Developing local networks: The experience from Vilvoorde Jessika Soors Policy coordinator radicalization and polarization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Protection Units
Advertisements

Trade Union Development Effectiveness Profile Trade Union Development Effectiveness Profile a practical tool for improving the quality of development cooperation.
Minneapolis Blueprint For Action to Prevent Youth Violence Mayor R.T Rybak Commissioner of Health Gretchen Musicant.
Step 1 - Community Engagement and Analysis
GUIDED FORUM ON INTERSECTORAL ACTION Communities’ experiences in developing intersectoral actions How to go further? Results of the guided forum January.
U n i t 6 Multisectoral collaboration. © WHO, │ By the end of this unit, the trainee should be able to: explain why there is a need for multisectoral.
Forming and Sustaining Community Groups / Community Advisory boards (CWGs/CABs) Presenter: Smangaliso Ntshele Community Mobilization Project Leader, Medical.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
Tim Pfeiffer-Gerschel, DBDD Dubrovnik, Jan 2008CARDS EWS CARDS 2004, Component 4 Early Warning System Tim Pfeiffer-Gerschel National Focal Point.
BUILDING A COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE. Question 1: What is the mission of our network? To share knowledge and experiences. To extract lessons to improve dialogue.
The World Bank Group. Knowledge and Capacity for Climate Risk Management in Cities Habiba Gitay World Bank Institute February 2009 – Cities at Risk.
Providing Quality Advice And Information Services Presentation for the Brighton and Hove Strategic Partnership John Holmström Chair, Brighton and Hove.
FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY FOR LOCAL/REGIONAL ACTION PLANNING FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION Dr. Haroon Saad Director QeC-ERAN Venice April 2007.
Coordination Page Multi-Sectoral, Coordinated Action General coordination responsibilities of a multi- sectoral and community-based approach include:
Why a CPCRN? CDC Expectations Katherine M. Wilson, PhD, MPH CPCRN Technical Monitor Division of Cancer Prevention and Control CDC.
Common ESF Indicators in the Current Programming Period.
Roma Inclusion pilot project: Information and awareness raising DG REGIO conference “Monitoring and Evaluation of Roma projects and policies” 30 November.
Proposed IEEE/Microsoft Mini-grant partnership for standards capacity building Johan Eksteen Regional Standards Officer: Sub-Saharan Africa Microsoft December.
Standard 1- Leadership & Vision Sara Saffell Amy Blackwell Marilyn McDonald 1. Leadership and Vision-Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive.
The Evaluation Focuses on Four Broad Areas: ◦ Program Quality ◦ Public Policy ◦ Public Awareness ◦ Funding/Sustainability.
Summary Characteristics of Models of Good Practice for Single Mothers and Elderly Women.
Recommendations on Monitoring and Tracking Quantity and Quality of Climate Expenditure, Accountability and Transparency Group 5.
Unit 6. Effective Communication and Collaboration This unit focuses on efforts to reduce juvenile delinquency through a collaborative process of community-based,
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Global PVE workshop Gender and PVE: Focus on women Fauziya Ali.
June 24, 2016 UNAIDS Partnerships- Strategies, structures and social relationships Sally Smith Partnership Adviser.
“Rural Financial Inclusion and the Challenges Involved”
Presentation Title Speaker’s name Presentation title Speaker’s name Housing First: Retention and Recovery Patrick McKay.
Political Staff Teachers & support staff Complaining that they do not have the time to deal with bullying, teaching is their priority. Lack of training.
1 PSFN and FFCol Foresight Day 22 July 2016 The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: International Follow- up and Review Efforts to Ensure Effective.
KMS.
Round-table discussion Session 4 Aime, Eugenijus and Asta
SUMMARY Project Action II. Impact and Evaluation of Project Action
Building Safer Communities
Why Special Events are Special
1 Panel 2, Position 4 Jack D. Ripper.
The foreign terrorist fighter challenge: think globally, act locally
Afghanistan PEACE Project
Pillar One: Building Trust and Legitimacy “Culture”
Country level analysis for poverty reduction
The Centre for Community-Driven Research
Module 5 SDG follow-up and review mechanisms
International threat – local struggle
ESF Evaluations by MS Antonella Schulte-Braucks
Strategies to increase family engagement
It might be nothing, it might be something.
Vision.
Enhancing institutional capacity and an efficient public administration (TO 11) - state of play in the framework of the negotiations     Florian HAUSER,
SACF Comments on the ECA Amendment Bill B
How do you start a collaborative response?
The role of Supreme Audit Institutions in fragile situations: initial findings Research by David Goldsworthy and Silvia Stefanoni of Development Action.
Family and Community Services
1 Panel 2, Position 2 Jack D. Ripper.
Common ESF Indicators in the Current Programming Period
Presentation by JO MIDGLEY Pro Vice-Chancellor Student Experience
WORKING GROUP ON FOREST FIRES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors
Building a Full Continuum of Integrated Crisis Services
Are we being held back? An exploration of how evidence is used to address complex social problems Professor Kristy Muir Superu Evidence.
Organisation Structure And Functions
Public Policy Management in Nepal: Context and Issues
Public Policy Management in Nepal: Context and Issues
Environment and Development Policy Section
Resettlement capacity in the EU
Inclusion of Muslim communities and prevention of discrimination in cities E U R O C I T I E S W O R K I N G G R O U P M I G R A T I O N & I N T.
ISABEL NAYLON ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP MEETING 13 NOVEMBER 2013
Building Your Adaptive Leadership Skills
HOW TO ENGAGE COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN OUTCOME EVALUATION?
A few reflections on faith and environmental action
Inclusion of Muslim communities and prevention of discrimination in cities E U R O C I T I E S W O R K I N G G R O U P M I G R A T I O N & I N T.
Presentation transcript:

Developing local networks: The experience from Vilvoorde Jessika Soors Policy coordinator radicalization and polarization

This is Vilvoorde inhabitants Demographic expansion 1,5% 25% non-Belgian origins Minors 40% High unemployment rate High rate of school drop out and backlog Shortage of public infrastructure Proximity of Brussels and Antwerp Sociologically one Metropolitan problems Mechelen 25/2/2016

Current situation 28 FF 3 minors 8 died 1 minor 8 returnees 1 currently living in Vilvoorde Group at risk: 69 persons 30 minors Mechelen 25/2/2016

Local policy There was little existing (infra-)structure to make use of Challenge/opportunity When creating new initiatives: what will we label prevention of radicalisation? Mechelen 25/2/2016

Local policy “A plan for warmth and safety” Recognized since May 2014 –Countering Violent Extremism Prevention: broad and specific Group oriented –Deradicalization Curative Person oriented –Repression Only police and justice Independent from any social program Mechelen 25/2/2016

CVE initiatives Take multiple entries to do community outreach Avoid one shot initiatives Recognise other important issues, and try to take them into account Be clear about coordination Political support has been a success factor Mechelen 25/2/2016

The link between prevention and intervention You cannot have one without the other Absolute transparency About goals About sharing information Giving trust is receiving trust Be aware for distrust amongst staff members It is a continuous effort Mechelen 25/2/2016

Individual interventions Partners round table Based on social mapping To create individual programs of support Define roles Avoid a crowded living room Unity of command Mechelen 25/2/2016

Final reflections –No more departures since May 2014, BUT… –On the right track, but still work ahead of us From trial and error to methodological sustainability –Evaluation models e.g. –Vilvoorde as a laboratory A lot of capacity needed –In need of support from the above local level Difficult balance between repressive and social approach –Collaboration between police and social partners –Inclusion instead of exclusion Mechelen 25/2/2016