45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
Advertisements

Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.
CESR Synchrotron Radiation Tables - Range of Photon Rates and Beta-averaged Photon Rates - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
Comparison of ECLOUD and POSINST Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts with Emphasis on the Relative Drift and Dipole Contributions Jim Crittenden Cornell.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden & John Sikora Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Early Results on a Search for Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD -- Collaboration with Eric Wilkinson -- These slides includes corrections arising from the.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Resolution of ECLOUD Tune Shift Calculation Instability Jim Crittenden.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modelling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD 1) Comparison with CesrTA.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD Simulations for the Tune Shift Measurements of December.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
Comparison of Primary Photoelectron Generation in ECLOUD, CLOUDLAND and POSINST Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 and January 2009 Measurements - Preparation for PAC2009 FR5RF Paper and Poster - “Effects.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Preliminary Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modeling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - This presentation limited to resolving drift/dipole weighting question -
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.
ElectronsdFud Simulation Work at Cornell Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Space Charge Electric-Field Calculations for Coherent Tune Shift Estimations using the Electron-cloud Modelling Algorithm ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Thanks to Marco for clarifying the drift/dipole weighting - - Thanks to Gerry.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD Simulations for the Tune Shift Measurements of December.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.
ECLOUD Simulations for CESR Witness Bunch Tune Shift Measurements Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
CESR Synchrotron Radiation Tables and Electron Cloud Modelling Input Parameters Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York First Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York CesrTA Electron Cloud Measurements and Simulations Jim Crittenden.
49th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop October 8 –12, 2010 LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD News 1) Bug in SEY model fixed 2) List of present activities.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
The Secondary Electron Yield Model in ECLOUD and Comparison to CLOUDLAND Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Shielded-Pickup Measurements in June and Update on Modeling Results / J.A. Crittenden 23 August / 4 Shielded-Pickup Measurements in June and Update.
CesrTA Electron cloud simulation update ILC 10 Workshop G. Dugan, Cornell 3/28/09 2/24/2016ILC 10 Workshop.
2nd International Particle Accelerator Conference September 4–9, 2011, San Sebastián, Spain LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden & John Sikora Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Synrad3D Photon propagation and scattering simulation G. Dugan, D. Sagan CLASSE Cornell University Ithaca, NY USA.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jared Ginsberg Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements
Update to ECLOUD Calculations for the
Using Time-Resolved Retarding Field Analyzer Measurements to Determine the SEY Mitigation Effectiveness of Grooves -- Bonus: first look at last night's.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Electron Cloud Meeting
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
First Look at the New SYNRAD3D Results
Detailed Characterization of Vacuum Chamber Surface Properties Using Measurements of the Time Dependence of Electron Cloud Development Jim Crittenden.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Use of the Shielded-Pickup Measurements for Optimization of the Photoelectron Production Energy Distribution in ECLOUD -- This topic was included in the.
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
First Look at Modeling Photoelectron Energy Distribution for a 2
Shielded Button Measurement/ECLOUD Simulation Comparison for 5
Electron Cloud Meeting
Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud Meeting 4 December 2013
Ryan Badman Jim Crittenden July 20, 2011 Electron Cloud Meeting
First Attempt to Simulate the Shielded Button Measurements with ECLOUD
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
All material for this talk may be obtained at
CesrTA Wiggler RFA Measurements
45 e+ bunches, 4-ns spacing, 0.9 mA/bunch
Presentation transcript:

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud Meeting 4 January 2012 Comparison of old SYNRAD3D using the smooth elliptical wall file and the new SYNRAD3D including diffuse scattering using the realistic wall file Diffuse scattering calculated for wall roughness 100 nm and correlation length 5000 nm -- Witness bunch studies at 15E and 15W Coherent tune shift measurement/simulation comparison as published at IPAC10 – 6 January 2012: Updated plots with full azimuthal range and added drift/dipole distributions.

