The effects of three different qualities of char on soil properties Rachel Unger* and Randy Killorn Agronomy Department-Iowa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biochar amendment to improve soil properties and sequester carbon
Advertisements

Biochar Properties & Production Techniques
Conservation Grassland
predominant Amazon soils notoriously infertile poor nutrient capacity
Soil Fertility and Nutrient Bioavailability Sponsored by the DEST program China Higher Education Strategic Initiatives © The University of Adelaide.
Biochar Studies at ISTC Tina Dinh, John Ossyra, Derek Vardon, John Scott, Wei Zheng, Nancy Holm, B.K. Sharma.
Nitrogen Mineralization Across an Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition Gradient in Southern California Deserts Leela E. Rao 1, David R. Parker 1, Andrzej Bytnerowicz.
Kevin Steinberger Internship with Princeton Environmental Institute – Working with Dr. Eric Larson and the Energy Group.
“Biochar,” a bit of myth busting
Huma-Char ® and Its Benefits to Agriculture Heating Up Crop Production With an Ancient Soil Amendment Dr. Vladimir Vasilenko (Dr. Humate)- Technical Director.
Julie Major Ph.D. candidate, Cornell University Extension Director, International Biochar Initiative Biochar 101 and IBI activities.
Edward Colosky and Kurt Spokas June 14 th 2013 Midwest Biochar Conference Champaign, Illinois A survey of biochars: Interactions with dissolved ammonia,
Characterization of Soil Resilience as influenced by Organic Management Practices in Perturbed Vertisol Ritesh Saha ICAR- Indian Institute of Soil Science.
Johannes Lehmann Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University John Gaunt GY Associates, UK Marco Rondon TSBF-CIAT, Cali, Colombia Bio-char.
Fertilizing potatoes with biofuel byproducts Amber Moore, Ph.D University of Idaho Twin Falls Research and Extension Center.
New soil remediation strategies targeted at reduction of PACs contaminant exposure and mobility National Environmental Research Institute Aarhus University.
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER. Organic Matter Decomposition: a cyclic view organic matter population sizes, temperature, moisture energy + CO 2 Biomass (more bugs)
Soil Testing Procedures for Biologically Based Systems Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, Nebraska
3. Soil pH.
Nick Herdeg Winter Ecology: Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Carbon sinks are becoming more relevant - challenges for forest research and university training Veli Pohjonen Tana-Beles WME project University of Helsinki.
Box 1 CO 2 mitigation potential of managed grassland: An example Franzluebbers et al. (2000; Soil Biol. Biochem. 32: ) quantified C sequestration.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Biochar Effects on Soybean Growth and Nodulation
Nutrient Recovery from Pyrolysis Systems Jatara Wise 1, Don Vietor 1, Sergio Capareda 2, Tony Provin 1, Derek Husmoen 1, Matthew Keough 1, Clyde Munster.
Cornell University 2009 ASA-CSSA-SSSA Meetings High C/N ratio Refugia pH & aeration Physico- chemical sorption Surface change Microbes Nutrients Amending.
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effects of reducing rumen degradable protein (RDP) with constant rumen undegradable protein in mid-lactation.
PROBLEM Nitrogen and phosphorus contamination of groundwater and reduction of carbon sequestration benefits via greenhouse gas emissions are important.
Methods During summer 2011 we measured freshwater DOC uptake ( k ; day -1 ) using short-term, dark bottle bioassay incubations: where C 0 and C t represent.
Soil Respiration Unit: Soil Science. Objectives O Define: soil respiration and soil microbes O Explain the role of soil respiration in determining soil.
Introduction: Globally, atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 are rising, and are expected to increase forest productivity and carbon storage. However, forest.
Goals: Quantify the effects of existing management practices at the Jones Farm. Provide baseline data for assessing the efficacy of new management strategies.
Ecology.
Savoy,*H.J. 1, Leib, B. 1, and Joines, D. 2 1 Associate Professors, University of Tennessee, Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, Extension 2. Manager,
Tana-Beles watersheds develop - monitoring past and present, challenges for tomorrow Veli Pohjonen Tana-Beles WME project Team leader Discussion in World.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Inorganic N was significantly higher under NH than under N0 and NL among N treatments at 0, 10, 45, and 200 days. Inorganic N was significantly lower under.
After successful completion of this Lesson, you have learned to: List the 3 indicators of soil health. List the physical indicators that help to know a.
Soil Bulk Density Unit: Soil Science. Objectives O Define: ammonification, available water holding capacity, nitrification, bulk density, denitrification,
Goal Ho`oponopono Correct the imbalance Make it right 1. Reduce atmospheric CO2 levels by sequestering carbon in the form of biochar in soil 2. Become.
Above and Below ground decomposition of leaf litter Sukhpreet Sandhu.
Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Photo :Tom van Cakenberghe/IWMI Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Water for a food-secure world W. Mekuria, A. Noble, C.T.
Carbon Dioxide Fluxes in a Forest Soil in the Citronelle Oil Field of South Alabama Latasha Lyte and E.Z. Nyakatawa Department of Natural Resources and.
Use of Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizer and its effect on soil quality. Soil bacterial population Hernandez, Jorge D., Garcia, Rosalia. and Lightfoot,
Marco A. Galang, Lawrence A. Morris, and Daniel Markewitz D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, DW Brooks Drive,
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Soil and Plant Growth What is soil?
