Water Resource Policy Action Kit Enter Action Kit Set presentation to “Slideshow” mode ( or F5 ), This project has been funded wholly or in part by the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

Public Health - Always Working for a Safer and Healthier Washington Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking.
Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability presented to Prairie Water Policy Symposium Beverly Yee, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Environment September.
What is the Lane Livability Consortium? Participating Agencies  City of Eugene  City of Springfield  Lane County  Lane Transit.
1 Role of Local, State and Federal Agencies in E&SC Issued May 2009 Level IB: Advanced Fundamentals Seminar Education and Training Requirements for Individuals.
DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES CLIMATE ADAPTATION GUIDEBOOK Kate Marshall, SRA International, Inc. (703) ,
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Overview the local, state, and federal regulatory authorities which affect the interim housing mission Identify vital stakeholders with regulatory authority.
2014 Federal Farm Bill Overview 3/14/14. Conservation Compliance 2 “Recoupling” federal crop insurance premium support benefits to HEL and wetland conservation.
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Wetland Planning Requirements, Tools & Processes.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
The Maryland Co-teaching Framework
Zoning The legislative division of an area into separate districts with different regulations within each district for land use, building size, and the.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Presented by Molly Skorpik at the 2011 Montana Association of Dam and Canal Systems Conference Presented by Molly Skorpik at the 2011 Montana Association.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Best Local Land Use Practices Development Incentives Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Locally Led Conservation Colorado State Conservation Board.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Tom Krapf Assistant State Conservationist NRCS - Wisconsin The Regional Conservation Partnership Program.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program October 30, 2012 Sandra Kosek-Sills PhD Ohio Lake Erie Commission.
1 Natural Resources Block Grant (NRBG) A Program that works to: – Streamline assistance and $$ to landowners – Coordinate activities of federal and state.
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan PUBLIC MEETINGS April 5-7, 2010 Rochester, Montesano, and Chehalis.
Anatomy of Iowa Floods: Preparing for the Future “How urban and rural Iowans work together to reduce flood impacts.” Wayne Peterson, Division of Soil Conservation.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Hazard Mitigation Planning III Session Name: Hazard Mitigation Planning III Coastal Hazards Management Course 3.1 Review the various local departments,
Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. Chagrin River Balanced Growth Plan Amy Brennan (440) , Newbury Township.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Terri Wegener, P.E., DWR Briefing for Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Hazard Mitigation Planning III Session Name: Hazard Mitigation Planning III Coastal Hazards Management Course 3.1 Review the various local departments,
The Smart Growth Implementation Toolkit Smart Growth Leadership Institute | Benjamin de la Peña | Associate Director for Implementation.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
Drinking Water Source Protection Action Kit
Partners in Conservation
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. January 19, 2008
Sean D. Rafferty Research Director and Associate Director
Coal Mining Activities
Nutrient Abatement Erosion and sediment control and urban stormwater program and Flexible options for nutrient management – point source. Sandra Avendano,
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
Legal Responsibilities of a Conservation District
Low Impact Development: Stumbling Blocks or Stepping Stones?
The Urban Forest Management Plan
Coal Mining Activities
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Transfer of Development Rights Conservation Subdivisions
Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals Effective August 2018
Dane County Farmland Preservation Plan Planning Areas
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
Evaluating Oregon Communities at Risk using the Wildfire Risk Explorer
Agricultural Land & Avian Foraging Habitat Mitigation Fee
Images and logos as appropriate
Images and logos as appropriate
Presentation transcript:

Water Resource Policy Action Kit Enter Action Kit Set presentation to “Slideshow” mode ( or F5 ), This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement WC-00J05001 to Lane Council of Governments. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Action Kit Instructions The “Action Kit” is designed to provide you with an array of policy options to use to protect local water resources. To navigate use the buttons on the slides to move from topic to topic. The Table of Contents button will return you to the Table of Contents, where you will find all topics available. Use escape to exit any additional resources you have opened. Table of Contents

Wetland Resources Protection Alternatives/ Model Ordinances Riparian Area Resources File Directory Oregon Administrative Rules Action Kit Instructions This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement WC-00J05001 to Lane Council of Governments. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency. Citizen’s Corner Goals 5 & 6 ESEE Analysis Evaluation of New Methodologies and Technologies Case Study in Water Resource Policy Development

Oregon Administrative Rules (OARs) Goal 5 OAR’s Goal 6 OAR’s Table of Contents Local Wetland Inventory OAR’s

Riparian Area Resources Riparian Area Buffers Table of Contents Riparian Area Overview Riparian Area Inventory and Assessment

Wetland Resources Find Oregon Local Wetland Inventory Reports and Maps What are Local Wetland Inventories? Table of Contents Wetland Resources Summary Frequently Asked Questions Functions and Assessments Wetland Buffers

Protection Alternatives Goal 5 & 6 Protection Framework Protection Programs/ Model Ordinances Table of Contents

