDIENCE 24

TASK AND AUDIENCE FROMTO Standardized, teacher- designed, or software- generated task Challenge where students have some role in shaping the experience Teacher as sole audience for student work Authentic audiences beyond the teacher to share/grow information, ideas, and actions 25

EVALUATION How is performance evaluated on a given task using criteria? 26

EVALUATION FROMTO Teacher as the sole judge of student work Student-teacher conference to make judgments about the quality of the work using established criteria 27

CUMULATIVE DEMONSTRATION OF LEARNING How do we show evidence of learning across time? 28

CUMULATIVE DEMONSTRATION OF LEARNING FROMTO A scoring system based on accumulation of grades A competency-based system where students select and share artifacts 29

INSTRUCTIONAL PLAN What does designing a learning plan look like? 30

INSTRUCTIONAL PLAN FROMTO Teacher as sole manager of learning Students increasingly navigate when, what, and with whom they are learning 31

FEEDBACK How does feedback promote growth? 32

FEEDBACK FROMTO Teacher as sole provider of feedback to ensure students are on track with larger projects Diverse sources of feedback and opportunity for action on that feedback 33

PERSONALIZED LEARNING FILTERS 34

USE THE FILTERS TO EXAMINE A PRACTICE Imagine a practice that you consider to be personalized learning. Use the filters to answer the questions: –To what degree do you see the opportunity for student voice? –To what degree do you see the opportunity for co- creation? –To what degree do you see the opportunity for social construction? –To what degree do you see the opportunity for self-discovery? 35

What are our burning questions or needs to help move us forward in personalized learning? 36

WANT MORE INFORMATION? 37