Dr. J. P. Deshmukh Shri. S. N. Potkile Shri. P. V. Shingrup
Pyrolysis of Bioenergy Crops Grown on Reclaimed Mining Land in
National Research Council of Italy
Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations
Faith Simitz and Benjamin D. Duval
Long term Biochar versus Wood Ash Agronomic Field Trial at 6 months
3RD WASWAC CONFERENCE: Land degradation processes and mechanism
EFFECT OF ABATTOIR WASTES ON THE PHYSICO- CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF TWO SOIL TYPES IN ENUGU STATE NIGERIA EDEH, I.G. AND IGWE, C.A. UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA,
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Bioscience conference, Berlin, Germany
Assessment of Soil Amendment and Carbon Sequestration
Biochar Colonization by Aanaerobic Microorganisms
Arafat Alkhasha Abdulrasoul Al-Omran Anwar Aly
Forestry and the Carbon Cycle
Carolina Medina Soil & Water Science Dept. University of Florida
Changes in Soil Quality in the Midwest and Potential Solutions
Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida
Effects of organic materials on soil properties, growth and yield of honeydew melon (Cucumis melo L. inodorus) Nguyen Van Tam, Ph.D Thai Nguyen University.
Ecology.
Oliver, O., Muthomi, J., Narla, R., Ojiem, J., Nderitu, J
Drawing Conclusions.
Soil.
Presentation transcript:

The effects of three different qualities of char on soil properties Rachel Unger* and Randy Killorn Agronomy Department-Iowa State University Objective This study was done in order to measure the effects of char application on different soil chemical properties. Materials and Methods Collected and dried a Nicollet soil (Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Aquic Hapludoll) and a Storden subsoil (Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Eutrudept), typical Iowa soils Mixed 100g dried soil with 0.8g of one of three qualities of char which were created by having 0, 10, 25% air present in the reactor while the char was being formed Mixed a urea solution with the soil and char at rates equivalent to 0, 56, 112, 224 kg N ha -1 Treatments were arranged in a complete randomized block study with three replications Incubated at room temperature Used destructive sampling immediately, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks Tested for total nitrogen (N) and total organic carbon (C) (S.M. Combs and M.V. Nathan, 1998), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) (K. Frank, D. Beegle and J. Denning, 1998), and pH (M.E. Watson and J.R. Brown, 1998) Soil tests were run by the Iowa State University Soil Testing Laboratory Results The percent of total N increased when compared over the different chars (Fig. 1) while the percent of total C decreased (Fig. 2). The Nicollet soil pH levels out at around week 6 (Fig. 3), which is similar in the Storden subsoil soil (Fig. 4). Char 3 produced a higher soil pH than the other chars at all sampling times. Soil P decreased until sometime between week 2 and 4 and then an increase to the end of the study (Fig.5 ). The same trend was observed with soil K (Fig. 6). The pH at the 0 kg N ha-1 in the Nicollet soil remained constant, while the pH where N was added decreased (Fig. 7). In the Storden subsoil soil, the pH was decreased in all treatments (Fig. 8). The initial results for each soil property tested by soil can be seen in Table 1. Preliminary Conclusions These data suggest that the char contained bio-available C that decomposed over time releasing P and K, which explains the increase in extractable P and K. The decrease it total C brings into question using char to increase the carbon sinks in the soil. Introduction Using charred organic material is an idea that has been around for hundreds of years. Many areas along the Amazon River Basin have been discovered to have extremely fertile areas believed to have been created through indigenous peoples burning organic materials. It has been shown that char transforms labile carbon pools into stable soil organic matter (Glasser et al. 2001). Char has also been shown to increase the cation exchange capacity (Lehmann et al. 2003) and neutralize pH (Fowles 2007). Using char as a fertilizer has also shown the potential for decreasing the amount of nitrogen fertilizer that needs to be added to the field, but also increasing the carbon sink in the soil (Lehmann et al. 2006). Char has the potential to play a large part in the future of fertilizers. Discussion We have no good explanation at this time for the increase in total N and it needs to be examined further. The decrease in total C could be explained by the presence of biologically active C in the chars, which was utilized by soil micro-organisms as an energy source. The increase in soil P could be attributed to microbial decomposition of the char. One possible explanation for the change in K over time is that K is being physically sequestered and as the char is broken down, K is released. Works Cited Combs, S.M. and M.V. Nathan Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. Revised January North Central Regional Research Publication No Fowles M Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy, doi: /j.jiombioe Frank, K., D. Beegle and J. Denning Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. Revised January North Central Regional Research Publication No Glasser, B, Guggenberger G, Haumaier L, Zech W Persistence of soil organic matter in archaeological soils (Terra Preta) of the Brazilian Amazon region. In: Rees RM, et al. (eds) Sustainable management of soil organic matter. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp Lehmann J, da Silva JP Jr, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glasser B Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Antrhrosol and a Ferrasol of the Central Amazon Basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249: Lehmann, J Gaunt J, Rondon M Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11: , doi 10:1007/s Watson, M.E. and J.R. Brown Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. Revised January North Central Regional Research Publication No Figure 1. Change in percent of total N in three different qualities of char over time. Figure 2. Change in percent of total C in three different qualities of char over time. Figure 3. Change in pH of a Nicollet soil in three different qualities of char over time. Figure 4. Change in pH of a Storden subsoil soil in three different qualities of char over time. Figure 5. Mehlich-3 extractable P compared by four different nitrogen fertilizer rates. Figure 6. Mehlich-3 extractable K compared by four different nitrogen fertilizer rates. Figure 7. Change in pH of a Nicollet soil compared across four different nitrogen fertilizer rates. Figure 8. Change in pH of a Storden subsoil soil compared across four different nitrogen fertilizer rates. Table 1. Initial soil properties by soil. SoilpHPKTotal NTotal C Nicollet Storden8.5O p-value<