MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Advertisements

Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Index The Region: Regional Transit West East North West Side Access Downtown: Transit Lines Catchment Areas BACKNEXT INDEXEND Lower Manhattan Transit.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Network Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
Wiehle Ave. Traffic Concerns Created by Judy and Doug Pew.
The Transit Metropolis. What is a Transit Metropolis? Transit metropolis is a region where a ‘workable fit’ exists between transit services and urban.
Examining Potential Demand of Public Transit for Commuting Trips Xiaobai Yao Department of Geography University of Georgia, USA 5 July 2006.
1 Think Big – Build Small Presented to White Flint Sector Plan Advisory Committee Nov, 2007 Presented by Natalie Goldberg.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
Bus Management System in SEOUL Metropolitan Area.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Chapter 1: Highway Functions
Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Highway Functional Classification Chapter 16 Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Developing Customer Oriented Transit Performance Measures National Transit GIS Conference.
Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Complete Streets Training
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
9.6 Turning Roadways and Channelization, Types of Turning Roadways p.9-55 ~ 9-92 Lean how to determine minimum edge-of-traveled- way radii for the.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
MODULE 4, LESSON 4 Developing Service: Measuring Quality of Service.
MODULE 4, LESSON 5 Developing Service: Calculating Capacity.
Urban Land Uses 6 Land Classifications. 1.0 Residential Land Uses includes all the places where people live often takes up to 40% or more of the developed.
Transportation Survey General Information
Intersection Design Spring 2017.
A Bus Corridor for George Street in New Brunswick
Student handout.
Network Characteristics
Playing in Traffic: A New Look at Management and Operations
Neighborhood Pedestrian Fatality Risk
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Transit for Tomorrow strategic plan
Developing Service: Measuring Quality of Service
HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee March 23, 2018
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Network Characteristics
Midblock Crossings Lesson 12 Publication No. FHWA-HRT
Traffic Management in Singapore
Travel patterns in a city
HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee March 23, 2018
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
COMMUNICATIONS,NETWORKS, THE INTERNET AND
Travel patterns in a city
1.6 miles walking distance 1.2 miles walking distance
Long term strategy and structure
1.6 miles walking distance 1.2 miles walking distance
M14A/D Select Bus Service
Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
Rural Transit Stop Design Guidelines Prof Omer maaitah
Tauranga Transport Models (TTM)
Module 6 A 21st Century Transportation Network
Presentation transcript:

MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks

Learning Objectives Explain the key factors that drive transit demand Summarize the main approaches to network design Describe the role of intermodal coordination in transit planning

WHAT DRIVES TRANSIT DEMAND?

Three Perspectives on Demand Transit Demand Socio- economic factors of the community Spatial factors of the service area Transit agency factors

Socio-Economic Factors Groups with limited access to private vehicles  Children  Elderly  Disabled  Low-income  Low car ownership High employment levels, especially in central location

Spatial Factors Land uses generating travel  Housing density  Employment density Difficult access via auto  Low supply of parking at destination  High price of parking at destination  High tolls, congestion, gas prices also influence

Transit Agency Factors Fares Quantity of service Quality factors: 1. Bus information 2. Station safety 3. Customer service 4. Safety en-route 5. Cleanliness

Identifying Transit-Supportive Areas Visualize the geographic patterns in transit demand The Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (TCQSM) identifies different levels of transit service that can be supported by different residential and job densities:

Example – Transit- Supportive Areas Weighted sum of:  Population per acre  Jobs per acre  Zero car households per acre Classified into five categories DVRPC, PA/NJ

Example – Transit-Supportive Areas La Crosse, WI Fixed-Route Transit Propensity VariableVery LowLowModerateHighVery High 0 vehiclesAll of the variables fell below the lower limit 2 of 3 of the variables fell below the lower limit 5.0%-10.4%2 of 3 of the variables exceeded the upper limit All of the variables exceeded the upper limit Minority4.4%-7.8% Poverty7.2%-13.7%

NETWORK DESIGN

How Large is the Catchment Area? Common rules of thumb: Travelers will walk ¼ mi or ½ mi to transit FTA funds pedestrian improvements within ½ mi of transit FTA funds bicycle improvements within 3 mi of transit

Street Networks and Access Most transit passengers access their stop by walking ¼ mile or less However, the network structure will make this walk less direct Network Structure Percent of ¼ Mile Area Accessible in Walking Distance Grid64% Hybrid54% Cul-de-sac28%

Grid Network

Hybrid Network

Cul-de-sac Network

Selecting Roadways for Bus Minimum lane width 11 ft Minimum turning radius at intersections Collector streets should be avoided University Place, WA

Transit Network Concepts Radial – Focused on the downtown Grid – Straight parallel routes spaced at regular intervals crossed by another set of routes (may require transfers) Trunk lines with feeders – Arterial main line with separate branch lines Through routing – All buses downtown which are then looped and sent back out Transit centers – Lines converging at transit centers to facilitate transfers

Radial Network

Pros:  Serves the central area very well  Ideal for cities with a very dominant downtown Cons:  Service may be very indirect for outlying areas Variations: Cities with multiple activity centers may use more of a “web” or “hub and spoke”

Grid Network

Pros:  Provides broad service coverage and access  Ideal for cities with evenly distributed travel demand Cons:  Transfers will be quite common

Trunk and Feeder Network

Through Routing

Transit Center Approach Without Transit Center CBD Route A Route B Route C With Transit Center Transit Center CBD Route A Route B Route C

Using “Pulse” Timed Transfers Passengers hate waiting for a transfer – they perceive it as twice as stressful as time on-board a vehicle Making transfers convenient can extend the reach of a network Timed transfer example: 8:25 Buses A and B arrive Passengers make an easy transfer… 8:30Buses A and B depart

INTERMODAL COORDINATION

Transit and Transit San Diego, CA

Transit and Autos Harpers Ferry, WV

Transit and Bicycles

Transit and Pedestrians