4 January 2012 Comparison of Old SYNRAD3D and New SYNRAD3D with Diffuse Scattering / J.A.Crittenden 2 / 9 15E/W Geometry and SYNRAD/SYNRAD3D Comparison Slide from talk of 8 September 2010 SYNRAD and SYNRAD3D calculate a similar e-/e+ direct rate ratio at 15E and 15W, but SYNRAD3D rates are lower because more than half the direct photons are reflected. SYNRAD3D also shows the degree to which the ring symmetry reverses the reflectivity. 15W 15E

4 January 2012 Comparison of Old SYNRAD3D and New SYNRAD3D with Diffuse Scattering / J.A.Crittenden 3 / 9 Compare old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall file and new code with realistic wall file including diffuse scattering chess_ , 5.3 GeV e+, 15W Shielded Pickup ECLOUD simulations to date have been done for p.e. rates on the bottom of the beampipe of about pe/m/e. With the smooth wall file, the rates at the top and bottom of the beampipe are due to the (unrealistic) elliptical shape of the vacuum chamber at the outside wall. With the realistic wall file, the rates are due to the diffuse scattering component. New SYNRAD3d including diffuse scattering with realistic wall file Old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall file Assuming QE = 24% TopBotto m

4 January 2012 Comparison of Old SYNRAD3D and New SYNRAD3D with Diffuse Scattering / J.A.Crittenden 4 / 9 Shielded Pickup Witness Bunch Study 5.3 GeV e+, 5 mA/bunch, 15W (TiN) Shielded Pickup Comparing witness bunch simulations with no further tuning of ECLOUD input parameters The comparison with the data is similarly satisfactory, even though the distribution of photoelectrons produced by scattered photons is substantially different. Old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall fileNew SYNRAD3d with realistic wall file

4 January 2012 Comparison of Old SYNRAD3D and New SYNRAD3D with Diffuse Scattering / J.A.Crittenden 5 / 9 In contrast to 15W, both the old and new SYNRAD3d calculations give high rates of photons incident on the inner wall. (Reminder: my talk of 24Nov11 showed the rate on the inner wall to be important to match the SPU signal shapes.) The distributions of photons on the top and bottom of the beampipe are quite different. New SYNRAD3d including diffuse scattering with realistic wall file Old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall file Assuming QE = 27% Compare old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall file and new code with realistic wall file including diffuse scattering chess_ , 5.3 GeV e+, 15E Shielded Pickup

4 January 2012 Comparison of Old SYNRAD3D and New SYNRAD3D with Diffuse Scattering / J.A.Crittenden 6 / GeV e+, 3 mA/bunch, 15E (Carbon) Shielded Pickup Comparing witness bunch simulations without tuning the ECLOUD input parameters Again, the new SYNRAD3d calculations provide a good description of the data. Old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall fileNew SYNRAD3d with realistic wall file

4 January 2012 Comparison of Old SYNRAD3D and New SYNRAD3D with Diffuse Scattering / J.A.Crittenden 7 / 9 The diffuse scattering with vertical vacuum chamber sides results in an 76% higher photon rate in the drift regions and 21% lower rate in the dipole regions. The azimuthal distribution is now much more similar in drift and dipole regions. New SYNRAD3d including diffuse scattering with realistic wall file Old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall file Assuming QE = 10% Compare old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall file and new code with realistic wall file including diffuse scattering 2085mev_ , 2.1 GeV e+, ring-wide drift and dipole averages Field-free regions Dipole regions

4 January 2012 Comparison of Old SYNRAD3D and New SYNRAD3D with Diffuse Scattering / J.A.Crittenden 8 / 9 IPAC10 & Phase 1 Report Tune Shift Measurements 1 February GeV 45-bunch train e+ The ECLOUD calculations using SYNRAD (no photon scattering, refl=15%) published at IPAC10 have been repeated using the old and new SYNRAD3D results without tuning of any other input parameters. In both cases the drift contribution to the tune shift increases significantly, more so with the realistic wall and diffuse scattering. The match to the data is about as good. The match to the new SYNRAD3D would improve with a trivial 5% reduction in QE. New SYNRAD3d including diffuse scattering with realistic wall file Old SYNRAD3d with smooth wall file 0.4 mA/bunch 0.8 mA/bunch

4 January 2012 Comparison of Old SYNRAD3D and New SYNRAD3D with Diffuse Scattering / J.A.Crittenden 9 / 9 IPAC10 & Phase 1 Report Tune Shift Measurements 1 February GeV 45-bunch train e+ These comparisons substantiate the claims made on the previous slide concerning the consequences of photon scattering calculations for the modeling of coherent tune shift measurements. The IPAC10 results required extensive tuning, including the introduction of the rediffused SEY component and statistical approximations such as electrostatic grid size. With no further tuning, the SYNRAD3d photon scattering model gives a good match, with dramatically different drift and dipole contributions. New SYNRAD3d including diffuse scattering with realistic wall file IPAC10 Results SYNRAD (no photon scattering, refl=15%) 0.4 mA/bunch 0.8 mA/bunch