ARE PAN-GENOTYPIC THERAPIES READY FOR PRIME TIME? 3 Rd International HIV/Hepatitis Coinfection Meeting Durban SA Marina B. Klein, MD, MSc FRCP(C) Chronic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Trials of Hepatitis C Therapy in the HIV Co-infected Stephen D. Shafran, MD, FRCPC, FACP Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases.
Advertisements

Slide 1 of 8 From DL Wyles, MD, at Atlanta, GA: April 10, 2013, IAS-USA. IAS–USA David L. Wyles, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of California.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in Genotype 1 (Viral Relapsers) PROMISE Trial Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Forns X, et al. Gastroenterology.
The new Treatments Dr John F Dillon. Curing one person Curing a population one person at a time.
Liver Disease and Thalassaemia George Constantinou.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotypes 1,4,5,6 ATOMIC Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Kowdley K, et al. Lancet.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT-1 and HIV Coinfection NIAID ERADICATE Trial Phase 2a Treatment Naïve and Treatment.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- 3 rd DAA in HCV Genotype 1 NIAID SYNERGY Phase 2 Treatment Naïve (unfavorable baseline.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir-Ledipasvir +/- Ribavirin in GT-1 LONESTAR Trial Phase 2a Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced Source:
Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Paris 2012 Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Marys School of Medicine Barts and The London.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced Dieterich D, et.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in HCV GT 4 Egyptian Ancestry Trial Phase 2 Ruane PJ, et al. J Hepatol. 2015;62:
Module 6: Treatment options. Module goal To enable participants understand the best current treatment options, factors that influence outcomes and potential.
Abstract Results Objectives Results Conclusions Background Methods V-1637 Background-At the CORE center in Chicago, despite an on-site hepatitis clinic.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir in Treatment Experienced RESPOND-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:
Update on the HCV Antiviral Pipeline Todd S. Wills, MD SPNS HCV Treatment Expansion Initiative Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center Infectious Disease.
Hepatitis web study H EPATITIS W EB S TUDY H EPATITIS C O NLINE Treatment of Chronic HCV Genotype 5 or 6 Robert G. Gish MD Staff Physician, Stanford University.
Response Guided Therapy Fabien Zoulim Hepatology Department & INSERM Unit 1052, Lyon University Lyon, France.
NS5A and polymerase inhibitors Mark Sulkowski, MD Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
ALLY-2  Design  Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, in treatment-naïve genotype 1 treated for 12 weeks DCV + SOF 400 mg QD DCV + SOF.
SMV 150 mg QD + SOF 400 mg QD Randomisation 1 : years HCV genotype 1 Naïve or pre-treated with IFN-based regimen No cirrhosis HCV RNA ≥
Response Guided Vs.Response Unguided Therapy K.Rajender Reddy M.D Professor of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, USA.
HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 500 N = 100 W12 Placebo > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5 or 6 Naïve or pre-treatment with IFN-based regimen.
David L. Wyles, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of California San Diego San Diego, California State of the Art in Hepatitis C Virus Infection.
Sulkowski M. Lancet 2015;385: C-WORTHY  Design Randomisation* Open-label > 18 years HCV genotype 1, treatment naïve HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml No cirrhosis.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir with PEG + RBV in Genotype 1 SPRINT-1 Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Kwo PY, et al. Lancet. 2010;376:
High sustained virological response rates using generic direct antiviral treatment for Hepatitis C REDEMPTION-1 James Freeman 1, Richard Sallie 2, Adam.
Daniel Dhumeaux, Henri Mondor hospital Créteil, France HCV compassionate use programme The French experience Amsterdam, April.
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 106 W12 > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1-6 Naïve or pre-treatment with IFN-based regimen Compensated cirrhosis allowed*
#AIDS2016 Innovations in HCV treatment: what the future holds Jürgen Kurt Rockstroh Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn,
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label W8 W12
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in DAA-Naïve GT 1-6 POLARIS-2
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Viral Hepatitis Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir (Epclusa)
PHOTON-2 Study: SOF + RBV in HCV-HIV co-infection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label W12
Failure to achieve SVR on No HBV or HIV co-infection
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Future Trials of Hepatitis C Therapy in the HIV Co-infected
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Resistance to HCV direct-acting antivirals: What should we know?
DAA’s in the treatment of HCV: The Beginning of the end or the end of the beginning for HCV?
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve (unfavorable baseline treatment characteristics) Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- 3rd DAA in HCV Genotype 1 NIAID SYNERGY: Genotype.
Elbasvir + Grazoprevir + Ribavirin in PI-experienced HCV GT1 C-SALVAGE
Therapeutic Background & Study Rationale
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Elbasvir + Grazoprevir +/- Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve HCV GT 2, 4, 5, or 6 C-SCAPE Brown A, et al. EASL 2015; Abstract P0771.
Ombitasvir + Paritaprevir + Ritonavir +/- Ribavirin in HCV GT4 PEARL-I
New Agents, New Regimens, New Strategies
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
LEPTON Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 genotype 1 or 3 Phase II
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced HIV Coinfection
Advances in the Treatment of HCV Genotype 3 and HIV/HCV Coinfection
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Elbasvir-Grazoprevir + Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype 1 or 3 C-SWIFT Poordad F, et al. EASL 2015; Abstract O006.
SOF/VEL in liver transplantation with genotype 1-4 infection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 2 Treatment Experienced (with Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin)
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Incidence of HCC after HCV treatment with DAAs: ERCHIVES
Johannes Vermehren, James S. Park, Ira M. Jacobson, Stefan Zeuzem 
Presentation transcript:

ARE PAN-GENOTYPIC THERAPIES READY FOR PRIME TIME? 3 Rd International HIV/Hepatitis Coinfection Meeting Durban SA Marina B. Klein, MD, MSc FRCP(C) Chronic Viral Illness Service McGill University Health Centre

How times have changed….. The bad old days Interferon/Ribavirin ■Injectable and multi-pill regimens ■Long duration ■Poor efficacy ■Severe side effects

That was then….this is now! Sunny ways…Sunny daysDAAs ■Simple once daily all oral regimens ■Few side effects ■Short duration ■Highly Effective

Consequences of the HCV treatment revolution for drug development ■Previously G1 infections were most difficult to treat ■Highest concentration of G1 infections in the developed world/markets ■R&D efforts concentrated on drugs for G1 ■Trials lumped “easy to treat” G2 and G3 infections together ■Few studies if any on more rare genotypes 4 and beyond ■Current low efficacy for G3 infections

Genotype Map

The World viewed (very) differently World mapper.limited

All Genotypes are NOT created equal ■Learned that G1a and G1b differ, with G1b being far easier to treat ■G2 responds much better than G3 ■G4 variation in response according to different subtypes ■Little know about “orphan” genotypes (5+)

The challenge of Genotype 3: virus or host…or both? ■Genotype 3 is estimated to affect 54.3 million people and is the second most common worldwide behind genotype 1 (83.4 million) ■G3 infections have worse clinical prognosis –More rapid development of liver disease and cirrhosis –More steatosis –Higher rates of HCC ■G3 infections have emerged as the most difficult to treat with DAAs, with response rates as much as 20% lower than other genotypes

■US VA COHORT of 110,484 patients with chronic HCV (8,337 with G3) ■Compared with G1, pts with G3 were: –31% more likely to develop cirrhosis (aHR=1.31; 95% CI, ) – 80% more likely to develop HCC (aHR=1.8; 95% CI, ). ■Association was independent of age, diabetes, BMI or antiviral therapy. Kanawal et al Hepatology, 2014

Clinically important HCV G1 2K/1B Chimeras ■Genotyping usually by “hybridization assay (LIPA)” of core, but NS3 or NS5 typing can be important N Core E1 E2 p7 C NS2 NS3 NS4ANS4BNS5ANS5B G2k Core E1 E2 p7 C NS2 NS3 NS4ANS4BNS5ANS5B N G1b Core E1 E2 p7 C NS2 NS3 NS4ANS4BNS5ANS5B N G2k/ 1b Susser et al PS001- EASL 2016

Genotype 2K/1B Chimeras – more common in immigrants from Russia Germany: 17 patients Rx’d Sof/RBV: 15 relapsed – all responded to G1 rescue therapy Susser et al PS001- EASL 2016.

The Real World mimics or exceeds trial data for G1: Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir Sof/LDV in cirrhotic, TE (n=507) Curry et al. Poster SAT-214, EASL / / / /45 97/99 311/ / 30 8/8 8 wks for GT-1 (n= 752) Buggisch et al. Poster SAT-242, EASL 2016.

But G3 still a challenge German National HCV registry – DHC-R n=688 33/5832/41164/ /167115/156112/133121/135119/12740/5340/47 Cornberg M et al. Poster SAT-208, EASL 2016.

Especially in cirrhotics…. Relapse:853 Lost to follow-up:321 Death:110 Sof/LDV/RBV in Canada – n=111 Feld et al. Poster SAT-183, EASL /11131/3966/70

Is SOF/DCV the answer? In cirrhotics: adding ribavirin increases cure rates to 88% with 12 weeks and 92% with 16 weeks of treatment.

SVR12, % HCV genotype ALLY-2 (HIV Coinfection) SVR12 by HCV Genotype: 12-Week Groups NaiveExperienced Wyles, CROI 2015

Truly the Pangenotypic Era? Sofusbuvir/Velpatasvir (ASTRAL 1,2,3 ) Agarwal, Poster SAT-195, EASL SVR12 (%) Total GT 1GT 2GT 3GT 4GT 5GT 6 2 relapse 2 LTFU 1 D/C 11 relapse 2 D/C 1 death

ASTRAL-5: 12 weeks Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in HIV/HCV Co-infection 106 co-infected patients any HCV genotype treatment-naïve or –experienced On stable ARV regimens for HIV, fully suppressed HIV RNA GT1a: 62%; 1b: 11%; GT2: 10%; GT3:11%, GT4: 5% 18% cirrhotic Wyles D et al. PS104 EASL /28 99/ / 65 11/ 12 4/ 4 11/ 11 HIV medications at baselinen (%) NRTI backbone TDF-based w boosted agent56 (53) TDF-based w/o boosted agent35 (33) ABC/3TC base15 (14) ART use PI (DR, LPV or ATV)50 (47) NNRTI (RPV)13 (12) Integrase inhibitor (RAL or EVG)36 (34) Other (> 1 of above classes)7 (7)

Kwo P, et al. 51 st EASL; Barcelona, Spain; April 13-17, Abst. LB01. ABT-493 and ABT-530 +/- RBV in G3 with Cirrhosis Results: SVR12 by ITT Analysis ABT ABT-530 ABT ABT RBV SVR12, % Patients 24 / / 24

Market access REGISTRATION ACCESS TAG: mapcrowd.org/public/p df/EN_mapCrowd_Rep ort.pdf

Sunny days really are here!! …...at least in some places