Biotic interactions and trait-based ecosystem functioning in arable fields vs. field margins Valentina Sechi

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five yrs of research on reduced tillage and earthworm populations – what did we learn? Mirjam Pulleman, Stephen Crittenden, Walter Andriuzzi, Tamila Eswaramurthy,
Advertisements

The methodology and applications of Agricultural Landscape monitoring in Estonia Kalev Sepp, Institute of Environmental Protection Estonian Agricultural.
Project: Effects of micro- and macrobioturbation produced by soil fauna on the stabilisation of organic matter in agricultural soils DFG SPP 1090 Justus.
Functional traits, trade-offs and community structure in phytoplankton and other microbes Elena Litchman, Christopher Klausmeier and Kyle Edwards Michigan.
Principles of Landscape Ecology ENVS*3320 Instructors: Dr. Shelley Hunt (Module 1) Rm. 2226, Bovey Building x53065 Dr. Rob Corry (Module.
1 Food Webs Augmented With Additional Data: Structure and Dynamics Daniel C. Reuman, Rockefeller University, New York, U.S.A. Joel E. Cohen, Rockefeller.
Ecology Review. What Is Life? 8 Life Characteristics Made of one or more CELLS (cell theory) Displays organization (atoms  organism) Metabolism (Acquire.
1 Multivariate Statistics ESM 206, 5/17/05. 2 WHAT IS MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS? A collection of techniques to help us understand patterns in and make predictions.
Levels of Ecological Organization in Freshwater Systems Population Community Ecosystem.
Effects of Soil Management on Soil Organisms Mary Barbercheck Dept. of Entomology Penn State University.
What is an Ecosystem SECTION Interactions of Organisms and their environment Populations don’t live by themselves – they are in an area with other.
16 The Nature of Communities. Chapter 16 The Nature of Communities CONCEPT 16.1 Communities are groups of interacting species that occur together at the.
Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole- farm approach Paper by: R. H. GIBSON, S. PEARCE, R. J. MORRIS, W. O.
Introduction Subalpine meadows play a crucial role in species diversity, supporting many endangered species of plant and wildlife. Subalpine meadows play.
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Ch 20 Community Ecology: Species Abundance + Diversity.
Chapter 17 Community Structure A community has attributes that differ from those of its components –Number of species –Relative abundance of species –Nature.
Soil biological indicators: Organic Farming Systems Dr. Rachel Creamer, Prof. Bryan Griffiths Johnstown Castle Environment Research Centre Acknowledgements:
Weed mapping tools and practical approaches – a review Prague February 2014 Weed mapping tools and practical approaches – a review Prague February 2014.
Adam M. Davis Center for Geospatial Data Analysis Indiana University, Bloomington, IN Studying geological controls on succession in an old field: Progress.
Tuesday 11:00 – 1:50 Thursday 11:00 – 1:50 Instructor: Nancy Wheat Ecology Bio 47 Spring 2015.
Species Abundance and Diversity
A Local Ecosystem. Abiotic features of the environment Abiotic features are the non-living components of the environment. They include, Physical features:
1 Species Abundance and Diversity. 2 Introduction Community: Association of interacting species inhabiting some defined area.  Community Structure includes.
Ecology: Community Structure & Ecosystem Services David Mellor, PhD Citizen Science Coordinator Virginia Master Naturalists.
What Is Ecology? What is Landscape? What is Landscape Ecology? A road to Landscape Ecological Planning.
BIOLOGY 157: LIFE SCIENCE: AN ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACH (Communities and Succession)
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
 Comparing Vegetation in a Riparian Zone to an Upland Area in a Colorado Montane Forest By: Abby Branson Vegetation Ecology, Summer 2013 Mountain Research.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
Biodiversity Biology ATAR Year 11 Biology 1AB Biology 3AB.
Ecosystem Functioning. Richness Abundance Body mass Ecosystem Functioning.
Diversity Productivity Relationships Species Richness Seminar October 21, 2003.
What Is Life? 8 Life Characteristics ______________________________________________________.
Energy and Matter Exchange in the Biosphere
Tropical ecosystem engineers and their effects on soil quality & crop yield in maize-based cropping systems Mirjam Pulleman, Birthe Paul, Fred Ayuke, Marianne.
Contribution of fungi activity for N 2 O emission in no-tillage with cover crop fields Zhaorigetu 1,2, T.Nishizawa 2, Y.Sato 2, M.Komatsuzaki 1, H.Ohta.
Trajectories of Community Change: using traits to understand convergence and divergence.
The Biosphere of Life Abiotic Factors contribute to the environment and local ecosystem physical, non-living parts of the environment Ecosystem – all.
ECOSYSTEMS Mr. Harper 8 th Grade Science. WHAT’S AN ECOSYSTEM? Ecosystems are complex, interactive systems that include both biological communities (biotic)
Biodiversity in Functional Restoration Joan L. Walker Southern Research Station Clemson, SC.
Ecology. Scientific study of the interactions between __________ and their environment.
3 Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, E-08003, Barcelona, Spain
Ch 1 Ecology, Environmental Science and the Big Picture
We generally think of soil from the ground up
Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations
Figure 1. The relationships of bacterial operational taxonomic unit richness (A) and phylogenetic diversity (B) with aridity index based on 97% sequence.
Land Management, Mycorrhizal Diversity, and Soil Carbon Sequestration
UDS, School of Allied Health Sciences- Tamale
By the end of this session I should be able to:
Citizen Science’s contribution to GEO BON
Chapter 26 & 27 Plant Ecology
How Ecosystems Work Homework: Chapter 5: Read Pages
The flow of matter and energy through an ecosystem.
Lotic Communities What is a community? A) The Dictionary B) The Ideal
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
Learning Objectives Identify the levels of organization that ecologists study Explain how biotic and abiotic factors influence an ecosystem.
H = -Σpi log2 pi.
Describing and Monitoring Rangelands:
Ecological Organization
Ecology and our Ecosystems
Diversity in Ecosystems
TERMS 2.
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
EOC Review – Day 3 Standard B-5:
Introduction to Ecology
Day 1: Ecosystems and Ecotones
ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS I pp
Ecology and Environmental Biology
Soil organic carbon (SOC) can significantly influence key soil functional properties and improve soil quality by increasing water holding capacity, reducing.
Fig. 3 Effects of plant species identity, plant traits, and soil properties on plant-soil feedbacks. Effects of plant species identity, plant traits, and.
Presentation transcript:

Biotic interactions and trait-based ecosystem functioning in arable fields vs. field margins Valentina Sechi

Points of my talk: 1.Background 2.Objectives 3.Hypotheses 4.Experimental Design 5.Main Results 6.Preliminary Conclusions 2

Background 3 Ecosystem services are a key to value ecosystems and to promote sustainable use of natural resource Soil attributes and biotic interactions play important roles in ecological processes, ecosystem functioning and, hence, in the delivery of ecosystem services Therefore we need to understand how different organisms actually contribute to the ecosystem services QESAP project: (Quantification of Ecosystem Service for environmental Assessment and Planning)

General Objectives The main objectives of the QESAP-project are: Understanding the mechanisms underlying Ecosystem Functioning Developing a tool to quantify Ecosystem Services In particular my PhD aims to: I.Explore the main processes (biotic and abiotic) which are underpinning soil ecosystem services and assess the traits that influence ecosystem functioning II.Identify and quantify the relationship between ecological processes and ecosystem functioning 4

Objectives of the current study Investigating the belowground value of margins along arable fields with a trait-based approach Characterizing how components of the soil community respond to different management (pressures) and therefore Providing links between taxonomy, trait-based ecology, and ecosystem functioning 5

In this study we looked at the following functional traits: Ecophysiological traits: Microbial Respiration Community response traits: Abundance, Biomass, Shannon, Jaccard Functional diversity: Faunal feeding-group distribution Functional response traits: Maturity Index, Enrichment, Structure Functional effect traits: Allometric scaling Functional traits… … capture different characteristics of an organism that link to the organism’s function: determine individual responses to pressures determine the effects on ecosystem processes (effect trait). 6

