Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0668r0 Analysis of Intra-Cluster Effects Using Pencil Beam Antennas Date: 2016-05-17 Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationAddressPhone .

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1196r1 Submission Data Rate and Spectrum Requirements for IEEE aj (45 GHz) Date: Authors: Haiming Wang (SEU)Slide.
Advertisements

A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links
mmWave MIMO Link Budget Estimation for Indoor Environment
Submission doc.: IEEE /0296r0 March 2015 Cagatay Capar, EricssonSlide 1 Long range indoor channel measurements for the 60 GHz band Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Channel Sounding for ay
Submission doc.: IEEE /0329r0 Channel Sounding for NG60 Date: Authors: Slide 1.
July 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 July 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:
Channel Sounding for ay
Doc.: IEEE c Submission January 2006 Slide 1 Hiroyo Ogawa, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0402r2 Submission May 2012 Haiming Wang, Xiaoming PengSlide 1 Date: Authors: Overview of CWPAN SG5 QLINKPAN.
Doc.: IEEE /1152r0 Submission November 2009 Tian-Wei Huang, National Taiwan UniversitySlide 1 60-GHz Living-Room Channel Measurements Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0416r1 Slide 1 Broadband Indoor TVWS Channel Measurement and Characterization at 670 MHz Date: Mar 2012 Ming-Tuo.
Doc.: IEEE d_Intra-Device_Propagation_Measuremets Submission March 2015 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2015 Camillo Gentile, NISTSlide 1 NIST Preliminary Channel Measurements at 83 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE c Submission March 2006 Slide 1 Chang-Soon Choi, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1094 Overview and discussion about the next steps for ay channel modeling Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /278r1-SG3a Submission 7/04/ :52 PM Saeed S. Ghassemzadeh, Vahid Tarokh Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2008 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE Submission Nov 2014 Link Budget Analysis for 40-50GHz Indoor Usage Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan Liu, Mediatek Inc.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission November 2009 I. Siaud, Orange LabsSlide 1 Path Loss Models for TGad Channel Models: Antenna and Dispersion Impact.
Doc.: IEEE /0372r0 Submission March, 2010 Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 1 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise.
March 2016 doc.: IEEE / ay SubmissionCamillo Gentile, NISTSlide 1 NIST Channel Model for Conference Room at 83 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE c Submission January 2006 Ali Sadri (Intel Corporation)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
Doc.: IEEE /0664r0 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Technische Universität Ilmenau
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2005
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
Indoor Propagation Modeling
Modified Channel Model For Outdoor Open Area Hotspot Access Scenario
Small-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
60 GHz Cubicle Wall Reflectivity
<month year> doc.: IEEE c January, 2006
Summery of Channel Measurement for the ay Channel Model Document
Technische Universität Ilmenau
Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
TGad Channel Model Update
Match 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: The THz Channel Model in Wireless Data Center.
November, 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Smart Antenna Opportunities for Spectrum.
<month year> doc.: IEEE a July 2006
<month year> doc.: IEEE c January, 2006
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
Overview of CWPAN SG5 QLINKPAN
Submission Title: [Wireless Display Throughput Requirements]
<month year> doc.: IEEE a July 2006
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
January, 2010 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60GHz (Part 3)] Date: Authors: Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku University.
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Outdoor measurement for a rooftop to street scenario at 60 GHz
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar 2016
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Analysis of Intra-Cluster Effects Using Pencil Beam Antennas Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationAddressPhone Jian Luo, Yan Xin, George Calcev Huawei Technologies om Robert Müller, Stephan Häfner, Diego Dupleich, Reiner Thomä Technische Universität Ilmenau Ilmenau.de ilmrnau.de

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Abstract In this presentation, we show the characterization of a wall in the entrance hall scenario at 60 GHz under using pencil beam antennas. The goals of this measurement are to analyse different beamforming strategies and lifetime of clusters with different beam widths. Another possibility of this measurement is the detailed analysis of intra cluster properties in view of the attenuation, polarimetric scattering effects and reflection characteristic. This measurement can thus be used as a basis for calibration of a ray tracer and also for modelling of clusters for other channel models. Here we like to show the measurement and first beamforming analysis results. Slide 2