Communities can use a combination of regulatory, non-regulatory, and incentive programs to protect water resources. Regulatory Programs: Regulate individual land use decisions Non-Regulatory Programs: Provide residents and businesses with education, information, resources and motivation to protect water resources Incentives: Provide forms of encouragement to protect water resources Specific Protection Alternatives Regulatory Programs/ Model Ordinances Non-Regulatory Programs Incentive Programs BackTable of Contents Low Impact Development (LID)

Goal 5 & 6 Protection Framework Table of Contents Goal 5 Wetland Decision Tree Goal 5 & 6 Options to Consider Goal 5 & 6 Schematic Goal 5 Riparian Decision Tree What are others doing? Goal 5 ESEE Analysis Template Goal 6 Primer Goal 5 & 6 Decision Points

Safe Harbor Wetland Model Code Counter Materials Supporting Model Code Safe Harbor Wetland Model Code Document Table of Contents In 2012 Lane Council of Governments in partnership with the Department of Conservation and Land Development, Department of State Lands, and eight individiaul jurisdictions in the Willamette Valley worked together to develop model code language which reflects agency (goal) priorities as well as small city functionality. This process also generated counter materials to support the model code (fact sheets & check list). Safe Harbor Wetland Model Code with ESEE Provisions

Regulatory Programs and Model Ordinances Floodway and Floodplain Overlay District Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinances Wetland Buffers Table of Contents Riparian Overlay District Drinking Water Source Protection District Hillside Development Overlay District Wetland Protection Overlay District Riparian Buffers Overlay Districts Back Safe Harbor Model Wetland Code

Directory Oregon Administrative Rules Goal 5 Goal 6 Local Wetland Inventory Riparian Resources Riparian Area Inventory and Assessment Riparian Resources Wetland Resources Functions and Assessments Frequently Asked Questions Wetland Resources Summary Local Wetland Inventories Regulatory Alternatives and Model Ordinances Wetland Safe Harbor Model Code Wetland Safe Harbor Model Code with ESEE Provision Wetland Safe Harbor Model Code Counter Materials Goal 5 & 6 Example Findings Riparian Overlay District Model Code Drinking Water Source Protection District Model Code Hillside Development Overlay District Model Code Floodway and Floodplain Overlay District Model Code Wetland Protection Overlay District Model Code Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance Model Code Riparian Buffer Wetland Buffer References Non-regulatory Programs Non-regulatory programs Fact Sheet Technical Assistance Education and Outreach Cost Share Programs Low Impact Development Action Kit Incentive Programs Conservation Easements Density Transfers Development Fees Transfer of Development Rights Conservation Subdivisions Goal 5 & 6 Protection Framework Goal 5 & 6 Options to Consider Goal 5 & 6 Decision Points Goal 5 & 6 Schematic Goal 5 Wetland Decisions Tree Goal 5 Riparian Decision Tree Goal 6 Primer Goal 5 ESEE Analysis Template What are others doing? Policy Development Integrated (Cross Program) Benefits Prioritizing Water Resources Comparison of MCWRAP Policy Development Methodologies and Technologies LiDAR – Vigil Agrimis LiDAR -- Lane Council of Governments ORWAP -- Evaluation for Policy Development Table of Contents

Evaluation of Water Resources Inventory and Assessment Methodologies and Technologies Oregon Rapid Wetlands Assessment Protocol (ORWAP) Light Detection and Radar (LiDAR) Table of Contents

Light Detection and Radar (LiDAR) Evaluation by Vigil-Agrimis Design Professionals Table of Contents MCWRAP Learning and Sharing Lessons from LiDAR Technology With Technical Assistance funds from the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), the MCWRAP team was able to investigate the utility of LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data in Wetland and Waterway inventories and assessments. Several MCWRAP cities were selected and analyzed using this new and exciting technology. Two technical memoranda summarize the results of this investigation Evaluation by Lane Council of Governments Back

Evaluation of Oregon Rapid Wetland Assessment Protocol (ORWAP) Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Oregon Rapid Wetland Assessment Protocol (ORWAP) Results into Local Policy: Table of Contents Water Resource Protection Priorities Under Statewide Planning Goal 5 The Oregon Rapid Wetland Assessment Protocol (ORWAP), developed by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) is a standardized protocol for rapidly assessing the functions and values of wetlands. The assessment protocol has the expressed intention of being used for multiple purposes by multiple agencies and types of organizations, including land use planning. The following include evaluations of ORWAP as an assessment tool or for developing policy: Back

Case Study in Water Resource Policy Development Integrated (Cross Program) Policy Development Table of Contents Comparing Policy Development within the Multi-City and County Water Resources Assessment Project Establishing Priorities in Water Resources Planning The following reports summarize and evaluate the process and lessons learned through a unique partnership of eight cities, three counties, and federal, regional and local agencies in the southern Willamette River Basin. The Multi-City County Water Resources Assessment Project partnership inventoried and assessed resources, and established water resource-related protection policies. This distinctive opportunity explicitly considered and evaluated water resources policy development under Oregon Statewide Planning Goals 5 and 6.