1 © 2007 Humboldt Consortium Fraunhoferstraße 5 64283 Darmstadt HUMBOLDT Surveys: The Handbook of Standards and the User Classification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark GIS Guidance update.
Advertisements

CIRAS PROJECT OVERVIEW
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Quality Guidelines for statistical processes using administrative data European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Q2014 Giovanna Brancato, Francesco.
WP5 – Knowledge Resource Sharing and Management Kick-off Meeting – Valkenburg 8-9 December 2005 Dr. Giancarlo Bo Giunti Interactive Labs S.r.l.
Conception of a Geospatial Data Infrastructure in Northrhine- Westphalia, Germany (GDI) Institute for Geoinformatics (IfGI), University of Muenster Robert-Koch-Str.
LWMEA Spatial decision support tool (DST) Gerrit J. Carsjens Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Page 1 Vienna, 03. June 2014 Mario Gavrić Croatian Bureau of Statistics Senior Adviser in Classification, Sampling, Statistical Methods and Analyses Department.
Project “European CDDA and INSPIRE”: scope, transformation workflow and mapping rules INSPIRE Conference 2014 Workshop: Implementing Existing European.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
WP3 Interoperable datasets for nature conservation María Cabello Tracasa.
Copyright © 2009, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Towards a Common Information Model of Water 70th OGC Technical Committee Darmstadt, Germany Rob Atkinson.
1 Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services Data quality and Metadata: what is needed, what is feasible, next steps Interoperability of Spatial.
FP WIKT '081 Marek Skokan, Ján Hreňo Semantic integration of governmental services in the Access-eGov project Faculty of Economics.
The MEMOBUST project Ágnes Andics EESW Nürnberg 1.
CountrySTAT Regional Basic Administrator Training for ECO Member States Friday, October 23, 2015 EVENT Foundations of CountrySTAT E-learning.
Introduction 1. Purpose of the Chapter 2. Institutional arrangements Country Practices 3. Legal framework Country Practices 4. Preliminary conclusions.
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The “Protected Areas” scenario of the HUMBOLDT project Roderic Molina GISIG NATURE-SDIplus Good.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
Software Acquisition and Project Management Lesson I: Introduction.
The Geographic Information System of the European Commission (GISCO) By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat ESPON.
Overview of FEA Geospatial Profile, Version 0.3 Doug Nebert FGDC Secretariat.
FP January 9, 2016 Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš Sabol1 Project Access-eGov Ján Hreňo - Marek Skokan - Tomáš Sabol
National Nuclear Regulatory Portal (NNRP) (Concept, Development and Experience) FNRBA Training Course on Knowledge Safety Networks, 14–18 October 2013,
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
UNSD Recent international developments in Energy Statistics.
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
Bavarian Agency for Surveying and Geoinformation AAA - The contribution of the AdV in an increasing European Spatial Data Infrastructure - the German Way.
WP3 Task 3.2 Adaptation of the Training Material.
Ellinogermaniki Agogi Research and Development Department DigiSkills Network DigiSkills: Network for the enhancement of Digital competence skills.
The Cascadoss Project is financed by the European Commission under the Sixth Framework Programme Evaluating FOSS4G for Environmental Applications, International.
1 © 2007 Humboldt Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt The HUMBOLDT Framework: FOSS and Standardization in a large-scale.
Planning Engagement Kickoff
Quality declarations Study visit from Ukraine 19. March 2015
European Monitoring Platform for Mapping of QoS and QoE
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
Europe’s Environment Assessment of Assessments EE-AoA 2011
CCl Expert Team on Education and Training
General presentation of SMART GROUND project
Geospatial Knowledge Base (GKB) Training Platform
WORKSHOP GROUP ON QUALITY IN STATISTICS
Regulatory Compliance in Information Systems Research
Alignment of COBIT to Botswana IT Audit Methodology
Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata
دائرة الإحصاءات العامة
SISAI STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATION
eContentplus Programme (2005 – 2008)
LOSD Publication Deirdre Lee
Giuliano Amerini Unit E6 (Transport)
Adult Education Survey : recommendations of the TF AES
WP 4 - Revision of Natura 2000 dataflow
Session 3: Information Modelling and Information Communities
Márton Németh – László Drótos How to catalogue a web archive?
Peer reviews DIME/ITDG Steering Group 15 February 2019 Claudia Junker
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
ESS.VIP Validation Item 5.1
Reportnet 3.0 Requirements Catalogue
The role of metadata in census data dissemination
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Geographical Information Systems for Statistics Luxembourg March 2008
Handbook on Rural Household Livelihood and Well-being
Projects under Pillar I of White Paper on Climate Change Adaptation
GISCO working group meeting 2015
Work Session on Statistical Metadata (Geneva, Switzerland May 2013)
… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III
QoS Metadata Status 106th OGC Technical Committee Orléans, France
ESS conceptual standards for quality reporting
High-Level Group for the Modernisation of Official Statistics
Presentation transcript:

1 © 2007 Humboldt Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt HUMBOLDT Surveys: The Handbook of Standards and the User Classification and Requirements Reports CASCADOSS Workshop, Warsaw, Poland Thorsten Reitz Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research (IGD), Darmstadt, Germany

