Some Practical Considerations for the GEO-CAPE Mission Sensitivity, Saturation, Sun glint, Cloud cover, etc Chuanmin Hu, Zhongping Lee, Keping Du, Antonio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 nm)  nm) PurposeSpatial Resolution (km) Ozone, SO 2, UV8 3251Ozone8 3403Aerosols, UV, and Volcanic Ash8 3883Aerosols, Clouds, UV and Volcanic.
Advertisements

From UV to fluorescence, a semi-analytical ocean color model for MODIS and beyond Stéphane Maritorena & Dave Siegel Earth Research Institute University.
ASTER Operation Scenario and Status Y. Yamaguchi (Nagoya Univ., Japan) M. Fujita, T. Tachikawa, M. Kato, H. Tsu ( ERSDAC, Japan), M.J. Abrams, L. Maldonado.
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
Resolution.
GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Requirements Curtiss Davis COAS, Oregon State university.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Reflected Solar Radiative Kernels And Applications Zhonghai Jin Constantine Loukachine Bruce Wielicki Xu Liu SSAI, Inc. / NASA Langley research Center.
Visible Satellite Imagery Spring 2015 ARSET - AQ Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training – Air Quality A project of NASA Applied Sciences Week –
Lian Feng and Chuanmin Hu University of South Florida NASA MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting May 18 – 22, 2015, Silver Spring, MD.
UNH Coastal Observing Center NASA GEO-CAPE workshop August 19, 2008 Ocean Biological Properties Ru Morrison.
A.B. VIIRS (Nov. 20, 2013).
GEO-CAPE Ocean Color STM Measurement Instrument Platform Other Science Questions Approach Requirements Requirements Requirements Needs How do short-term.
Multiwavelength Continuum Survey of Protostellar Disks in Ophiuchus Left: Submillimeter Array (SMA) aperture synthesis images of 870 μm (350 GHz) continuum.
A Comparison of Particulate Organic Carbon (POC) from In situ and Satellite Ocean Color Data Off the Coast of Antarctica Amanda Hyde Antonio Mannino (advisor)
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from MODIS Data
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Level-2 ocean color data processing basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Multispectral Remote Sensing of Benthic Environments Christopher Moses, Ph.D. Jacobs Technology.
High Resolution MODIS Ocean Color Fred Patt 1, Bryan Franz 1, Gerhard Meister 2, P. Jeremy Werdell 3 NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Science Applications.
Resolution Resolution. Landsat ETM+ image Learning Objectives Be able to name and define the four types of data resolution. Be able to calculate the.
Ocean Color Radiometer Measurements of Long Island Sound Coastal Observational platform (LISCO): Comparisons with Satellite Data & Assessments of Uncertainties.
1 Applications of Remote Sensing: SeaWiFS and MODIS Ocean Color Outline  Physical principles behind the remote sensing of ocean color parameters  Satellite.
The MEaSUREs PAR Project Robert Frouin Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA _______________________________________ OCRT Meeting, 4-6 may 2009,
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Remote Sensing of Water Properties Using the SWIR- based Atmospheric Correction Algorithm Menghua Wang Wei Shi and SeungHyun.
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011 The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events at urban and regional scales 1/ What do we see with.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
Title page. “ Possible Geocape Capabilities Measurements of Diurnal Variability with Requirements of hours to days……………. “
Ocean Color Products: The challenge of going from stocks to rates
POLAR MULTI-SENSOR AEROSOL PROPERTIES OVER LAND Michael Grzegorski, Rosemary Munro, Gabriele Poli, Andriy Holdak and Ruediger Lang.
Further information Results 19 tournaments surveyed : 415 interviews; 579 fishing locations; 1,599 fish hooked/landed Variable.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
Fluorescence Line Height (FLH) Ricardo Letelier, Mark Abbott, Jasmine Nahorniak Oregon State University.
Synergy of MODIS Deep Blue and Operational Aerosol Products with MISR and SeaWiFS N. Christina Hsu and S.-C. Tsay, M. D. King, M.-J. Jeong NASA Goddard.
New Fluorescence Algorithms for the MERIS Sensor Yannick Huot and Marcel Babin Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche Antoine Mangin and Odile Fanton.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Polarization analysis in MODIS Gerhard Meister, Ewa Kwiatkowska, Bryan Franz, Chuck McClain Ocean Biology Processing Group 18 June 2008 Polarization Technology.
May 15, 2002MURI Hyperspectral Workshop1 Cloud and Aerosol Products From GIFTS/IOMI Gary Jedlovec and Sundar Christopher NASA Global Hydrology and Climate.
Orbit Selection for the WATER HM Mission R. S. Nerem CCAR, CIRES, University of Colorado D. P. Chambers Center for Space Research, University of Texas.
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
Group Presentation, July 17, 2013
Deliberative control for satellite-guided water quality monitoring
JAXA Himawari-8 Ocean Color and Aerosol
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
Study area & research’s purposes
Monitoring Water Chlorophyll-a Concentration (Chl-a) in Lake Dianchi,China from 2003 ~ 2009 by MERIS Data.
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
NASA’s Ocean Color Online Visualization and Analysis System
GEO-CAPE to TEMPO GEO-CAPE mission defined in 2007 Earth Science Decadal Survey Provide high temporal & spatial resolution observations from geostationary.
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
Jian Wang, Ph.D IMCS Rutgers University
IMAGERY DERIVED CURRENTS FROM NPP Ocean Color Products 110 minutes!
Using Sun Glint and Antarctic Ice Sheets to Calibrate MODIS and AVHRR Observations of Reflected Sunlight William R. Tahnk and James A. Coakley, Jr Cooperative.
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
Introduction of the SCIAMACHY SBAF web tool
Need for TEMPO-ABI Synergy
Geostationary Sounders
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
Deep Convective Cloud BRDF characterization using PARASOL
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
MODIS L1B Data Product Uncertainty Index Jack Xiong (Xiaoxiong
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Toward a synergy between on-orbit lunar observations
Presentation transcript:

Some Practical Considerations for the GEO-CAPE Mission Sensitivity, Saturation, Sun glint, Cloud cover, etc Chuanmin Hu, Zhongping Lee, Keping Du, Antonio Mannino NASA GEO-CAPE Science Working Group Meeting May 2011, Boulder, Colorado

Some practical considerations for the GEO-CAPE mission Sensitivity, Saturation, Sun glint, Cloud cover, etc Objectives Help define sensor constraints Help implement measurement plans NASA GEO-CAPE Science Working Group Meeting May 2011, Boulder, Colorado

SeaWiFS Florida Strait MODIS/Aqua Florida Strait Sensitivity versus Saturation

MODIS RGB (land bands) MODIS FLH (ocean bands) Sensitivity versus Saturation

Problem with Low Saturation

SeaWiFS Solution Knee Values

551 (555)667 (670)748 (765)869 (865) MODIS Saturation SeaWiFS Knee MODIS versus SeaWiFS Units: mW  cm -2  m -1  sr -1

How Precise are MODIS Chl? 5-10% RMS speckle noise. Resolves to <0.005 mg m -3 at low concentrations

MODIS Fluorescence Sensitivity MODIS/Aqua Chl, Sargasso Sea MODIS FLH Not sufficient to resolve Chl < 0.1 mg m -3 Then, how do we choose the trade between sensitivity and dynamic range (saturation)?

MODIS versus SeaWiFS Radiance (L) units: mW  cm -2  m -1  sr -1. Numbers in () are for SeaWiFS 1 DN of MODIS 678 band is corresponding to 0.1 – 0.2 mg m -3 Chl Band (nm) Res.L (1 DN) NE  L m m m m km (0.0136) (0.0130) km (0.0076) (0.0080) km (0.0042) (0.0056)

From Xing et al. (2007, Ocean Science Journal) MODIS (10) (10) (10) MERIS (10) (7.5) (9) GLI (10)679.9 (10) (10) GOCI (20) (10) (20) MODIS MERIS GLI GOCI NE  L (mW  cm -2  m -1  sr -1 ) Band Center (Bandwidth) MODIS versus Others

MODIS/Aqua Lt (typical)

MODIS/Aqua Lt (max)

Lt Dynamic Range

Question With these MODIS-based settings, can GEO- CAPE differentiate fluorescence quantum efficience changes at large solar zenith angles?

