PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING SHRA Employee Annual Performance Appraisal Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 28, Performance Management Overview. Performance Management Agenda Objectives Current and future environment What weve done to create future.
Advertisements

Welcome to the Writing Performance Plan Elements & Standards Workshop.
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
HOUSTON EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (HEAR) PROCESS INFORMATION SESSION NON-SUPERVISOR For more information, visit
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
UMW Administrative and Professional Faculty Performance Evaluation Process.
Introduction Performance appraisals, reviews and evaluations are all terms used to describe a process for documenting and communicating employees’ performance.
+ NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS March 2010-April 2011 and January 2011-December 2011.
Performance Management 2012 Conducting Performance Evaluations Office of Human Resources UMW: “Putting U First”
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PRE-TEST WELCOME BACK! WELCOME BACK! Supervisor Essentials.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
System Office Performance Management
Performance Appraisal System Update
Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Presented by: Cecelia Largo-Nez, Community Involvement Specialist Local Governance Support Center Fort Defiance Agency March 25,2 009 “Essential Tools.
Overview 1. Section 1: Slides a) What is Butler GPS?
Performance Management for IT Leaders
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
 The supervisor supervises the work of ORWs, PEs and other TI staff  S/he sets the targets for ORWs, PEs and other TI staff  The supervisor ensures.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals and Merit-based Salary Program ANR Town Hall July 29, 2016 Dial-in for audio Access code:
SHRA Performance Management April 2017 Derek Hoar, Senior Employee Relations Consultant UNC School of Medicine Human Resources.
Performance Management Training
2017 Performance Management Changes
Welcome To University Shared Services
Supervisor’s Guide for Employees in Professional Series
ARTICLE 10 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE
Roll-out of the NORTHRAIL PMS
Penn State Performance Management
Butler University Goal and Performance System (GPS) Human Resources
2016/17 Staff Performance Appraisals
Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs
ARTICLE 10 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE
Penn State Performance Management: Step One: Setting Goals and Expectations Adobe Connect Seminar for Supervisors Presenter: Stephanie Flanagan
TOPS TRAINING.
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
NinerTalent STAKES Hi, I’m Paulette Russell, HR Consultant for Performance Management. Today, I am going to talk to you about our new performance management.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS Daniel Dominguez-Moncada Director of Administration January 12, 2017.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Performance Management System
Verna P. Best, MSA OEO Annual Contractors’ Training Conference
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Skills for Success! Strategy & Implementation Guide
Five-Level Performance Management System
T.O.P.S
Monitoring Performance
Performance Management System
Lesson 6: Evaluating Performance
SHRA Performance Management March 2018 Derek Hoar, Senior Employee Relations Consultant UNC School of Medicine Human Resources.
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
My Performance Journey
Performance Review for County Educators
Employee Performance Management System
Performance Review for County Educators
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Performance Management Training
Critical Element: Evaluation
How to Conduct Effectively
Periodic Accounting Review Periodic Revenue Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING SHRA Employee Annual Performance Appraisal Program

OBJECTIVES  Identify components of performance management program  Describe the difference between individual and institutional goals  Be able to calculate final overall ratings

PERFORMANCE CYCLE Performance Cycle  April 1 to March 31 Performance Plan (Work Plan)  Due May 30 (April-May to complete) Annual Appraisal  Due May 30 (April-May to complete)

PERFORMANCE PLAN Defines how well the employee needs to perform job duties on the position description in order to meet performance expectations. Institutional Goals  Expertise  Accountability  Customer-Oriented  Team-Oriented  Compliance & Ethics  Supervision (for supervisors only) Institutional Goals are set by UNC General Administration. These goals address a wide range of performance expectations found in all aspects of employee work product as well as standard expectations for employee behavior and conduct.

PERFORMANCE PLAN Individual Goals  Three to five goals each year  Applied to employees, work units and/or divisions  May be unique to current performance cycle Defined by supervisor. These goals may be specific to an individual employee or may be shared across employees in the work unit or broader organization. Goals may be based on recurring job duties or may be assignments unique to the current performance cycle.