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Outline Motivation Overview of 60 GHz Entrance Hall Measurement Pencil Beam 60 GHz Intra Cluster Measurements in the Entrance Hall Environment 60 GHz dual polarimertic Scattering Measurement Results Discussion of 60 GHz dual polarimertic Scattering Measurements in the Entrance Hall Conclusion Slide 3

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Motivation Broadband and full polarimetric characterization of Cluster To understand the broadband and polarimetric scattering of different structures Advanced System Concepts  define measurement and modelling requirements Massive MIMO/pencil beamforming  large spatial bandwidth Adaptive or switched selection beamforming to mitigate shadowing Channel bonding  large bandwidth Propagation channel Double directional measurements are needed to characterize the full channel Polarization is an important aspect High dynamic range is essential to measure the different propagation effects Channel characterization for different usage cases Slide 4

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Slide 5 Overview of 60 GHz Entrance Hall Measurement

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Dual Polarimetric Ultra-Wideband Channel Sounder (DP-UMCS) 7 GHz BW up to 10 GHz measurable bandwidth Maximum excess delay of 606 ns (180 m) in CS version 1 Dual polarization measurement capability 25 dB AGC (Automatic Gain Control) with 3.5 dB steps High instantaneous dynamic range: up to 75 dB Multi-Link and Massive MIMO capabilities Double directional measurements (with 1 TX and 2 RX) Multiplier X8 PA min. 27 dBm 7 GHz Oscillator Multiplier X8 LNA Gain : 35 dB UWB Sounder RX 0 – 3.5 GHz 3.5 GHz GHz H Pol. V Pol. CH 1 CH 2 H Pol. V Pol. Switch TX Module RX Module GHz PA min. 27 dBm Step Attenuator LNA Gain : 35 dB UWB Sounder TX 0 – 3.5 GHz 3.5 GHz GHz Optical link Step Attenuator Slide 6

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Measurement System and Setup Slide 7 Value Stimulus SignalPRBS Bandwidth6.75GHz CIR length606ns Dynamic range70dB CIR averages1024 Transmit power20dBm ( max. 30dBm) Frequency band57.4GHz-64.1GHz Antenna HPBW30° Antenna XPI25dB Full polarimetricYes

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Slide 8 Entrance Hall of Zusebau at TU Ilmenau 3 TX Positions (3 floors) 9 RX Positions (ground floor) Access-point scenario Scanning at TX and RX RX: Azimuth: TX: Azimuth: ;Elevation: Overview of 60 GHz Entrance Hall Measurement RX 9 RX 10 RX 2 RX 1 TX 1 RX 1 RX 2 RX 3 RX 14 RX 4 TX 3 TX 2

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Tx 1 – Rx 1 LOS Normalized Power Elevation / Azimuth Profile at Tx Normalized Power Azimuth / Azimuth Profile at Tx and Rx Overview of 60 GHz Entrance Hall Measurement

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Tx 1 – Rx 13 NLOS Normalized Power Elevation / Azimuth Profile at Tx Normalized Power Azimuth / Azimuth Profile at Tx and Rx Overview of 60 GHz Entrance Hall Measurement

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Conclusions The results show a lot of clusters, which cannot be separate for deeper cluster analysis because of the spatial closeness and the used antennas (HPBW of 30°) To understand the influence of the clusters to every path a spatial and time resolved measurement of different clusters are required to characterized the intra-cluster properties Support the channel modeling task of Alexander Maltsev Slide 11

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Slide 12 Pencil Beam 60 GHz Intra Cluster Measurements in the Entrance Hall Environment

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Motivation Analysis of the full pol. scattering properties Characterization of the backscattering in term of radiation pattern of different scatters Influence of material and structure to the 60 GHz broadband propagation Lifetime of clusters (beam width of antennas vs. lifetime of cluster ) Enabling the analysis of beamforming strategies To model the clusters for realistic channel models Slide 13

