Introduction to the Gospels. Source criticism – synoptic problem Form criticism Redaction criticism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hwk – Q. Read pgs and use class notes for the last two questions. 1. Define source criticism 2. How does source criticism leads to the synoptic.
Advertisements

The Synoptic Problem and Markan Priority.  The Synoptic Problem  The “Four-Source Hypothesis”  Arguments for Markan Priority  Responses to the Arguments.
Source Criticism and the Synoptic Problem. The Biblical Warrant for Source Criticism: Luke 1:1-4. Luke tells us clearly that there were many other gospels.
The synoptic problem And our best theory as to the answer. Text and Traditions Unit 1 Catholic Regional College Melton.
The Synoptic Problem and the binary time series 1.
The Synoptic Problem.
Chapter 6 The Gospels: Form and Purpose. Key Topics/Themes The similarity of the Synoptic Gospels The uniqueness of the Gospel of John The diverse views.
SYNOPTIC GOSPEL DEVELOPMENT AND SOURCES. SYNOPTIC GOSPEL SOURCE DEVELOPMENT Mark (70 C.E.) First Gospel written- The “synoptic” prototype Short independent.
Scripture.
The Synoptic Problem Robert C. Newman - newmanlib.ibri.org -
Synoptic Problem. Definition Sun-optic (synoptic)—with one eye Confidence church saw differences and didn’t correct or try to harmonize them. What does.
Luke Context  Written ca CE Much common material with gospels of Mark and Matthew (the Synoptic gospels)  But has a distinctive point of.
Is revelation because it tells us what God wants us to know about Jesus through the words written by inspired writers It contains Jesus’ words, actions,
©McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 6 The Gospels: Form and Purpose.
CHAPTER ONE The Historical Jesus.
Luke-Acts The Two-Volume Gospel. The Gospel ascribed to Luke is the second of a two volume composition conventionally designated Luke-Acts. The Gospel.
Class VI: NT Source Criticism: The Synoptic Problem Apologetics December, 2009 Glenn Giles.
Literary Relationships Among the Gospels The Synoptic Problem.
MattLukeJohnMark Sources Peter Traditional view Experience with Jesus How Were the Gospels Written? The most difficult intellectual problem in human history.
Euangelion = gospel = “good news”, as used in Mk 1:1 Mt, Mk, Lk = synoptic gospels = “gospels seeing things alike,” from Greek synoptikos (“seen together”)
The Synoptics -English word “synoptic” comes from the Greek word “synopsis”, which means, “seeing together” -First labeled by J.J. Griesbach a German scholar.
The Synoptic Problem The Case for Q. What does “synoptic” mean?  From Greek meaning “to see altogether”
The Gospels Four pictures of Jesus.
Synoptic Gospels By Chaplain Ron McCants. The "Synoptic Gospels” The Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, and Luke are so similar to each other that, in.
Synoptic Gospels Introduction Mr. Christopher B. Perrotti Theology 1 Chapter 6 intro.
Form and Redaction Criticism How the Gospels Came Together.
1 Any serious discussion of the Synoptic Gospels must, sooner or later, involve a discussion of the literary interrelationships among Matthew, Mark, and.
Know Your Bible Welcome to Week 7 The Gospels (Teaching and miracles)
The Synoptic Problem Robert C. Newman What is the Synoptic Problem? Synoptic means "looking together." Matthew, Mark & Luke are very similar. John is.
Synoptic Problem. Definition Sun-optic (synoptic)—with one eye Confidence church saw differences and didn’t correct or try to harmonize them. What does.
Synoptic Problem Reading Keys for Mark 1. OT Prophecy shapes Markan material 2. Jesus Identifies with Sinners (& Sin) 3. Divine Sonship 4. Jesus’ Cosmic.
The Christian Scriptures. Structure  The Christian Bible contains the:  Old Testament – Hebrew, written before Jesus. These books include the Pentateuch.
1. Name the 4 religious group in Palestine at the time of Jesus? 2. How many parts are there in the Bible? 3. Explain the Biblical reference Matthew 18:20.
Exegesis- Putting it all together Text and Traditions Unit 1 Catholic Regional College, Melton.
What is good news? Jesus Revealed and Was Good News Jesus is the incarnate Son of God, revealing God’s unconditional love for all people. Incarnate: invested.
New Testament  Gospels in the New Testament are main sources of information about Jesus  ‘Gospel’ means Good News  Christians believe the Good News.
Apologetics 101 Types of Criticism and the Synoptic Problem.
Terms & Nature of the Gospels
Gospels Exegetical Workshop
The Gospel of Belief John 1-21.
The Gospel According to
Tuesday, November 15.
Dr. Rick Griffith • Singapore Bible College • BibleStudyDownloads.org
The Light and the Life… Revealed!. The Light and the Life… Revealed!
The Gospel of Matthew Holy Cross College 2016.
The Bible I. The Bible A. Divine Inspiration – Holy Spirit inspired the human authors to teach what He wants B. Canon of Scripture – Books in the Bible.
Prayer: Incline my heart, O God, to your decrees; and favor me with your law. Ps. 119 Lord, our souls yearn and pine for your courts and your love. Help.
Introduction to the Synoptic Problem
REVIEW FINAL EXAM 2012 JESUS AND FILM
Lesson 1: Introduction Why the Ignatius Catholic Study Bible?
GOSPEL OF MARK JESUS AS THE SERVANT
On your whiteboard: Sum up what John’s gospel tells us about the nature and message of Jesus.
NEW TESTAMENT.
New Testament Gospels.
The Gospel of John: Myths and Facts
SOURCE CRITICISM It is a method that has been used to analyze the synoptic Gospels in trying to understand the Synoptic Problem.
The Synoptic Gospels.
Conversations with John
The Gospels An introduction.
REDACTION CRITICISM THE HUMAN AUTHOR.
Week 23 The Gospels.
YEAR 10 RE THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS TRIVIA QUIZ.
Announcements Wednesday, March 8th Graded papers returned
MEETING JESUS AGAIN for the first time
Announcements Papers available for pick-up on Thursday afternoon in my office- between 2-4:30pm. Grades posted on iCollege. Final project due dates: March.
The Gospels of Matthew and Mark?
Book of Signs Definition: The Book of Signs is the first part of the Gospel according to John, including many stories of miracles, or signs, in the life.
Methods of Bible Study Week 3.
Lecture Two The New Testament in Our Modern World
Gospels/Acts Exegetical Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Gospels

