Session PEN – 5Page 1 Update From PPFRC Normand Frenette Stephen Butterfield June 30, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIA Pension Seminar 15 April 2009 The Dos and Don’ts of Applying the Funding Relief Rules Mario Marchand, Senior Actuary Régie des rentes du Québec.
Advertisements

CIA Pension Seminar Colloque sur les régimes de retraite April 16, 2007  Le 16 avril 2007 Toronto, Ontario Investment and longevity risks.
Update from Pension Plan Financial Reporting Committee June 28, 2007 Vancouver Update from Pension Plan Financial Reporting Committee June 28, 2007 Vancouver.
University of Saskatchewan 1999 Academic Pension Plan November 8, 2013 Aon Hewitt | © 2014 Aon Hewitt. All Rights Reserved Lump Sum Transfer Option on.
Breaking up is hard to do Valuation & Division of Pension Assets on Breakdown of a Spousal Relationship 2014.
PEN-22 SERP Pension Session CIA Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA June 29 & 30, 2006  Les 29 et 30 juin 2006 Ottawa, Ontario SERP Commuted Values.
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
COUNCIL OF ONTARIO UNIVERSITIES Council of Ontario Universities Working Group on University Pension Plans Presentation for Briefing Meeting on Solvency.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
Pension Accounting Chapter 17
TELKOM POST RETIREMENT MEDICAL AID (PRMA) ALTERNATIVE FOR EMPLOYEES
The Pensions Board Funding Standard Seminars June 2012.
Changes to the Rules governing the Pension Benefits Act Affecting Ontario Locked-in Accounts.
2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
Absa presentation title  Date of presentation Company confidential use only / Unrestricted distribution 2013 BUDGET RETIREMENT REFORM PROPOSALS May 2013.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
1 CIA Pension Seminar April 15, 2009 Colloque sur les régimes de retraite de L’ICA Le 15 avril 2009.
PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
OSFI Update November 19, 2009 Bernard Dupont Director, Capital Division.
Bennie Crous 22 November 2012 Columbus Retirement Funds – Investment Feedback.
Life Insurance in a Qualified Plan Chapter 13 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Copyright 2009, The National Underwriter Company1 What is it? Qualified.
1 Winter 2014 History in the Making – York’s Pension Plan.
MROC Munich Re Group P&C Loss Reserve Discounting Canadian Perspective Spring Meeting Quebec City June 18, 2008 Claudette Cantin.
1 IFRS in the Banking Sector A supervisor’s perspective REPARIS Workshop Marc Pickeur Vienna CBFA March 2006 Belgium.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
18 November 2004 Hôtel Fairmount le Reine Élizabeth Montréal, Québec Marc Queenton, FCIA CIA General Meeting H4-PD How to Make Commuted Values Work ? Point.
April 15, 2008 Montréal, Québec Session SP-1 CIA Pension Seminar Update from PPFRC.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
Life Insurance In Qualified Plans Chapter 32 Tools & Techniques of Life Insurance Planning  What is it?  Life insurance is purchased and owned.
The Application Of Fundamental Valuation Principles To Property/Casualty Insurance Companies Derek A. Jones, FCAS Joy A. Schwartzman, FCAS.
Discussion of Unpaid Claim Estimate Standard  Raji Bhagavatula  Mary Frances Miller  Jason Russ November 13, 2006 CAS Annual Meeting San Francisco,
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
CIA Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA June 29 & 30, 2006  Les 29 et 30 juin 2006 Ottawa, Ontario Session Val-5 CLIFR Part II.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute.
CHAPTER 14 PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS.
2009 General Meeting ● Assemblée générale 2009 Ottawa, Ontario ● Ottawa (Ontario) 2009 General Meeting ● Assemblée générale 2009 Ottawa, Ontario ● Ottawa.
Financial Audit Autonomous Bodies AS 1 and 4 Session Accounting Standards.
2009 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2009 Halifax, Nova Scotia ● Halifax (Nouvelle-Écosse) 2009 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2009 Halifax, Nova.
Proposed ASB Actuarial Standard of Practice on Statements of Actuarial Opinion Regarding Property/Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves Status.
Supplemental Pension Plan Funding Relief Provisions Pension Seminar April 15,
Stephen Butterfield, FSA, CIA André Choquet, FSA, FCIA 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale.
Normandin Beaudry, Consulting actuaries inc. Session H4-PD How to make commuted values work Martin Cyrenne, FCIA.
1 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Munich Reinsurance Company of Canada September 14, 2004 Las Vegas Session 7 Loss Reserve.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute.
1 Contributory Pension Scheme Members’ Meeting 26 February 2016.
Phoenix FamilyShield Annuity SM A Single Premium Immediate Annuity designed for Medicaid planning For Producer training purposes only. Not for use with.
CONNECTIONAL MINISTRIES REACHING FURTHER WITH THE GOSPEL BY SHARING THE LOAD.
GASB’s OPEB Changes - Will they impact public sector health care benefits? November 7, 2014 Eric Gary, FSA, FCA, MAAA Chief Health Actuary.
University of Aberdeen Superannuation and Life Assurance Scheme
2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois
CHAPTER 17 Pensions 2.
24th India Fellowship Seminar
FASB Targeted Improvements
2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario
Ontario Energy Board Consultation on the Regulatory Treatment of Pensions and Other Post-Employment Benefits (EB ) Stakeholder Forum Sherri Steingart,
PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (FIN-28)
Accounting for superannuation plans
OPEB Just Like Pensions but Not! October 12, 2017
UBPAS Pension Consultation Meetings
Setting Actuarial Standards
Other Post Employment Benefits
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
Queen’s University Information Session University Pension Plan (UPP)
Canadian Institute of Actuaries PD-2 L’Institut canadien des
Legislative Update: SB 2224 and SB 322 October 1, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Session PEN – 5Page 1 Update From PPFRC Normand Frenette Stephen Butterfield June 30, 2006

