1 RASC / HOPE Transportation Revolutionary Aerospace System Concepts Human Outer Planet Exploration Mission Systems concepts and trade space NASA Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Concept Overview for 2 mt Case “2 mt case”: integrated payloads of no more than 2 mt can be landed on the surface of Mars; extension of current Mars EDL.
Advertisements

A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.
Comparative Assessment of Human Missions to Mars Damon F. Landau Ph. D. Preliminary Exam September 13, 2005.
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
MAE 5391: Rocket Propulsion Overview of Propulsion Systems
Mission To Mars In Kerbal Space Program, Where distances are 1/9 real world values.
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
February 1, 2005HYPERION ERAU 1 Thermal Analysis of a Radiation Shield for Antimatter Rocketry Concepts Jon Webb Embry Riddle Aeronautical University.
EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
Class 4: Fundamentals of Rocket Propulsion
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Atul Kumar Presentation Week 3: February 1 st, 2007 Aerodynamics Team Re-Entry vehicle analysis - Lifting body 1.
A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.
28 October st Space Glasgow Research Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Nuclear Power Fission and Radioisotope Presented to: Propulsion and Power Panel Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board National Research Council by Joseph.
Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Samara 2015 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OPTIMIZATION TRAJECTORY OF MOTION OF ELECTRIC PROPULSION SPACECRAFT.
Background The Apollo program sent 12 Americans to the lunar surface between 1969 and 1972, but humans have not set foot on the moon since then. In January.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
February 18, 2006HYPERION ERAU 1 Interstellar Travel Now.
Spacecraft Trajectories You Can Get There from Here! John F Santarius Lecture 9 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology 533 / Astronomy 533 / EMA 601 University.
What to do with Space Station Poo 1. 2 David Heck Advanced Manufacturing Research & Development Boeing – Phantom Works, St. Louis, Mo SEND IT TO THE MOON.
VASIMR: The Future of Space Travel (?) Kevin Blondino 8 October 2012.
Mars Orbit Rendezvous Robert Dyck. Only land what you need Mars Direct ERV contains stuff not needed on Mars Food & life support for transit to Earth.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Preliminary Trans-Lunar Analysis [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] January 29,
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
FAST LOW THRUST TRAJECTORIES FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
Introduction to the Altair Project
Low Thrust Transfer to Sun-Earth L 1 and L 2 Points with a Constraint on the Thrust Direction LIBRATION POINT ORBITS AND APPLICATIONS Parador d'Aiguablava,
Design of Supersonic Intake / Nozzle P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Meeting the Cruising Conditions…
Nuclear Propulsion Allen May. What is it?  Any Propulsion Method that uses some form of nuclear reaction.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
IRNCLAM – InteRNational CisLunar Ascension Module Brian Anderson ASTE /11/23.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Project Aquarius Rogge - 1 Courtney Rogge Week 6: February 22 nd, 2007 Power Group Nuclear Power Capabilities TV Nuclear.
Nuclear Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology M artian S urface R eactor Group Nuclear Reactors for The Moon and Mars Tyler Ellis.
ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Interplanetary Prof. Jeffrey S. Parker University of Colorado – Boulder Lecture 29: Interplanetary 1.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
Rocket Performance Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Parametric Design The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I.
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Robotic and Piloted Titan Missions Brice Cassenti University of Connecticut.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
Initial Mission Architecture Trade Space Fission Based Nuclear Power and Propulsion –Technologies – NTR, Bimodal NTR, NEP, Hybrids, etc. –Trajectories.
NASA Johnson Space Center, Advanced Space Propulsion Laboratory Point Design for 2.5 Megawatt VASIMR Engine For Mission to Callisto in 2045 Developed with.
Goal to understand how Ion Propulsion works.
THE TSIOLKOVSKY ROCKET EQUATION
The Future of Human Spaceflight *** A Journey to Mars
Preliminary Human Asteroid Mission Design
Callisto Mission LaRC Option
Cost Comparison of Higher Parking Orbit Scale up for Arbitrary Payload
Lunar Trajectories.
NASA Design Team January 31, 2003
Technical Resource Allocations
A Parametric Study of Interplanetary Mission Using Solar Sail
MOM Mars Orbiter Mission ISRO
Basics of Rocket Propulsion
Unit D – Space Exploration
Deputy, Washington Operations
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Week 6 Presentation Thursday, Feb 19, 2009
  Robert Zubrin Pioneer Astronautics W. 8th Ave. unit A
Goal to understand how Ion Propulsion works.
Introduction to the Altair Project
Inputs on HPM EPS, SEP Stage Block II configuration, and comments on 10/2 presentation package Tim Sarver-Verhey 10/1/2001.
Week 4 Presentation Thursday, Feb 5, 2009
  Robert Zubrin Pioneer Astronautics W. 8th Ave. unit A
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