Chlorophyll fluorescence quantum yield Morrison (2003, L&O) Decreased Photochemical Quenching Increased Non- Photochemical Quenching Quantum Yield PAR (  mole  m -2  s -1 )  0 = 60 o  0 = 70 o  0 = 80 o

Surface PAR

Hours from Sunrise and Sunset PAR ~ 970 PAR ~ 600 PAR ~ 250

PAR ~ 970 PAR ~ 600 PAR ~ 250 Hours from Sunrise and Sunset

Sensitivity of L w 685 to solar/viewing geometry

Sensitivity of fluorescence (L w 685 and FLH) to solar/viewing geometry MODIS NE  L (678 nm) ~ mW  cm -2  m -1  sr -1

Chlorophyll fluorescence quantum yield Morrison (2003, L&O) Decreased Photochemical Quenching Increased Non- Photochemical Quenching Quantum Yield PAR (  mole  m -2  s -1 )  0 = 60 o  0 = 70 o  0 = 80 o

Sensitivity of fluorescence (L w 685 and FLH) to solar/viewing geometry MODIS NE  L (678 nm) ~ mW  cm -2  m -1  sr -1 Assuming MODIS sensitivity on GEO-CAPE and a constant fluorescence efficiency (quantum yield) of 2%, for Chl = 0.5, FLH decreased by mW  cm -2  m -1  sr -1 (nearly halved) from  0 =60 o to 70 o. Quantum efficiency nearly doubled from  0 =60 o to 70 o, resulting in similar FLH changes if everything else remains the same. Conclusion: With MODIS sensitivity on GEO-CAPE, it is possible to derive fluorescence quantum efficiency changes in the non-photochemical regime for Chl ~> 0.5 mg m -3

June 22. # of hourly observations with non- photochemical quenching (100 < PAR < 1000) Dec. 22. # of hourly observations with non- photochemical quenching (100 < PAR < 1000)

Summary on Sensitivity  MODIS sensitivity can serve as a good template Sufficient to resolve fluorescence quantum efficiency changes between  0 =60 o to 80 o for Chl ~ 0.5 or higher  Saturation radiance determined from MODIS measurements (together with ACE missions). May need adjustment when global dataset is considered.

Twice/day versus once/day Cloud Avoidance - TBD

June 22. # of hourly observations with  o < 80 o June 22. # of hourly observations with sun glint (wind = 6 m/s) Sun Glint Considerations

Dec. 22. # of hourly observations with  o < 80 o Dec. 22. # of hourly observations with sun glint (wind = 6 m/s) Sun Glint Considerations

Sun Glint Is Not Always A Bad Thing % of days showing surface oil presence, April 22 – July 31, 2010 Makes it easier to detect oil spills

-135W GOES West-75W GOES East Characteristics of the visible band of GOES imager: Wavelength: 550~750 nm Spatial resolution: 1 km Spatial coverage (Routinely): Every 3 hours for Full disk & 15 min for Continental U.S. Range of Measurement: 1.6~ 100% albedo Accuracy: ±5% of the maximum scene radiance

Cyanobacteria (Trichodesmium erythraeum) blooms observed by GOES and MODIS What Time Is Desirable to Capture Diurnal Changes? WFS 5/22/2004

Conclusions - MODIS sensitivity can be followed - Saturation radiance may need adjustment - Need to implement a data acquisition matrix to optimize performance for science needs - Timing and frequency of measurements - Synoptic or targeted mode, where/when - Clouds and glint considerations NASA GEO-CAPE Science Working Group Meeting May 2011, Boulder, Colorado

MODIS, MERIS, GLI, etc. MODIS (9): (SNR) (all 10-nm bandwidth except and 869.5) MERIS (15): (SNR) Not available. But has SNR > 2000 for typical TOA radiance (all 10-nm bandwidth except , , and ) GLI (19): (2) (2) (SNR) Not available. (all 10-nm bandwidth except 763 and 865) For coral reef mapping: (Hochberg et al., 2003) For inter-tidal benthic algae: <500, 540, 565, 580, 610, 790 (Borstad, pers. comm.)