Hypotheses 7 Figure from Mulder et al Adv. Ecol. Res. 46:1–88 Traits composition of soil communities in grass margins differs from that in arable fields: i)Margins are dominated by larger-sized species with lower numerical abundance ii)Change in the trophic groups composition iii)Higher biodiversity in the margins

Experimental Design: 8 Arable Field Field Margin Site: Hoekschse Waard Sampling Time: late September Design: 4 Farms x 2 Treatments (margins vs. arable) x 4 Pseudo-Replicates Criteria for the selection of the area : Conventional farms Homogeneous croplands: wheat Field margins older then 3-4 years Sampling: Fungi, Bacteria, Nematodes, Enchytraeids Collembolans, Mites, Earthworms Arable field Field margin m 20 m

Soil Parameters: 9

Soil community response traits: Ecophysiological traits: 10

11 Log B Log N Soil community response traits: Abundance and Biomass The biomass and the abundance of Nematoda and Enchytraeidae were higher in the margin Biomass of Micro-arthropoda is higher in the margin The biomass and the abundance of Lumbricidae are not significantly different between treatments

Nematodes present lower biodiversity in the margins Mites biodiversity is higher in the margins Enchytraeids biodiversity of is higher in the margins of Farm 1 and Farm 3 Earthworms and Collembola biodiversity does not differ between treatments Soil community response traits : Shannon Index 12

Shannon index and Jaccard Similarity Sites Ordinate by Shannon Index (H’) No faunal similarities across farms and treatments Enchytraeidae Nematoda AcarinaCollembola Sites Clustered by Jaccard similarity Biodiversity is not clearly enhanced in the margins but… 13

Log N Enchytraeidae Nematoda AcarinaCollembola Log M Plant feeders are more abundant (but smaller) in the margin (more evident for Collembola and Enchytraeids ). Plant feeders Predators Predatory Nematodes are bigger in the margins and predatory Mites are less abundant in the margins Functional Diversity: Faunal feeding-group distribution 14 Bacterial feeder Plant Feeder Fungal FeederSubstrate FeederPredatorOmnivoreParasite

Functional response traits: Maturity Index Margins Arable Margins Arable Margin has less disturbed and more structured community Enrichment Structure Index 15 Arable Margin

Functional effect traits: Allometric scaling… 16 Mulder et al. 2011, Oikos, 120:529–536  Allometry, in its broadest sense, describes how the characteristics of living creatures change with body size  In my study it is the scaling between traits (e.g., between body mass and numerical abundance).  The study of allometry concerns the functional mechanisms that generate scaling relationships and how the resulting scaling responds to environmental changes Intensity of treat One step back….What is allometry? 16

Slightly significant difference in the allometric scaling between margin and arable field (slope is less steep in the margin) If we look to stoichiometry, the allometric scaling is directly correlated with C, N and P (the more the nutrient(s), the less steep the slope) Arable: Slope ±0.02 Intercept 4.56±0.04 Margin: Slope ±0.02 Intercept 4.48±0.04 Functional effect traits: Allometric Scaling 17 Entire soil food-web

Allometric Scaling: micro- and meso- fauna Intercept is lower in the fields margin Slope is less steep in the field margins However… Slope Interc Slope Interc Slope Interc Slope Interc Slope Interc Slope Interc Slope Interc Slope Interc The coefficient of variation of slope-changes in the margins is almost twice as high as in the arable fields (CV = 19% vs. 10%, respectively).

Main Results: i)Traits composition of soil biota in margins differed from arable fields. In general: – ranked organisms (as classes or taxocenes) are more abundant and have higher biomass in the margins. ii)There is a shift in the feeding group composition between treatments. – Plant feeders (and in some cases fungal feeders) are more abundant in the margins. iii)Despite changes in allometric scaling across farms, there is a significant difference between treatments. iv)Belowground biodiversity responds slowly to the changes in land management or soil nutrient composition. 19

Preliminary conclusion and perspective 20 Functional traits reflect environmental pressure and therefore are the suitable tool to quantify habitat–ecosystem and community responses Further study is needed to i)improve the understanding of the dynamics occurring in the ecosystem under different environmental pressure ii)find a direct link between functional traits and ecosystem functioning

Thank you for your attention! Valentina Sechi 21

Supplementary slide: STATISTICS 22