1 RASC / HOPE Transportation Revolutionary Aerospace System Concepts Human Outer Planet Exploration Mission Systems concepts and trade space NASA Design Team Advanced Plasma Propulsion Option (VASIMR) February 5, 2003

2 RASC / HOPE Transportation VASIMR Propulsion System Technical Characteristics Basic Concept (Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket): Hydrogen (or Deuterium) plasma is heated by RF energy to exhaust velocities up to 300 km/s. Exhaust velocity/thrust can be varied at constant power. Other propellants can also be used depending on Thrust/Isp mission requirements. Engine has no electrodes for plasma generation and acceleration so erosion problems are avoided. Magnetic ducting and RF heating enables high plasma power density. Projected performance Specific Power: 30 MWe Specific mass - VASIMR: 0.76 kg/kWe Specific Mass – Reactor (crew mission): 3.1 Kg/kWe Specific Mass – Reactor (cargo mission): 2.0 Kg/kWe Specific impulse: 3,000 to 30,000s Engine on-off Control Possible: Cost Phase – (Piloted 213days, Cargo 187days) (See Cost Arc Slide for more detail) Maturity/Feasibility TRL: (4-5) Critical mass of propulsion vehicle (VASIMR + Brayton Fission Reactor): MT Experiments in progress: vacuum chamber testing of kW system Planned experiments: space demonstration of kW system on the ISS (battery-driven, long (10min) pulses, with ion cyclotron heating and with magnetic nozzle) in ~3 years (pending funding) Operability Fuel: LH2, LD2, He, for High Isp ops. N2, Li, Ar, Xe for low Isp ops Throttle variability: Can be operated continuously or turned off and on as needed Power Requirement: 30 MWe Isp: continuously variable from 3000 s to 30,000s by modifying plasma flow via RF excitation By-products: exhaust is harmless (except for Li, where contamination may be an issue) Radiation: electromagnetic waves

3 RASC / HOPE Transportation Mission Architecture 1st Trip: Pre-deployment of essential assets at Callisto 2nd Trip: Crew transfer from Earth-Moon L1 to Callisto –Everything goes to Callisto in two mission flights: Mission Flight One: Transfer of Crew Lander, Surface Hab, ISRU and Crew mission flight return propellant from L1 to Callisto; Lander remains in orbit –VASIMR+Reactor M sp is approximately 2.76 Kg/kWe –Optimized with 3 Reactors at 10MWe per reactor (Mission can still be preformed with 2 reactors) –VASIMR+Reactor infrastructure can act as a contingency return vehicle or be utilized as an orbiting relay asset Mission Flight Two: Crew transfer from L1 to Callisto Orbit Insertion, including TransHab ONLY –Dock to orbiting Lander for surface descent of Crew (3) –VASIMR+Reactor M sp is approximately 3.86 Kg/kWe –Artificial gravity for all but one year of round trip mission duration –Two (2) TransHabs included in dry mass (Helps with artificial gravity spinning as also acts as a spare.

4 RASC / HOPE Transportation Cargo Mission Trajectory Begin Spiral from Earth at L1: 12/6/2043 Period of Earth / L1 Spiral: 15 days Heliocentric Transfer to SOI of Jupiter: 950 days Period of Jupiter Injection: 232 days Period of Callisto Injection: 17 days Arrival at 500km Parking Orbit: 3/29/2047 Total Mission Time: 1214 days (3.3 years) Crew Round Trip Trajectory Begin Spiral from Earth at L1: 2/19/2045 Period of Earth / L1 Spiral: 15 days Heliocentric Transfer to SOI of Jupiter: 680 days Period of Jupiter Injection: 170 days Period of Callisto Injection: 7 days Arrival at 500km Parking Orbit: 7/5/2047 Stay Time: 30 days Begin Spiral Out from Parking Orbit: 8/6/2047 Period of Callisto Escape Spiral: 9 days Period of Jupiter Escape: 140 days Heliocentric Transfer to SOI of Earth: 670 days Period of Earth Injection: 20 days Arrival at Earth / L1: 11/27/2049 Total Mission Time: 1741 days (4.8 years) Earth Escape Trajectory SOI of Earth Callisto Injection Trajectory SOI of Callisto Jupiter Orbit SOI of Jupiter Jupiter Injection Trajectory Cargo / Crew Mission Trajectory Profiles Callisto Mission using VASIMR Technologies

