Exposure scenarios II Tony Newbould, BCF Consultant Eastwood Hall, Nottingham Wednesday 30 March 2011 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIP Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting August, 2007 FDLF.
Advertisements

ES-MODIFIER An IT-tool for formulators – particularily SME’s
WORKSHOP on EXPOSURE SCENARIOS “Communication in the Supply Chain” Helle Simon Elbro Danish Paint Association in collaboration with DHI SDS Background.
Transferring Knowledge to Enable Safe Working With Hazardous Chemicals in Small Firms : A Chemical Industry Perspective on What Really Matters Chris Money.
Sustainable Approaches: Industrial Ecology and Pollution Prevention Chapter 21 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
REACH and SDS Requirements Presented by Paula Laux Senior Regulatory Specialist Wercs Professional Services.
Chemicals Inventory Management as a Tool to Check Compliance with Restricted Substances Regulations Ursula Schumacher.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
The Revision of the Waste Framework Directive Key suggested amendments by the Rapporteur.
Information requirements for reproductive toxicity under REACH EU-OSHA Workshop Ulrike REUTER Senior Scientific Officer European Chemicals Agency 15. January.
The Implications of REACH for the Plastics Industry Sarah Plant Industrial Issues Executive.
ATIEL/ATC Generic Exposure Scenarios ENES 5 Breakout Session ATIEL represented by Alison Margary and Joy Worden (Shell) ATC represented by Sara Brennan.
1 Presentation of ChemXchange TEC-3 meeting on 04/09/2009 Brussels.
REACH: Protecting Your Supply Chain Georjean L. Adams EHS Strategies, Inc. November 17,
1 Discussion of the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting Data December 12, 2006 Nhan Nguyen U.S. EPA.
ART in the context of tiered approaches for Exposure Assessment and Chemical Safety Assessment Cefic LRI workshop Advanced REACH Tool (ART), 20 April 2012.
ERT 417 WASTE TREATMENT IN BIOPROCESS INDUSTRY W ASTE M INIMIZATION & M ANAGEMENT.
Preparing for REACH implementation: The RIP process Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, PhD Institute for Health and Consumer Protection DG Joint Research Centre.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
1 Waste Duty of Care (The Environmental Protection Act 1990) To what kind of waste does the duty of care apply? –Controlled Waste (Directive Waste) - Includes:
Communication in the Supply Chain
Checking the Exposure Scenario. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, to.
REACH, 12 Nov Supply chain communication Tatjana Humar –Jurič, M.Sc. Semira Hajrlahović Mehić, LL.M.
SCP / Sps / REACH Objective : Safe use of chemicals.
ETUC Conference on REACH March 2005 Improving REACH ETUC proposals for Downstream Users and SMEs Bernd EISENBACH EFBWW.
& H AS HEALTH AND SAFETY AUTHORITY REACH and Downstream Users Marie McCarthy REACH GI Inspector Health and Safety Authority.
Reduction of Mercury in Products Action Plans. 2 Action Plan  describes the activities to be carried out and the related implementation strategies for.
Authorization Part III. Content of a license Structure of a license General elements General and specific conditions Annexes Documents attached (e.g.
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
HazCom 30 CFR Part 47 (Interim Final Rule) Telling Miners about Chemical Hazards.
Demonstrating and Promoting Best Techniques and Practices for Reducing Health Care Waste to Avoid Environmental Releases of Dioxins and Mercury Project.
Tatsiana (Tanya) Dudzina EGRET v2 Enhanced Control Banding for Automated Consumer RMM Selection 1.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency,
Supply chain communication, GPS safety summaries, (e)SDS and use of harmonised IT tools Leo Heezen INT MARKT 24 – 25 Sep Cairo, Egypt.
Chemicals Policy and Health (CP&H) Introduction to Ecetoc TRA GPS Risk Assessment and REACH/GHS implementation in practice Leo Heezen Cefic 30 – 31 May.
‘Supply chain communication under REACH: current issues and potential solutions’ Workshop on REACH & supply chain on April Mercedes Viñas.
Supply chain communication, GPS safety summaries, (e)SDS and use of harmonised IT tools Workshop on Implementation of REACH and CLP INT MARKT
Leo Heezen Cefic 30 – 31 May 2011, KIEV UKRAINE
REACH Downstream Users Istanbul 21 st June 2010 Mike Potts UK REACH Competent Authority.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by.
Toolbox presentation: Approaches to hazard identification.
Cefic template to convert REACH dossier
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview
ICCA GPS Risk Assessment and Guidance
Communication: Safety Summary
DUCC Mixtures TF October 2016
Hazard Communications Standard HS-105 (R)
Globally Harmonized System
Enhancing the efficiency of Supply Chain Communication
WASTEMENEGEMENT IN BUILDINGS
Stakeholder consultations
HSNO Reforms - Highlights Package
Communication in the Supply Chain
Handling of Exposure Scenarios for mixtures ESmodifier®
The general obligations regarding self-classification under the CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 Sylvain BINTEIN.
REACH 2018 Registration How to prepare and mitigate Supply Chain Disruption REGISTRATION under REACH provides data on a chemical substance relating to.
ECETOC TRA tool Proposed application to estimate PEC/PNEC ratio for substances with risk score = 1 ECETOC has developed a tiered approach for calculating.
MSDS Training SustainaPac January 2013 AS.
Questions you may get from your EU customers, and
22/02/2019 REACH REACH update.
Overview on the Regulations and Technical Requirements for E-Waste Management in Rwanda. RURA.
Environment & occupational safety and health (OSH)
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Embassy of Denmark in Washington, D.C.
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
What is an MSDS sheet?.
Overview of the Minamata Convention On Mercury
Presentation transcript:

Exposure scenarios II Tony Newbould, BCF Consultant Eastwood Hall, Nottingham Wednesday 30 March

What to do if your use is not covered? 2

M/I sets DNEL(s)/PNEC(s) for the substance M/I carries out risk assessments for each use – uses standard tool e.g. ECETOC TRA: emission/exposure factors M/I determines safe use OCs/RMMs (RCR<1) M/I communicates safe use conditions in ES if use already safe, no DU action if easy, DU adopts OC/RMM within defined time if disproportionate/inappropriate, DU – uses own OCs/RMMs in scaling algorithms If RCR<1, no DU action If RCR>1, action needed – resorts to more drastic solutions 3 Overview of process

historically: – technical function: solvent, hydraulic fluid, extraction agent – product: organic solvent borne PVC plastisol – application process: airless spray REACH definition: how substance is handled any processing, formulation, consumption, storage, keeping, treatment, filling into containers, transfer from one container to another, mixing, production of an article or any other utilisation  translates into process steps/tasks  described by use descriptor codes 4 What is a use?

5 REACH use descriptors TermExplanationExample SUSector of use Indicator of where substance is used or type of user: industrial, professional, consumer SU 3 Industrial manufacture (all) PROCProcess category Indicator of how substance is handled in occupational uses – human exposure PROC 7 Industrial spraying PCProduct category Indicator of product type in which substance used for consumer applications - human exposures PC 9a Coatings ACArticle category Indicator of how substance used in articles - with no intended release AC 11 Wooden e.g. toy - with intended release AC 32 Scented eraser ERCEnvironmental release category Indicator of how substance may be released to environment ERC 2 Formulation

What to do regarding on-site activities 6

Step 1: inventory of own uses (SU, PROC, ERC) – use CEPE webpage for sector uses: emplate_im=100087&eas:dat_im=101AED emplate_im=100087&eas:dat_im=101AED Step 2a: are any uses advised against in the SDS Step 2b: compare inventory with uses in ES – interpret liberally: another use may apply if OC/RMM appropriate – ERC: can only be 2 - formulation – SU: SU 3 covers SU 2, SU – PROC: hierarchy [next slide] 7 Own manufacture

8 PROC hierarchy PROC 5** PROC 4 PROC 3* PROC 20 PROC 2 PROC 1 ** not true for dermal exposure with LEV * not true for dermal exposure PROC 8a PROC 8b PROC 9 PROC 15 (except for industrial use of solids with LEV)

Step 3: uses not covered in the ES? – contact M/I to include in dossier and to issue additional ES – find alternative supplier who has covered – carry out own CSA/CSR and prepare ES – substitute the substance Step 4: extract the OCs and RMMs, and waste handling instructions, relevant to your PROCs/ERCs Own manufacture 9

10 Key itemWhatWhere 4-part9-part are my uses covered?- sector of use - PROCs - ERC 1 and 21 are my OCs covered?- duration of exposure - frequency of exposure amount used environmental emissions 2.25 what are the exposure RMMs?- dermal/inhalation what are the emission RMMs?- air/water/soil how are wastes handled?- disposal 2.27 what can I scale, and how?- basis of M/I’s assessment 38 - scaling algorithms 4 9 What to look for in an ES

11 Key itemWhatAction are my uses covered?- sector of use - PROCs - ERC ES can be used if your sector of use, PROCs and ERCs are covered are my OCs covered?- duration of exposure - frequency of exposure If OCs outside those in ES, scaling may be an option (para 9/section 4) - amount used - environmental emissions what are the exposure RMMs?- dermal/inhalation Compare and contrast with current controls. Take appropriate action to comply with REACH what are the emission RMMs?- air/water/soil how are wastes handled?- disposal what can I scale, and how?- basis of M/I’s assessment Identifies risk assessment approach - scaling algorithms Use to assess own situation What to look for in an ES

Step 5: compare OCs/RMMs with what you currently do – yours: better or as good as – no action, but record – yours: less than M/I – action required Own manufacture 12

Step 5: compare OCs/RMMs with what you currently do – yours: better or as good as – no action, but record – yours: less than M/I – action required Own manufacture 13 Reminder: - have 12 months from receipt of Registration Number in an SDS to implement controls...

Step 6: options if supplier OCs/RMMs not feasible: – scale show are operating within ES conditions uses own OCs/RMMs in scaling algorithms If RCR<1, no DU action If RCR>1, action needed – change process to accommodate – M/I to redo risk assessment using sector OCs – Tier 2 assessment using own site data – Tier 3 assessment – identify alternative supplier who covers uses – change formulation – do own CSA resource and cost implications 14 Own manufacture

End 15