Session PEN – 5Page 2 Agenda Changes to Pension Specific Standards of Practice –CSOP translation of new commuted value standard Educational Notes –Commuted values –Assumptions for windup / solvency valuations –Additional Notes in progress Queries / responses Development of new Standards of Practice for funding valuations

Session PEN – 5Page 3 About the PPFR Committee Reports to the Practice Standards Council (PSC) Although not mandated, membership is intended to be broadly distributed by: –Region (West, Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic) –Type of employment (large consulting, small consulting, plan sponsor, regulators, etc.) –Employer (no more than two members) –Time since Fellowship

Session PEN – 5Page 4 Current Membership Stephen Butterfield (Chair) – Towers Perrin Michael Banks – Mercer Paul Chang – Morneau Sobeco André Choquet – Watson Wyatt Worldwide Martin Cyrenne – Normandin Beaudry Normand Frenette – ACS/Buck Consultants Derek Gerard – Eckler Gregory Heise – Leong & Associates Mario Marchand – Régie des rentes du Québec Nicolas Morissette – Aon Consulting, Inc. Phil Rivard – The Segal Company

Session PEN – 5Page 5 Terms of Reference With respect to pension plan financial reporting, valuation of pension plans for any purpose, and benefit value determination other than those relating to actuarial evidence before the courts, the committee is to study, organize discussion of, propose revisions to, and, on request, advise members about standards of practice; and promote continuing education

Session PEN – 5Page 6 CHANGES TO PENSION SPECIFIC STANDARDS OF PRACTICE

Session PEN – 5Page 7 Changes to Pension Specific Standards of Practice Section 3800 – Pension Commuted Values Changes to the commuted value standard began under the prior due process and prior to adoption of the Consolidated Standards of Practice (CSOP) As such, the new commuted value standard was not originally written or adopted in CSOP format Also, the Standard of Practice for Reduced Life Expectancy had not been translated into CSOP format New Section 3800 is the CSOP translation of these new Standards of Practice Section 3800 is intended to apply identically to the prior Standards of Practice Part of the prior Standard of Practice has moved to an Educational Note

Session PEN – 5Page 8 Changes to Pension Specific Standards of Practice Section 3800 – Pension Commuted Values: Clarifications : “The standards in this Section 3800 apply to the determination of a lump sum payment from the pension plan in lieu of an immediate or deferred pension to which a plan member’s former spouse is entitled after a division of the member’s pension on marital breakdown.” Implies that IF a pension has been split due to marriage breakdown, THEN the commuted value of the pension payable to the former spouse must be determined in accordance with Section 3800 Does not imply that the value of a former spouse’s share in a member’s pension must be determined in accordance with Section 3800