5 RASC / HOPE Transportation coast arc (engine-off period). Crew Mission Coast arc: Engine Off (Time Counter) Leg 1) Earth escape trajectory (Transit Time = 15 days) Coast arc : 1.32 days ( )day Leg 2) Heliocentric trajectory (Transit Time = 680days) Coast arc : days ( )day Leg 3) Jupiter injection trajectory (Transit Time = 170days) Coast arc : days ( )day Leg 4) Callisto injection trajectory (Transit Time = 7days) No Coast arc Leg 5) Callisto escape trajectory (Transit Time = 9days) No Coast arc Leg 6) Jupiter escape trajectory (Transit Time = 140days) Coast arc : 7.54 days ( )day Leg 7) Heliocentric trajectory (Total = 670days) Coast arc : days ( )day Leg 8) Earth injection trajectory (15days) No Coast arc Cargo Mission Coast arc: Engine Off (Time Counter) Leg 1) Earth escape trajectory (15days) Coast arc : 1.61 days ( )day Leg 2) Heliocentric trajectory (950days) Coast arc : days ( )day Leg 3) Jupiter injection trajectory (232days) Coast arc : days ( )day Leg 4) Callisto injection trajectory (17days) No Coast arc Example how to read this chart Cost arc: 1.32days – time in cost phase Time Counter (13.68 – 15)day – time in trajectory leg that engine is turned off

6 RASC / HOPE Transportation Direct transfer L1 departure to Callisto rendezvous: TRIP 1 Pre-deployment of return fuel, Surface Facility Habitat, Lander, & ISRU leaves L1 with “duplicate” VASIMR /Nuclear Reactor transport propulsion system Total wet mass from L1 is approximately 506 MT Transit to Callisto Orbit Injection Transit time from L1 to Callisto is approximately 1214 days (3.3 yrs) Callisto arrival: –Surface Facility Habitat and ISRU pre-deployed to surface, and setup for operational activation –VASIMR/Nuclear Reactor propulsion system, Descent/Ascent Lander, return fuel, etc. situated in 500 Km altitude Callisto orbit operations: –Eventual connection of Lander to Crew arrival spacecraft –Remaining VASIMR/Nuclear Reactor propulsion system can act as contingency spacecraft or as an orbiting relay asset Callisto Mission Trajectory Concept Cargo Transfer

7 RASC / HOPE Transportation Direct transfer L1 departure to Callisto rendezvous: TRIP 2 Callisto Mission Trajectory Concept Crew Transfer Six (6) person crew leaves L1 with VASIMR /Nuclear Power propulsion system, Structure, Fuel, and two equipped TransHabs L1 departure: Total mass from L1 is approximately 431 MT (118 MT LH2 needed) Transit to Jovian System with artificial gravity conditions equal (as a minimum) to Callisto gravity (~1/8 G) Transit time from L1 to Callisto is approximately 872 days (2.39years) Callisto arrival: (minimum 32 day stay) –Crew transport spacecraft docks with Orbiting Lander;3 person crew uses Lander to descend to surface –Return fuel transferred from Pre-deployed spacecraft to crew transport spacecraft –VASIMR/Nuclear Reactor propulsion system, 2 TransHabs, return fuel, etc. situated in orbit 500 Km) with remaining crew of 3 Callisto departure: Total mass from Callisto is approximately 421 MT (118MT LH2 is needed) –3 person crew departs surface (via Ascent Module from Lander) for rendezvous with Orbiting crew transport spacecraft –Picks up ~118 MT of fuel in orbiting Cargo spacecraft Transit time from Callisto to L1 is approximately 864 days (2.37 years)

