A Profile of OU 1 st Year Students OGL Session April 30, 2013 Reuben Ternes Research Associate, OIRA Cassandra Barragan Assessment Coordinator, OIRA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3/13/2012 Division I - Transfers. Transfer Student A transfer student, in the application of NCAA eligibility requirements, is a student who transfers.
Advertisements

Figure 1. There Are 13.3 Million Uninsured Young Adults Ages 19–29, 30 Percent of the Nonelderly Uninsured, 2005 Source: Analysis of the March 2006 Current.
Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation – April Update.
Illinois. Graduating Class Of 2002 Demographics State And National Test Volume Source: State, National ACT Profile, 2002, Executive Summary.
Undergraduates in Minnesota: Who are they and how do they finance their education? Tricia Grimes Shefali Mehta Minnesota Office of Higher Education November.
11 Liang Y. Liu, Ph.D. Community Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Section Texas Department of State Health Services
0 - 0.
Using NSSE Data in Student Affairs West Chester University.
Modular Delivery and Peer-Led Team-Learning for Precalculus
A Profile of OU 1 st Year Students OGL Session April 29, 2014 Reuben Ternes Research Associate, OIRA Cassandra Barragan Assessment Coordinator, OIRA.
First-Year Graduate Student Survey INTRODUCTION As part of the Graduate Schools recruitment and retention efforts, a graduate student survey was developed.
Peer-Led Team Learning in Precalculus Helmut Knaust Department of Mathematical Sciences The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) August 2, 2012.
The HEPI–HEA Student Academic Experience Survey 2014 Nick Hillman and Paul Bennett.
Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship Program Special Report Tennessee Higher Education Commission January 27, 2011.
Tertiary Education The State of Education Series March 2013 A Global Report.
1 Queen Elizabeth High School HOME of the KNIGHTS.
11 Million Reasons to become Diverse How Diverse Populations are Changing Libraries and Society ATLA, 2013 – Charlotte, NCPresented by Stephen Sweeney,
© 2013 E 3 Alliance 2013 CENTRAL TEXAS EDUCATION PROFILE Made possible through the investment of the.
An Overview for NMU Parents.  “FYE” stands for First Year Experience  FYE was designed with three goals in mind: help students develop strategies and.
Sponsored by CEPA Foundation – Cultural & Educational Programs Abroad CEPA Foundation Webinar #3 on Curriculum Integration: Evaluation Integrating Education.
Reuben Ternes Assessment Coordinator, OIRA OGL Session April 28, 2011.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
The Aging Population Source: U.S. Census Bureau Percent Growth in U.S. Population, by Age Bracket.
Missouri Higher Education Issues and Initiatives 2013.
Demographics of First Year Students Source: Measurement and Research Center Available at: Student Profile - & NEW Factbook -
2007 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) First-Year Student Survey Profile Administered August 2007 West Chester University of Pennsylvania.
ANDREA BROWN DIRECTOR, PROGRAM ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH How to Use Student Survey Data (NSSE) to Improve Your Teaching.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
1 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) UCLA’s Higher Education Research Institute COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) Presentation.
2 ND ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FORUM WHO ARE OUR STUDENTS & WHAT PREDICTS THEIR SUCCESS ? December 2, 2013.
Margie Bennett Executive Assistant to the President for Planning, Institutional Research, and Compliance SEPTEMBER FACULTY MEETING.
Institutional Research & Effectiveness Who Are the Freshmen at Austin Peay? Institutional Research & Effectiveness Ellen Smyth May 2009.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Using NSSE Data to Improve University Policy Reuben Ternes OIRA October, 2011.
Facts about First-Year Students at Central Connecticut State University Presented by Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
CSULB Student Profiles Characteristics & Aspirations.
Undergraduate Persistence and Graduation Rates Bernadette Gray-Little Faculty Council September 15, 2006.
OU Student Profile Who are OU’s Students? June 7, 2006 Laura Schartman.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Student Profile Brooklyn College Office of Institutional Planning, Research, and Assessment 2010.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
From Recruitment to Retention: Focusing Campus Efforts to Promote Transfer Student Success National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students January.
August 2012 Reuben Ternes, OIRA. Presentation in 6 Parts Introduction to OIRA Part I: FTIAC Growth Part II: Recruitment Data Part III: The Importance.
Undergraduate Students at UMass Boston: A Presentation for the Student Educational Research and Advocacy Center April 4, 2007 Prepared by: The Office of.
Getting to Know Your Transfers THECB Transfer Success Conference.
An Introduction for COM 101 Faculty All About FTIACs.
1 The Study of UT Student Financial Status Conducted by UT Office of Survey Research, Fall Conducted by UT Office of Survey Research, Fall 2002.
THE FRESHMEN SURVEY 2008 (FTS, FORMERLY CIRP) UNDERSTANDING THE 2008 CLASS OF MVNU ENTERING FRESHMEN DATA SUMMARY AND COMPARISON OF MVNU ENTERING FRESHMEN.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
HERI Faculty Survey Selected IVCC Results Office of Institutional Research.
Regular Versus Shorter University Orientations: A Comparison of Attendee Make-up Carla Abreu-Ellis & Jason Brent Ellis.
Student Affairs 08/10. Enrollment 11,648 undergraduate students –9,855 Full Time –1,793 Part Time 2,222 graduate students –1,237 Full Time – 985 Part.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
Who Are Our Students? Demographic Profile Retention and Choice Student Time Use Alcohol and Drugs Student Satisfaction Academic Performance Career and.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Reuben Ternes Assessment Coordinator, OIRA OGL Session April 29, 2010 A Profile of OU 1 st Year Students.
Using Entering Student Data to Estimate Campus Retention Rates LINDA J. SAX Associate Professor & Associate Director of HERI University of California,
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
Results of 2004 Freshman Survey in regards to significant differences between STU and Peer Groupings.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
IPEDS COMPARISON FALL 2010 – FALL 2014
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Presentation transcript:

A Profile of OU 1 st Year Students OGL Session April 30, 2013 Reuben Ternes Research Associate, OIRA Cassandra Barragan Assessment Coordinator, OIRA

Presentation Overview Who Are OU FTIACs? Institutional Data Values and Expectations Academic Success College Engagement

Part 1: Institutional Data Various pieces of information that our office (OIRA) collects on OUs student body. All kinds of information can be found on our website: Including this power point!

Growth in FTIACs

FTIACs: Average ACT Score

FTIAC Gender Ratios

FTIAC Ethnicity About half of OUs non-white ethnicities are African American students

Undergraduate Age (All UG Students)

Full Time/Part-Time Status (All UG Students)

Part 2: Values and Expectations The CIRP survey Cooperative Institutional Research Project conducted by the Higher Education Research Institute at the University of California at Los Angeles We get an average of 70 to 80% response rate on this survey. In general, we are more similar to national norms than we are dissimilar.

Important reasons in deciding to go to college Percentage of Students Answering Very Important

Important reasons to select OU

Important Life Objectives

Estimated Parental Income

Drank beer during high school year

OU students political views

Admissions Acceptances and Student Choices

Part 3: Academic success Graduation Rates Retention Rates Probation Rates Info compiled by OIRA

First Semester Probation Rates (FTIACs)

Retention to second year

Six-Year Graduation Rates by 1 st -term credits 14+ Credits 12 or 13 Credits

Part 4: College engagement College student survey that assesses the extent to which students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development Administered every two years. OU has shown steady increases in NSSE results since 2005 More data is available on OIRAs website. All data is for 1 st year students unless otherwise noted. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE: pronounced nessie)

More than 10 hours per week working off campus ClassOakland Selected Peers Freshmen46%27% Seniors70%57%

the environment emphasizes spending significant amounts of time on academic work Very Much (4) Some (2)

Time Spent preparing for class Hours Per Week (4.0) 6-10 Hours Per Week (3.0)

Quality of Relationships with other students Friendly & Supportive Unfriendly & unsupportive

Questions and discussion ?