SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4 June 2014© Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All rights reserved1 Reservoir Connectivity and Fluid Uncertainty Analysis using Fast Geostatistical.
Advertisements

Title Petrophysical Analysis of Fluid Substitution in Gas Bearing Reservoirs to Define Velocity Profiles – Application of Gassmann and Krief Models Digital.
Multipoint Statistics to Generate Geologically Realistic Networks 1 Hiroshi Okabe supervised by Prof. Martin J Blunt Petroleum Engineering and Rock Mechanics.
3-D Fault Visualization with Fracture Swarms
Williams Fork Formation Reservoir Characterization at
Important for : Conversion from traveltime to depth Check of results by modeling Imaging of the data (migration) Classification and Filtering of Signal.
Brian Russell #, Larry Lines #, Dan Hampson. , and Todor Todorov
2012 SEG/SPE/AAPG Summer Research Workshop
A Workflow Approach to Designed Reservoir Study Presented by Zhou Lei Center for Computation and Technology Louisiana State University June 25, 2007.
Vivek Muralidharan Simulation and imaging experiments of fluid flow through a fracture surface: a new perspective.
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Using the EnKF for combined state and parameter estimation Geir Evensen.
Elastic Inversion Using Partial Stack Seismic Data: Case Histories in China.
OIL RECOVERY MECHANISMS AND THE MATERIAL BALANCE EQUATION
16 th Annual Meeting Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 24 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Wed 26 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Well.
Attribute Expression Using Gray Level Co-Occurrence Sipuikinene Angelo*, Marcilio Matos,Kurt J Marfurt ConocoPhillips School of Geology & Geophysics, University.
Si-Yong Lee Model development & Aneth site example.
SOES6002: Modelling in Environmental and Earth System Science CSEM Lecture 1 Martin Sinha School of Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton.
Geomathematical and geostatistical characters of some clastic Neogene hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Croatia (“Stochastic simulations and geostatistics”,
Bed Contained Tectonic Fold-Related Fractures Flank of Teton Anticline Sawtooth Mnts. W. Montana Miss. Madison Ls.
Stochastic inverse modeling under realistic prior model constraints with multiple-point geostatistics Jef Caers Petroleum Engineering Department Stanford.
1 RPSEA Project – Facies probabilities from seismic data in Mamm Creek Field Reinaldo J Michelena Kevin Godbey Patricia E Rodrigues Mike Uland April 6,
Petrel Workflow Tools 5 Day Introduction Course
Seismic Data Driven Reservoir Analysis FORT CHADBOURNE 3-D Coke and Runnels Counties, TX ODOM LIME AND GRAY SAND.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 21: Groundwater Hydrology Concepts – Part 1 1.
Adaptive Spatial Resampling as a McMC Method for Uncertainty Quantification in Seismic Reservoir Modeling Cheolkyun Jeong*, Tapan Mukerji, and Gregoire.
Sandy Chen*, L.R.Lines, J. Embleton, P.F. Daley, and L.F.Mayo
Joel Ben-Awuah. Questions to Answer What do you understand about pseudo-well? When to apply pseudo-well? What are the uncertainties in reservoir modeling?
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting The Stanford VI-E Reservoir: A Synthetic Data Set for Joint Seismic-EM Time- lapse Monitoring Algorithms Jaehoon.
Earth models for early exploration stages PETROLEUM ENGINEERING ÂNGELA PEREIRA Introduction Frontier basins and unexplored.
Erno Takacs 1, Zoltan Hajnal 1, Bhaskar Pandit 1 1 Department of Geological Sciences, U of S ______________________________________________________ Joint.
North Texas Earthquake Study Group EARTHQUAKES AND FLUID DISPOSAL – A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Acknowledgements: Cliff Frohlich and the USGS Earthquake Hazards.
Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale - OGS ( Italy) Modeling techniques to study CO 2 -injection induced micro-seismicity by.
68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 1 Impact of Time Lapse Processing on 4D Simultaneous Inversion The Marlim Field Case Study C. Reiser * 1, E.
OBTAINING LOCAL PROPORTIONS FROM INVERTED SEISMIC DATA TOWARD PATTERN-BASED DOWNSCALING OF SEISMIC DATA Lisa Stright and Alexandre Boucher School of Earth.
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji 25th SCRF Annual Meeting May 9 – 11, 2012
INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi
Continuum Mechanics (MTH487)
Hasan Nourdeen Martin Blunt 10 Jan 2017
Thin sub-resolution shaly-sands
Value of Information Analysis in Spatial Models
SESAME: Surface Electric Sounding and Acoustic Monitoring Experiment
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
Marcell Lux, hydrogeologist engineer
On Optimization Techniques for the One-Dimensional Seismic Problem
Introduction to Seismology
A strategy for managing uncertainty
GMS Geostatistical Realizations CMG-STARS Results
Combining statistical rock physics and sedimentology to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization Per Åge Avseth Norsk Hydro Research Centre.
Peipei Li, Tapan Mukerji
SCRF 26th Annual Meeting May
Establishing Patterns Correlation from Time Lapse Seismic
Yongduk Shin and Tapan Mukerji May 8th, 2014
Dario Grana, Tapan Mukerji
by A. Belaidi, D. A. Bonter, C. Slightam, and R. C. Trice
Seismic attribute applications:
Earthquakes Photo credit: USGS.
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
Jaehoon Lee, Tapan Mukerji, Michael Tompkins
Elastic Moduli Young’s Modulus Poisson Ratio Bulk Modulus
Alexey Stovas NTNU, Trondheim 2005
SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES
Log data from 205/21a-6 across an interval of Fractured Basement and an interval of Fault Zone. Log data from 205/21a-6 across an interval of Fractured.
Brent Lowry & Jef Caers Stanford University, USA
Yao Tong, Tapan Mukerji Stanford University
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting
SCRF High-order stochastic simulations and some effects on flow through heterogeneous media Roussos Dimitrakopoulos COSMO – Stochastic Mine Planning.
QUANTITATIVE RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING ROCK PHYSICS, SEISMIC AND GEOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS – EXAMPLES FROM SEMLIKI BASIN IN ALBERTINE GRABEN By Nakajigo.
The three fracture end members (microfractures, joints and seismically identified faults) that comprise the Lancaster conceptual model. The three fracture.
Yalchin Efendiev Texas A&M University
Presentation transcript:

SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION

SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION Elastic Rock Properties Seismic Velocity inversely correlated with Porosity Rock Property Predictions from Seismic Attributes Geometrical Attributes – Faults, Sedimentary Features, Channels Bright Spot vizualization

FOR FLOW SIMULATION MODEL THE RESERVOIR ENGINEER NEEDS Porosity: amount and spatial distribution Permeability Nature of fluids and saturation Pressure Temperature Barriers to flow (faults, strat. barriers)

ELASTIC ROCK PROPERTIES For isotropic media, (Sheriff, 1992) Compressional wave velocity Vp = [λ + 2μ /ρ] 0.5 where Lamé’s constant λ, an elastic parameter sensitive to fluid content, is related to μ and κ by λ = κ - 2μ/3. rigidity (shear modulus, μ), Incompressibility (bulk modulus, κ) density (ρ)

ELASTIC ROCK PROPERTIES Shear wave velocity = Vs = (μ / ρ ) 0.5 where rigidity (shear modulus, μ), density (ρ)

ELASTIC ROCK PROPERTIES where σ is the Poisson ratio.

SEISMIC VELOCITY AND POROSITY where φ is the porosity, Vf is the velocity of the interstitial fluid, and Vm is the velocity of the rock matrix (Wyllie et al. 1956).

SEISMIC VELOCITY AND POROSITY a high negative correlation between porosity and acoustic impedance has a physical basis

SEISMIC VELOCITY MAP AND WELL POROSITY

SEISMIC VELOCITY AND WELL POROSITY

Snap 3D Seismic to Grid Impedance (Stochastic Inversion) 3D Inversion Cube

Acoustic Impedance Model

PREDICTION METHODS Regression Geostatistics Neural networks

PREDICTION PROCESS Calibration Choice of seismic attribute(s) Cross-validation Management decisions

SEISMIC VELOCITY MAP AND WELL POROSITY

RISK MAP based on 100 conditional simulations showing the probability that porosity is ≥ 9%.

FALSE CORRELATIONS Possiblity of false correlations increases with: small number of well data many seismic attributes

GEOMETRICAL ATTRIBUTES depict patterns related to: faults fracture swarms depositional patterns channels

GEOMETRICAL ATTRIBUTES MULTIPLE-POINT STATISTICS allows geological patterns integration through pixel-based modeling (Journel, 1997, 2002; Caers, 2000; Strebelle, 2000). Training images depict the geological conceptual model then a sequential-based simulation algorithm is used to generate multiple realizations

GEOMETRICAL ATTRIBUTES left - seismic amplitude data showing channel-like features center - conceptual model right - pixel-based realization

Data Integration Geology Geophysics Structural Map on Top Reservoir using G&G

Example Well Average Porosities Seismic Amplitude Map Average Porosity Maps Combined using Collocated Cokriging R = 0.75

Uncertainty Reduction Average Porosities - Wells Only Realization 1 Realization 2 Realization 3 Average Porosities - Wells plus Seismic Realization 1 Realization 2 Realization 3

Example 3D sGs constrained by 2D seismic surface Cokriged Por. Map Amplitude Map Cokriged Por. Map 3D Porosity Model Avg. of 3D Model

Reservoir Facies Using Seismic

A series of equally probable high resolution impedance models Impedance Logs 3D Seismic Data Deterministic Inversion Stochastic Inversion A series of equally probable high resolution impedance models

Reservoir Geometry Using Seismic Channel geometries are locally controlled by the use of Seismic facies.

Bright Spot Vizualization

Bright Spots

Seismic attributes can help in characterizing and modeling: Reservoir Geometry Reservoir Facies Reservoir Property (Porosity) Bright spots