Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training 2016-17 SY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Advertisements

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
Performance Management Review FAQs
Orientation: Classified Evaluation Process
KCTCS PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCESS RESULTS OF KCTCS EMPLOYEE PPE SURVEY (Overall 317 faculty and 614 staff responded, a total of 931) Only 6% of.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
WSU Training for Supervisors September 2014 Position Descriptions, Expectations, and Annual Reviews.
Performance Appraisal in the Public Sector
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Georgia Teacher Evaluation Program Orientation
Competency Assessment and Pay Determination N.C. Office of State Personnel Career-Banding Project Team.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Evaluating School Counselors SY13-14
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 School Counseling Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams,
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
CCSD Performance Evaluation Systems
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY11-12
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1 for Districts & Schools for Educators.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Library Media Specialist Evaluator Training August 2010 Library Media Education Dept, C&I Andy Spinks, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley,
DMS Leadership Team Meeting September 23, :00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
EVALUATIONS EVALUATIONS ARE REGULATED AND REQUIRED BY KDE (KAR’S AND KRS’S)
Evaluating School Counselors SY11-12 School Counseling Program, SSS Gail Smith, Ed. S., Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley, PHR, Director.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Evaluating Central Office Employees Evaluator Training for Clerical Evaluations July 2008.
Faculty Orientation for Certified Evaluation SY13-14
School Social Workers’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 School Social Workers Office, SSS Paulette Herbert, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office,
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 Guidance Services Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley,
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY15-16 Gail M. Smith, Supervisor School Counseling Office, Teaching and Learning Support and Specialized.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Evaluating School Counselors August 2010 School Counseling Program, SSS Gail Smith, Ed. S., Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley, PHR,
Office of Human and Resources 2014/2015 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS & GUIDELINES.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training SY
Unrepresented Staff Yearly Performance Reviews Tips for an Effective Review.
2014 – 2015 EVALUATION PERIOD KCTCS ePerformance Training.
December 13,  Current policy  Required employees to complete Individual Development Plans (IDPs) for Milestone and Exemplary Merit increases.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
WSU Training for Supervisors September 2016 Position Descriptions, Expectations, and Annual Reviews.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Performance Management
ARTICLE 10 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE
TOPS TRAINING.
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Performance Review Tool Updates College of Engineering
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Certified Evaluation Orientation
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
California Community Colleges
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Performance Management System
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Employee Performance Management System
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Kyrene School District Employee Information and Resources
Performance Management Training
WSU Training for Supervisors
Presentation transcript:

Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training SY

Classified Employees Evaluation Process Classified employees are evaluated in three Performance Categories, each containing performance descriptors which describe expected behaviors within the category ~ see your job-specific evaluation form – Job Competencies – Workplace Qualities – Human Relations

1 st Performance Category Job Competencies The first of 8 performance descriptors in this category references your job description Although the items on your job description are not specifically rated, the importance of your performance on the essential duties of your job can not be overstated The first descriptor in the Job Competency category is your supervisor’s assessment of your performance of your essential duties (job description) If you should receive a Needs Improvement (NI) on this single descriptor, you will not receive an overall Meets Expectations (ME) rating for this Performance Category

Two Other Performance Categories… Workplace Qualities – These six performance descriptors address desirable behaviors in the workplace as related to your department and specific position, such as “self-motivated” Human Relations – These six performance descriptors address desirable traits related to professional interpersonal skills, such as “teamwork”

How are these performance descriptors rated? Each descriptor is assigned one of three individual ratings based on the employee’s performance – Meets Expectations (ME) – Needs Improvement (NI)  – Non-Applicable (NA) 

What do the performance descriptor ratings mean? Simply put…. Meets Expectations (ME) means that the employee consistently accomplishes assigned tasks and demonstrates specific competencies needed for the responsibilities at or above the expectations of the supervisor. Needs Improvement (NI) means that the employee inconsistently accomplishes assigned tasks or fails to demonstrate specific competency for the responsibility.

What do the performance descriptor ratings mean? Non-applicable (NA) means the descriptor is not applicable to that employee. NA counts as an ME. Evaluator determines if a descriptor is NA. Unsatisfactory means that the employee consistently fails to accomplish assigned tasks and/or fails to demonstrate specific competencies needed for the responsibilities of the position (Overall Annual Rating only).

How is each overall category rating determined? Each Performance Category is given an Overall Category Rating based on the number of individual descriptors within the category and the rating received on each one: Job Competencies: 6 of 8 ME = Overall ME Workplace Qualities: 4 of 6 ME = Overall ME Human Relations: 4 of 6 ME = Overall ME Remember NA = ME

So, how is the overall annual rating determined? The Annual Overall Rating is assigned based on the overall ratings earned on the three Performance Categories – Meets Expectations ME in all 3 Overall Ratings – Needs Improvement NI in 1 Overall Rating – Unsatisfactory NI in 2 or 3 Overall Ratings

No Surprises! No employee should receive an Annual Overall Unsatisfactory Rating unless he/she has been informed in writing of specific performance concerns during the year.

Recognizing the Best! Your administrative evaluator is strongly encouraged to acknowledge exceptional performance with specific written commentary in Section VI of the evaluation document.

When do I have my annual evaluation conference? Paraprofessionals must have their annual conferences by May 8 th, Other classified employees must have their annual conferences before June 30 th, 2017 ~ District Rule

What if I wish to appeal my annual evaluation rating? If an employee wishes to appeal his/her evaluation results, he/she must complete an evaluation appeal form (found on PASS) and submit it, along with any evidence and/or documentation, to the evaluator within 10 business days of the receipt of the original evaluation report The evaluator must respond to the appeal within 20 business days of receipt of the appeal If the rating is upheld by the evaluator, the employee may submit an appeal to the evaluator’s supervisor within 10 days of receipt of the evaluator’s response The evaluator’s supervisor must respond to the appeal within 20 days of receipt of the appeal If the evaluator’s supervisor upholds the rating, the appeal process is exhausted

Unsatisfactory Annual Ratings ~ Paraprofessionals Because Paraprofessionals are certified by the PSC, per GA law and PSC regulation, an annual Unsatisfactory rating earned by a paraprofessional must be recorded on the PSC’s UNSAT statewide database If a paraprofessional has 2 Unsatisfactory ratings on the database and has not demonstrated remediation (improvement), the PSC will not renew the paraprofessional’s certification

Unsatisfactory Annual Ratings In accordance with Administrative Rule GBA-R, any employee earning an overall UNSAT annual rating will have his/her salary/step frozen until he/she has earned a satisfactory annual rating in a subsequent year Human Resources will receive the originals of all classified evaluations for filing in employees’ personnel files

Help is on the way! As needed and at the Supervisor’s discretion, a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) may be developed to support professional growth at any time during the year A PIP may also result following Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory Performance Evaluation Ratings

Questions? Please call the Evaluations Office, Human Resources, Maria Schmidt