INDIVIDUAL GOALS… may be critical-function goals that highlight some of the most critical work needs in the employee’s position. These are usually compliance related (for example, annual research or budget reports) may be project-oriented goals that may be regular or one-time work that is particularly significant during this performance cycle to meet specific business needs (for example, implementing new software, completing a phase of a research project, reaching a fundraising goal, etc.) Most individual goals should be forward-focused or stretch goals. This means that they should align with both the work unit’s and the University’s strategic goals and mission, if possible. (For example, if the Chancellor sets an initiative for increased policy compliance on the campus, then supervisors might develop individual goals toward increasing policy knowledge and awareness in the work unit or goals to ensure that the work unit is in compliance, such as revising procedure guides or audits of files. If the individual goal is accomplished, then it should help the organization move forward in some way to make things more understandable, more efficient, less hectic, etc. to improve the work environment for employees, supervisors, and customers.)

PERFORMANCE PLAN Weighting Goals  Institutional Goals: 50% of final overall rating  Individual Goals: 50% of final overall rating  All goals must be at least 5% of final overall rating Management Calibration Sessions  Set consistent expectations for institutional goals  Set individual goals for work units for similar positions

PERFORMANCE PLAN Development Goals  Job-Related  Career-Related  Service-Related Defined by supervisor and employee The University recommends that each employee have at least one development goal each performance cycle. Supervisors are expected to set development goals to address performance deficiencies for employees who received any rating of Not Meeting Expectations on their performance appraisal.

PERFORMANCE PLAN Performance Planning Review Session  Review position description and institutional goals  Review individual goals and development goals  Provide additional resources to clarify expectations  Provide employee opportunity for comment, discussion, and response

OFF-CYCLE REVIEWS Interim  Required for identified performance deficiencies Probationary  Required quarterly Transfer  Required at employee/supervisor change Employee Request  One additional review during cycle Management Choice  Whenever appropriate

PERFORMANCE MONITORING Coaching and Feedback  Supervisors and employees interact for feedback and additional clarification on expectations throughout cycle  Supervisor may provide Memos of Understanding (MOUs) or Clarification of Expectation Memos (CEMs)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Requirements  Must have worked for at least 6 months  Must be employed as of March 31  Rating scale (Not Meeting, Meeting, or Exceeding Expectations)  Final Overall Rating (weighted scoring)  Overall comments section Management Calibration Sessions  Apply ratings consistently for institutional goals  Apply ratings consistently for individual goals

SCORING Institutional Goal and Individual Goal Scores  3 = Exceeding Expectations  2 = Meeting Expectations  1 = Not Meeting Expectations Final Overall Rating  2.70 to 3.00 = Exceeding Expectations*  1.70 to 2.69 = Meeting Expectations  1.00 to 1.69 = Not Meeting Expectations *If received disciplinary action and/or received any rating of “Not Meeting,” then Final Overall Rating cannot be higher than “Meeting.”

SCORING Overall Score: = 2.50 Meeting Expectations

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Performance Appraisal Review Session  Review accomplishments and address any deficiencies  Review ratings for each goal and final overall rating  Review progress on development goals  Provide employee opportunity for comment, discussion, and response

ACCESS TO RECORDS Employee  Can receive performance plan, off-cycle reviews, and annual appraisal documents upon request Hiring Supervisors  Can review performance management documents of current or former employees who are final candidates Managers/Peer Supervisors  Can review documents for calibration purposes  Management may share performance plans internally

EMPLOYEE COMMENTS Options  Written response to performance plan or appraisal  Other documented responses during cycle Deadline  Recommended: Within two weeks of receiving performance plan or appraisal Related Issues  Comments are separate from signature process  Comments are not considered a grievance filing

APPEAL RIGHTS University SHRA Employee Grievance Policy  Final overall rating of “Not Meeting Expectations” on annual performance appraisal  Must file grievance within 15 calendar days of performance review session Process  Informal discussion with supervisor/employee  Step 1: Mediation  Step 2: Hearing Panel/Officer  Final University Decision (no further appeal)

QUESTIONS