Session PEN – 5Page 9 EDUCATIONAL NOTES

Session PEN – 5Page 10 Educational Notes General Educational Notes are additions to our Standards of Practice Educational Notes are intended to provide guidance to actuaries Actuaries are not compelled to follow this guidance, but should be prepared to justify any non-compliance

Session PEN – 5Page 11 Educational Notes Pension Commuted Values Portions of new commuted value Standard of Practice that relate to examples or interpretation are no longer in the Standards of Practic, but are in an Educational Note: –E.g., calculation of unisex mortality rates, indexing adjustments, frequency of payment, etc. Two most common questions relate to: –The determination of “u” –Implicit vs. Explicit indexing

Session PEN – 5Page 12 Educational Notes Pension Commuted Values Determination of “u” (adjustment for indexing which applies less frequently than monthly) –Suggested adjustment is 1 – 11/24 x “u”, where “u” is the implied indexing rate Relevant comments: –The formula is prefaced by “For example” –There is a different value for “u” in the first 10 years and after 10 years We would not expect actuaries to use this level of exactness in calculations Actuaries should use judgement in establishing one rate for “u” –The adjustment “decreases” commuted values –A greater commuted value is permissible if agreed to by the plan administrator –With the plan sponsor’s approval, the adjustment can be ignored

Session PEN – 5Page 13 Educational Notes Pension Commuted Values Implicit vs. Explicit indexing “Alternatively, the actuary could use the explicit approach using the non- indexed interest rates and the applicable index” Rounding of rates should be applied such that the two approaches use consistent net discount rates For example (fully indexed plan): –Unrounded non-indexed rate = 4.10% (rounded to 4.00%) –Unrounded indexed rate = 2.55% (rounded to 2.50%) –Assuming implicit indexing, net discount rate is 2.50%. –Assuming explicit indexing, assumed inflation rate is: (1.040 / 1.025) – 1 = 1.46% (do not round) Project benefits at 1.46% per year and discount at 4.00% per year

Session PEN – 5Page 14 Educational Notes Assumptions for Windup / Solvency Valuations Guidance is similar to last year’s guidance Non-indexed annuity proxy: –long-term Gov’t of Can bond yield plus 45 bps –4.51% at Dec 31, 2005 / Jan 1, 2006 –Most plans should use a 4.5% rate Other highlights: –Deferred annuities –Differentiation by size –Indexed benefits –Substandard mortality –Large plans (say > $1 Billion)

Session PEN – 5Page 15 Educational Notes Assumptions for Windup / Solvency Valuations: Large Plans Unlikely to be able to purchase annuities –Even as a series of purchases Many hypotheses put forward for methods of settling benefits –Most probable is some form of immunization How would the cost of an immunized fund differ from an annuity purchase? –Access to higher yielding assets? –Exclude provision for insurer profit margin? –Lower expense ratios? PPFRC does not have enough information to provide more detailed guidance Investment Committee has been approached to assist in answering some of these questions Intention is that more specific guidance will be developed next year

Session PEN – 5Page 16 Additional Documents in Progress Educational Notes: –Development of expense assumptions –Post calculation events Interim actuarial opinions –Asset smoothing techniques Standards of Practice: –Required disclosures in actuarial reports on funding To be issued shortly

Session PEN – 5Page 17 QUERIES

Session PEN – 5Page 18 Queries Disclosure – new CV standards If full payment is subject to additional contribution, communication must contain a clause to that effect Even if plan sponsor always makes such contribution Requirement to file an actuarial report Responsibility of Plan Administrator Standards do not require Actuary to file a report, even if it has been prepared Multi-employer plans – Valuation using best estimate assumptions Typically not permitted May be permissible if both parties have agreed that no PfADs should be included in valuation

Session PEN – 5Page 19 Queries CV Standard – Unusual indexation formula Excess interest: determine expected levels of future indexing based on formula and calculate Valuation of designated plans Advice on funding should be based on a going concern valuation subject to ITA maximum And solvency basis, if required by legislation Asset smoothing using 6 data points No requirement to limit number of points in AAP

Session PEN – 5Page 20 Queries – In Progress Some queries on which we are working- Optional form bases CV indexing methodology Wind-up basis Disclosure of PfADs or lack thereof Solvency valuations

Session PEN – 5Page 21 DEVELOPMENT OF NEW STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR PENSION PLAN FUNDING