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Measurement Objects Slide 14 concrete pillar Wall and big screen Corner wall Entrance door

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 60 GHz dual pol. Scattering Measurements Setup Slide m h1h1 h2h2 rail positioner positioner 2 positioner m

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 60 GHz Scattering Measurements Setup at the Wall

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Slide 17 Tx: Located on the side of the wall Height from ground 1.47 m GHz of the antenna (Gaussian Beam  no side loops) Rx: Located at on the side of the wall Height from ground 1.47 m GHz of the antenna (Gaussian Beam  no side loops) Scanning at Tx and Rx stage via positioners Tx: Azimuth 0°2° 52° Rx:Azimuth 0°2° 52° Rail movment with 20cm steps Intra-Cluster Measurement Set-Up

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Slide GHz dual polarimertic scattering measurement results

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Scenario The maximum is always close to the Tx – Rx azimuth range in which the incident and reflected angles are the same (Tx Az = -Rx Az) Influence of Incident and Reflected Angles Rx position on the rail 0 mRx position on the rail 0.8 m Rx position on the rail 1.8 m Tx Rx Tx AzRx Az

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Rx positions and the different Tx and Rx azimuth beams (2° HPBW) for the maximum per Rx position Influence of Incident and Reflected Angles  Only the direct reflection of the wall are contribute in this configuration energy  This kind of wall reflected primarily not diffuse

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Scenario The Tx is pointing to the wall with a 2°HPBW The Rx is moving parallel to the wall without updating the Rx beam  Different HPBW considered at the Rx by adding consecutive 2°HPBW beams Living Distance of Beams Tx Rx 8° 12° Rx position on the rail Analysis Objectives Beam width vs. Living time of clusters Tx updating vs. Tx and Rx beam direction updating

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Results Results normalized to the first position For narrow beams at Rx (<10°HPBW), the signal is attenuated more than 20 dB after moving 0.5 m without any update in the beams at the Rx After updating the beams at Rx at each position, a maximal loss of 12 dB is encountered Without updating the beam at Rx After updating the beam at Rx Living Distance of Beams Rx Position on the Rail [m]

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Results The optimal result is updating the beams at Tx and Rx in each position (in the figure the Tx beam HPBW is 2°) The right figure shows the comparison of updating the Tx and Rx beams per position and the result without updating the beams  With narrow beams (pencil beams) the update is necessary at Tx and Rx after moving 0.4 m After updating the beam at Rx and Tx Living Distance of Beams Rx Position on the Rail [m] Comparison with and without update at Tx and Rx

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Scenario The Tx is pointing to the wall with different HPBW beams The Rx is moving parallel to the wall without updating the Rx beam (2°HPBW) Living Distance of Beams Tx Rx 8° 12° Rx position on the rail Analysis Objectives Beam width vs. Living time of clusters Tx updating vs. Tx and Rx beam direction updating

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Results For narrow beams at Tx (<10°HPBW), the signal is attenuated more than 20 dB after moving 0.5 m However, with >10°HPBW the UE can be displaced up to 1 m having a loss of 10 dB Living Distance of Beams

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Power of the reflections highly depends on the incident angles For modelling, if we talk about pencil beams, we need to have a precise information of the scatter in order to describe the reflections, since a small change in the incident and reflected angles leads to high losses Spatial consistency is very important, more deterministic approaches For beam-forming, with pencil beams an update is necessary more often (in location) Wider beams reduce the received power but also the need of updating the beam-former  save energy Conclusion

Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Conclusion/Discussion We present first dual pol. measurements with a pencil beam antenna to figure out the intra cluster properties Also we use this data to analyze the lifetime of the reflection in comparison to the opening angle of the antennas Next Steps Further measurements for the broadband and polarimertic characterization of scatters at 60 GHz Outdoor measurements at 60 GHz Large indoor scenarios with distances larger than 40 m Dynamic measurements of human scattering inclusive Doppler shift up to 50 km/h Compare different scatter for statistical analysis Slide 27