1 XXXIII Nordic Intellectual Property Conference New rules on domain names – national and regional systems. Conflicts involving trademarks. Petter Rindforth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 WIPO Staff Briefing, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, June 19, 2009 WIPO Staff Briefing June 19, 2009 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Erik.
Advertisements

ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR)
LDRP.CL experience Margarita Valdés Cortés Legal and Business Manager NIC Chile Universidad de Chile Luxembourg, 2005.
Dispute Settlement Services offered by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Heike Wollgast, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center.
Governmental Advisory Committee New gTLD Program Briefing 19 June 2010.
1 Updated as of 1 July 2014 Issues of the day at ICANN The New Generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) Program KISA-ICANN Language Localisation Project Module.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER 1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center February, 2008 Arbitration of Intellectual.
Lim Yuk Min Operations Manager, SGNIC Workshop on Member States’ Experience with ccTLDs Geneva, 3 – 4 March 2003 “Singapore Experience”
Johannes Christian Wichard Deputy Director WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO and ccTLDs ccTLD Best Practices: Latest and Future developments Luxembourg,
1 Domain Name Disputes Rami Olwan Bibliotheca Alexandrina IP and the Digital Age Workshop December 2008.
Domain Disputes Overview of UDRP Procedures 6/5/2015.
Resolving Domain Name Disputes Sean M. Mead Mead, Mead & Clark, P.C. Salem, Indiana.
Conflict Resolution.
Marko Bonac EURid Marko Bonac TERENA GA – Rhodes June
Domain Names Ferenc Suba LLM, MA Chairman of the Board, CERT-Hungary, Theodore Puskás Foundation Vice-Chair of the Management Board, European Network and.
Present and Future of the.eu ADR Process Presented by: Zbynek Loebl and Daniela Cizkova (CEAG)
Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT) Proposal Comments Sue Todd, Director, Product Management Monday 11 May 2009, San Francisco.
MODULE C - LEGAL SUBMODULES C1. Conflict Of Interest/Code Of Ethics C2. Antitrust C3. Torts C4. Intellectual Property C5. Speaking For The Society.
Briefing to the ICANN Intellectual Property ConstituencyOctober 27, 2009 UDRP Update Briefing to the ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency October 27,
تقديم وسائل تسوية المنازعات Presentation of dispute settlement means.
WELCOME. CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 1986 Consumer Protection Act 1986 Consumer is the purpose and most powerful motivating force of production Consumer.
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process. Genesis USG White Paper, June 5, 1998: –“The U.S. Government will seek international support to call.
A Critique of Online Dispute Resolution : Case Study of Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Downloaded from
2 Dedicated to keeping the Internet secure, stable and interoperable Formed in 1998 as a not- for-profit public-benefit corporation Follows multistakeholder.
Practical Aspects of IP Arbitration: Improving the negotiating position Olav Jaeger September 14, 2009.
Real and Virtual Identities Francis Gurry Assistant Director General World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Konsument Europa/ European Consumer Centre (ECC) Sweden ADR in cross-border disputes - practical examples 3 rd October 2013 Vilnius Ms. Jolanda Girzl Konsument.
1 ICANN’s New gTLD Program: Trademark-related Concerns Arbitration and Mediation Center World Intellectual.
Domain Name Registration Sanjay Gupta August 29, 2008.
CYBERLAW CLASS 14 Regulating Domain Name Disputes – ICANN and the International System Oct. 15, 2002.
OECD - HCOPIL - ICC Conference on Building Trust in the Online Environment The Hague, December 11-12, 2000 THE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION EXPERIENCE OF.
PROCESSES/PROCEDURAL ISSUES FOR DECISION MAKING AT RCAKL 1 MARCH 2010 Syed Naqiz Shahabuddin NAQIZ & PARTNERS
The launch of.eu 7 December 2005 TERENA GA – Budapest, 21 October 2005.
1 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Rome Conference, December 11, 2009 Theme 6: Dispute Settlement and Enforcement of IP Rights by MSMEs WIPO Arbitration.
Implementation of the.eu Top Level Domain Marko Bonač Arnes.
On the Internet, No-one Knows You're a … Cat! Absurdity and the UDRP David HELLAM GA ČR S.
Dispute settlement mechanism within the Lisbon system 6 December 2013 Massimo Vittori, Managing Director.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER 1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Mediation and Arbitration at WIPO LLM in Intellectual.
May 19, 1999Japan Network Information Center 1 Dispute Policy of JP domains by Naomasa Maruyama 丸山 直昌 JPNIC at ChinaInet 99, May 19,
Copyright © 2016 Eversheds Attorneys Ltd. | New Rules on Domain Names – National and Regional Systems Conflicts Involving Trademarks -
Effects on other proceedings against or by the debtor. Creditor rights Dr Marek Porzycki.
Vice Chair, UK Representative, Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)
New gTLD Rights Protection Mechanisms & RPMs Review
Registering your brand
Distribution Contracts and Arbitration How to deal with small agency and distribution disputes Marie Öhrström Assistant Secretary General
NCUC Africa Members First Regional Webinar Ines Hfaiedh
In Depth Overview of Sunrise Period | 21 September 2016
New challenges for archives in Iceland
ICANN’s Policy Development Activities
Rights Protection Mechanism Report to the ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
UNIVERSITY OF MONTENEGRO INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES
.eu Top Level Domain Technical Briefing 1 Dec. 2005
MODULE C - LEGAL SUBMODULES C1. Conflict Of Interest/Code Of Ethics
Community protection of geographical indications :
Status of the RPMs PDP Susan Payne IPC Member and WG participant
European Insolvency Regulation
ADR: a potential tool for SMEs for standards related disputes
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Overview & Guideline for Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Overview & Guideline for Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Mediation Law in Austria
Envisaged WIPO domain name dispute resolution services for the ccTLD
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

