SCORING BRIEF CPT J Boggs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
We’re Making Choices! 3 rd grade is moving into the “Real World!” Will you achieve all of your goals? What choices will you make? What will you have to.
Advertisements

What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Formative assessment of the Engineering Design process
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Student Learning and Growth Goals 101: Requirements and Recommendations Spring 2015 Webinar.
Student Learning Objectives Session 3 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
Presented by: Dr. Sue Courtney Janice Stoudemire, CPA, ATA, ABA Associate Degree Board of Commissioners Copyright Protected: Material can not be use or.
Mentee Overview. Welcome to Gold Star Welcome to Gold Star mentee! This pilot has been designed based on Quality Matters, a faculty- centered, peer review.
Mentor Overview.
Competency Assessment and Pay Determination N.C. Office of State Personnel Career-Banding Project Team.
Drive Engagement by Assessing Progress Against Development Goals
Formative vs Summative Assessments Formative assessments (assessments that aid in learning) are designed to give students practice and feedback on.
Showcase Learning with Digital Badges Angela Elkordy Doctoral Candidate Eastern Michigan University College of Education Leadership and Counseling Dept.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
2010/2011 SCHOLARSHIPS, BURSARIES & AWARDS AVAILABLE TO FORESTRY STUDENTS AT VANCOUVER ISLAND UNIVERSITY Scholarships; students must have achieved a minimum.
Preceptor Orientation
 Business improvement template  Best practice framework  Building on initiatives that are already in place  Focus is on the benefit to our people.
PRIMARY SCIENCE Education Consultancy Primary Science Quality Mark Funded by the Wellcome Trust.
EVALUATOR TRAINING. EVALUATION TEAMS 1 Adult Evaluator 2 Student Evaluators + 1 Student Room Consultant 1 Student Timer 1 Student Clerk 1 Monitor (only.
SCORING/TRACKING MAJ Dan Kidd (845)
Fires are a real danger even in modern apartment buildings. How much do people know about these situations? Do they know how to react? The critical question.
Learning Targets, Change Rationale. The Task at Hand ► Challenging times call for people to step forward - try new things, lead new innovation, look at.
Prior Park Award The award is aimed at pupils in Year 5 & 6 and is designed to provide enrichment and challenges beyond the curriculum. We believe that.
Competency-Based Education What It Is & What It Is Not Alison Kadlec, Ph.D. Director of Higher Education & Workforce Programs Public Agenda May 14, 2015.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Student Performance Objectives. Need for Performance Objectives Identify intended outcomes Students –Identify what is expected of them –Describe activities.
Kershena Additional 11th grade test.
SCORING BRIEF LTC D KIDD. Scoring metrics Each event is scored based on points, time or both. This score will be applied to a matrix of Min / Max. This.
M. Nelson, 21 Mar NorthWest Louisiana Autonomous Robotics Competition (NWLA-ARC) 2 Challenges – 4 Bottle Race – Board Challenge Awards for Event.
ONE WORLD, ONE AWARD LevelMinimum period of participation Direct entrantsAward holders Bronze6 monthsNot applicable Silver12 months6 months (if Bronze.
Southern Regional Education Board Standards-Based Instruction in CT Centers: Addressing Technical, Academic, and 21 st Century Knowledge and Skills Standards-Based.
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away.
LEARNING GOALS AND PERFORMANCE SCALES PLC FOCUS FOR BVS
A Tutorial Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
High School Proficiency Exam Nevada Department of Education.
Blimp Pentathlon a proposal of possible events for an indoor blimp competition The Blimp Pentathlon is an open-source, team guided competition. The competition.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
SCORING/TRACKING MAJ Dan Kidd (845)
Chester County 24 Challenge® Tournament Overview
KS3 National Baccalaureate for England
Kershena Additional 11th grade test.
DESIGNING A LOGO.
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Netley Abbey Junior School Assessment Evening
Training is not an event – it’s a process!
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
Welcome to Delaware County IU 24 Challenge® Tournament Overview
Formulate the Research Problem
EDCI Retreat; Aug TJ Oakes Phillip VanFossen
Alternative Assessment (Portfolio)
Kershena Additional 11th grade test.
BECOMING A LEADER Instructor(s) introduce the course to make sure everyone is in the correct course. Instructor(s) introduce themselves – name, lodge,
Assessment Criteria and Approaches to Learning Skills
CASAS Reports: Assess, Analyze and Adjust
Principles of Assessment & Criteria of good assessment
Alabama Graduation Rate is 86%
Sandhurst Scoring Concept
Standards-Based Planning
SPHERO SCORING GUIDE.
Formative assessment of the Engineering Design process
The Individual Development Plan (IDP)
Assessments TAP 1- Strand 5.
Executive Coaching Process
Sir James Smith’s Community School
Conclusion.
PBIS Update Board Meeting August 14, 2018.
Law 16 The Goal Kick.
Mastery Based Learning and Grading 101
Passage Criteria and Learning Areas
Passage Criteria and Learning Areas
Presentation transcript:

SCORING BRIEF CPT J Boggs

Course time will evaluated in 2 ways Scoring Scoring metrics Each event is scored based on points, time or both. This score will be applied to a matrix of Min / Max. This score will represent the team’s performance which will convert to competition points. The site information boards will explain the scoring criteria and penalties Final scoring will be based on cumulative performance scores. Course time will evaluated in 2 ways Phase 1 – penalties given for teams who meet check-in gates. Eg RMAS Blue to arr NLT 1302 at GR 345252. Team arr 1303 – penalty awarded. Phase 2 – Sprint No prescribed check in time – faster is better All penalties awarded in Ph1 applied to this time Competition points awarded against Min / Max matrix No hold times

Scoring Scoring Passport Scoring Redundancy Competition points and route penalties recorded in passport Challenges Challenge upheld = score scrubbed Challenge rejected = unsportsmanlike behavior penalty Scoring Redundancy Sites will capture team competition points and penalties in a site report as well as the team PASSPORT Sites will radio in team competition points and penalties to scoring center for near real-time tracking Upon site closeout – site OIC will return to TOC and reconcile any report discrepancies The Final check will be based off the data entered into the team PASSPORT Upon crossing the finish line the PASSPORT will be brought to the scoring center Any discrepancies will be adjusted to the data entered into the PASSPORT

Unacceptable performance Scoring Unacceptable performance

TIME BASED SCORING TIME GOLD SILVER BRONZE Physically impossible Unacceptable performance GOLD SILVER BRONZE 1 2 3 4 5 Best Achievable score - optimal team in good conditions Mastery – the minimum score that would still allow the demonstration of comprehensive knowledge or skill in a subject or accomplishment Proficiency – the minimal score assessed to show a high degree of competence or skill Introductory standard – rudimentary understanding Worst Possible score

ATTAINMENT BASED SCORING Best Achievable score - optimal team in good conditions Physically impossible 1 Mastery – the minimum score that would still allow the demonstration of comprehensive knowledge or skill in a subject or accomplishment GOLD SILVER 2 SCORE Proficiency – the minimal score assessed to show a high degree of competence or skill BRONZE 3 4 Introductory standard – rudimentary understanding Unacceptable performance Worst Possible score 5