Session PEN – 5Page 22 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Where Have We Been? PPFRC issued a Statement of Principles in March 2005 –Proposed changes to the Standards of Practice for funding valuations of pension plans We received submissions from various sources –Actuaries –Plan sponsors / trustees –Regulators –Other professionals (accountants, lawyers, etc.) Issued subsequent discussion documents in the Fall of 2005

Session PEN – 5Page 23 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Where Have We Going? We have digested the submissions received We have had considerable internal discussions / debates We have rethought the direction we are taking –On some issues: we remain convinced that our suggested approach is correct –On other issues: we are moving in other directions Currently working on Exposure Draft of actual revised Standards of Practice

Session PEN – 5Page 24 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Roles and Responsibilities We remain convinced that we have the roles and responsibilities appropriately defined Plan sponsors / administrators (Funders) –Set the funding policy –Set investment policy Pension regulators –Define minimum funding requirements –Set investment constraints Tax authorities –Define maximum funding constraints –Establish certain investment constraints

Session PEN – 5Page 25 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Roles and Responsibilities Actuaries –Measurement and reporting of liabilities and costs –Disclosure of pertinent risks It is NOT the role of the actuary: –to establish acceptable levels of risk –to establish how a plan should be funded Risk cannot be eliminated and the actuary’s role is not to eliminate risk, but to report on it –Public Policy dictates the acceptable levels of risk

Session PEN – 5Page 26 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Roles and Responsibilities Nevertheless, we acknowledge many of the submissions received which advocated a greater role for the actuary In many cases, we envision the Standards of Practice encouraging certain practices, subject to: –The Funder’s Funding Policy; and –Regulatory considerations More details to follow

Session PEN – 5Page 27 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Objectives of Pension Plan Funding We continue to believe that there are two primary objectives: –Benefit security P romoted primarily through a windup valuation –Stability of cost recognition / budgeting Promoted primarily through a going concern valuation But … –We acknowledge that benefit security is all that really matters Short-term Long-term

Session PEN – 5Page 28 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Windup Valuation – Almost Always Required Requirement to disclose the financial position on a true windup basis –Market value of assets –Full provision for all benefits payable upon windup Limited exceptions –E.g., public sector plans with no windup provisions Incremental windup cost must be reported Simplified windup gain/loss required

Session PEN – 5Page 29 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Windup Valuation with Margins – Almost Always Required Must disclose windup position including provisions for adverse deviation Extensive work needed to determine manner and extent of margins –Would likely depend on plan’s investment policy and other factors –CIA has established a Task Force to develop a Research Paper Important to note that the PPFRC is not advocating the funding of a windup liability with margins, but disclosure of the variability of the windup liability

Session PEN – 5Page 30 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Going Concern Valuation – Usually Required Much debate about the need for going concern valuations –Valuable budgeting tool? –Is windup all that is really needed? Current thinking is that a going concern valuation must be undertaken, unless not required by the funding policy Currently, all jurisdictions require going concern valuations –Most RPPs would be required to undertake going concern valuations

Session PEN – 5Page 31 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Going Concern Valuation – Margins for Adverse Deviation Currently, our Standards of Practice require that going concern valuations include provision for adverse deviation PPFRC envisages that the Funder would determine whether provisions for adverse deviation would be included However, if the goal of a going concern valuation is to promote “contribution stability”, then varying provisions for adverse deviation must be used PPFRC envisages our actuarial Standards “encouraging” the inclusion of provisions for adverse deviation

Session PEN – 5Page 32 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Funding Our Standards of Practice would provide the Funder and the regulators with information to assist in developing funding requirements –True windup position –Windup position, including some form of margin –Going concern valuation Likely including provision for adverse deviation It is not up to actuaries to say whether these amounts should be funded or how fast they should be funded

Session PEN – 5Page 33 New Pension Funding Standards of Practice Next Steps PPFRC is close to reaching consensus on underlying principles –Meeting for a full day in July to further review positions Next step in the process is an Exposure Draft –PPFRC has initiated a first draft of this document Hope is that an Exposure Draft will be issued in the Fall Next Steps would depend on the submissions received to this Exposure Draft Your comments will continue to be considered and appreciated

Session PEN – 5Page 34 THANK YOU! Please provide your feedback, It is important for our work!