SPRING 2016 2016 ASSESSMENT OF COLLEGE PROCESSES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Advertisements

- Overview- Program Review and SLOs Preparing to Write the Self-Study Why? What? How? For more SLO resources see:
ASCCC Accreditation Institute 2013 Marybeth Buechner, Sacramento City College Dolores Davison, Foothill College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
First Draft Proposals at Classified Senate
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Program Review 2012 A Dialogue on Success. Program Review 2012  Summary of Findings in Themes  Current Status of Submissions  Sustainable CPI.
2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 1. LAHC 2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 All Accreditation Commission recommendations successfully.
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
FLEX Day Presentation August 13, Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM)
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Strategic Directions at BC, Committee Presentations, Spring 2015 Kate Pluta, lead Liz Rozell, Academic Affairs Grace Commiso, Student Affairs.
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
2015 Governance Survey Results Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) June 17, 2015 E. Kuo & J. Marino-Iacieri FH IR&P.
All College Day August 23, 2013 The Homestretch to Reaffirmation! REAFFIRMED.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Emphasizing the Dialog at Monterey Peninsula College Fred Hochstaedter Academic Senate President SLO Coordinator Monterey Peninsula College What we do,
SBVC and CHC Follow–Up Report Joint Presentation to the SBCCD Board of Trustees October 8, 2015 Haragewen Kinde, SBVC ALO Celia Huston, Co-Chair, ASLO.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
Articulating Institutional Learning Outcomes as GE + Pursuing meaningful assessment across multiple disciplines. A case study. SLOA Co-coordinators San.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM) Workshop November 19, 2015.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Survey Assessment of Cañada College Decision Making Procedures & Process (Spring 2010) Summary of Findings & Open Discussion Office of Planning, Research.
Funding Technology at Mission College Challenges and Recommendations.
Strategic Master Planning Revising the Strategic Master Plan
Budgets, Dialog and Sustainability Chris Hill, Grossmont College Virginia May, Sacramento City College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
All College Day Friday, January 25, 2013 West Valley College Integrated Planning.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Surveys Quantitative data Qualitative data Etc. Service Unit Outcomes Administrative, Student Services, Instructional Support Services Program Outcomes.
CONVOCATION AUGUST 14, 2014 THE LOOK AND FEEL OF TASKSTREAM.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair
Outcomes Assessment for All How We Can Improve Our Services or Confirm Our Good Practices Fall 2016 – August 12, 2016.
Committee Orientation
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
Institutional Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Accreditation: Preparing for the 2016 Self Study
Welcome to the Learning Outcome Assessment Process
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
University Resource Alignment: Goals and Process
Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo Shelley Blackman, Evergreen Valley
Sam Houston State University
Chairs and Managers Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Yuba Community College District Board of Trustees Meeting
ISER Committee Presentations
OSE Student Experience Survey
Spring 2018 OSE Student Experience Survey
Step-by-Step Guide to Adopting a Classified 9+1
SLO Summit 2014.
Presented To: College Planning Council
ISER Committee Presentation-College Council
Student Learning Outcomes
Accreditation & Institution Set Standards
Completing your Program Review
Sam Houston State University
Comprehensive Evaluation: Institutional Effectiveness Committee Recommendations Presentation to College Council Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Accreditation follow-up report
Presented To: College Planning Council
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
SLO Assessment and Program Review
Presentation transcript:

SPRING ASSESSMENT OF COLLEGE PROCESSES

BACKGROUND Accreditation Recommendations Integrated Planning and Budgeting Cycle – ‘closing the loop’ Questions/criteria developed from: 2011 College-wide assessment CEMPC input ACCJC effectiveness criteria

OVERVIEW Online survey: survey monkey Ordinal and interval Likert scale questions, open ended questions 5 major sections Assessment Program Review Integrated Planning and Budgeting Collegial Decision-Making Participatory Governance Committees (College Council, CEMPC, CBC, CTC, CFC) 82 Responses collected: 6 Administrators, 23 Classified Staff and 53 Faculty

SUMMARY COMMENTS The campus recognizes wide-scale efforts at improvement, which makes constituents feel like the campus is improving in effectiveness. It is imperative that in order for these processes to improve, more of the campus needs to be involved and aware. Campus processes overall face similar challenges: to increase participation and collaboration, transparency, simply and sustain. The campus needs to define what effectiveness looks like for all these processes and identify potential direct measures of assessment.

RESULTS - ASSESSMENT Assessment Processes Always/Most of the Time Occasionally /Some of the Time Rarely/Never I don’t know. My department or unit plans and prepares for upcoming assessment activities. 3846%3340%79%45% My department or unit makes improvements based on assessment results. 3948%2025%1417%810% Overall, assessment drives improvement in student learning and achievement at Merritt College. 2632%3746%1114%79% Please rate the effectiveness of assessment processes (SLO, PLO, and ILO) at Merritt College. Average: 5.81

RESULTS – PROGRAM REVIEW Program Review Process Always/Most of the Time Occasionally/So me of the Time Rarely/NeverI don’t know. Program Review is data-driven and includes analysis of institutional and learning outcome assessment data. 3242%2431%79%1418% My department or unit makes improvements based on results of program review. 2836%2938%1114%912% My department or unit requests new resources based on results of program review. 3647%2128%811%1115% Overall, program review drives improvement in student learning and achievement at Merritt College. 2735%2229%1317%1520% Please rate the effectiveness of the Program Review process at Merritt College. 5.61

RESULTS INTEGRATED PLANNING AND BUDGETING Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process Always/Most of the Time Occasionally/So me of the Time Rarely/Never I don’t know. Budget development and resource allocation is driven by planning and assessment. 1925%2331%1520%1824% Resources requests are linked to data and institutional goals. 2027%2635%1216%1723% Overall, integrated planning and budgeting results in improvement of student learning and achievement at Merritt College. 1520%2331%1723%2027% Please rate the effectiveness of the integrated planning and budgeting process at Merritt College. Average: 4.94

RESULTS – COLLEGIAL DECISION MAKING Collegial Decision Making Always/Most of the Time Occasionally/So me of the Time Rarely/NeverI don’t know. Governance committees represent all constituency groups in decision making processes. 1521%3650%811%1318% Governance committees collaborate to implement data driven and integrated planning and budgeting processes. 1217%3042%1622%1419% Governance committees engage in dialogue about institutional effectiveness. 1927%3245%913%1115% Overall, decision making through Participatory Governance at Merritt College results in improved student learning and achievement. 1115%2940%1825%1419% Please rate the effectiveness of the collegial decision making process at Merritt College. Average: 4.76

MAKING IMPROVEMENTS – GROUP ACTIVITY