Source criticism – synoptic problem Form criticism Redaction criticism

Source Criticism Literary relationship of Matthew, Mark, and Luke to each other, as against John. – Much similarities in Matt, Mark, and Luke Compare Matt 14:22-33 and Mark 6:45-52 – Matthew has a longer version – Both stories end in different ways  Matthew on a confessional manner; Mark on a critical note

Source Criticism Of the 661 verses in Mark, 500 appear in Matt, 350 in Luke. 235 verses common to Matt and Luke, and do not appear in Mark

Source Criticism The similarities: – Often verbatim for the entire clauses and sentences – agreement in wording Difficult to explain the differences among the writers – esp. if Jesus spoke in Aramaic and these agreements are in Greek If compared to John, why are there so few verbal similarities (92%) unique?

Source Criticism The similarities: – Agreement also extends to parenthetical or editorial comments, e.g., Matt 24:15//Mark 13:14; Matt 9:6//Mark 2:10//Luke 5:24; Matt 27:18//Mark 15:10

Source Criticism The similarities: – Agreement in the order of narratives not linked together chronologically Matthew’s sermon of the mount (Matt 5-7) and Luke’s sermon on the plain (Luke 6:17ff, and other places) Matthew’s Parables of the Kingdom in Matt and Luke’s Parables in Luke 8 and 13

Source Criticism Synoptic Problem - relates to source criticism Luke’s prologue (1:1-4) suggests some dependent on various sources Purpose: to identify the written traditions and to determine the relationships of the synoptic gospels with the hope of ascertaining the purpose of the evangelists in writing the gospels.

Source Criticism: Solution Augustinian Hypothesis – Matthean priority – Follows canonical order – Wenham argues for early dating

Source Criticism: Solution Griesbach Hypothesis – Matthean priority, with Mark as the reader’s digest version of Matt and Luke

Source Criticism: Solution Oxford Hypothesis – Variation of the hypothesis – Argues for Markan priority – 2-source hypothesis, e.g. Carson – 4-source hypothesis, including Q – 4 source hypothesis with Proto-M – Problem with Q

Source Criticism: Solution

Source Criticism: Solution Four Source Hypothesis

Source Criticism: Solution Farrer Hypothesis – Rejects Q – Accept Markan priority – Luke uses Matthew

Source Criticism: Solution Literary Independent Hypothesis – Eta Linnemann

Source Criticism: Solution The question of Q – See Mark Goodacre – No one has ever seen Q – Difficult to sustain the existence of Q

Source Criticism: Solution Pool of: – oral traditions – written sources (cf. Luke’s prologue in 1:1-4) – Memory of the eyewitnesses?

Source Criticism: Solution Summary: Most accept Markan priority – The argument from length – Mark is shortest, yet not an abridgement – The argument from grammar - Mark’s poorer writing style the use of Aramaic in Mark 3:17, 7:11. Redundancy – Mark 15:25; cf. Matt 27:35; Luke 23:34

Source Criticism: Solution – The argument from style Mark’s harder reading – see Mark 6:5-6//Matt 13:58; Mark 10:18//Matt 19:17//Luke 18:19; Mark 1:12//Matt 4:1//Luke 4:1 Mark’s stylistic features in the frequent use of “immediately”, “and”, “and immediately” Mark’s use of historical present – 151 against 78 in Matt and 9 in Luke

Source Criticism: Solution – The argument from fatigue See Matt 14:1 and 9: tetrarch  king (reproducing Mark 6:26?) See Luke 9:10, 12  feeding of 5000 in a city called Bethsaida  a deserted place (reproducing Mark 6:35)?

Form Criticism Method of analysis focusing on individual, self-contained units of materials Champion: Bultmann The task: identifying the process of transmission; classifying the individual pericopes into various forms, assigning a Sitz im Leben, and reconstructing the history of the tradition

Form Criticism Examples of Forms – “I AM” sayings in John – Pronouncement stories – Mark 2:13-17; 3:31-35 – Parables – Speeches – Miracle stories What kind of changes???? No longer in “fashion” today

Redaction Criticism The way the redactors/editiors/evangelists change their sources or utilise the traditions Task: to rediscover the evangelist’s theology and setting

A way forward Canonical & Narrative approach? Avoiding harmonising of the gospels Paying attention to individual voice of the evangelist