8 RASC / HOPE Transportation J J Earth-Moon L1 departure (2/19/2045) “HOPE -- Callisto” Direct Transfer from L1 using VASIMR propulsion technology (circa 2045) S Callisto departure (8/6/2047) J VASIMR Propulsion (3,000 < I sp < 30,000 sec Variable Engine Efficiency Engine on-off Control ) Brayton Nuclear Fission Reactor Power (30 MWatt) 872 day transit (2.39 years) (L1- Callisto) 1/8 Artificial G 116 MT fuel use Total Spacecraft Mass at L1 launch: 432 MT (~118 MT of hydrogen fuel) Total Spacecraft Mass at Callisto departure: 421MT (~118 MT of hydrogen fuel) 2 TransHab Mass (w/consumables): ~ 105 MT Radiation Protection: wrapped LH2 fuel tanks + hydrogen Nanofiber sheathing (Crewed Mission) 864 day transit (2.37 years) (Callisto - L1) 1/8 Artificial G 112 MT fuel use Callisto arrival (7/5/2047) Fluid Transfer (Cargo and Piloted Ship)

9 RASC / HOPE Transportation Triangle Shaped Reactor Radiators SA= 3330m 2 Per Panel (13,320m 2 Total) Flat Panel and Cylindrical Radiators 4 Flat Panels SA=445m 2 Total 2 Cylindrical SA=455m 2 14m 26.4m 49m 30MWe Piloted Callisto Transfer Vehicle (PCTV) Artificial Gravity – Two TransHabs 198m 34.0m 22.8m 42.7m “Preliminary” PCTV Mass Properties (Two TransHabs – Total Wet Mass 430MT Series of 10MWe Brayton Fission Reactors provide 30MWe of electrical power for constant thrust Variable Isp (3000s to 30,000s) with an varying efficiency Eff = 1X10 -5 x Isp Total VASIMR Alpha = 0.76kg/kWe (Engine = 0.24kg/kWe, PPU = 0.52kg/kWe) Dry Mass = 207MT Propellant Capability = 118MT (NOTE: more tanks can be added) Payload Masses = 105MT Provides a constant 1/8g simulated gravity environment

10 RASC / HOPE Transportation Cargo and Crewed Mission masses

11 RASC / HOPE Transportation Basic Figures of Merit studied (Using Fuel Load Calculated by LARC Trajectory Code) ** Assumes a 32 day surface stay on Callisto

12 RASC / HOPE Transportation BACKUP SLIDES

13 RASC / HOPE Transportation 30MWe Brayton/VASIMR next to the ISS

14 RASC / HOPE Transportation Analysis Results -Trajectory transit times Earth-Moon L1 to Callisto Mass (metric tons) of a Crew spacecraft with 30MW VASIMR Patched Conic method to include gravitational effects of Earth, Jupiter, Callisto

15 RASC / HOPE Transportation Analysis Results -Trajectory transit times Callisto to Earth-Moon L1 Mass (metric tons) of a Crew spacecraft with 30MW VASIMR Patched Conic method to include gravitational effects of Earth, Jupiter, Callisto

16 RASC / HOPE Transportation Trajectory analyses -30MWe VASIMR Crewed Mission (Similar for Return Trip) Fig 1. An example of Earth Escape Trajectory

17 RASC / HOPE Transportation Y(AU) X(AU) Heliocentric Trajectory to Jupiter System Sun Earth Jupiter Thrust Vector Spacecraft Trajectory Entering Jupiter's Sphere of Influence Escaping from Earth Trajectory analyses - 30MWe VASIMR Crewed Mission (Similar for Return Trip) Fig 2. An example of Heliocentric Trajectory to Jupiter System

18 RASC / HOPE Transportation Y(Jupiter radii) Jupiter Injection Trajectory Entering Jupiter's Sphere of Influence Jupiter Injection Trajectory Jupiter's Sphere of Influence direction to Sun direction of Jupiter's orbital velocity Jupiter Thrust Vector Entering Callisto's Sphere of Influence Callisto's Orbit Trajectory analyses - 30MWe VASIMR Crewed Mission (Similar for Return Trip) Fig 3. An example of Jupiter Injection Trajectory

19 RASC / HOPE Transportation Trajectory analyses - 30MWe VASIMR Crewed Mission (Similar for Return Trip) Fig 4. An example of Callisto Injection Trajectory