1 XXXIII Nordic Intellectual Property Conference New rules on domain names – national and regional systems. Conflicts involving trademarks. Petter Rindforth Fenix Legal KB, Sweden

Domain Dispute History – Sweden :.se is established by Mr Björn Eriksen (9.se domain names registered this 1 st year) February 1, 2000: More than se domains. Today (June 1, 2016): Initial registration system: Only a registered corporate name (main corporate name) could get a.se domain name. No trademarks, no personal names, no subsidiary company names… (making.nu more popular) 1996: Control Alt Delete: fiat.se, opel.se, skoda.se, mercedes.se, ferrari.se, kawasaki.se, astra-zeneca.se, gilette.se… Registered under.com

Domain Dispute History – Sweden : iDRS – DRS – NDR - Nämnden för Domännamnsregler i Sverige (The Board for domain name rules). “Is it possible to find a way to register trademarks under.se?” 2000: 30 official sub domains: tm.se for trademarks, pp.se for private persons, press.se for periodicals, parti.se for political parties, a.se for local companies in Stockholm, etc 2003: The Swedish ADR (“ATF”)

Domain Dispute History – Sweden :.SE accepting Internationalized domain names containing å, ä, ö, ü and é (monsteras.se / Mönsterås) 2007: 250 new characters available, supporting names in all of the legally recognized minority languages of Sweden: Finnish, Meänkieli (Tornedalsfinska), Sami, Romani and Yiddish. 2011: Accelerated ADR is introduced

Statistics 702 decisions as per June 10, : 66 decisions, whereof 29 accelerated proceedings (3 of them refused) 34 replied by the holder 47 accepted 61 decisions with only 1 arbitrator

Active Swedish domain names

The ADR procedure… “ADR is a simple and fast process, intended for any party that considers that their protected right (i.e. a brand or company name) wrongly has been registered as a domain name by someone else. Anyone can apply to initiate an ADR matter” The three absolute requirements: 1.The disputed domain name is identical or similar to a name right (trademark, company name, family name, an artist's name, or be designation covered by European Council’s Regulations) that is valid in Sweden and to which the applicant can claim rights to, and 2.The domain name has been registered or used in bad faith, and 3.The domain holder has no rights or justified interest in the domain name. Swedish or English IIS appoint an arbitrator and administers the proceedings The applicant can choose one or three arbitrators (from a list of 13)

…in Sweden The applicant may request - in the original application - that the accelerated proceeding is used, should the counterparty fail to respond to the application IIS an application fee for ADR: -Private individual, 1-5 domains, one arbitrator: SEK -Swedish legal entity (not a SME) / governments, 6 – 10 domains, 3 arbitrators: SEK ADR decided within 30 (one arbitrator) or 60 days (three arbitrators) after it has been turned over to the arbitrators. The accelerated proceeding is always decided by one arbitrator within 10 working days. Transfer within 14 days, if the holder has not filed a claim for claimed better rights in court

ADR Accelerated Proceeding Introduced February 15, 2011, as a complement to standard ADR if the domain owner does not respond to the ADR application. The arbitrator shall consider all conditions applicable in a standard ADR case, but make a decision within 10 working days instead of the normal 30 days. The decision is provided only with a brief explanation. Full fee to be paid, but: If the accelerated proceeding is applied IIS will return the whole application fee to the applicant, in excess of SEK in administrative charge.

BANK Protected as part of a company name or (in certain cases) trademark – financial institution Geographical: Doggers bank, Banks island,Bankeryd Surname Bank Ban Ki Moon = BANKimoon.se

ATF 136: baltic.se Baltic Safety Products vs Name Navigation BALTIC trademark for lifejackets Baltic also a generic/geographical word Keyword marketing, however also with sponsered links to lifejackets TRANSFER – Majority decision. Minority: ”BSP has not proved that BALTIC is a well-known TM, thereby not bad faith”

ATF 166: lansforakringar.se Länsförsäkringar vs Merlana Global Corp (Cypern) Nearly identical, TM & company name well- known Owner – no response, thereby no legitimate interest Obvious knowledge and bad faith TRANSFER

Family names Aschberg.se / robertaschberg.se (Sweden) -23 individuals with the surname Aschberg in Sweden -Only the Complainant = Robert Aschberg -Holder no rights + caused personal damage

The road ahead…

.SE disputes in the future Possible transfer of the administrative work to WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center -Reduce the costs for IIS… -Swedish cases still searchable with comments from panelists? -The same fees?

Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in all gTLDs PDP Working Group Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program, i.e.: - the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, - the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and - the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) – January 2018

Thank you!