2 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Overview The Role of WP03 (State of the Art) in the Project Common Methodology Handbook of Standards  Specific Methodology for the Handbook of Standards  Results in the Handbook of Standards User Groups and Needs Report  Specific Methodology for the User Groups and Needs  Results for the User Groups and Needs

3 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Importance of Information Gathering in the Approach Application-driven Approach Identification of user requirements (incl. “communication skills”) Proof of concept in different domains (scenarios) Evaluation as to user requirements Technology-driven Approach Technical concept, implementation, and technical evaluation of the harmonisation framework Contributions and use of standards (OGC, W3C)

4 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Internal HUMBOLDT work organization WP3 activities: Assessment of how external developments are suitable for adoption within HUMBOLDT A3.1: Common Methodology A3.2: SOTA Geospatial tools A3.3: Inventory User Groups & Needs A3.4: SOTA Software Architectures A3.5: SOTA Harmonisation Tools A3.6: Handbook of Standards Activities are mostly carried out in the first six months of the project, and then documents are updated in a six/nine month cycle.

5 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Common Methodology

6 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Acquisition and documentation of the state of the art Collection of documents by a very heterogeneous group of experts:  Wide range of application domains  Different educational backgrounds  From various European countries Templates-based investigation of documents:  One template for each task  Each document is investigated once  During this investigation process all relevant information is extracted and filled into templates   A3.2A3.5A3.3A3.4  Templates to be completed

7 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Evaluation process Evaluation as the Core of the Methodology is a two-tiered process:  General rules are applied for all relevant WP3 Activities (A3.2 – 3.5)  Specific rules refer to a particular WP3 Activity only Motivation for this approach:  General rules support the evaluation of diverse tasks in the state of the art analysis  Other criteria are relevant to a specific task only => need specific rules Definition of general rules Collecting state of the art documents Definition of specific rules Best practice solutions identified Application of specific rules

8 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Evaluation process: General rules General rules will be applied in all activities dealing with state of the art evaluation Definition of general rules must be completed before state of the art analysis (=disregarding results of state of the art analysis) Methodological approach (CIM):  Criterion is defined  Indicators are determined  Metrics are developed General Rules:  Be Minimal  Be Exact  Be Complete  Be Implementable  Be Conformant

9 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Evaluation process: Results summary INSPIRE state of play reports Templates per Activity Number of received templates A3.5 (common data harmonisation and management)A3.4 (software architecture)A3.3 (user groups and needs)A3.2 (tools) A total number of 254 templates have been considered.

10 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Example Rules from A3.2 (Spatial Tools) General Rules  Tool is usable  Tool is tested  Tool is easy to integrate or extend  Tool is of no or low cost  Tool is scalable  Tool is generic Specific Rules  Tool used for generating the data model/schema applies ISO (Conceptual Schema Language)  Tool used for data modelling and/or data and model transfer process supports GML/XML (ISO 19136)  Tool used for data storage applies ISO (Core profil of the spatial schema)  Tool used for discovery and management of metadata applies ISO (Metadata)  …

11 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt The Handbook of Standards

12 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Specific Rules for the Evaluation of Standards Features: Addressed HUMBOLDT core requirements Maturity: How often is the Standard used? Are these research projects or also Production usage? External Evaluation: Have others evaluated the standard? With what result? Update Frequency: How active is the community supporting the standard’s continuous development? Breaking changes: How often are versions released that are incompatible with existing standards versions? Longevity: How old is the standard? Support: How is the standard supported in terms of consultancy and implementation? Design Criteria: Modularity, High cohesion on one topic, Extensibility

13 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Examples of metrics for the Rules

14 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Examples of metrics for the Rules

15 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Example Application of Rules

16 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Summary of the Handbook of Standards Contents Standards: Relevant standards to use that are compatible and implementable Tools: Important libraries and platforms Approaches: RM-ODP

17 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt User Groups and Needs

18 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Specific Methodology Template Analysis + Interviews/Questionnaires for in-depth analysis Guided Interviews with identified users based on a questionnaire and a vademecum A total of 34 interviews were conducted

19 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt (Some of the) Specific Rules

20 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt HUMBOLDT Users Classification V2.0 Direct users (Framework) Developers: Contributors to the development of the HUMBOLDT Framework Data Integrators/Application Developers: Integration of data sets for applications and development of applications based on the HUMBOLDT Framework components Data Custodians: people/institutions who have to provide data adapted to given standards (harmonized) – because of legal or market requirements End Users of Geodata: Experts from the geoinformation domains who perform analysis, modelling and visualisation based on harmonised geodata resources Indirect users End Users of Geoinformation, such as Decision Makers: Use services developed by Application Developers and are not dealing with raw geodata

21 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Statistics: Types of Users Interviewed

22 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Statistics: Application Domains

23 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Findings I

24 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Findings II: Commonly encountered problems in integration

25 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Findings III: INSPIRE Impact

26 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Thank you for your attention! Thorsten Reitz M.Sc. Department Geographic Information Systems Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Telefon +49 (0) 6151/ Fax +49 (0) 6151/

27 © 2008 HUMBOLDT Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt Inventory of User types in Project and Environment