20 RASC / HOPE Transportation from Earth L1 to Callisto Begin Spiral from Earth at L1: 2/19/2045, Propellant loaded (73.47mt, 32 small tanks), Total S/C mass: mt Period of Earth / L1 Spiral: 15 days, Propellant 1.28mt Heliocentric Transfer to SOI of Jupiter: 680 days, Propellant: 37.52mt Period of Jupiter Injection: 169 days, Propellant: 10.88mt Period of Callisto Injection: 8 days, Propellant: 5.07mt Arrival at 500km Parking Orbit: 7/5/2047 Total Flight Time: 872 days (2.39 years), Total Propellant used: 54.75mt (18.72mt fuel left) Stay Time: 30 days from Callisto to Earth L1 Begin Spiral from Parking Orbit: 8/6/2047, Propellant loaded (73.47mt, 32 small tanks), Total S/C mass: mt Period of Callisto Escape Spiral: 9 days, Propellant: 5.77mt Period of Jupiter Escape: 140 days, Propellant: 21.87mt Heliocentric Transfer to SOI of Earth: 670 days, Propellant: 30.03mt Period of Earth Injection: 17 days, Propellant: 1.18mt Arrival at Earth / L1: 11/24/2049 Total Flight Time: 836 days (2.29 years), Total Propellant used: 55.61mt (13.19mt fuel left) Total Mission Profile Total Mission Time: =1738 days (4.8 years), Propellant Used (54.75mt, 55.61mt) Crew Mission Trajectory Profiles 30MW VASIMR with Vapor Core Reactor 5 Year Round Trip

21 RASC / HOPE Transportation from Earth L1 to Callisto Begin Spiral from Earth at L1: 4/25/2045, Propellant loaded:149.32mt, Total S/C mass: mt Period of Earth / L1 Spiral: 9 days, Propellant 2.54mt Heliocentric Transfer to SOI of Jupiter: 380 days, Propellant: mt Period of Jupiter Injection: 100 days, Propellant: 15.16mt Period of Callisto Injection: 5 days, Propellant: 9.00mt Arrival at 500km Parking Orbit: 9/2/2046 Total Flight Time: 494 days (16.47 months), Total Propellant used: mt (4.82mt fuel left) Stay Time: 30 days from Callisto to Earth L1 Begin Spiral from Parking Orbit: 10/2/2046, Propellant loaded (149.32mt), Total S/C mass: mt Period of Callisto Escape Spiral: 5 days, Propellant 6.60mt Period of Jupiter Escape: 85 days, Propellant 25.40mt Heliocentric Transfer to SOI of Earth: 390 days, Propellant mt Period of Earth Injection: 10 days, Propellant 3.48mt Arrival at Earth / L1: 2/5/2048 Total Flight Time: 490 days (16.33 months), Total Propellant used: mt (6.77mt fuel left) Total Mission Profile Total Mission Time: =1014 days (33.80 months), Propellant Used (144.50mt, mt) Crew Mission Trajectory Profiles 200MW VASIMR with Vapor Core Reactor 3 Year Round Trip

22 RASC / HOPE Transportation “Preliminary” PCTV Mass Properties (Two TransHabs – Total Wet Mass 623MT 1Vapor Core Reactors provides 200MWe of electrical power (Alpha=0.29kg/kWe) Variable Isp (3000s to 30,000s) with an varying efficiency Eff = 1X10 -5 x Isp Total VASIMR Alpha = 0.76kg/kWe (Engine = 0.24kg/kWe, PPU = 0.52kg/kWe) Dry Mass = 368MT Propellant Capability = 150MT Payload Masses = 105MT 168m 22.5m 49m 52.5m 14m 200MWe Vapor Core Reactor Powered VASIMR

23 RASC / HOPE Transportation Two Sided Triangle Radiators SA = 3279m^2 4 (double sided )Flat Panels SA=968m 2 Total Cylindrical SA=612m 2 VAPOR Core Reactor Vapor Core / VASIMR VCR Radiator Assumptions: 1.Overall power output efficiency of 20% while allowing operation of the condensing radiator at constant heat rejection temperature of 1500K. 2.VCR-MHD fuel/working fluid (UF4) could condense at just under 1atm. 3.Waste heat load is estimated to be about 800 MW yielding an area of 3279 m2 (assuming.85 effective emissivity for the radiator) or 46 MT at 14 kg/m2. 4.Piping is made of molybdenum alloy (TZM or other similar strength alloys) with composite 5.The radiator surface is the carbon/graphite composite fins VASIMR Radiator Assumptions: 1.Thermal load = 900K using a molten salt coolant. At this temperature two-sided carbon fiber SiC radiator could be used and using the same conservative effective emissivity of.85 yield an area of 1580 m2 or MT at 6-8kg/m2. 2.estimate is based on using an overall efficiency of 50% for the VASIMR engine

24 RASC / HOPE Transportation 200MWe Crewed Mission masses